First Indian National Army
The First Indian National Army (First INA) was the
This first incarnation of the Indian National Army was involved in operations of espionage in the Burma frontier which, according to some military historians and allied generals, threatened the morale of Indian troops and fed discontentment and was partly responsible for the failure of the first Burma offensive. Operatives of the INA were also landed in the Indian coast by submarine for planned espionage operations within India. Coming at the time that the Quit India Movement had raised turmoil within British India, the threat of the INA affecting British Indian troops and INA operatives mounting espionage within India saw the start of a propaganda campaign in the British Indian Army and a news ban on the unit that was not to be lifted till after the war ended.
Background
Indian nationalism in World War II
With the onset of the Second World War all the three major
German motives and intentions with relation to India were more complex. The German Foreign office wanted to support Indian revolutionaries and nationalists, but there is consensus that, ultimately,
HoweverBritish-Indian army in Malaya
Large number of Indian troops had begun arriving in Malayan peninsula and Singapore by 1941, as a part of defensive preparations for possible war with Japan.[9] It was estimated that were some 37 000 Indian troops stationed in these areas, making up roughly about the 40 percent of the total military strength of the British forces.[9] The British-Indian troops swelled from 200 000 to 900 000 between 1939 and 1941. However, these deployments were beset with a number of problems. The troops were spread too thinly, with insufficient resources and supplies in the Malay Peninsula and Singapore.[9] Further, a large proportion of the British-Indian troops were very young recruits (as a result of the open recruitment policy of the British) who had very little or no combat training and experience, leading to anxiety amongst the British-Indian forces.[10][9] Feelings of discrimination amongst British Indian soldiers, compared to the pay and service conditions for European soldiers created acrimony. Indiscriminate recruitment by the Indian government in order to maintain the numbers for its army, meant that it was no longer carefully curating its selection for the armed forces. By 1941, British abuse, both verbal and physical of the Indian soldiers was rampant.[9]
Japan and Indian nationalism
India and Japan, especially from the last decade of the 19th century, had enjoyed a growing exchange of cultural, religious and philosophical ideas. India, as the home of
After the end of World War I, Japan increasingly became a haven for radical Indian nationalists in exile, who were protected by patriotic Japanese societies. Notable among these included
By the end of the war however, the pan-Asiatic vision gradually shifted away from prominence as the
Japan's India Policy
At the outbreak of the war in south-east Asia, Japan had not formulated any concrete policy with regards to India.
From late 1941 the Japanese began to profess increasing support for the Indian Independence movement. Exiles like
The successful
F Kikan
By the end of 1941, India had started featuring prominently in the Japanese policies. By early 1942,
The first INA
In December 1941, after meeting with the Japanese commanding general, Rash Behari Bose was convinced of the feasibility of raising an armed Indian unit. Between himself,Rash behari Bose, Pritam Singh and Fujiwara, formulated plans of contacting Indians in the British Indian Army in South-east Asia. The fall of Malaya further brought under Japanese control approximately 45,000 regular Indian troops from
The units that were formed in this predecessor of the INA numbered about 200. They were volunteers from within the British Indian soldiers captured in Malaya. They were issued rifles and given armbands bearing the letter "F".[29] They were organised into units and trained and worked along with those already under Pritam Singh in Malaya and Thailand. They were further tasked to work amongst fighting British-Indian Army units to foment dissent and encourage defection.[24] Before the fall of Singapore, these troops grew to number nearly 2,500.[23] There was significant deviation from the British Indian Army. Officers were organised into a single class, a common kitchen (opposed to caste-based kitchen as had been the norm), common slogans were adopted. All these efforts attempted to bridge any communal and casteist rivalries that were accepted or even institutionalised in the British army.[23]
On 10 March 1942, the Indian soldiers at
Farrer Park
Singapore surrendered on 15 February 1942. On the evening of the 16th, the Indian troops of the now amalgamated 1/14th and 5/14th Punjab were ordered by the Malaya command of the Commonwealth forces to assemble at Farrer Park. The British officers were, in the meantime, ordered to assemble east to Changi. On the morning of 17 February 1942, some 45,000 Indian POWs who gathered at Farrer Park where addressed by in turns, first by a Col Hunt of the Malaya Command, who handed over the troops to Japanese command under Fujiwara.
