Gheorghe Pintilie
Gheorghe Pintilie | |
---|---|
Great National Assembly | |
In office March 1948 – November 1952 | |
Constituency | Ialomița County |
Personal details | |
Born | Panteley Timofiy Bodnarenko November 9, 1902 Tiraspol, Kherson Governorate, Russian Empire |
Died | August 11, 1985 Bucharest, Socialist Republic of Romania | (aged 82)
Resting place | Ghencea Cemetery, Bucharest |
Nationality | Russian (1902–1917) Soviet Russian (1918–1922) Soviet (1922–1944) Romanian (1944–1985) |
Political party | Romanian Communist Party (1940s–1968) |
Other political affiliations | Komsomol (1920s) People's Democratic Front (1948) |
Spouse | Ana Toma |
Children | Radu Pintilie Ioana Constantin |
Occupation | Locksmith, spy, bodyguard, assassin, torturer |
Awards | Star of the People's Republic, Second Class (1948) Ordinul Muncii, First Class (1949) August 23 Order, Third Class (1959) Order of Tudor Vladimirescu, Second Class (1971) |
Signature | |
Nickname | Pantiușa |
Military service | |
Allegiance | Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic Soviet Union Kingdom of Romania Romanian People's Republic |
Branch/service | |
Years of service | ca. 1920–1963 |
Rank | Lieutenant General (Romania) |
Battles/wars | Russian Civil War World War II Anti-guerilla operations |
Gheorghe Pintilie (born Panteley Timofiy Bodnarenko,[1] Ukrainian: Пантелей Тимофій Боднаренко; also rendered as Pintilie Bodnarenco, nicknamed Pantiușa; November 9, 1902 – August 21, 1985) was a Soviet and Romanian intelligence agent and political assassin, who served as first head of the Securitate (1948–1958). Born as a subject of the Russian Empire in Tiraspol, he was briefly employed as a manual laborer, and trained as a locksmith, before joining the Red Army cavalry and seeing action in the Russian Civil War. The NKVD shortlisted him for espionage missions in the 1920s, and in 1928 sent him on for such clandestine work in the Kingdom of Romania. Bodnarenko was apprehended there some nine years later, and sentenced to a twenty-years' imprisonment. While at Doftana, he became the ringleader of imprisoned Soviet spies, together with whom he joined the Romanian Communist Party (PCR). He expressed his loyalty toward Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, the jailed communist and emerging factional leader; their tight political camaraderie lasted into the late 1950s.
Staging a walk-out from
In engineering the DGSP, General Pintilie surrounded himself with men of working-class origin, who became notorious for their brutality, but also their overall incompetence—particularly in dealing with the
Pushed into full retirement during the anti-Soviet backlash of 1963, Pintilie then watched as Gheorghiu-Dej's posthumous successor, Nicolae Ceaușescu, proceeded to expose some of the crimes committed by Securitate personnel in previous decades. He cooperated in the investigation, openly discussing some of his individual crimes, but was never questioned regarding his involvement in mass purges; the only repercussions he faced were political, leading to his expulsion from the PCR in 1968. Though his wife Ana Toma was allowed a return to the forefront of political life, Pintilie himself lived the remainder of his life in relative obscurity. The Ceaușescu regime still bestowed him with the Order of Tudor Vladimirescu, and granted him military honors upon his death in 1985.
Biography
Youth and imprisonment
According to a 2005 piece by historian
The Bodnarenkos were from
A late rumor recorded by dissident communist Belu Zilber notes that young Bodnarenko specialized in murdering enemies of Budyonny "by his own hand".[15] Tatiana Pauker-Brătescu, who was acquainted with Bodnarenko in the late 1940s, recalls him being "a sinister figure": "To what measure, we got to see during one of his drunken exploits. He recounted then that, as a young man in the Komsomol, he would go after the kulaks, and was informed that priests were having meetings out in the steppe, in some pit-house. He got there in no time—this was in the Ukraine—and I don't know if he ever summoned them to get out, but in any case he covered the pit-house in earth and killed them by suffocation."[16] Deletant also writes: "According to one source, the October Revolution brought to the surface a sadistic streak which characterised his direction of the Securitate after 1948."[17]
In the early 1920s,[18] the Soviet NKVD recruited "Pantiușa" for espionage and sabotage actions. From 1924[19] or 1925,[2] he was directed toward his native Tiraspol, which was serving as capital for the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Upon arriving there, he was trained to carry out subversion in the neighboring Kingdom of Romania. The NKVD finally sent him across the Romanian border in 1928,[20] when he crossed the Dniester into Bessarabia using falsified Romanian identity papers.[2][21] Upon his 1940s reinvention as "Gheorghe Pintilie", his official biographies claimed that he was active in Bucharest throughout the early 1930s, helping to rally workers for the Grivița strike of 1933. The Romanian Kingdom's intelligence service, or Siguranța, caught up with him by 1937, when he was arrested.[2][22] Bodnarenko faced trial as an enemy agent, his defense reportedly arranged by Ion Gheorghe Maurer, a left-leaning attorney.[4] He was sentenced to 20 years in prison.[23]
