German Fatherland Party

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
German Fatherland Party
Deutsche Vaterlandspartei
AbbreviationDVLP
Alldeutscher Verband
Membership1,250,000 (July 1918 est.)[6]
Ideology
Political positionFar-right
Colours  Black   White   Red

The German Fatherland Party (

Wilhelmine Period, and militant nationalists of the extreme right who would become popular during the interwar period.[13][14][15][16]

History

Foundation

Backed by the

bourgeois parties reacted inconsistently to the founding of the Fatherland Party. Many conservative parties expressly welcomed them. The board of the National Liberal Party offered to cooperate with the Fatherland Party and left party members the option to join it. The left-liberal Progressive People's Party, which lost a noticeable number of members to the DVLP, expressly refused to work with it. The Catholic Centre Party (Zentrum) told party members on 12 October 1917 not to assist the DVLP.[22]

Dissolution

The November Revolution effectively ended the existence of the DVLP. Until 28 November, the board met again and agreed to stop all "public activities." Furthermore, the members were asked to agitate for the early convocation of a national assembly, to ensure that the "national forces" were gathered together, and, for the time being, to support the Council of the People's Deputies in "maintaining order." Finally, on 10 December 1918, the Reich Committee of the DVLP, which about 20 people only visited, decided to dissolve the party. On this occasion, a three-member liquidation committee was established, which initiated the transfer of the party's assets to the German National People’s Party (DNVP) and became finalized on 1 February 1919.

Subsequent influence

During World War I,

National Socialist German Workers' Party, better known as the Nazi Party, that came to national power in January 1933 under Adolf Hitler.[24] German scholar Dirk Stegmann concluded that the Fatherland Party was pre- or proto-fascist because of Drexler's involvement.[25] It should be considered that many historians challenge this position. In 1997, scholar Heinz Hagenlücke argued that "the party was explicitly founded as a party and not a movement, members reflected the typical picture of high Wilhelmine society in contrast to the lower class organizations of the Weimar Republic, which sociologically reached the lower-middle class, soldiers, and the youth."[26]

Ideology

Political positions

The Fatherland Party represented

populist, antisemitic and völkisch political circles, united in their opposition against the Reichstag Peace Resolution of July 1917. It played a vital role in the emergence of the stab-in-the-back myth and the defamation of certain politicians as the November Criminals.[29][30]

The Fatherland Party was decidedly

coup d'etat
against the German government, led by Hindenburg and Ludendorff, even against the Emperor if necessary.

Though the Tirpitz plan was not implemented, the very fact it was mooted showed the extent of military dissatisfaction with the existing leadership and the strength of the "state within the state" in that Tirpitz was not punished despite having essentially called for deposing the Emperor.[34] In August 1916, Germany became a de facto military dictatorship under the duumvirate of Generalfeldmarschall Hindenburg and Generalquartiermeister Ludendorff, who ruled Germany until 1918.[35] During the rule of the "silent dictatorship" of Hindenburg and Ludendorff, the German government advocated a set of imperialist war aims calling for the annexation of most of Europe and Africa that in many ways were a prototype for the war aims of the Second World War.[36]

Foreign policy objectives

Alleged map of German plans for a new political order in Central and Eastern Europe
Possible outcome of a German victory in Africa with German pre-WW1 possessions in dark blue and gains in medium blue

The official purpose for the existence of the Fatherland Party was to end the war victoriously and secure a "German peace."[8] On 24 September 1917, Tirpitz had demanded a "correct solution to the Belgian question," a "safeguarding of the open sea lanes," "physical compensation" and a "place in the sun" secured for Germany. In the months that followed, the following ideas gradually emerged:[37][38]

The war aims of the DVLP were concerted at every possible opportunity in "countless meetings (...) and a flood of declarations, appeals, writings, demands and telegrams to the Kaiser, the government, the Reichstag, the Supreme Army Command and to the public" became known and popularized. Above all, this should create the impression of a "primitive popular movement."[39]

Domestic neutrality

In the first few months of its existence, the DVLP repeatedly emphasized its "national" character and its alleged domestic political neutrality. The call to members and supporters, which was still little veiled in the "Great Appeal," to stand up against a Prussian electoral reform, the parliamentarization of Reich policy, and the government's commitment to the DVLP line were deleted on 24 September 1917, without comment. The party promised not to put up its own candidates for Reichstag elections, and the "internal dispute" should rest until the war's end. However, this demonstration of disinterest was merely a tactical tool that arose from the DVLP's political concept. The main domestic political goal of the party leadership was clearly to force a dissolution of the Reichstag by employing extra-parliamentary pressure. This was justified with a populist and pseudo-democratic argument that parliament no longer portrayed the "will of the people."

