Franco-Italian Agreement of 1935

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Franco-Italian Agreement
)
Aozou strip
, the main territorial agreement in the Mussolini-Laval accord

The Franco-Italian Agreements (often called Mussolini-Laval Accord) were signed in

Prime Minister Benito Mussolini on 7 January 1935.[1]

History

After its victory in World War I, it was agreed that Italy would not receive territories from the defeated German colonial empire. These territories were to be divided between France, Japan and the British Empire, but Italy would be rewarded some bordering areas from the British and French colonial possessions. That was considered by Italians to be very little compensation for their sacrifices in the bloody war, which was one of the reasons of the rise to power in Italy of Mussolini's fascism.

Detailed 1935 map showing the Aouzou Strip and the new Libya-Chad border
1938 map of French Somaliland. Following the Rome Accords of 1935, the northern border of French Somaliland was moved south of the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb

The British ceded

French Sahara
.

Laval had succeeded

Italy, to meet Mussolini. It was the beginning of a diplomatic offensive intended to contain Nazi Germany
by a network of alliances.

He proposed a treaty to Mussolini to define disputed parts of French Somaliland (now Djibouti) as part of Eritrea, redefine the official status of Italians in French Tunisia and give Italy a mainly-free hand to occupy Ethiopia during the Abyssinia Crisis.

Italy was also to receive the Aouzou Strip, which was to be moved from French-ruled Chad to Italian-ruled Libya (that issue would have some implications in World War II and in the later Toyota War between Libya and Chad).

In exchange for those concessions, France hoped for Italian support against German aggression, which did not occur.

The agreements were confirmed by a law of the French Parliament on 26 March 1935.[2] The French and the Italian Parliaments ratified the 1935 agreement. Since the instruments of ratification were not exchanged, ICJ named the agreement as "Non-ratified".[3]

The agreement had the following main terms:

References

Sources

See also