First Test, 1948 Ashes series
The First Test of the 1948 Ashes series was one of five
The Australians started the match as firm favourites, having won the previous series against England 3–0; in the lead-up to the 1948 series, they had won 10 of their 12 tour matches in England, mostly by large margins. This included a crushing innings defeat in a match over the
On the second day, Yardley attempted to slow the Australian batsmen by employing
After the rest day, play resumed in poor visibility, with frequent interruptions due to rain and bad light. England's batsmen progressed steadily as Australia struggled in Lindwall's absence, which forced his fellow bowlers to bear a greater workload. Hutton made 74 and Compton batted through the entire day to be unbeaten on 154, with England one run ahead at the close of play, on 345/6. Compton's innings in the difficult conditions was highly praised and his team still had a chance of hanging on for a draw if the lower order could bat for a large part of the final day. The next day, Australia prised out the remaining wickets and England were dismissed for 441, with Compton out for 184 after falling on his stumps. Miller and Johnston had both taken four wickets. Australia then made the 98 runs required for victory with the loss of two wickets; opener Sid Barnes made his second half-century for the match in the pursuit.
Background
Prior to the First Test, Australia had played 12 first-class matches since arriving in England and starting their campaign in late-April, winning ten and drawing two.[1] Eight of the victories were by an innings, and another was by eight wickets.[1] One of the drawn matches, against Lancashire, was rain-affected, with the first day washed out entirely.[2]
One of the tour matches was against the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), which fielded a team composed almost entirely of Test players.[3] In what was effectively a dress rehearsal for the Tests, Australia fielded their full-strength team and won by an innings.[4] The difference in Australia's team for the First Test was the omission of leg spinner Colin McCool,[3][5] who had been struggling from a torn callus on his spinning finger, which prevented him from bowling long spells.[6] It was thought that Bradman would play another leg spinner—Doug Ring—in McCool's place, but the Australian captain changed his mind on the first morning when rain was forecast. Bill Johnston was played in the hope of exploiting a wet wicket.[7][8] In previous rain-affected matches on the tour, Johnston had been highly effective, taking match figures of 10/40 and 11/117 against Yorkshire and Hampshire respectively.[9][10][11][12] Bill Brown, the reserve opener, played out of position in the middle-order, as he had against Worcestershire and the MCC.[3][5][13] Aside from Brown and Johnston's inclusion, Australia's team was the same as that which started the previous Ashes series in 1946–47, which they won 3–0.[5][14]
England lost their leg spinner
Before the start of the match, much of the attention was placed on the weather forecast and the prospects of rain. In their 12 tour matches leading up to the Tests, Australia had been almost completely untroubled by the opposition except in the two matches against Yorkshire and Hampshire on rain-affected pitches. In these two matches they came close to defeat after heavy batting collapses before recovering to victory. It was thus thought that the toss could be of great importance, especially if the team batting first had accumulated a substantial total by the time rain came.[23] The match was the first Ashes Test to be played on English soil since the end of World War II.[24]
Scorecard
Umpires | F. Chester E. Cooke |
Toss | England elected to bat first |
Result | Australia won by eight wickets |
Series impact | Australia lead 5-match series 1–0[5] |
England innings
England | First innings | Second innings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Batsman
|
Method of dismissal | Runs | Method of dismissal | Runs |
L. Hutton | b Miller | 3 | b Miller | 74 |
C. Washbrook | c Brown b Lindwall | 6 | c Tallon b Miller | 1 |
W. J. Edrich | b Johnston | 18 | c Tallon b Johnson | 13 |
