Financial repression
Financial repression comprises "policies that result in savers earning returns below the rate of
The term was introduced in 1973 by
Mechanism
Financial repression may consist of any of the following, alone or in combination.:[5]
- Explicit or indirect capping of interest rates, such as on government debt and deposit rates (e.g., Regulation Q).
- Government ownership or control of domestic banks and financial institutions with barriers that limit other institutions from entering the market.
- High reserve requirements.
- Creation or maintenance of a capital requirements, or by prohibiting or disincentivising alternatives.
- Government restrictions on the transfer of assets abroad through the imposition of capital controls.
These measures allow governments to issue debt at lower interest rates. A low
The size of the financial repression tax was computed for 24 emerging markets from 1974 to 1987. The results showed that financial repression exceeded 2% of GDP for seven countries, and greater than 3% for five countries. For five countries (India, Mexico, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Zimbabwe) it represented approximately 20% of tax revenue. In the case of Mexico financial repression was 6% of GDP, or 40% of tax revenue.[8]
Financial repression is categorized as "
Examples
After World War II
Financial repression "played an important role in reducing
China
After the 2008 economic recession
In a 2011
"To get access to capital,
Criticism
Financial repression has been criticized as a theory, by those who think it does not do a good job of explaining real world variables, and also criticized as a policy, by those who think it does exist but is inadvisable.
Critics[who?] argue that if this view was true, borrowers (i.e., capital-seeking parties) would be inclined to demand capital in large quantities and would be buying capital goods from this capital. This high demand for capital goods would certainly lead to inflation and thus the central banks would be forced to raise interest rates again. As a boom pepped by low interest rates fails to appear in the time period from 2008 until 2020 in industrialized countries, this is a sign that the low interest rates seemed to be necessary to ensure an equilibrium on the capital market, thus to balance capital-supply—i.e., savers—on one side and capital-demand—i.e., investors and the government—on the other. This view argues that interest rates would be even lower if it were not for the high government debt ratio (i.e., capital demand from the government).[11]
Also, financial repression has been called a "
See also
- Capital controls
- Banking regulation
- Bank reserves
- Inflation tax
- Indirect tax
- Hidden tax
Reform:
General:
- Sovereign debt
- Financial regulation
- Macroprudential policy
- Debasement
References
- ^ a b c d "China Savers Prioritized Over Banks by PBOC". Bloomberg. November 25, 2014.
- ^ a b c d Carmen M. Reinhart, Jacob F. Kirkegaard, and M. Belen Sbrancia, "Financial Repression Redux", IMF Finance and Development, June 2011, p. 22-26
- ^ Shaw, Edward S. Financial Deepening in Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973
- ^ McKinnon, Ronald I. Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1973
- ^ a b c Carmen M. Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia, "The Liquidation of Government Debt", IMF, 2011, p. 19
- ^ Reinhart, Carmen M. and Rogoff, Kenneth S., This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008, p. 143
- ^ Bill Gross, "The Caine Mutiny Part 2", PIMCO
- The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 4 Sep. 1993 (pp. 953-963)
- ^ "The great repression". The Economist. 16 June 2011.
- ^ a b "Financial Repression 101". Allianz Global Investors. Retrieved 2 December 2014.
- ^ cf. Paul Krugman's point of view: Secular Stagnation, Coalmines, Bubbles, and Larry Summers, The New York Times, November 16th, 2013, retrieved November 28th, 2013: „[…] a situation in which the 'natural' rate of interest – the rate at which desired savings and desired investment would be equal at full employment – is negative. […] when looking forward you have to regard the liquidity trap not as an exceptional state of affairs but as the new normal.“ cf. also: Larry Summers at IMF Economic Forum, Nov. 8, YouTube, published on November 8th, 2013, retrieved on November 28th, 2013: Larry Summers said there: „imagine a situation where natural and equilibrium interest rate have fallen significantly below zero.“
- ^ Gillian Tett, "Policymakers learn a new and alarming catchphrase", Financial Times, May 9, 2011
- ^ Amerman, Daniel (September 12, 2011). "The 2nd Edge of Modern Financial Repression: Manipulating Inflation Indexes to Steal from Retirees & Public Workers". Financial Sense.