Geoffrey Elton

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Geoffrey Elton
Born
Gottfried Rudolf Otto Ehrenberg

(1921-08-17)17 August 1921
Died4 December 1994(1994-12-04) (aged 73)
Alma materUniversity College London
Occupation(s)Historian, writer
Spouse
Sheila Lambert
(m. 1952)
Parents
Relatives

Sir Geoffrey Rudolph Elton

Regius Professor of Modern History
there from 1983 to 1988.

Early life

Ehrenberg (Elton) was born in Tübingen, Germany. His parents were the Jewish scholars Victor Ehrenberg and Eva Dorothea Sommer.[1]: 79  In 1929, the Ehrenbergs moved to Prague, Czechoslovakia. In February 1939, the Ehrenbergs fled to Britain. Ehrenberg continued his education at Rydal School, a Methodist school in Wales, starting in 1939.[1]: 79  After only two years, Ehrenberg was working as a teacher at Rydal and achieved the position of assistant master in mathematics, history and German.[1]: 79 

There, he took courses via correspondence at the

anglicised his name to Geoffrey Rudolph Elton.[1]: 79  After his discharge from the army, Elton studied early modern history at University College London, graduating with a PhD in 1949.[1]
: 79 

Under the supervision of J. E. Neale, Elton was awarded a PhD for his thesis "Thomas Cromwell, Aspects of his Administrative Work", in which Elton first developed the ideas that he was to pursue for the rest of his life.[1]: 79  Elton naturalised as a British subject in September 1947.[2]

Career

Elton taught at the

Regius Professor of Modern History there from 1983 to 1988. Pupils included John Guy, Diarmaid MacCulloch, Susan Brigden and David Starkey. He worked as publication secretary of the British Academy from 1981 to 1990 and served as the president of the Royal Historical Society from 1972 to 1976. Elton was appointed a Knight Bachelor in the 1986 New Year Honours.[3]

The Tudor Revolution in Government

Elton focused primarily on the life of

Elizabeth I. Elton was most famous for arguing in his 1953 book The Tudor Revolution in Government that Thomas Cromwell was the author of modern, bureaucratic government, which replaced medieval, household-based government.[1]: 79–80  Until the 1950s, historians had played down Cromwell's role by calling him a doctrinaire hack who was little more than the agent of the despotic Henry VIII. Elton, however, made Cromwell the central figure in the Tudor revolution in government. Elton portrayed Cromwell as the presiding genius, much more so than the King, in handling the break with Rome and the laws and administrative procedures that made the English Reformation so important. Elton wrote that Cromwell was responsible for translating royal supremacy into parliamentary terms by creating powerful new organs of government to take charge of church lands and thoroughly removing the medieval features of the central government.[4]

That change took place in the 1530s and must be regarded as part of a planned revolution. In essence, Elton was arguing that before Cromwell, the realm could be viewed as the King's private estate writ large and that most administration was done by the King's household servants rather than by separate state offices. Cromwell, Henry's chief minister from 1532 to 1540, introduced reforms into the administration that delineated the King's household from the state and created a modern bureaucratic government.[1]: 80  Cromwell shone Tudor light into the darker corners of the Realm and radically altered the role of Parliament and the competence of Statute. Elton argued that by masterminding such reforms, Cromwell laid the foundations of England's future stability and success.[5]

Influence

Elton elaborated on his ideas in his 1955 work, the bestselling England under the Tudors, which went through three editions, and his Wiles Lectures, which he published in 1973 as Reform and Renewal: Thomas Cromwell and the Common Weal.[1]: 80 

His thesis has been widely challenged by younger Tudor historians and can no longer be regarded as an orthodoxy, but his contribution to the debate has profoundly influenced subsequent discussion of Tudor government, particularly on the role of Cromwell.[4]

Historical perspective

Elton was a staunch admirer of

What is History?
.

Elton was a strong defender of the traditional methods of history and was appalled by postmodernism, saying, for example, that "we are fighting for the lives of innocent young people beset by devilish tempters who claim to offer higher forms of thought and deeper truths and insights – the intellectual equivalent of crack, in fact. Any acceptance of these theories – even the most gentle or modest bow in their direction – can prove fatal."[7] Ex-pupils of his such as John Guy claim he did embody a "revisionist streak," reflected both in his work on Cromwell, his attack on John Neale's traditionalist account of Elizabeth I's parliaments, and in his support for a more contingent and political set of causes for the English Civil War of the mid-seventeenth century.