D. C. S. Compton | b Miller | 19 | hit wicket b Miller | 184 |
J. Hardstaff jnr |
c Miller b Johnston | 0 | c Hassett b Toshack | 43 |
C. J. Barnett | b Johnston | 8 | c Miller b Johnston | 6 |
* N. W. D. Yardley | lbw b Toshack | 3 | c & b Johnston | 22 |
+ T. G. Evans | c Morris b Johnston | 12 | c Tallon b Johnston | 50 |
J. C. Laker | c Tallon b Miller | 63 | b Miller | 4 |
A. V. Bedser | c Brown b Johnston | 22 | not out | 3 |
J. A. Young | not out | 1 | b Johnston | 9 |
Extras | b 5; lb 5 |
10 | 3 | 32 |
Total | (79 overs) | 165 | (183 overs) | 441 |
Australia | First innings | Second innings | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bowler
|
Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | |
R. R. Lindwall | 13 | 5 | 30 | 1 | – | – | – | – | |
K. R. Miller | 19 | 8 | 38 | 3 | 44 | 10 | 125 | 4 | |
W. A. Johnston | 25 | 11 | 36 | 5 | 59 | 12 | 147 | 4 | |
E. R. H. Toshack | 14 | 8 | 28 | 1 | 33 | 14 | 60 | 1 | |
I. W. G. Johnson | 5 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 42 | 15 | 66 | 1 | |
A. R. Morris | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | – | – | |
S. G. Barnes | – | – | – | – | 5 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
Australia innings
Australia | First innings | Second innings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Batsman
|
Method of dismissal | Runs | Method of dismissal | Runs |
S. G. Barnes | c Evans b Laker | 62 | not out | 64 |
A. R. Morris | b Laker | 31 | b Bedser | 9 |
D. G. Bradman |
c Hutton b Bedser | 138 | c Hutton b Bedser | 0 |
K. R. Miller | c Edrich b Laker | 0 | ||
W. A. Brown | lbw b Yardley | 17 | ||
A. L. Hassett | b Bedser | 137 | [4] not out | 21 |
I. W. G. Johnson | b Laker | 21 | ||
+ D. Tallon | c & b Young | 10 | ||
R. R. Lindwall | c Evans b Yardley | 42 | ||
W. A. Johnston | not out | 17 | ||
E. R. H. Toshack | lbw b Bedser | 19 | ||
Extras | 1 | 15 | lb 2; nb 1; w 1 | 4 |
Total | (216.2 overs) | 509 | (28.3 overs) | 98/2 |
England | First innings | Second innings | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bowler
|
Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets | |
W. J. Edrich | 18 | 1 | 72 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 0 | |
A. V. Bedser | 44.2 | 12 | 113 | 3 | 14.3 | 4 | 46 | 2 | |
C. J. Barnett | 17 | 5 | 36 | 0 | – | – | – | – | |
J. A. Young | 60 | 28 | 79 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 28 | 0 | |
J. C. Laker | 55 | 14 | 138 | 4 | – | – | – | – | |
D. C. S. Compton | 5 | 0 | 24 | 0 | – | – | – | – | |
N. W. D. Yardley | 17 | 6 | 32 | 2 | – | – | – | – |
10 June: Day One
England captain
During the lunch interval, heavy rain fell, before the sun began to dry the pitch, making the ball skid through upon England's resumption at 13/1.
Bradman then made a double change and brought on the two left-arm pacemen, Bill Johnston and Ernie Toshack.[31] In his first over, Johnston bowled Edrich with a delivery that knocked the off stump out of the ground as the batsman leaned forward on the front foot. Two balls later, Johnston removed Hardstaff for a duck, caught by Miller in slips after attempting a cut. Wisden described the catch as "dazzling".[5][15] Miller dived and balanced himself on his spine as he caught the ball heels over head.[33] O'Reilly said: "Johnston had trimmed and embroidered the efforts of his opening bowlers and had swung the fortunes of the game completely in Australia's favour".[32]
Bradman then decided to bring Miller back in place of Toshack.[34] Two runs later, Compton was bowled attempting a leg sweep against Miller, his leg stump knocked out of the ground as he moved across his wickets.[34] Five English wickets had fallen with only 48 runs on the board after 100 minutes of play; three batsmen had been dismissed in just ten minutes.[5][15] O'Reilly said "There was nothing whatsoever to suggest that the pitch had been instrumental in the English debacle. It was purely and simply an exhilarating display of splendid bowling fit to be classed with any match-winning bowling performance in the story of Test cricket."[35]
The collapse left Barnett and captain Yardley as the new men at the crease.