Bodnarenko was incarcerated at the Doftana together with others who were held on similar charges (of whom he remained the "most important")[24]—but also with activists of the outlawed Romanian Communist Party (PCR). While in confinement there, Bodnarenko befriended Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, who was to become the PCR General Secretary in 1944.[25] He was subsequently moved to Văcărești Prison, on the outskirts of Bucharest.[2][26] During most of World War II, when Romania was allied with Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union, both Gheorghiu-Dej and Bodnarenko were held in Caransebeș Prison. Here, "Pantiușa" convinced most Soviet convicts to follow Gheorghiu-Dej's directives and join the PCR as regular members.[27] Gheorghiu-Dej and Iosif Chișinevschi became Pintilie's close friends, assigning him the task of identifying and eliminating informants from within PCR cells.[28] As Oprea notes: "he instilled in Dej a pathological fear of provocateurs, as well as an admiration for the potential and means available to a secret police agency."[2]
In early 1944, the authorities took decisions which further divided the party cells—Gheorghiu-Dej and others were sent to a camp in Târgu Jiu. An eyewitness account by political scientist Pavel Câmpeanu (who was then a young PCR cadre serving time at Caransebeș), Bodnarenko and Chișinevschi became junior leaders of the Caransebeș group, second only to Teohari Georgescu.[29] The anti-German coup of August 23, partly organized by Gheorghiu-Dej's military adviser Emil Bodnăraș, took the communist cells into the open; this was shortly after Bodnăraș had deposed and kidnapped the PCR General Secretary, Ștefan Foriș. As reported by Câmpeanu, Bodnarenko and Georgescu organized the inmates' march out of the unguarded prison on August 24, and then headed with them by train, to Bucharest. According to this account, Bodnarenko resisted attempts to have Câmpeanu negotiate the terms with the Romanian Railways staff, appointing instead Bercu Feldman as PCR representative.[30] Câmpeanu then places the future General Pintilie among the paramilitaries manning the PCR front Apărarea Patriotică in Bucharest's Obor neighborhood, during the final days of August;[31] officially, his function was recorded as "Chief of Service No 1 (guarding of buildings and dignitaries)".[32] Bodnarenko was then assigned to the Patriotic Combat Formations (FLP), which answered directly to Bodnăraș. He was second in command for the FLP's Fifth Section, directly under Simion Bernachi.[33] The unit was armed with old carbines, sent over by Colonel Victor Precup.[34]
Communist rise
The end of World War II enshrined the Soviet occupation of Romania and the communists' infiltration into the Kingdom's governing institutions. During this process, in 1949,[35] Bodnarenko was one of the many PCR cadres who chose new surnames which were meant to conceal their ethnic origins. Like his future Securitate colleague Serghei Nicolau (Nikonov), he opted for Romanianization; their Jewish subordinate, Boris Grünberg, preferred a Russian-sounding name, "Alexandru Nicolschi".[36] Bodnarenko's victim, lawyer-diarist Petre Pandrea, alleges that, by picking out his new surname, the future Securitate chief wanted to pass as a relative of the PCR's hero-activist, Ilie Pintilie.[5] It corresponds with Bodnarenko's earlier first name, Panteley, both being derived from Saint Pantaleon; Pintilie is most common in the Maramureș and Moldavian dialects of Romanian.[37]
Despite his apparent assimilation, Pintilie had a hard time mastering the Romanian vernacular, and is described by political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu as agramat ("semi-literate").[38] A Securitate subordinate, Gheorghe Crăciun, found his Romanian to be "broken and vulgar";[39] or, as Deletant writes: "Those who knew him commented on his [...] heavily-Russian-accented Romanian, coloured with expletives."[40] Troncotă adds that: "Pintilie never mastered the Romanian language, maintaining no links with the Romanian people's way of life, its interests, or its aspirations. His entire work was in serving Soviet interests in Romania, which is to say in undermining Romanian economic, political and military life".[41]
As early as October 1944, Pintilie-Bodnarenko and Nicolschi-Grünberg were assigned by the occupation authorities to lead a Romanian chapter of SMERSH counter-intelligence, whose activity remained classified.[42] As noted by Oprea, Dmitri Fedichkin of the First Chief Directorate also made Pintilie his direct assistant, thereby establishing the Soviet MGB in a position of power over Romanian police agencies.[2] From March 1945, Pintilie was assigned to the Siguranța, which Bodnăraș had proceeded to communize.[43] His takeover there ran parallel to a mass trail of the old Siguranța leadership, resulting in either imprisonment or execution for all those appearing in court.[44]
From 1945 to August 1948,[45] Pintilie was also at the helm of the Central Committee's Political and Administrative Office. While here, he prepared a transition from the old-regime Siguranța to a new, fully communized structure, the Securitate.[46] He personally oversaw a money laundering system, which saw the Siguranța dumping gold on the black market, then transferring it toward the PCR.[47] Pintilie was seconded and succeeded at the PCR Office by Alexandru Drăghici, who also continued Pintilie's work in verifying the loyalties of PCR cadres.[48] Troncotă additionally notes that this specialized position made Pintilie the éminence grise of inner-party "conflicts and intrigues".[49] Alexandru Bârlădeanu, who also enjoyed Gheorghiu-Dej's confidence, made the following assessment: "In his line of work [Bodnarenko] was held to be a very honest man. Honest in that he only did what was asked of him. He never took any initiative, since these would've looked like intrigues, on that level of his. Chișinevschi was the opposite. Here's why Dej trusted Pantiușa, who only did things if so ordered by a superior."[50]