In 1990 Elton was one of the leading historians behind the setting up of the History Curriculum Association. The Association advocated a more knowledge-based history curriculum in schools. It expressed "profound disquiet" at the way history was being taught in the classroom and observed that the integrity of history was threatened. [8]

Elton saw the duty of historians as empirically gathering evidence and objectively analysing what the evidence has to say. As a traditionalist, he placed great emphasis on the role of individuals in history instead of abstract, impersonal forces. For instance, his 1963 book Reformation Europe is in large part concerned with the duel between Martin Luther and the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Elton objected to cross-disciplinary efforts such as efforts to combine history with anthropology or sociology. He saw political history as the best and most important kind of history. Elton had no use for those who seek history to make myths, to create laws to explain the past, or to produce theories such as Marxism.

Family

Elton was the brother of the education researcher Lewis Elton and the uncle of Lewis's son, the comedian and writer Ben Elton. He married a fellow historian, Sheila Lambert, in 1952. Elton died of a heart attack at his home in Cambridge on 4 December 1994.[9]

Works

He edited the second edition of the influential collection The Tudor Constitution. In it, he supported

Tudor constitution mirrored that of the mixed constitution of Sparta
.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Hughes-Warrington, Marine (2000). Fifty Key Thinkers on History. London: Routledge.
  2. ^ "No. 38100". The London Gazette. 17 October 1947. p. 4890.
  3. ^ "No. 50361". The London Gazette (Supplement). 30 December 1985. p. 1.
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ Arthur J. Slavin, "G.R. Elton and His Era: Thirty Years On." Albion 15#3 (1983): 207-229.
  6. ^ See his essays 'The Stuart Century', 'A High Road to Civil War?' and 'The Unexplained Revolution' in G. R. Elton, Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government: Volume II (Cambridge University Press, 1974).
  7. ^ Ó Tuathaigh, M. A. G., 'Irish Historical "Revisionism": State of the Art of Ideological Project?' in, Brady, Ciaran (ed.), Interpreting Irish History (Dublin, 2006), p. 325.
  8. ^ Daily Telegraph 19 March 1990
  9. ^ Saxon, Wolfgang (17 December 1994). "Sir Geoffrey Rudolph Elton, 73, Tudor Historian at Cambridge". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 January 2018.

References

  • Black, Jeremy "Elton, G.R." pages 356–357 from The Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing, Volume 1, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1999
  • Bradshaw, Brenden "The Tudor Commonwealth: Reform and Revision" pages 455–476 from Historical Journal, Volume 22, Issue 2, 1979.
  • Coleman, Christopher & Starkey, David (editors) Revolution Reassessed: Revisions in the History of Tudor Government & Administration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • Cross, Claire, Loades, David & Scarisbrick, J.J (editors) Law and Government under the Tudors: Essays Presented to Sir Geoffrey Elton, Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge on the Occasion of his Retirement Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • Guth, DeLloyd and McKenna, John (editors) Tudor Rule and Revolution: Essays for G.R Elton from his American Friends, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • Guy, John "The Tudor Commonwealth: Revising Thomas Cromwell" pages 681–685 from Historical Journal Volume 23, Issue 3, 1980.
  • Haigh, Christopher. "Religion" Transactions of the Royal Historical Society Vol. 7 (1997), pp. 281–299 in JSTOR deals with Elton
  • Horowitz, M.R. "Which Road to the Past?" History Today, Volume 34, January 1984. pages 5–10
  • Jenkins, Keith 'What is History?' From Carr to Elton to Rorty and White London: Routledge, 1995.
  • Kenyon, John The History Men, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983.
  • Kouri, E.I and Scott, Tom (editors) Politics and Society in Reformation Europe: Essays for Sir Geoffrey Elton on his Sixty-fifth Birthday, London: Macmillan Press, 1986.
  • Schlatter, R. Recent Views on British History: Essays on Historical Writing since 1966, New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1984.
  • Slavin, Arthur J. "G.R. Elton and His Era: Thirty Years On." Albion 15#3 (1983): 207-229.
  • Slavin, Arthur. "Telling the Story: G.R Elton and the Tudor Age" Sixteenth Century Journal (1990) 21#2 151–69.
  • Slavin Arthur. "G.R. Elton: On Reformation and Revolution" History Teacher, Volume 23, 1990. pp 405–31 in JSTOR
  • Transactions of the Royal Historical Society pages 177–336, Volume 7, 1997.
  • Williams, Penry and Harriss, Gavin "A Revolution in Tudor History?" Past and Present, Volume 25, 1963. pages 3–58

External links

Academic offices
Preceded by
Richard Southern
President of the Royal Historical Society
1973–1977
Succeeded by