England was facing the prospect of setting a new record for the lowest Test innings score at Trent Bridge, worse than the 112 made by England against Warwick Armstrong's Australians in 1921.[15] However, a late fightback averted the unwanted record. Laker and Bedser, both from Surrey, joined forces and scored more than half of England's total, adding 89 runs in only 73 minutes. Laker's innings was highlighted by hooking and driving, while Bedser defended stoutly and drove in front of the wicket,[15] much to the delight of the Nottingham crowd, who had appeared to have become depressed by the collapse of England's batsmen.[35] At first, Bradman did not appear concerned by the partnership between the two bowlers from Surrey—it was thought the Australian captain may have been happy for England to continue batting so his top order would not have to bat in fading light towards the end of the afternoon, but he became anxious as the total continued to mount and both Bedser and Laker appeared comfortable.[35] O'Reilly speculated that both players had batted confidently as their home ground in Surrey—The Oval—had a reputation for being batsman-friendly, and that as they would have had to contend with opposition batsmen who had the benefit of consistently favourable conditions, then they should also prepare so they too could capitalise on their opportunities with the willow.[38] According to English commentator John Arlott, the playing surface was easier for batting than it had been at the start of the day, "but the difference was not such as to cause hesitation in the best batsmen in England".[37]
Eventually, Australia was forced to take the second new ball, and Bedser was finally removed by Johnston and Miller had Laker caught behind two runs later, ending England's innings at 165.[5] Laker top-scored with 63 in 101 minutes, with six boundaries,[5] having reached his first 50 in only 60 minutes.[34] O'Reilly said "There was nothing about his batting to suggest that luck was going his way or that he was short of batting experience."[38] Johnston ended with 5/36, a display characterised with his accuracy and variations in pace and swing.[15] Miller took 3/38 and a catch, while Lindwall and Toshack took one wicket each.[39] Spin was not used in abundance, as Johnson bowled five overs and Morris three.[5] Following England's struggles in the first innings, many pundits criticised Yardley's decision to bat first.[40]
Australia had less than 15 minutes of batting before the scheduled close of play. Barnes made an
11 June: Day Two
Ideal batting conditions and clear weather greeted the players on the second day.[15] After only four overs had been bowled in total the previous afternoon, Edrich was relieved of the new ball, which was given to Barnett, who accompanied Bedser.[43] Both bowlers swung the ball into the right-handed Barnes and away from the left-handed Morris.[43] Not a frontline bowler, Barnett focused on bowling defensively at medium pace, and the Australians wanted to make a safe start, so they decided to play him watchfully. This prompted some commentators to claim Barnett had allowed the Australians to settle into their rhythm by not trying to pressure them.[44]
Barnes batted assuredly, while Morris was hesitant and shuffled around the crease. At one stage, Morris scored only seven runs in 55 minutes. Barnes was involved in some interplay with umpire Chester when the umpire failed to evade a drive from Morris and stopped it with his foot. Barnes picked the ball off the ground and handed it to the bowler, prompting a finger-wagging from Chester, to which Barnes responded by admonishing the umpire for blocking the ball.[45] Morris unnecessarily played at a ball outside off stump from Bedser and edged it to wicket-keeper Evans, who dropped the catch. The batsman recomposed himself and hit Young's first ball—a full toss—for runs as Australia passed 50 without loss.[44] After the wayward start, Young began to bowl with consistent accuracy.[44]
Barnes and Morris took the score to 73 before the latter was bowled for 31 by Laker after two hours of batting.[5] Morris tried to force a ball from Laker away, but hit it from the middle of his bat into his back pad, and the ball rebounded onto the stumps.[46] Bradman came in and Yardley set a defensive field, employing leg theory to slow the scoring. The English leader packed the leg side with fielders, including two short legs, and ordered Bedser to bowl at leg stump. Bradman almost inside-edged the second ball onto his stumps, before defending uneasily for a period. With Laker stopping the scoring at the other end, Bradman managed only four runs in his first 20 minutes of batting.[47][48] The Australian captain regarded Bedser as the finest seam bowler he faced in his career, and he batted in a circumspect manner as he sought to establish himself.[48] At the other end, Bradman misjudged a ball from Laker and an incorrectly executed cut shot narrowly went wide of the slip fielder.[49] Now aged 40, Bradman's reflexes had slowed and he no longer started his innings as confidently as he had done in the past.[49] Barnes then reached his half-century after 135 minutes, pulling Barnett for four,[50] and the Australians passed 100 before lunch after 125 minutes of batting. At the adjournment, the tourists were 104/1.[49]
The score had progressed to 121 when Barnes tried to cut Laker, but only edged it onto the thigh of wicket-keeper Evans. The ball bounced away and the gloveman turned around and took a one-handed diving catch to dismiss Barnes for 62.[5][50] Umpire Cooke was unsure of whether Barnes had hit the ball into the ground before Evans took the catch, and consulted with Chester, who had been standing at point on the other side of the field, before ruling the batsman out.[48] Miller came in and was dismissed for a duck in Laker's next over without further addition to Australia's total.[49] He failed to pick Laker's arm ball, which drifted away and went straight on instead of turning inwards, thereby clipping the outside edge of his bat. The ball flew to slip where Edrich completed the catch.[5][15][39][48][50] The hard-hitting Miller had come in at No. 4, a position usually occupied by vice-captain Lindsay Hassett, a more sedate batsman, indicating that Bradman may have been looking to attack, but the change in batting order failed.[51]
Laker to this point had taken 3/22 from 12.4 overs, having also top-scored in the first innings.[5][15] All the while, Australia had been scoring slowly, as they would for most of the day. Brown came in at No. 5, but he had played most of his career as an opening batsman and looked unaccustomed to playing in the middle order,[50] but Bradman brought him in ahead of Hassett as the new ball was due and Brown was used to starting his innings against pace bowlers and a new ball.[51] The Australian captain decided to hasten the new ball by using his feet to get to the pitch of the ball to attack the spinners, hitting them through the off side.[51] Yardley removed Laker—who was bowling effectively[52]—from the attack and took the second new ball, bringing back Bedser and Edrich. However, this move backfired as Bradman struck his first boundary in over 80 minutes, and in the first 40 minutes after lunch, 43 runs were added.[52] Yardley brought back his two spinners,[52] and Australia passed England's total before the English captain brought himself on to bowl, trapping Brown—who was attempting to push the ball to mid-on—lbw with an off cutter in his first over.[15][50] This ended a 64-run stand in 58 minutes and Hassett came in at 185/4.[5] The Australian vice-captain came close to being caught when he knocked a ball from Bedser into the air, narrowly evading the grasp of Evans.[50] Following the departure of Brown, the Australian scoring slowed as Bradman changed the team strategy to one of attempting to bat only once.[51]
Yardley continued to employ a leg side field as he and Barnett bowled outside leg stump. During one over, Bradman did not attempt a single shot and then put his hands on his hips to express his displeasure at England's tactics. During the 15 minutes before tea, the Australian captain did not add a single run and was heckled by the crowd. Bradman reached tea on 78, and 55 minutes after the resumption of play, he
Bradman added a further 30 in the last hour to end with 130. Hassett also batted patiently, with one period of 20 minutes during which his score remained on 30.