Pintilie himself reminisced that, in early 1945, Gheorghiu-Dej was visibly irritated by the charismatic PCR man Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu, whom he called "that swine".[51] A more urgent task was in neutralizing the Foriș faction—as allegedly reported by "Pantiușa", the Soviet embassy wanted Foriș to disappear before the Allied Commission could hear his story.[6] Bodnarenko's rise was accelerated in summer 1946, when, along with his driver Dumitru Neciu, he kidnapped Foriș. Various accounts suggest that he then beat Foriș to death with a crowbar,[2][6][10][52][53] though Câmpeanu credits Neciu as the actual killer.[54] The Neciu–Pintilie team is also responsible for two other similar murders, which occurred in the aftermath of Foriș's, with the three bodies buried together at the same compound in Dorobanți.[6][55] Various authors also implicate Pintilie in the murder of Foriș's mother by a Siguranța team in Oradea,[56] though at least one researcher, Doina Jela, notes that the account may be inexact.[57]
Also in 1946, Pintilie married Ana Grossman-Toma, noted for her wartime activities with the PCR underground; she had previously been married (or romantically linked) to Constantin Pîrvulescu, and then to Sorin Toma.[2][58] Ana, who kept her second husband's name, became a highly visible asset of the PCR's agitprop section, where she worked under Leonte Răutu.[59] They emerged as a power couple, noted for having equal access to both Gheorghiu-Dej and his rival Ana Pauker.[38][60] Reportedly, Toma spied on Pauker for Dej, making use of her regular presence in Pauker's intimate circle (which saw her ironing Pauker's dresses).[61] Both Gheorghe and Ana were directly involved in helping Pauker's father Herș Rabinsohn to embark on a Jewish migrant ship bound for Mandatory Palestine—the event was kept secret from others in the party leadership.[62]
Several historians, who see Ana Toma as an MGB asset, propose that she either spied on her husband[63] or existed as a supervising link between the MGB and Pintilie's offices in national security.[64] Câmpeanu recalls that they formed a "bizarrely non-homogeneous couple", beyond their shared dislike for Foriș. Ana Toma had a Jewish-and-bourgeois background, being congenial, adaptable, and intelligent; Pintilie, meanwhile, was "structurally dogmatic, primitive, obtuse, [...] as inflexible as he was dull."[65] Crăciun found that Pintilie's qualities were reduced to his being "slick" and "entertaining in that way circus clowns are". His main focus, Crăciun contends, was on lying by omission, and on formulating sentences that could mean two things at the same time.[66] By contrast, a report compiled in March 1950 by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs characterized Pintilie as "very gifted and intelligent".[67]
DGSP creation
Documentarist
In tandem, Bodnăraș appointed Pintilie as head of the Securitate's General Directorate (DGSP), where he took over on August 30, 1948 (after a formal appointment on August 15).
Among the scholars, Liviu Pleșa argues that the appointment was part of a deliberate move to infiltrate security structures with known Soviet spies—including not just Pintilie and Bodnăraș, but also Nicolau, Nicolschi, Vladimir Mazuru, and Lucian Stupineanu.[81] According to historian Adrian Cioroianu, several of these figures, including Pintilie, were not just reactivated spies, but also registered officers of the MGB;[82] Neagu Cosma, at one point the head of Securitate's Counterintelligence Directorate, found that "under Pantiușa and Nicolschi, there were hundreds of other NKVD men, occupying all supervising offices, and quite a few of the executive offices".[83] Pintilie himself credited such notions, reporting that Soviet intrusion had come to be seen as a problem by Nicolau himself, who rebelled against his handlers. He also noted that Gheorghiu-Dej never followed up on Nicolau's reports; according to Pintilie, Nicolau was punished by the Soviets "in some way that remained between them".[84]
Pintilie, Nicolschi and Mazuru, as the very first Securitate triumvirate,[85] were originally involved in greatly increasing the Securitate's personnel, taking on 2,600 new recruits in March 1949. At the time, Pintilie took personal pride in noting that most were working-class men, who "hadn't yet learned how to hold a pen with their hand".[86] The trend was undermined by many resignations, or by cases in which officers never showed up for active duty.[87] Recruitment was finally curbed in early 1950, when the biographical records submitted by the new arrivals were reconsidered. Pintilie led this effort, suggesting that "ever-greater vigilance" was required when vetting new admissions, so that "class enemies will have no way of entering our ranks, or that they be discovered just in case they do".[88] Meanwhile, he kept informed about the round-up of former Romanian Police cadres, including old prison guards. By September 1949, 870 of them had been sent to Târgșor Prison, where they maintained fervent (but unrealistic) beliefs about a coming American liberation of Romania.[89]
From September 15, 1949, Pintilie was also a junior minister at Internal Affairs.