Fujiwara spoke to the troops in Japanese which was translated into English and then Hindustani. In his speech, Fujiwara is said to have told the troops of the Asian co-prosperity sphere under the leadership of Japan, of Japanese vision of an independent India and its importance to the co-prosperity sphere, and of the Japanese intentions to help raise a "liberation army" for the independence of India.[30] He invited the troops seated at the park to join this army. Further, he told the troops, they were going to be treated not as PoWs, but as friends and allies. Fujiwara ended his speech stating he is passing on their responsibilities and command to Mohan Singh.[30]
Mohan Singh's speech, in Hindustani, was short. He told the troops of forming the Indian National Army to fight for an independent India, and invited the troops to join it. As an Indian Jawan present at the time remembers, Mohan Singh's speech was powerful and touched a chord, and the troops responded with wild enthusiasm and excitement.[31] It is estimated that nearly half of those present at Farrer Park later joined the first INA.[32] Significantly however, a large number of Indian officers decided not to, which also kept those under their command disinclined.[33][34]
The Japanese forces, eager to engage the co-operation of the troops and further lacking the man-power, did not have the men impounded. The supreme command of the INA was set up at Mount Pleasant suburbs in the Northern part of Singapore. The PoW headquarters, along with the largest PoW camp was set up at Neesoon under
It would not be until 9 May 1942 that the INA would come into full effect. However, following the events of Farrer Park, Indians in Singapore begun to enjoy special privileges during the Japanese 'pacification' of Singapore .[9] The Japanese treated the Indians and Chinese differently during this period. During these early months, it was reported that roughly 50 000 Chinese in Singapore and the Malayan Peninsula were brutally killed in what is now known as the ‘Sook Ching Massacre’ .[36] In contrast, the Indians received far more lenient treatment.[37] However, this is not to say that the Indians felt no fear at all. In fact, the attitudes of the Japanese forces towards the Chinese population did instill some fear in the general Indian civilian population as well as leaders such as Pritam Singh. This was significant or the Indian leaders, during the Farrer Park meeting who had expressed reservations about collaborating with the Japanese as these incidents further cemented their initial beliefs about the cruel nature of the Japanese and would further affirm their decision to not join the INA in May 1942.[9]
Indian Independence League
In April 1942, as the discussions and the process of setting up the Indian Independence League and defining the aims of the movement carried on, Mohan Singh convened a meeting of a group of his officers to frame what is now called the Bidadary resolution. This resolution announced that:[38]
Indians stood above all differences of caste, community, or religion. Independence was every Indian's birthright. An Indian National Army would be raised to fight for it.
The resolution further specified that the army would go to battle only when the Congress and the people of India asked it to.[38] It did not, however, specify the army was to interact with the Japanese forces.[38] This resolution was circulated among the Indian PoWs, followed by tour of the mainland camps by Mohan Singh and Fujiwara. The PoW headquarters was subsequently dissolved and the staff were transferred to Mohan Singh's supreme command. On 9 May, Singh began recruiting for the INA.[38] The process involved identifying units that were most likely to come up with volunteers. These units were transferred to Neesoon and Bidadary, while the other units were shipped away to other camps.[38]
In April 1942— the same month as Mohan Singh formally declared the formation of the Indian National Army— he and other representatives of the INA and IIL, were invited to attend
Autumn 1942
On the back of the success of the INA, Fujiwara suggested in January 1942 expanding the work of the F-Kikan to all parts of Asia.
Earnest organisation of the INA in preparation for the battle began after news of
The end of the first INA
It was mainly from the intelligence and subversion training schools that the first frictions arose between the Indians and Japanese, as the trainees began to be sent before completing their training and without knowledge or consent of the Indian leaders. By late 1942, the divisions appeared as the Indian troops increasingly felt as pawns in the hands of the Japanese. Anticipating a thrust towards Imphal, both the Japanese strategists and INA command envisaged a role for the Indian troops. Initially, this was to begin with intelligence gathering missions. Niranjan Singh Gill was in charge of intelligence and long-range penetration groups being deployed in the Burma-India border. Amongst operatives, Gill sent to Burma was a close associate who subsequently defected back to Commonwealth forces, followed by nearly eight other men. This was followed by the capture of a number of other operatives by Commonwealth forces.