After the day's play, O'Reilly—a former teammate of Bradman who was covering the tour as a journalist—consulted Bedser on his use of leg theory. During his career O'Reilly had often attacked leg stump, and had devised a plan to ensnare Bradman.[57]
12 June: Day Three
On the third morning, amid sunshine,[57] Bradman resumed on 130,[5] before progressing to 132 and becoming the first player to pass 1,000 runs for the English season.[15] The Australian captain was not aware of the reason for the spontaneous crowd applause until being notified by wicket-keeper Evans.[57]
Bedser was bowling and he soon implemented O'Reilly's plans. Hutton was moved from leg slip to a squarer position at short fine leg, around 11 metres from the bat. Two short legs and a mid-on were put in place. Bradman drove Bedser through cover for a boundary, but on the next ball, his innings terminated at 138 when he glanced an inswinger from Bedser straight to Hutton at short fine leg, who caught the ball without having to move.[57] Bradman had batted for 290 minutes and faced 321 balls and as Johnson walked in to replace him with Australia at 305/5,[5] Bedser waved to O'Reilly in the press box. When former Australian Test opener Jack Fingleton—a teammate of both Bradman and O'Reilly who was also working as a journalist—reported what his colleague had done, there was some debate as to whether O'Reilly's actions were treacherous.[57]
Johnson made 21, including an edge over the slips cordon, before being bowled by Laker. He inside edged the ball onto his foot and it rolled back into his stumps.[58] At the same time, Yardley pinned Hassett down with more leg theory. Laker bowled with one slip, while Young had none and had all of his fielders evenly spread in a circular formation.[58] Tallon came in and took 39 minutes to compile 10 before hitting a return catch to the left-arm orthodox spin of Young.[5] The scoring was very slow during this passage of play—Young delivered 11 consecutive maiden overs and his 26-over spell conceded only 14 runs.[15] Hassett conducted himself in a humorous way, and Arlott said: "only his grace and concealed humour made his innings tolerable".[59] He mainly scored from deflections and was for the most part prepared to take his time.[59]
The injured Lindwall came out to bat at 365/7 without a
After the break, Hassett reached his century after 305 minutes of batting, his first in Tests in England. He then accelerated, adding a further 37 runs in 49 minutes before being bowled by Bedser, having struck 20 fours and a six.