Accolades received by General Pintilie included Ordinul Muncii, First Class, in 1949.[96] In late May 1952, shortly before taking over as Interior Minister, Drăghici deplored the ill-preparedness of Securitate officers, though also noting that Pintilie, "sent to us from the outside", was a laudable exception.[97] As the DGSP's junior Director of Inquiries, Tudor Dincă was disconcerted by his own staff's "frightful" linguistic and literary incompetence—however, as noted by historian Florian Banu, Pintilie displayed similar clumsiness, addressing his colleagues in ungrammatical sentences.[98] As recounted by one of the young Securitate cadres who underwent training during that year, Soviet advisers instructed them to view Pintilie as the organizational "father", showing them pictures of his face. The same source reports that meeting Pintilie in person was disappointing: speaking a language that was "archaic, uneducated, riddled with vulgarities", he also looked "prematurely aged" by chain-smoking and continuously binging on vodka, never going home to his wife before 2 AM.[99] Rumor had it that the Lieutenant General had once commandeered a boxcar-load of Plugar cigarettes for his personal use.[2]
Pushing for atrocities
According to various accounts, Pintilie was by then tasked with carrying out some of the major terror campaigns and political purges that reshaped Romanian society between 1948 and 1964. In 1950, shortly after taking over as junior minister, he signed Order 100, which established a nation-wide system of labor camps, designed to "
Ion Mihai Pacepa, the Securitate spy master and anti-communist defector, reflects that: "Pantiușa's signature was enough grounds for authorizing the Securitate to arrest any person, to confiscate assets, to deport, to sentence, to execute any person that they labeled a 'counterrevolutionary'. Pantiușa's two subordinates could send anyone into the labor camps." He notes that Pintilie countersigned most deportations on the Danube–Black Sea Canal, as well as the "infamous judicial travesties [...] that have seen the near-liquidation of the Romanian intelligentsia".[102] The Lieutenant General put in place a commission which both proposed and reviewed terms of imprisonment in the labor camps, on a weekly basis, resulting in the geographic "dislocation" of some 11,000 "undesirables" during 1952–1953.[103] In July 1952, after consulting with Nicolschi, Pintilie issued arrest warrants for 417,916 people (some of whom were no longer alive or present in the country); over 130,000 of these were solely targeted for their membership in religious organizations, while 100,000 more were divided between the old regime's political parties.[104]
Prosecutor Grigore Răduică reported in 1992 that he considered Pintilie "responsible for many a crime", including the sending of thousands to do work on the Canal;[6] Pacepa sees him as guilty for the deaths in custody of some 50,000 people.[102] Colonel Ilie Bădică, who was tasked with supervising the labor colonies, claimed in 1968 that improving the living standards of inmates was disallowed by "comrade Pintilie, [...] who said that, if a warden ever gave good food to his prisoners, then he might as well be colluding with the class enemy."[105] One record of the Georgescu–Pintilie conversations sees the latter reporting that scores of people had been arrested "just because we needed to take their homes."[106] Such criminal lassitude was sometimes curbed by the PCR leadership. Also in 1952, Pintilie reluctantly staged a round-up among the staff of the Canal labor camps, arresting eight leading figures of the dedicated Securitate branch.[107] These figures were then tried for their abuses against political prisoners, which helped to document the crimes for posterity. In 1955, a military tribunal handed out 32 prison sentences, including for 21 high-ranking officers. Drăghici had them pardoned within the year, and Pintilie added his weight, ordering that they be reinstated and granted an expense-free vacation.[108]
Faced with an increase in the cases of armed anti-communist resistance, Georgescu, Pintilie, and the other figures at Internal Affairs initially relied on input from the regular police force, or Miliția. In March 1949, they assigned some missions to Eugen Alimănescu, already famous for his wanton killings of criminal suspects. Alimănescu then proceeded to execute anti-communist "bandits" held in custody, including some who had served under Ion Uță and Nicolae Dabija.[109] Alongside Nicolschi, Avram Bunaciu, and others, Pintilie also personally handled the one-week-long trial of Spiru Blănaru, who had assisted Uță in Teregova.[110] The Lieutenant General eventually organized a Singular Command of the Securitate to deal with resistance groups, staffing it with figures such as Pavel Aranici, Ristea Ciuchici, and Spiridon Coman.[111] During March 1950, at the peak of the "Tito–Stalin split", he introduced speculation that the resistance groups of Timișoara Region were being propped up by a Yugoslav network, and that the Securitate's failures in untangling this conspiracy suggested its own infiltration by the "Titoists".[112] In early 1951, he extended the "dislocation" policy to those areas, deporting some 44,000 locals, including children, to the inland Bărăgan Plain.[113]
Pintilie also implicated the Securitate in the more violent aspects of land collectivization, particularly after the Securitate and Miliția were called upon to contain peasant revolts. On August 31, 1949, he organized a meeting of all regional Securitate leaders "in order to instruct them about how to reduce repressive intervention in the villages and take appropriate measures to resolve tensions."[114] In this context, Pintilie acknowledged that some arrests made by the Securitate were based on "imaginary charges", and asked his agents to cease arresting "disorganized inimical elements", unless the latter persisted in their opposition.[115] In July 1950, the Securitate of Cluj County cited its "immediate tasks", as outlined by the Lieutenant General, including "the sound completion of [grain] collecting."[116] As recounted in October by Major Mihail Kovács, who had shot down five peasants near Luduș, "Comrade Minister Pintilie said that we should spare no effort for the timely discovery of conspiracies by the chiaburi against collective farms and yards".[117]
Brainwashing experiment
