Gaṇasaṅgha
Part of the Politics series |
Republicanism |
---|
Politics portal |
Gana-Sangha
Etymology
The word gaṇa (
The phrase gana sangha can be translated as (rule by) tribal assembly. In ancient
Among the
The gana sanghas were generally located in the periphery of the major ancient Indian states, both geographically and culturally, and tend to occupy the higher ground near the Himalayas.[1] The gana sanghas of Vajji, Malla, Koliya, and Shakya mentioned above all situated at the foothills of Himalayas, near eastern Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Terai region of Nepal. In contrast, the states which followed a monarchical government (saamarajya) were generally located in the flood plains of the Ganges.
Institution
According to the Buddhist sources, key characteristics of the gana sangha seem to include a king (raja), and a deliberative assembly (sangha). Elected by the gana sangha, the monarch apparently always belonged to a family of the noble class of Kshatriya Varna. The monarch coordinated his activities with the assembly; in some states, he did so with a council of other nobles.[7] The assembly met regularly, and would discuss all major state decisions. This body also had full financial, administrative, and judicial authority. Other officers, who rarely receive any mention, obeyed the decisions of the assembly.
The general make-up of the gana sanghas was either that of a single clan (e.g.
Historical records
The gana sanghas in India it is generally believed existed as early as the 6th century BC, and persisted in some areas until the 4th century. The ancient Buddhist texts provide many accounts of the various ancient Indian states at the time of the
The
Outside Indian sources,
Scholars differ over how best to describe the gana sangha governments, and the vague, sporadic quality of the evidence allows for wide disagreements. Some emphasize the central role of the assemblies and thus tout them as democracies; other scholars focus on the upper-class domination of the leadership and possible control of the assembly and see an oligarchy or an aristocracy.[13][14]
The rulers always belonged to warrior class. This is mentioned in Hindu, Buddhist, Jain texts.[13] The oligarchs are always from warrior class. This leads many scholars to claim that the true nature of gana sanghas is not comparable to truly democratic institutions.[14][15]
See also
References
- ^ ISBN 9780520242258. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
- ^ Majumdar, Asoke Kumar (1977), Concise History of Ancient India: Political theory, administration and economic life, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, p. 140
- ^ Witzel, Michael (1997): 'The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools: The Social and Political Milieu (Materials on Vedic Śåkhås, 8)' in Witzel, Michael (ed.) Inside the texts, Beyond the Texts, Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, p. 313
- ^ "sangha". Lexico UK English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020.
- ^ Anguttara Nikaya I. p. 213; IV. pp. 252, 256, 261
- ISBN 978-1615301225
- ^ Robinson, 1997, p. 22
- ^ Robinson, 1997, p. 23
- ^ Sharma (1968). Republics in ancient India. Brill Archive. pp. 93–. GGKEY:HYY6LT5CFT0.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Raychaudhuri Hemchandra (1972), Political History of Ancient India, Calcutta: University of Calcutta, p. 107
- ^ Trautmann T. R., Kautilya and the Arthashastra, Leiden 1971
- ^ Diodorus 2.39
- ^ a b Bongard-Levin, 1996, pp. 61–106
- ^ a b Sharma 1968, pp. 109–22
- ISBN 0-520-24225-4.
Further reading
- Gadkari, Jayant (1 January 1996), Society and Religion: From Rugveda to Puranas, Popular Prakashan, pp. 100–, ISBN 978-81-7154-743-2
- Handa, O. C. (2004), Naga Cults and Traditions in the Western Himalaya, Indus Publishing, pp. 63–64, ISBN 978-81-7387-161-0