England thus started their second innings still 344 runs in arrears.[5] Although Lindwall was able to run between the wickets, he did not take to the field in the second innings and the 12th man Neil Harvey took his place. Fingleton called Harvey "by far the most brilliant fieldsman of both sides".[67] Yardley was sceptical as to whether Lindwall was sufficiently injured to be forced from the field, but did not formally object to Harvey's presence on the field.[67] O'Reilly said Lindwall had demonstrated his mobility during his innings, was in no way "incapacitated" and that the English captain "must be condemned for carrying his concepts of sportsmanship too far" when no substitute was justified.[60] O'Reilly decried the benefit Australia derived through the substitution, agreeing with Fingleton's judgement of Harvey was the tourists' best fielder by far.[60] Arlott went further, calling Harvey the best fielder in the world.[68]
Four of the first five runs were leg byes;[68] Miller then removed Washbrook for one from a top-edged hook shot that was caught by Tallon. The batsman was displeased with the umpire's decision and gestured to a red mark on his shirt, indicating he felt the ball had touched his body and not the bat.[67][69] Edrich came in and while he continued to struggle, he defiantly held up his end of the pitch. After scoring 13 from 43 minutes, Edrich was caught behind attempting a cut from the off spin of Johnson. He did not read the arm ball, which went straight on and took the outside edge, leaving England 39/2.[5][15][70] Johnson was extracting a substantial amount of spin from the surface.[71] This brought together England's leading batsmen, Hutton and Compton. The latter, coming in upon the fall of Edrich, ran down the pitch before the ball was bowled and had to quickly play a defensive shot on the run. He clipped the next ball to the leg side for two runs before surviving a confident leg before wicket appeal from Johnson when he was on eight. Compton appeared ready to walk off, but umpire Chester declined the appeal, much to his surprise. England reached 50 in 65 minutes and with Lindwall missing, Bradman had difficulties in spreading the workload among his depleted bowling resources. The part-time leg spin of Barnes was brought on as the fifth bowling option to give the others some time to rest, and Miller resumed bowling late in the day, delivering slow off spin to conserve energy.[70] Hutton and Compton exploited the depleted bowling attack and began to score freely, using their placement to bisect the gaps between the fielders.[72] The pair did not give a chance apart from when Compton aimed an uppish square drive from Johnston that flew in the air wide of cover point.[68]
Hutton then leg glanced Miller, before cover driving and square cutting him in another over. All three shots went for four and he reached his fifty in 110 minutes. Miller responded to the spate of boundaries with a series of bouncers,[73] including five in the last over of the day.[39] One of these struck Hutton high on his left arm. The batsmen survived, but Miller received a hostile reaction from the crowd throughout his short-pitched barrage, including shouts of "Bodyline".[15][39] The original practitioners of Bodyline, Harold Larwood and Bill Voce, were both from Nottinghamshire and played at Trent Bridge, and were later excluded from selection for England after being blamed for the ill-feeling caused by Bodyline. The Nottinghamshire supporters were still angry with how their players had been removed and were not happy that Miller was able to do something they saw to be equivalent.[74] For his part, Miller appeared to be amused by the crowd reaction and revelled in it, grinning and flicking his hair.[75] However, Hutton had the last word, glancing Miller down to fine leg for a four from the final ball of the day. England were 121/2, with Hutton and Compton on 63 and 36 respectively.[5][73] Miller was widely jeered and heckled as he walked off the field,[73] and the crowded surged towards him as he walked up the steps into the dressing room.[74] O'Reilly defended Miller's use of short-pitched deliveries, pointing out that he had not employed a packed leg side field and had allowed the batsman the opportunity to score from hook and pull shots if he was willing to try; in contrast the packed Bodyline field meant batsmen would find little reward for such shots and defensive play would only lead to dismissal.[76]
14 June: Day Four
The third day was followed by a rest day on Sunday and play resumed on the fourth morning, a Monday, with England still 223 runs in arrears.[5] Before the start of play, the Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club (NCCC) secretary, H. A. Brown, broadcast an appeal to the gallery over the public address system to refrain from their heckling of Miller.[15]
Let us keep Nottingham a place where Test matches can continue to be played. On Saturday the Australian, Miller, was booed and there was much subsequent publicity in the press. These Australians are great sportsmen. They stood by the Empire in the war and we should always be pleased to greet them. Let us show them how really pleased we are and give them a warmhearted greeting this morning.[77]
The crowd responded by clapping as the Australians took to the field. The chairman of the NCCC reportedly apologised to Bradman in private for the crowd reaction to Miller.[77]