At the same time, Pintile began highlighting the importance of establishing an informants' network, advising his men that delators were to a Securitate officer "what a razor is to the barber".[118] This directive had an unintended outcome, as various Securitate agents began torturing the potential informants into compliance; Pintilie intervened to stop the practice.[119] In February 1952, he also noted that bribing sources from the "Special Informative Expenses Fund" presented another particular challenge: Securitate cadres preferred to continue with torture, embezzling the bribes for their own benefit. In one such case, presented for his review, high-ranking Securitate officials in Stalin Region had spent Fund money on "partying and personal affairs".[120] The Lieutenant General had relied on Saxon informants and collaborators for bringing the Evangelical Augustan Church, which was geographically folded within the Stalin Region, into the PCR orbit. This led to a kompromat operation against the Saxon bishop, Friedrich Müller, which nonetheless failed to impress his congregation.[121]
One of Pintilie and Nicolschi's main pursuits was a round-up and annihilation of a fascist underground movement, the Iron Guard. According to historian Mihai Demetriade, Securitate leaders felt personally insulted in noting that the interwar Siguranța had "proven success" when it came to untangling Guardist networks.[122] From 1949, Pintilie had insisted on the need to infiltrate Guardist cells formed within Romania's prisons, asking Major Ion Nemeș, and then Lieutenant Colonel Tudor Sepeanu, to oversee the operation on his behalf.[123] As he put in one of his speeches, he knew from personal experience as a prisoner that inmates could and did organize in such a way as to undermine a government.[124] Various researchers identify Pintilie as wholly or partly to blame for the Pitești Experiment, which had exposed political prisoners to crude brainwashing techniques, leaving many dead in its wake. Demetriade describes a "Pintilie method", which consisted in "breaking apart and compromising" the anti-communist cells through the activity of prisoners who had embraced the regime. He credits such guidelines with engendering a spiral of violence, cruelty, and eventually slaughter.[125]
Pintilie took personal credit for the earliest, least violent, form of the experiment, which took place in Suceava. He was not satisfied with the results, since the prison population there was too diverse, and not likely to respond identically to the stimuli. It was Pintilie who decided that the "method" needed to be applied in a penitentiary where youths, and specifically far-right students, could form the majority; he therefore handled the transfer of prisoners to Pitești.[126] Former prisoner Georghe Boldur-Lățescu alleges that both Pintilie and Nicolschi were "directly or indirectly in contact" with the Guardsman-turned-communist Eugen Țurcanu, asking him to "impress 'reeducation' into a new format, which would be based on violence." This new stage was inaugurated on Christmas Day 1949, when Țurcanu's men and the prison guards "savagely beat up" disobedient inmates, while "making sure not to kill anyone."[127] In February 1950, Țurcanu's beatings produced their first fatality, the 22-year-old Corneliu Niță. As confessed by Major Nemeș, both Pintilie and Nicolschi were immediately informed of this, but never intervened to reprimand Țurcanu.[128] Troncotă likewise notes that the experiment was made possible when the DGSP director informed his peers that his only focus would be on "unmasking" and "reeducating" anti-communists, especially those who had been in the Iron Guard; he explicitly noted that he would spare no interest for the methods used to accomplish this goal.[129]
According to Demetriade, this ambiguity allowed the Guardists to revert on their own experiences of political strife: they had learned from their leaders a set of violent methods to use against "traitors" of the Guardist cause, which they now used and amplified against those who still resisted communism.[130] Pintilie's own communist optimism had it that prisoners undergoing "reeducation" would act not only as witnesses for the prosecution, but also as active instigators of investigations, who would go out of their way to expose enemies of the regime.[131] He allowed the atrocities to take place by not providing Nemeș and his team with any restrictive guidelines until early 1951. The set of rules that was supposedly introduced at the time does not survive in any copy.[132] Sepeanu candidly noted that he never received written instructions from either Pintilie or Nicolschi, but also confirmed that "Mr Junior Minister Pintilie" was always his immediate supervisor.[133]
In the power struggles
Throughout his tenure at the DGSP, Pintilie maintained a role in stifling inner-party opposition, involving himself in the resulting intrigues. As early as 1949, he and Nicolschi had reputedly wiretapped the phone lines used by PCR eminences, including Gheorghiu-Dej.[134] In 1950, Pintilie and Ghizela Vass joined Iosif Rangheț's panel, which investigated the communist orthodoxy of Spanish Civil War veterans. As he noted later on, that project was almost immediately brought to a halt by Teohari Georgescu and Pauker, who thought that the "very suspect" Rangheț was mounting a witch-hunt.[135] Others suggest that Pintilie himself was relatively lenient toward other party cadres, especially when his former lawyer, Ion Gheorghe Maurer, who had joined the PCR as a Gheorghiu-Dej devotee, expressed his qualms about following Soviet directives. According to Maurer's own reports, he was subsequently slated for liquidation by the MGB, and "Pantiușa" was ordered to fabricate a show trial. The project never took off: "Pantiușa Bodnarenko [...] loved me quite a lot [...]. When he got drunk, for he was one hell of a drinker, he would come by my place and cry on my shoulder. Quite a lot of time was wasted on this".[4]
Pintilie, alongside a team of Soviet advisors, had also been tasked with organizing the show trial of Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu and of his intimate circle of disciples.[136] This project began in the final months of 1947, when Bodnarenko informed Pyotr Fedotov, who led the Soviets' Committee of Information, that Pătrășcanu was hampering "Romania's advance toward communism", "using his position at the Ministry of Justice to protect the leaders of opposition parties."[137] Such allegations formed part of a report he sent to the MGB in March 1948.[2] The Pintilie–Fedotov exchange was closely followed by Petre Pandrea's arrest in 1948. According to Pandrea himself, the matter upset other Securitate men—including Mișu Dulgheru, who wanted Pandrea, described by him as a "progressive democrat", to walk free. Dulgheru reportedly confessed that Pintilie personally ensured that such a measure would not be effected.[5]
