File talk:Virgo constellation map.png

From

• Image:Taurus constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Taurus constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 05:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Virgo constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Virgo constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 05:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Aries constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Aries constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 05:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Gemini constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Gemini constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 05:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Scorpius constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Scorpius constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Leo constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Leo constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Libra constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Libra constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Cancer constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Cancer constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:09, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Pisces constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Pisces constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Aquarius constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Aquarius constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Capricornus constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Capricornus constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Sagittarius constellation map.png - OB by commons:Image:Sagittarius constellation map.png. --EugeneZelenko 06:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP! The bigger pictures uploaded at the Commons are not so neat as the smaller pictures here on Wikipedia. Bigger is not better in this case. If the bigger pictures are desired to be retained at the Commons for any purpose, then they may be, else they can be deleted. If these pictures may be more useful at the Commons, then they should be moved there. But they should not be deleted. --Jamadagni 2005-05-20 09:32 UTC
  • keep If the reader of an constellation article follows the advice "click to enlarge", it would be bad to show him these sub-optimal bitmaps of Wikipedia Commons. Sub-optimal for two reasons: They are unnecessarily big, and they've been produced with smoothing off. The maps are not very rich in detail anyway (for good reason), so it's pointless do make them bigger as they are now. Besides, star maps are language-dependent. – Torsten Bronger 14:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not deleted. dbenbenn | talk 04:11, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]