Organization

Leadership

The party's leaders were Wolfgang Kapp[40] – who would later play a key role in the failed coup in 1920 known as the Kapp Putsch – and Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz,[41] a naval minister and post-war party leader. Walter Nicolai, head of the military secret service, was also supportive.[42] Media baron Alfred Hugenberg was also a prominent member and Duke John Albert of Mecklenburg[43] was made "Honorary Chairman". The party included many leading industrialists, large landowners, and business association officials, including Georg Wilhelm von Siemens, Carl Duisberg, Ernst von Borsig, Hugo Stinnes, Emil Kirdorf and Hermann Röchling, but also humanities scholars such as Eduard Meyer.

The Fatherland Party held two congresses (on 24 September 1917 and 19 April 1918 in Berlin). The statute did not provide a delegation procedure, and every party member could participate in the party congresses, which were purely forums for acclamation. The Select Committee called a party congress. In addition, there was a Reich Committee composed of the Executive Board, the Select Committee, and 50 individuals to be determined by the party congress, but only met three times. In addition to Tirpitz, Johann Albrecht and Kapp, the DVLP board of directors was made up of the following people:

Wilhelm von Siemens, Dietrich Schäfer, Franz von Reichenau, Ernst Schweckendieck, Otto Hoffmann, Ulrich von Hassell and Stephan von Nieber. The party executive of the DVLP had a powerful, almost independent position - it could not be changed from within the party and chose new members if necessary. Decisions were made in small groups; according to the statute, the committee had a quorum when two (from April 1918 three) members were present.[44]
The Select Committee, abolished in April 1918, later included the eight people appointed in September 1917.

Source of funding

The party's political influence peaked in the summer of 1918 when it had around 1,250,000 members.

German Revolution on 10 December 1918. Most of its members later joined the German National People's Party (DNVP), the major national-conservative party in Germany during the Weimar Republic. Before the rise of the Nazi Party, it was the major conservative and nationalist
party in Weimar Germany.

Head of the noticeably large head office of the party with its last nine departments and up to 137 employees were (one after the other) Kapp's close confidants Georg Wilhelm Schiele, Franz Ferdinand Eiffe, and Konrad Scherer. Huge sums of money were incurred for the maintenance and activities of the DVLP party apparatus, which were completely unusual for other contemporary parties. In addition, the party gave the bulk of its literature and other propaganda material completely free of charge. This effort could not possibly be covered only by membership fees and occasional donations. In the spring of 1918 alone, the sum of the initially uncovered expenses averaged 142,000 marks per month.

In addition to the support from the Pan-German League, the Fatherland Party also received additional support from a number of nationalist organizations and

These organizations became collectively known as the nationale Verbände.

Party infrastructure

The DVLP had its central main management based in Berlin and was divided into state, district, and local associations at the middle and lower levels. The Berlin headquarters of the DVLP employed almost 150 members at the end of 1917. According to the statutes, the state, district, and local associations were set up as required. The local associations could only communicate with the party executive through the state associations. District associations were only to be interposed when needed; they had no members and only served the regional associations as administrative bodies. In July 1918, 32 state associations, 237 district associations, and 2,536 local associations across Germany.[51][52]

Membership

According to its own information, the DVLP had 450,000 members in March 1918, 1,250,000 in July, and 800,000 in September. However, these numbers are considered highly exaggerated. At least, very likely, but more than half of the members belonged to "patriotic" clubs and associations affiliated with the Fatherland Party. It is also known that several higher officials - including Prussian government presidents - forced the staff of the departments and authorities they headed to join the party. The party tried harder to attract workers, especially after the January strike. A guideline for party speakers had previously stated that the worker "must gain the understanding that he is serving himself by joining our party; because our party especially serves the welfare of the workers by advocating a peace that secures our economic future." As early as January 1918, the party officially claimed to have over 290,000 "registered workers" in its ranks.[53]

References

Informational notes

  1. ^ Or possibly 3 September, according to historians Jeffery Verhey and Hans-Ulrich Wehler.[3]