Operations involving the first INA
Southeast Asia
The first INA, especially at the time of its inception with F Kikan, was involved in espionage and sabotage. From the time of initial Japanese landings in Malaya, INA volunteers infiltrated British-Indian battle lines inducing Indian soldiers to defect to the INA. This it did with the considerable success of hundred men each, under the command of Capt Allah Ditta, to the Singapore operations, accompanying the
The
Espionage in India
Although the
Intelligence summaries initially did not believe the INA to be a substantial force or have any purpose more than propaganda and espionage purposes. However, by the end of 1942, they had become aware of trained Indian espionage agents (of the INAs
Interactions
Japan
The army's co-existence with Imperial Japan was an uneasy one. Misgivings about Japanese intentions existed from early in the history of the army. Col N.S. Gill, in overall charge of Pow Camps, regarded Japanese overtures and intentions with caution[38] Further, the close relation of Fujiwara and Mohan Singh was not replicated after the I-Kikan replaced Fujiwara's office.[41] Iwakuro was considered less idealistic and romantic than Fujiwara.[54] Iwakuro took his post at a time the Pacific War faced a higher priority among Japanese forces for materiel.[32] and did not use his expertise to encourage the "true Indian army" that Fujiwara had envisioned. By some accounts he only engaged in as much development of the INA as would keep Mohan Singh happy.[41] Within the league, members of the original Indian delegation to the Tokyo conference held reservations about serving Rash Behari Bose, and of ultimate Japanese intentions with regards to independent India.[55] Rash Behari Bose had lived in Japan for a considerable length of time, married a Japanese woman, and his son had enlisted in the Imperial army. Among the thirty-four points of the Bangkok resolution, the INA and the IIL raised a number of questions and sought clarifications. These included the role and position of India in Japan's co-prosperity sphere, Japan's intentions in – and towards – an independent India. These were presented via the Iwakuro Kikan after the Bangkok conference, and a point-by-point answer were demanded for each. Tokyo, however, was not able to give assurances of the kind sought by the league and the INA, which was seen as unacceptable to the council formed at the time of the Bangkok conference.[54][56]
The
British Indian Army
British intelligence was unaware of the formation of the army until around July 1942. The existence of "fifth columnists" influencing Indian troops had been noted even during the Malayan campaign.
Second INA
Between December 1942 and February 1943,
See also
- Iwaichi Fujiwara
- Mohan Singh
- Rash Behari Bose
- Battle of Singapore
- Joyce Lebra
- Peter Fay
- Hugh Toye
Notes
- ^ Ray, N.R. (1984). Challenge, a Saga of India's Struggle for Freedom. People's Publishing House. p. 586.
- ISBN 978-81-7629-842-1.
- ^ a b Hauner 1981, p. Part I
- ^ Cohen 1983, p. 351
- ^ Tojo 1943
- ^ Littlejohn 1987, pp. 137–138
- ^ Kurowski 1997, p. 137
- ^ Munoz 2002
- ^ a b c d e f g Rai, Rajesh (2014). Indians in Singapore 1819-1945: Diaspora in the Colonial Port City. Oxford University Press.
- ISBN 9781349426041.
- ^ Lebra 1977, p. 21
- ^ a b c Friedman 1940, p. 18
- ^ a b Lebra 1977, p. 22
- ^ Dignan 1983
- ^ Brown 1986, p. 421
- ^ a b Lebra 1977, p. 19
- ^ a b c d e f g h Lebra 1977, p. 20
- ^ "Freedom Depends on Nippon Victory". The Syonan Sinbun. 26 January 1943.
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 134
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 89
- ^ a b c d Lebra 2008, p. 41
- ^ Lebra 1977, p. 23
- ^ a b c d e f g h Lebra 1977, p. 24
- ^ a b c d Fay 1993, p. 75
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 74
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 90
- ^ Moreman 2005, p. 24
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 70
- ^ Green 1948, p. 47
- ^ a b Fay 1993, p. 83
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 84
- ^ a b c d Lebra 1977, p. 25
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 87,95,111
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 25
- ^ a b Fay 1993, p. 88
- JSTOR 41493428.
- Turnbull, Constance Mary(1989). A History of Singapore, 1819-1988. Oxford University Press.
