File talk:Seattle Mariners Insignia.svg
Appearance
![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This file was nominated at Wikipedia:Files for discussion on 2020 September 7. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Reason for it being kept
@Izno: Did you read the FFD before you closed it as kept?Jonteemil (talk) 19:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please be clear in what you want. I'm not going to respond to a passive-aggressive question. Izno (talk) 19:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @PD-logo}} and move to Commons. This was the reasoning Mdaniels had in his keep vote. I assume you kept the file given his comment, yes? If so, then why didn't you do as Mdaniels said?Jonteemil (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)]
- Yes, that comment was one of the reasons it was kept. If you would like to do the rest of the work indicated in his comment, go for it. Izno (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Izno: As the closing admin I would say that it's your responsibility. You can't close a file as free and let it remain non-free. Now it has been non-free since last year.Jonteemil (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, that comment was one of the reasons it was kept. If you would like to do the rest of the work indicated in his comment, go for it. Izno (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @
A) - B) I think you have handled a case incorrectly. I assumed an admin would know better. So no, I won't wait. You should wait closing the FFD if you can't be bothered to do it correctly. C) Maybe you forgot it, what do I know. Don't be passive-aggressive please.Jonteemil (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- And I can add, this wasn't the only FFD you handled incorrectly. I've taken a look to other closings you've made and there are more instances where the voters have wanted a relicense but you closed it without a relicense.Jonteemil (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)