Fujita scale
Scale | Speed | Damage |
---|---|---|
F0 | < 73 mph | Light |
F1 | 73–112 mph | Moderate |
F2 | 113–157 mph | Considerable |
F3 | 158–206 mph | Severe |
F4 | 207–260 mph | Devastating |
F5 | 261–318 mph | Incredible |
The Fujita scale (F-Scale;
Background
The scale was introduced in 1971 by
On February 1, 2007, the Fujita scale was decommissioned, and the Enhanced Fujita Scale was introduced in the United States.[7] The new scale more accurately matches wind speeds to the severity of damage caused by the tornado.[citation needed]
Though each damage level is associated with a wind speed, the Fujita scale is effectively a damage scale, and the wind speeds associated with the damage listed are not rigorously verified. The Enhanced Fujita Scale was formulated due to research that suggested that the wind speeds required to inflict damage by intense tornadoes on the Fujita scale are greatly overestimated. A process of expert elicitation with top engineers and meteorologists resulted in the EF scale wind speeds, but these are biased to United States construction practices. The EF scale also improved damage parameter descriptions.[citation needed]
Derivation
The original scale as derived by Fujita was a theoretical 13-level scale (F0–F12) designed to smoothly connect the
At the time Fujita derived the scale, little information was available on damage caused by wind, so the original scale presented little more than educated guesses at wind speed ranges for specific tiers of damage. Fujita intended that only F0–F5 be used in practice, as this covered all possible levels of damage to frame homes as well as the expected estimated bounds of wind speeds. He did, however, add a description for F6, which he called an "inconceivable tornado", to allow for wind speeds exceeding F5 and possible advancements in damage analysis that might show it.[9] In total, two tornadoes received the rating of F6, but both were later downgraded to F5.[10]
Based on aerial photographs of the damage it caused, Fujita assigned the strongest tornado of the 1974 Super Outbreak, which affected Xenia, Ohio, a preliminary rating of F6 intensity ± 1 scale.[11] The 1977 Birmingham–Smithfield F5 tornado's damage was surveyed by Ted Fujita and he “toyed with the idea of rating the Smithfield tornado an F6.”[12] In 2001, tornado expert Thomas P. Grazulis stated in his book F5–F6 Tornadoes; "In my opinion, if there ever was an F6 tornado caught on video, it was the Pampa, Texas tornado of 1995".[13] In 2023, it was announced by the Storm Prediction Center and National Weather Service Norman, Oklahoma that the 1970 Lubbock tornado was originally rated F6, which was later downgraded to its official rating of F5.[14]
Furthermore, the original wind speed numbers have since been found to be higher than the actual speeds required to incur the damage described at each category. The error manifests itself to an increasing degree as the category increases, especially in the range of F3 through F5. NOAA notes that "precise wind speed numbers are actually guesses and have never been scientifically verified. Different wind speeds may cause similar-looking damage from place to place—even from building to building. Without a thorough engineering analysis of tornado damage in any event, the actual wind speeds needed to cause that damage are unknown."[9] Since then, the Enhanced Fujita Scale has been created using better wind estimates by engineers and meteorologists.
Parameters
The six categories are listed here, in order of increasing intensity.[citation needed]
- The rating of any given tornado is of the most severe damage to any well-built frame home or comparable level of damage from engineering analysis of other damage.
- Since the Fujita scale is based on the severity of damage resulting from high winds, a tornado exceeding F5 is an immeasurable theoretical construct. Frame-home structural damage cannot exceed total destruction and debris dispersal, which constitutes F5 damage. A tornado with wind speeds greater than 319 miles per hour (513 km/h) is theoretically possible, and the 1999 Bridge Creek-Moore Tornado may have been such an event, but no such wind speed has ever been recorded and that measurement was not near ground level.