As the new ball was due soon after the start of the play, Johnson and Toshack opened the attack as Bradman saved Johnston and Miller. In his first over, Johnson extracted sharp turn from one delivery that pitched outside off stump; not expecting much spin, Compton did not play a shot and was hit on the pads, but the umpire rejected the loud appeal for lbw.[78] Otherwise, Hutton and Compton progressed steadily before the light deteriorated,[77] although Johnson and Toshack were able to make the ball deviate regularly.[78] Despite this, Bradman opted to have Miller take the new ball in the fifth over of the day as soon as it was available. Mindful of recent events, Miller refrained from bouncers during the morning.[77] In the overcast conditions, Miller bowled a relatively full length and swung the ball; one of his deliveries beat Hutton and narrowly missed his stumps.[78] At the other end, Johnston was also able to make the ball move sideways.[79] Meanwhile, Compton appeared to be untroubled by the bowling. After half an hour of play, an unsuccessful appeal against the light was made as dark clouds hovered overhead. The rejection of the appeal made little difference, as a thunderstorm stopped proceedings for five minutes soon after.[77] Shortly after the resumption, Miller bowled Hutton with an off cutter in the dark conditions,[15] ending the 111-run partnership at 150/3. Hutton had made 74 runs in 168 minutes with 11 fours,[5] and as in the first innings, he played forward to a ball without getting his front foot close to the bat, resulting in the delivery moving through the gap into the stumps.[80] The wicket prompted the entrance of Hardstaff, and on the third ball he aimed a cut at a wide Miller delivery, and it again went low to second slip as in the first innings. However, this time Morris was in the position and the catch was dropped. It was part of an eventful over during which Hardstaff had many near-misses. He played and missed at one ball, inside edged another into his pads and edged another through the slips for two runs.[81] Hardstaff had a reputation for being an uncertain starter, especially as he had a tendency to poke at deliveries outside his off stump, and the poor visibility further hindered him.[80]
At 12:35, bad light stopped proceedings, and after two inspections the umpires resumed play,[81] although Arlott claimed that visibility was "barely more than a half candle-power better".[79] Hardstaff then batted aggressively, walking towards the bowling and hitting three cover drives for four from Miller and Johnston,[80][81] in one period in which he outscored Compton 23 to four. He then edged through slips for another boundary before Compton swept Toshack to the fence. In the final over before the lunch break, Hardstaff square drove Johnston for four off the back foot and England adjourned at 191/3 with Compton on 63 and Hardstaff 31, still 153 in arrears.[82] During the session, Bradman used Miller for 11 overs in a row in an attempt to pressure the Englishmen, while Toshack bowled defensively from the other end.[83]
After lunch, the light was again poor, but England did not appeal to the umpires for an adjournment. Yardley wanted to bat now in poor visibility in order to eradicate the deficit and build a lead, so that if a shower came later and turned the pitch into a sticky wicket, Australia would have to chase a target on an erratic surface.[82] Bradman anticipated rain, so he utilised Toshack and Johnson to bowl defensively to slow England's progress in the hope that the hosts would not have a lead by the time a sticky wicket materialised.[82] As the umpires were obliged to not call off play unless the light was so poor as to endanger the batsman, the lack of pace of Johnson and Toshack forced play to continue as they posed no physical threat to the batsmen.[83] In foggy and misty conditions,[83] Hardstaff brought up England's 200 with a strongly-hit hook that almost hit Barnes.[82] Compton then hit a boundary from Toshack, prompting Bradman to further stack the leg side with fielders in defensive positions. Scoring was slow as Toshack pinned down the batsmen with an effective leg stump line.[82]
The innings was interrupted by bad light and upon the resumption of proceedings, poor visibility intervened for a second time with Compton on 97. After 55 minutes of delay, the umpires called the players back onto the field. Wisden said: "rarely can a Test Match have been played under such appalling conditions as on this day."[15] Fingleton said the conditions were "pitiable" and lamented the "utmost gloom in which batsmen and fieldsmen had intense difficulty in sighting the ball".[84] O'Reilly said it was "without doubt the worst light" under which he had seen a first-class match proceed.[80] Compton brought up his third consecutive century at Trent Bridge by hitting a single to square leg,[85][86] a "lovely century of stroke-play and patience" according to Fingleton.[85] The innings had taken 227 minutes and included 12 fours,[85] and Compton had regularly hit the ball in the middle of his bat despite the poor visibility, which meant the batsmen could not see the ball once it was close to the boundary.[86] O'Reilly described the innings as "one of the greatest batting efforts in the story of Anglo-Australian Tests",[86] adding that "his hundred runs was but a poor measure by which to estimate the value of his magnificent innings",[86] deeming Compton's innings equivalent to a double century under normal conditions.[86] Arlott said "In its manner, its style and its context it must rank with any innings he has ever played ... his innings will remain a Test classic."[87]
Soon after, Compton edged to the slips from the bowling of Miller, but Johnson spilled the catch. Hardstaff fell for 43, lofting Toshack to Hassett on the leg side, having put on 93 with Compton.