As the operation unfolded, Pintilie was on hand to personally arrest Pătrășcanu, and then ensured that interrogator Ioan Șoltuț could work on his victims in a "special area" that was completely cut off from the outside world.[138] As Pintilie himself reported, by 1949 he had secured approval from Soviet advisers, including Aleksandr Sakharovsky, to deal with Gheorghiu-Dej's enemies in an exemplary manner.[139] According to another member of the Gheorghiu-Dej circle, Gheorghe Apostol, the affair was entirely masterminded by Drăghici and "Pantiușa, the former Soviet spy".[140] Such claims were dismissed by Pintilie himself, who noted that "some comrades in the party leadership" had moved to tone down Dej's zeal: unlike him, they argued that there was little to connect Pătrășcanu with other PCR dissidents into a conspiracy. In a private conversation with Cristina Boico, Pintilie clarified that "some comrades" meant Pauker and her group.[141] Once Pauker had been sidelined, the trial could grow to implicate various other former communists. As reported by Georgescu, the Securitate heads, including Pintilie and Dulgheru, were still quietly opposed to these developments, now "convinced that we had absolutely nothing" on Pătrășcanu.[142]
Pintilie himself attempted to intervene on behalf on one victim,
A number of authors note that Pintilie played a direct part in Gheorghiu-Dej's orchestrated attack on Pauker and Vasile Luca, which saw the latter two sidelined, then persecuted.[10][38][149] In a 2001 interview, Pleșiță claims that Pauker's fall contributed in enshrining Gheorghiu-Dej's already great respect for "Pantiușa", who "was not a hundred percent the Russian asset".[10] One other account suggests that Pintilie openly celebrated Pauker's fall, which he reportedly greeted with the words: "Those kikes have been sabotaging our country!"[2] Dulgheru, who was also brought down and sent to jail during the attack on Pauker, remembers that "Pantiușa" had a dual role: though he participated in framing Dulgheru, he wanted no part in the "swindle" (potlogării) affecting Pauker.[150] Drăghici owed his appointment as minister to another ramification of the scandal, which touched Georgescu in 1953. The latter was imprisoned, and confessed to having raped his secretaries and taken a fortune in bribes, but was ultimately released in 1955 and sent to work as a clerk.[151] Luca was the most aggrieved by the fabrication, as a subject of "physical constraints" that included being beaten with an iron rod. As later confessed by his torturers and his co-defendants, his mistreatment had been ordered by Drăghici and by "Soviet advisers", rather than by Pintilie.[152]
In September 1952, Dej had segregated the Securitate from other police agencies, placing it under its own Ministry, and securing his own sweeping powers of that structure.[153] As suggested by Pintilie, Nicolschi, and other members of a review board, it grew to absorb the last independent remnant of the Siguranța—Nicolau's Special Information Service, a counterintelligence unit.[154] The DGSP, now known as DGSS, could rely on 55,000 armed personnel in 1953, with its civilian apparatus increased from 5,000 in 1950 to 19,000 in 1956.[155] In February of that year, Pintilie's commission had extended the maximum legal term for penal servitude to five years, from a previous two.[156] In November 1953, Pintilie and the other junior minister, Ion Vincze, assigned seven Securitate battalions and 50 police dogs to Colonel Coloman Ambruș, for the single purpose of hunting down Ion Gavrilă Ogoranu and his anti-communist guerillas hiding out in the Făgăraș Mountains. The display of force was largely futile, and Ogoranu was still free to engage in hit-and-run tactics during 1954.[157]
Political isolation
The 1952–1954 period marked a reaffirmation of
Writing in 2016, Tismăneanu similarly argued that Pintilie was personally involved in assessing the results of "reeducational" torture; the same author notes that evidence regarding his involvement was not yet available, as much had been "carefully removed" by the perpetrators themselves.[38] Țurcanu and 15 other torturer-inmates were sentenced to death in late 1954, but, as Boldur-Lățescu writes, "the real culprits", Pintilie included, "were never investigated, sanctioned, or sentenced by a penal court."[163] Writer Niculae Gheran, who relies on things heard from a political prisoner, defines Nicolschi and Pintilie as the "stage directors" of the experiment, claiming that the two kept photographs and magnetic tapes showing the results, to replicate if needed.[164] George Pavel Vuza, who served as Deputy Prosecutor General in 1954–1958, recalls that Pintilie and General Gheorghe Bucșan had ordered him to perform an investigation into the various penal facilities. The document he produced in March 1955 described in some detail the poor hygiene, failure to provide basic healthcare, and "miserable food", placing blame for all these on Drăghici; Gheorghiu-Dej took notice, asking for remedial action to be put in motion.[165]
Though he lost his seat on the Central Committee on December 28, 1955, the regime still honored the Lieutenant General, who received the Medal of Labor in 1956, and the
The intended target of Apostol's critique replied with notional
Pintilie is tentatively identified as "Comrade Penteleev", who, in March 1958, hosted in Bucharest a meeting of Eastern Bloc security services, which is only attested through a report made by Mircho Spasov (from the Bulgarian Committee for State Security).[173] By November, he had intensified Securitate links with the KGB, the Polish Security Service, and other European communist agencies, asking them for reports on the Romanian diaspora, and considering plans for intelligence sharing.[174] As reported by Pintilie himself, Drăghici was incensed by the "leniency and superficiality" displayed by Securitate cadres from the Magyar Autonomous Region, who had failed to anticipate any local ramifications of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956.[175] At the time, "Pantiușa" was allegedly preparing for a purge of the Hungarian minority, producing a list of some thousand ethnic-Hungarian intellectuals who were to be placed in pre-trial detention. His attempt was blocked by János Fazekas, a Hungarian member of the PCR Central Committee.[176] From July 1, 1958, Pintilie also resumed his campaign against religious dissidence, this time by targeting the Union of Seventh-day Adventists. On his recommendation, the Adventist leaders faced a kangaroo court which convicted them on false charges, allowing the Securitate to replace them with informants.[177]