Scale | Wind speed estimate[7] | Frequency[15] | Potential damage[7] | ||
mph | km/h
| ||||
F0 | 40–72 | 64–116 | 44.14% | Light damage.Shallow-rooted trees are blown down. Shingles are ripped off roofs, wall siding may be lost, some windows in cars and buildings are blown out, branches snapped off of trees. | |
F1 | 73–112 | 117–180 | 34.24% | Moderate damage.Roofs stripped from shingles or planting. Small areas of the roof may be blown off the house. Mobile homes are flipped or rolled onto their sides, Large trees are blown down. Moving cars may be blown off the road. | |
F2 | 113–157 | 181–253 | 16.17% | Significant damage.Whole roofs ripped off frame houses, interiors of frame homes damaged. Mobile homes are completely destroyed. Cars lifted off the ground. Some or all exterior walls of poorly-built houses may collapse. Possibly some interior walls may collapse too. Boxcars are turned over. Light object missiles are thrown in air. | |
F3 | 158–206 | 254–332 | 4.35% | Severe damage.Roofs and numerous exterior and/or some interior walls blown away from well-built frame homes, all trees in its path blown down. Vehicles are thrown. Trains flipped or rolled onto their sides. | |
F4 | 207–260 | 333–418 | 1.00% | Devastating damage.Frame homes are completely destroyed. Vehicles are thrown like missiles in air. Structures with weak foundations may be blown away. | |
F5 | 261–318 | 419–512 | 0.10% | Incredible damage.Well built frame homes are blown away. Cars are mangled and thrown hundreds, possibly thousands of meters away. Trees are debarked. Giant large objects thrown like missiles may be thrown. Devastation will occur. |
Pearson scales
In 1973, Allen Pearson added additional path length and path width parameters to the Fujita scale. Under this version, each tornado would be assigned one Fujita scale rating and two Pearson scale ratings. For example, a tornado rated F4 based on damage with a path length of 63 miles (101 km) and a path width of 800 yards (730 m) would be rated F,P,P 4,4,4. Use of the Pearson scales was not widespread, however, and it remained more common to simply list a tornado's path length and path width directly.[6]
Scale | Path length | Path width |
---|---|---|
– | <0.3 mi (0.48 km) | <6 yd (5.5 m) |
P0 | 0.3–0.9 mi (0.48–1.45 km) | 6–17 yd (5.5–15.5 m) |
P1 | 1.0–3.1 mi (1.6–5.0 km) | 18–55 yd (16–50 m) |
P2 | 3.2–9.9 mi (5.1–15.9 km) | 56–175 yd (51–160 m) |
P3 | 10–31 mi (16–50 km) | 176–566 yd (161–518 m) |
P4 | 32–99 mi (51–159 km) | 0.3–0.9 mi (0.48–1.45 km) |
P5 | 100–315 mi (161–507 km) | 1.0–3.1 mi (1.6–5.0 km) |
Rating classifications
F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weak | Strong | Violent | |||
Significant | |||||
Intense |
For purposes such as tornado climatology studies, Fujita scale ratings may be grouped into classes.[6][16][17]
Decommissioning in the U.S.
The Fujita scale, introduced in 1971 as a means to differentiate tornado intensity and path area, assigned wind speeds to damage that were, at best, educated guesses.[18] Fujita and others recognized this immediately and intensive engineering analysis was conducted through the rest of the 1970s. This research, as well as subsequent research, showed that tornado wind speeds required to inflict the described damage were actually much lower than the F-scale indicated, particularly for the upper categories. Also, although the scale gave general descriptions of damage a tornado could cause, it gave little leeway for strength of construction and other factors that might cause a building to sustain more damage at lower wind speeds. Fujita tried to address these problems somewhat in 1992 with the Modified Fujita Scale,[19] but by then he was semi-retired and the National Weather Service was not in a position to update to an entirely new scale, so it went largely unenacted.[20]
In the United States, on February 1, 2007,
See also
- Enhanced Fujita scale
- International Fujita scale
- Lists of tornadoes and tornado outbreaks
- Rohn Emergency Scalefor measuring the magnitude (intensity) of any emergency
- Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Scale
- Severe weather terminology (United States)
- Tornado intensity and damage
- Tornado records
- TORRO scale
- Wind engineering
References
- ^ a b "Fujita Tornado Damage Scale". spc.noaa.gov. Retrieved May 27, 2017.
- ^ "Fujita Scale – Tornado Damage Scale". factsjustforkids.com. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
- S2CID 7842905.
- .
- ^ McCarthy, Daniel. "NWS Tornado Surveys and the Impact on the National Tornado" (PDF). www.spc.noaa.gov.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-879362-03-1.
- ^ a b c Fujita Tornado Damage Scale Storm Prediction Center. Accessed May 20, 2009.
- ^ "Storm Prediction Center". spc.noaa.gov. Retrieved May 27, 2017.
- ^ a b Tornado FAQ. Storm Prediction Center. Site accessed June 27, 2006.
- ^ Anna, Carly (October 26, 2023). "Explaining the 'Inconceivable F6' Tornado" (Video). YouTube. @CarlyAnnaWx. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
- ^ Fujita, T. Theodore (1974). "Jumbo Tornado Outbreak of 3 April 1974" (PDF).
- ^ "April 4, 1977, Smithfield F5 Tornado". National Weather Service. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
- ^ Thomas P. Grazulis (2021). F5-F6 Tornadoes. The Tornado Project.
- ^ Roger Edwards (SPC); Matthew S. Elliott (SPC); Patrick T. Marsh (SPC; Douglas A. Speheger (NWS). "Errors, Oddities and Artifacts in U.S. Tornado Data, 1995–2021" (PDF). Storm Prediction Center Publications: 1–10. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
- ^ "Storm Prediction Center WCM Data". Storm Prediction Center. Retrieved September 15, 2021.
- ^ The Fujita Scale of Tornado Intensity, Archived at: Archived December 30, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Brooks, Harold. "index". nssl.noaa.gov. Archived from the original on October 4, 2012. Retrieved May 27, 2017.
- Fujita, Tetsuya Theodore(1971). Proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. Chicago: University of Chicago.
- ^ Center, Storm Prediction. "NOAA's NWS Storm Prediction Center". www.spc.noaa.gov. Retrieved May 27, 2017.
- ^ Fujita, Tetsuya Theodore (1992). Memoirs of an Effort to Unlock the Mystery of Severe Storms. Chicago: University of Chicago.
- ^ Assessing tornado damage: EF-scale vs. F-scale Archived April 27, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
Bibliography
- Storm Track. 24 (3): 6–10.
- S2CID 7842905.