15 June: Day Five
Compton and Evans continued to resist the Australians on the final morning, the latter being the more aggressive,[89] and proceedings were briefly interrupted by rain less than 30 minutes after the start of play. At the time, it appeared the downpour might cause the match to end in a draw.[90] After half an hour of stoppages, play resumed and Evans attacked, hitting two fours in quick succession.[90] England's wicket-keeper played Johnston and Johnson confidently, but Bradman nevertheless persisted in giving Compton easy singles in order to bring Evans on strike so he could be targeted.[91] For his part, Compton thought his partner could be relied upon and accepted the runs gifted to him by the Australian captain, while Evans continued to attack the bowling.[91] The batsmen appealed against the light after the first stoppage of the day, but were turned down. Australia took the new ball, but the home team's batsmen continued to proceed steadily, Evans being particularly aggressive.[92] After a second interruption for poor light, this time for ten minutes, play resumed,[92] and England had added a further 60 runs to their overnight total to reach 405/6.[90]
Miller bowled a fast and very short bouncer at Compton, who moved into position to hook before changing his mind and attempting to evade the ball. He lost balance and threw his legs apart, trying to avoid stepping onto his stumps. However, he was unsuccessful and was out
Australia progressed quickly at the start of the chase. Barnes took 13 runs, including three boundaries, from the opening over, bowled by Bedser,[93] while Morris again lacked fluency. However, Barnes continued to score quickly, and 24 runs came from the first four overs.[93][94] Yardley tried to stop the run-scoring by bringing on Young, but Morris hit him for four and the bowler was promptly taken off.[93] The tourists proceeded steadily to 38 from 32 minutes before Bedser bowled Morris for nine;[94] after bowling several balls that moved away, Bedser caught out Morris with an inswinger.[93] Morris had developed a habit of trying to defend the ball to the leg side while shuffling towards the off, and was not in a position to deal with a ball that hurried off the pitch.[95] Bradman came to the crease and batted for 12 minutes without getting off the mark. From the 10th ball he faced, the Australian skipper was out for a duck, again caught by Hutton at short fine leg in Bedser's leg trap.[15] Bradman showed obvious displeasure at allowing himself to be dismissed by the same trap in consecutive innings,[95] and his departure left Australia at 48/2. It was the first time in four tours to England that Bradman had made a duck in a Test.[96]
Upon Bradman's dismissal, dark clouds began to close in on the ground, and rain appeared to be a possible saviour for England.[96] However, it never came, and meanwhile Hassett joined Barnes. The pair attacked, Hassett twice driving Bedser over the infield for boundaries, and later pulling another ball in the air for another four.[96] Barnes gave Young an opportunity for a return catch, but the ball was dropped.[96] The pair reached the target without further loss after 87 minutes of batting. Barnes ended on 64 with 11 boundaries, having been prolific on the square cut. He tied the scores with a swept boundary, and having taken a stump as souvenir, ran off the ground believing the match was over. Barnes tossed his souvenir back into the playing arena and returned to the field after noticing the reaction of the amused crowd and Hassett promptly hit the winning run.[5][15][94][95]
Aftermath
The First Test was a continuation of the trend of English batsmen being largely unable to cope with Australia's pacemen. Hutton was the only Englishman to pass 50 in the MCC match, and at Trent Bridge only he and Compton managed this feat. Apart from Hardstaff, none of the remaining batsmen passed 25.[3][5] Wisden's verdict was that England fought back very well, but that avoiding defeat was almost impossible after their poor batting on the first day.[15] Bowes considered the defensive English bowling display worthy of a draw, and blamed the first innings batting for the failure to prevent defeat. However, he believed the English tactics to be justified and should have been continued.[97]
Australia's success came at a cost, with Lindwall injured and unable to bowl in the lead-up to the Second Test, missing the intervening matches against
Content with their convincing win at Trent Bridge, Australia made no changes to their team, while England made three, omitting Barnett, Hardstaff and Young due to a combination of injury and poor form.[5][63] Barnett and Hardstaff never played another Test. Despite his injury, Lindwall played a key role in a heavy 409-run Australian victory, taking eight wickets.[63] His bowling also led to the controversial omission of Hutton, who performed poorly at Lord's, for the Third Test. The reason was said to be Hutton's struggles with Lindwall's short-pitched bowling.[102] This decision pleased the Australians, who regarded Hutton as their most formidable opponent with the bat.[102]
On the field, the Australians continued to flourish. The Third Test was a rain-affected draw, and between the First and Fourth Tests, they won four of their five county matches, drawing the other.[1] On the final day of the Fourth Test, Australia's batsmen set a world Test cricket record by scoring 404 to win the match, thereby taking a series-winning 3–0 lead.[65][103]
After the historic win in the Fourth Test, Australia had five tour matches before the final Test. They won three while two ended in rain-curtailed draws.[1][104] Australia then completed the series with an innings victory in the Fifth Test at The Oval to complete a 4–0 result.[1] The Fifth Test was the last international match of the tour, and the tourists had seven further matches to negotiate in order to fulfil Bradman's aim of going through the English season undefeated. Apart from two washed-out matches,[104] Bradman's men had little difficulty, winning the remaining five fixtures by an innings. They thus became the first touring Test team to complete an English season undefeated, earning themselves the sobriquet The Invincibles.[1][105]
See also
Notes
- ^ a b c d e f g "Matches, Australia tour of England, Apr–Sep 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 16 July 2008.