As Gheorghiu-Dej embarked on a political feud with the new Soviet leader,
Pintilie was still a junior minister and active general until January 19, 1963,[183] when he was forced into retirement, collecting a special pension.[184] In March 1962, Gheorghiu-Dej had received a letter from the disgraced Georgescu, in which the latter alleged that Pintilie, always "hostile" toward Drăghici, had wanted to make Pauker head of the Special Information Service.[185] Upon reviewing the effects of Pintilie's removal during May 1963, Drăghici reported that the Soviet advisors had also become redundant: "They have had nothing to do since last year, they just sit in their offices and read the newspaper [...]. Back when Pintilie was around, they was [sic] sitting with him in his office and, wouldn't you know it, Pintilie fed them info. There, this is the situation currently, and my view is that we have no longer have any use for these advisers."[186]
Downfall
August 1963 saw the Romanian Politburo openly discussing ways to "neutralize those Soviet intelligence networks operating on Romania's territory, which Gheorghe Pintilie had coordinated."[187] Reportedly, in November the general secretary asked for, and obtained, a full record of Soviet agents operating in Romania, resulting in a list of 160 names. He then asked his loyalists, including Vasile Patilineț (who oversaw contacts between the Army and the PCR), to make sure that all those included on the list pledge themselves to the Romanian government, renouncing collaboration with the Soviets.[188] Nicolae Ceaușescu, who joined Patilineț's commission, reported that Pintilie's spying was confirmed as a matter of public record, and also that, despite the "hard times", the general continued seeing other Soviet agents, including Vasile Posteucă.[189] While her husband came under suspicion, Ana Toma kept her position in the Central Committee and the Ministry of Foreign Trade—but only to 1965, when Gheorghiu-Dej died. In the resulting reshuffle, she was sent to manage the National Union of Workers' Cooperatives (UCECOM).[190]
In April 1968, the new PCR leader Ceaușescu distanced himself from Gheorghiu-Dej's legacy by ordering an investigation into the Foriș's disappearance and Pătrășcanu's execution; this move also took aim at both Pintilie and Drăghici. That month, Pintilie and Șoltuț found themselves included on a list of Securitate operatives that had used "methods of physical coercion against party members under investigation".[191] According to Foriș's grandson Ștefan Sîrbu, just ahead of the more complex investigation, his family received a nocturnal phone-call from "Pantiușa", who "had gone insane". In confessing to the murder, Pintilie also confirmed to the Forișes that their patriarch was no longer alive, as they had never been explicitly informed that this was the case.[52]
In the ensuing rehabilitation process of his victims, Pintilie underwent interrogations by a PCR commission. He spoke about his criminal past, and, though he justified himself through his perfect obedience to the party line, he also admitted that some killings reflected his own "convictions".[192] As Sîrbu notes, documents of the interrogation show that Pintilie had rescinded his earlier confession, and was placing full blame for the Foriș killing on his "Russian driver, who had since escaped from the country."[52] As a member of the investigation team, Răduică reported that, in an oral statement, "Pantiușa" again confessed to being Foriș's first-hand executioner.[6] The definitive confession provided by Pintilie acknowledged that the roles had been distributed as follows: "My driver hit him over the head, just one hit [...] I dug the pit myself, I handled all of that [...]. It was both of us who killed [Foriș and the other two]".[193]
Also that year, Ceaușescu made a show of his opposition to the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, and prepared the Romanian population for resisting one such punitive incursion. Mihai Viorel Țibuleac, who was part of Ceaușescu's security detail during these events, reports that: "Each and every party session had discussions concerning Pantelei Bodnarenko, or Pantiușa, as a traitor to this country, one who was greatly detrimental for Romania."[194] Upon the end of the crisis, although formally sidelined and expelled from the party ranks,[38][195] Pintilie still received the occasional honor. One such situation came in 1971, when he was awarded the Tudor Vladimirescu Order, Second Class.[2][38][196] Those acknowledged in the same manner included Ana Toma, as well as dramatist Aurel Baranga; the latter's presence allowed for the circulation of a malicious pun, referring to the ceremony as Ranga și Baranga ("The Crowbar-anga").[38][197] As noted by Jela, this popular joke, "worthy of the history books", should be credited to Jean Coller, a second-rank PCR cadre "who appears to have also been decorated that day".[198]
According to Apostol's hostile account, the gesture was Ceaușescu's way of thanking Pintilie for not having implicated him in Dejist crimes.[199] Overall, none of the disgraced Securitate men were ever subject to a "criminal investigation into their past and there was not much investigation into the abused done against ordinary citizens either."[200] As reported by historian Nicoleta Ionescu-Gură, Pintilie was shielded from prosecution by the expiring statute of limitations.[201] Another historian, Ioan C. Popa, writes that, in the period after 1968, "some of [Pintilie's] former comrades" attempted to "diminish his responsibility and to have him viewed as a 'mere executor' of orders received from above."[202] This ambiguous status was also underscored when his wife remained a favorite of Elena Ceaușescu, who insisted that she be recognized as belonging to the most prestigious class of women in the nomenklatura.[203]
"Neither completely annihilated nor entirely forgiven", beginning in 1979 the Securitate general found himself placed under constant surveillance by his former subordinates.
The Pintilies had two adoptive children: Radu, who died at some point in the late 1970s or early 1980s, and Ioana, who trained as an architect and settled in Israel.