- ^ a b c d e f Fay 1993, p. 94
- ^ a b Fay 1993, p. 108
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 111
- ^ a b c d Fay 1993, p. 109
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 145
- ^ a b c d Toye 1959, p. 30
- ^ a b Toye 1959, p. 29
- ^ a b c Toye 1959, p. 32
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 138,140
- ^ a b Toye 1959, p. 33
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 139
- ^ Toye 1959, p. 37
- ^ a b Toye 1959, p. 38
- ^ Lebra 2008, p. 29,36
- ^ a b c d Fay 1993, p. 410
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 112,134
- ^ a b c Lebra 1977, p. 27
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 91,108
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 93,108
- ^ Lebra 2008, p. 32
- ^ Aldrich 2000, p. 45
- ^ Fay 1993, p. 409
- ^ Aldrich 2000, p. 163
- ^ Aldrich 2000, p. 159
- ^ Lebra 2008, p. 86
- ^ "MZ kiani". World news. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
- ^ "Subhas Chandra Bose in Nazi Germany". Sisir K. Majumdar. South Asia Forum Quarterly. 1997. pp. 10–14. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
- ^ "Total Mobilisation". National Archives of Singapore. Archived from the original on 29 August 2011. Retrieved 12 August 2011.
- ^ "Historical Journey of the Indian National Army". National Archives of Singapore. Archived from the original on 16 May 2007. Retrieved 7 July 2007.
Bibliography
- Aldrich, Ricjard J (2000), Intelligence and the War Against Japan: Britain, America and the Politics of Secret Service, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-64186-1.
- Allen, L. (1971), (in Reviews) Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1. (1971)pp. 89–92., Cambridge University Press., JSTOR 311662.
- Brown, Emily (1986), "(in Book Reviews; South Asia). The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2.", Pacific Affairs, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia., ISSN 0030-851X.
- Cohen, Stephen C. (1983), (in Book Reviews) Pacific Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 350–352, New York, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-03995-6.
- Dignan, Don. (1983), The Indian revolutionary problem in British Diplomacy,1914–1919., New Delhi, Allied Publishers..
- Fay, Peter W. (1993), The Forgotten Army: India's Armed Struggle for Independence, 1942–1945., Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press., ISBN 0-472-08342-2.
- Friedman, Irving S. (1940), "Pacific Affairs, Vol. 13, No. 1.", Pacific Affairs, Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia., ISSN 0030-851X.
- Ghosh, K.K (1969), The Indian National Army: Second Front of the Indian Independence Movement., Meerut, Meenakshi Prakashan.
- Green, L.C. (1948), The Indian National Army Trials. The Modern Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1. (Jan., 1948), pp. 47–69., London, Blackwell..
- Hauner, Milan (1981), India in Axis Strategy. Germany, Japan and Indian Nationalists in the Second World War, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta., ISBN 3-12-915340-3.
- Kaushik, Karuna (1984), Russian Revolution (1917) and Indian nationalism:Studies of Lajpat Rai, Subhash Chandra Bose and Ram Manohar Lohia, Delhi, Chanakya Publications..
- Kurowski, Franz (1997), The Brandenburgers Global Mission., Fedorowicz (J.J.), Canada., ISBN 0-921991-38-X.
- Lebra, Joyce C. (1977), Japanese trained armies in South-East Asia, New York, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-03995-6.
- Lebra, Joyce C. (2008), The Indian National Army and Japan, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies., ISBN 978-981-230-806-1.
- Littlejohn, Davis (1987), Foreign Legions of the Third Reich, Vol 4: Poland, the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania, Free India, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland and Russia, San Jose, Bender Publishing., ISBN 0-912138-36-X.
- Lundari, Giuseppe (1989), I paracadutisti italiani 1937/45, Milan, E.M.I..
- Moreman, T.R. (2005), The Jungle, the Japanese and the British Commonwealth Armies at War 1941–1945: Fighting Methods, Doctrine and Training for Jungle Warfare., London and New York: Frank Cass., ISBN 0-7146-4970-8.
- Munoz, Antonio J. (2002), The East Came West: Muslim, Hindu & Buddhist Volunteers in the German Armed Forces, 1941–1945., Axis Europa Books., ISBN 1-891227-39-4.
- Slim, W. (1961), Defeat into Victory., New York, David McKay., ISBN 1-56849-077-1.
- Tojo, Hideki (Premier) . (1943), Axis War Makes Easier Task of Indians. Chandra Bose's Berlin Speech. Syonan Simbun, Domei.
- Toye, Hugh (1959), The Springing Tiger: A Study of the Indian National Army and of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Allied Publishers.
External links
- From Banglapedia
- Article on Bose
- Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose & India's Independence
- Speeches of Netaji
- Centre of South Asian Studies, University of Cambridge
- Centre of South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin
- BBC Report: Hitler's secret Indian army
- BBC report about the Indian Army fighting the Japanese during World War II