- ^ "Lancashire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "MCC v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ Perry (2005), p. 228.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az "1st Test England v Australia at Nottingham Jun 10–15 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 12 December 2007.
- ISBN 0-207-15269-1.
- ^ Haigh, Gideon (26 May 2007). "Gentrifying the game". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 1 June 2007.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 82.
- ^ "Yorkshire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ a b "Hampshire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ "Australians in England, 1948". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (1949 ed.). Wisden. pp. 226–227.
- ^ Fingleton, p. 54.
- ^ "Worcestershire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ Perry (2005), p. 186.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad "First Test Match England v Australia". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Wisden. 1949. Retrieved 2 July 2008.
- ^ a b "Surrey v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ Fingleton, p. 73.
- ^ a b Perry (2005), pp. 175–189.
- ^ "Nottinghamshire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ "Sussex v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 77.
- ^ Bowes, p. 189.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, pp. 30–31.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 30.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 31.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 83.
- ^ O'Reilly, p. 32.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 84.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 33.
- ^ a b Arlott, p. 31.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 85.
- ^ a b O'Reilly, p. 34.
- ^ Fingleton, p. 86.
- ^ a b c d e Fingleton, p. 87.
- ^ a b c d e O'Reilly, p. 35.
- ^ a b Pollard (1990), p. 9.
- ^ a b Arlott, p. 32.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 36.
- ^ a b c d Perry (2005), p. 235.
- ^ Fingleton, pp. 82–88.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 88.
- ^ Arlott, pp. 33–34.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 34.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 35.
- ^ Fingleton, pp. 88–89.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 37.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 90.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 38.
- ^ a b c d Arlott, p. 36.
- ^ a b c d e f Fingleton, p. 91.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 39.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 37.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 92.
- ^ Arlott, pp. 37–38.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 38.
- ^ O'Reilly, p. 40.
- ^ a b c d e Fingleton, p. 93.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 94.
- ^ a b Arlott. p. 39.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 42.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 95.
- ^ Arlott, pp. 40–41.
- ^ a b c d "2nd Test England v Australia at Lord's Jun 24–29 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 12 December 2007.
- ^ "3rd Test England v Australia at Manchester Jul 8–13 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 12 December 2007.
- ^ a b "4th Test England v Australia at Leeds Jul 22–27 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 12 December 2007.
- ^ "5th Test England v Australia at The Oval Aug 14–18 1948". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 12 December 2007.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 96.
- ^ a b c Arlott, p. 41.
- ^ O'Reilly, p. 44.
- ^ a b Fingleton, p. 97.
- ^ O'Reilly, p. 43.
- ^ O'Reilly, p. 45.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 98.
- ^ a b Arlott, p. 43.
- ^ Arlott, p. 42.
- ^ O'Reilly, pp. 45–47.
- ^ a b c d e Fingleton, p. 99.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 48.
- ^ a b Arlott, p. 45.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 49.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 100.
- ^ a b c d e Fingleton, p. 101.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 50.
- ^ Fingleton, p. 103.
- ^ a b c d e f Fingleton, p. 102.
- ^ a b c d e f O'Reilly, p. 51.
- ^ Arlott, p. 46.
- ^ Arlott, pp. 44, 47.
- ^ Arlott, p. 48.
- ^ a b c d e Fingleton, p. 104.
- ^ a b c d O'Reilly, p. 52.
- ^ a b Arlott, p. 49.
- ^ a b c d Arlott, p. 50.
- ^ a b c Fingleton, p. 105.
- ^ a b c O'Reilly, p. 53.
- ^ a b c d Arlott, p. 51.
- ^ Bowes, pp. 188–89.
- ^ "Northamptonshire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ "Yorkshire v Australians". CricketArchive. Retrieved 18 December 2008.
- ^ a b Perry (2001), p. 233.
- ^ Perry (2005), p. 239.
- ^ a b Perry (2001), p. 224.
- ^ "Fourth Test Match England v Australia". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Wisden. 1949. Retrieved 2 July 2008.
- ^ a b Fingleton, pp. 190–210.
- ^ Harte and Whimpress, p. 405.
References
- Arlott, John (1949). Gone to the test match : being primarily an account of the test series of 1948. London: Longmans.
- Bowes, Bill (1949). Express Deliveries. London: Stanley Paul.
- Fingleton, Jack (1949). Brightly fades the Don. London: Collins.
- Harte, Chris; ISBN 0-670-04133-5.
- O'Reilly, W. J. (1949). Cricket conquest: the story of the 1948 test tour. London: Werner Laurie.
- ISBN 0-09-184051-1.
- ISBN 978-1-74166-222-1.
- ISBN 0-207-16124-0.