Citations

  1. .
  2. .
  3. ^ a b Dempster 2006, p. 19.
  4. ^ Hadry, 2007. Quote: "Party leaders and assets were transferred to the German National People's Party."
  5. .
  6. ^ Dempster 2006, p. 1.
  7. ^ Dempster 2006, pp. 35–36.
  8. ^ .
  9. ^ a b Dempster 2006, pp. 35, 44.
  10. .
  11. ^ Dassen, 2013, pp. 161–187.
  12. ^ Kruse, Wolfgang (6 May 2013). "Burgfrieden und Innenpolitik: Militärdiktatur und nationalistische Mobilisierung" [Burgfrieden and Domestic Policy: Military Dictatorship and Nationalist Mobilisation]. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (in German). Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  13. ^ (2003). German history of society. Volume 4: From the beginning of the First World War to the founding of the two German states 1914–1949, p. 108; Historian Hans-Ulrich Wehler described the DVLP as quote, "[...] the first right-wing radical proto-fascist mass party."
  14. .
  15. ^ Bernd-Jürgen Wendt, Peter-Christian Witt (1983). German Conservatism in the 19th and 20th Century pp. 199–230.
  16. .
  17. ^ Schädlich, Karlheinz (1966) Der Unabhängige Ausschuß für einen Deutschen Frieden als ein Zentrum der Annexionspropaganda des deutschen Imperialismus im ersten Weltkrieg
  18. ^ Klein, Fritz (1964) Politik im Krieg 1914–1918. Studien zur Politik der deutschen herrschenden Klassen im ersten Weltkrieg. Berlin Akademie-Verlag. pp. 50–65
  19. ^ Jennifer Llewellyn, Steve Thompson, (2019). Alpha History; WOLFGANG KAPP
  20. ^ Wolfgang Kapp Biography
  21. ^ Judson, 2011, p. 508.
  22. ^ Ullrich, Robert (1968). Deutsche Vaterlandspartei, in: Dieter Fricke (Ed.): The bourgeois parties in Germany. Handbook of the history of the bourgeois parties and other bourgeois interest organizations from Vormärz to 1945. Leipzig, Volume 1, pp. 620–628
  23. ^ Hamilton 1984, p. 219.
  24. ^ Shirer 1960, pp. 36–37, 183.
  25. ^ Dirk Stegmann, Die Erben Bismarcks. Parteien und Verbiinde in der Spiitphase des Wilhelminischen Deutschlands Sammlungspolitik, 1897-1918 (Berlin: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1970).
  26. ^ Dempster 2006, p. 3.
  27. .
  28. ^ "Pan-Germanism (German political movement) – Britannica Online Encyclopedia". Britannica.com. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
  29. .
  30. ^ Dempster 2006, p. 43.
  31. ^ Manfred Weißbecker, German Fatherland Party, in: Dieter Fricke et al. (Hg.), Lexicon on party history. The bourgeois and petty-bourgeois parties and associations in Germany (1789-1945). 2nd volume, Leipzig 1984, pp. 291-403.
  32. ^ Dempster 2006, p. 35.
  33. ^ Yurievich, Klimov (2017). EDUARD MEYER IN THE YEARS OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR AND THE REPUBLIC OF WEIMAR. Saint Petersburg State University. pp. 45-57.
  34. ^ a b Wheeler-Bennett 1967, p. 13.
  35. ^ Wheeler-Bennett 1967, pp. 13–14.
  36. .
  37. .
  38. ^ "Bethmann Hollweg, Germany's War Aims". wwnorton.com. Retrieved 2020-04-23.
  39. ^ Manfred Weißbecker: German Fatherland Party, in Dieter Fricke et al .: Lexicon for party history. The bourgeois and petty-bourgeois parties and associations in Germany (1789–1945). Volume 2, Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig 1984, pp. 397.
  40. ^ Dempster 2006, p. 20.
  41. ^ Dempster 2006, pp. 19, 21.
  42. ^ Zolling, Hermann;
    LCCN 71187140
    . Retrieved 9 December 2021. Wherever Nicolai saw morale threatened, wherever he sensed a desire for peace, he went into the attack. He was behind the formation of the Fatherland Party with its chauvinistic and reactionary programme of conquest [...].
  43. .
  44. ^ Hagenlücke, 1997, p. 164.
  45. .
  46. .
  47. ^ Dempster 2006, pp. 16–17.
  48. .
  49. ^ Geoff Eley, op.cit., p.VII
  50. .
  51. ^ Weißbecker, Manfred. German Fatherland Party, p. 397.
  52. ^ Hofmeister, 2011, pp. 128, 489.
  53. ^ Stegmann, Dirk (1972) Between Repression and Manipulation: Conservative Power Elites and Workers 'and Employees' Movement 1910–1918. A contribution to the prehistory of the DAP / NSDAP, in: Archiv für Sozialgeschichte, Vol. 12, pp. 351-432.

Bibliography

External links