Câmpeanu suggests that, like Georgescu, Pintilie was Dej's man within the "forces of repression", helping the Caransebeș prison faction (rather than the larger PCR) establish full control over Romania.[213] As rated by Tismăneanu, Bodnarenko and Nicolschi were "Soviet spies", whose cooperation with Dej remains key in understanding how the Securitate and state terrorism could emerge in Romania.[214] He argues: "Communist crimes were carried out by real-life humans (if we may call them humans). Pantiușa was one of these great criminals."[38] In a 2010 interview, Ioana Pintilie (married Constantin) defended her adoptive father and mother against such verdicts: "it hurts me that people who had known these two folks never wrote so much as a phrase about there being some humanity to them".[215]
Notes
- ^ Popa, p. 38
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s (in Romanian) Marius Oprea, "Pișa-ne-am pe mormîntul lor (portrete de securiști). Pintilie Gheorghe", in Tiuk!, Issue 9, 2005
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 302
- ^ a b c (in Romanian) Marius Oprea, "Omenește vorbind, eu am iubit trei lucruri: femeile, vînătoarea și vinurile bune". Un interviu inedit cu Ion Gheorghe Maurer realizat de istoricul Marius Oprea, Mediafax, October 16, 2019
- ^ ISBN 978-973-645-440-0
- ^ a b c d e f Grigore Răduică, "Ecouri la 'cazul' grupului Pătrășcanu. Crima din sediul Comitetului Central", in Magazin Istoric, May 1992, p. 42
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 183
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, pp. 38–39; Cioroianu, p. 44; Deletant (2005), pp. 302, 326; Dobre et al., p. 471; Jela, p. 48
- ^ Troncotă, p. 239
- ^ a b c d e (in Romanian) Viorel Patrichi, Nicolae Pleșiță, "Politică și servicii secrete. Informatori din convingere", in Lumea, Issue 1/2001
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Popa, p. 38. See also Deletant (2005), p. 326
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471. See also Deletant (2005), p. 326
- ^ Popa, p. 38; Troncotă, p. 239
- ^ Troncotă, p. 239
- ^ (in Romanian) Lavinia Betea, "Exclusiv — Fiica 'tovarășei Ana'", in Jurnalul Național, November 16, 2005
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 326
- ^ Popa, p. 38
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Popa, p. 38; Troncotă, pp. 239–240
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Deletant (2005), pp. 326–327; Popa, p. 38
- ^ Jela, p. 48; Popa, p. 38
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 105
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 226; Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 43, 105
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Câmpeanu, pp. 54–55, 59
- ^ Troncotă, p. 240. See also Jela, p. 48
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 68
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 40
- ^ Câmpeanu, pp. 39–43
- ^ Șiperco, p. 178
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 158; Șiperco, p. 178
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 158
- ^ Jela, p. 48
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 183. See also Deletant (2005), p. 286–287
- OCLC 895133413
- ^ Radio Free Europe(Moldova), December 13, 2016
- ^ Troncotă, p. 241
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 327
- ^ Troncotă, p. 240
- ^ Popa, p. 39
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, pp. 38–39. See also Deletant (2005), pp. 286–287; Hrițcu, p. 319
- ^ Popa, pp. 139–140
- ^ Deletant (2005), pp. 287, 327
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, pp. 38–39; Deletant (2005), p. 287; Pleșa, p. 24; Popa, p. 39; Troncotă, pp. 240, 246
- ^ Șiperco, pp. 186–187
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 324; Troncotă, p. 246. See also Popa, p. 39
- ^ Troncotă, p. 240
- ^ Mihalache, p. 180
- ^ Deletant (1994), p. 913
- ^ a b c (in Romanian) Lavinia Betea, Paula Mihailov Chiciuc, "Amintiri din comunism cu nepotul lui Foriș", in Jurnalul Național, March 8, 2008
- ^ Deletant (1994), p. 911 & (2005), p. 327; Dobre et al., p. 43; Jela, p. 48; Levy, p. 281; Mihalache, p. 191; Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 121, 297. See also Catalan & Stănescu, p. 39; Gheran, p. 470; Pleșa, p. 21; Popa, p. 139; Troncotă, p. 240
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 118
- ^ Jela, p. 48. See also Popa, p. 139
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, p. 39; Deletant (1994), p. 911 & (2005), p. 327; Gheran, p. 470; Popa, p. 139
- ^ Jela, pp. 48–49
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 119, 324, 343. See also Gheran, p. 470; Mihalache, p. 185
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 99
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 324–325, 343
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 324–325
- ^ Levy, p. 182
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, p. 39
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 327; Troncotă, pp. 241–242
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 146
- ^ Troncotă, p. 241
- ^ Troncotă, pp. 240–241
- ^ Hossu Longin, pp. 283–284
- ^ "Lista personalităților decorate cu 'Steaua Republicii Populare Române'", in Zori Noi, May 12, 1948, p. 4
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, p. 39
- ^ Dobre et al., pp. 21, 471. See also Deletant (2005), p. 327; Șiperco, p. 178
- ^ Popa, p. 41
- ^ "Numele deputaților aleși pentru Marea Adunare Națională", in Zori Noi, April 2, 1948, p. 3
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 287. See also Banu et al., p. 398; Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Pleșa, pp. 24, 50
- ^ Troncotă, p. 240. See also Demetriade, p. 38; Dobre et al., p. 471; Popa, p. 41; Șiperco, p. 178
- ^ Banu et al., p. 71
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 287
- ^ Deletant (2005), pp. 287, 291
- ^ Pleșa, pp. 14–16, 21
- ^ Cioroianu, p. 44
- ^ Troncotă, p. 250
- ^ Pleșa, p. 16
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, pp. 39–40; Cioroianu, p. 44; Deletant (2005), p. 287; Popa, p. 41
- ^ Pleșa, pp. 26–27
- ^ Pleșa, p. 33
- ^ Pleșa, p. 37
- ^ (in Romanian) Mihai Pelin, "Structurile de poliție și informative", in Jurnalul Național, May 25, 2005
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471. See also Levy, p. 250
- ^ Pleșa, pp. 42–43
- ^ Pleșa, p. 48
- ^ Enache, pp. 167–168
- ^ Pleșa, pp. 31–32
- ^ Adrian Nicolae Petcu, Denisa Bodeanu, "Contribuții la întocmirea unui dicționar al ofițerilor de securitate", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. II, Issue 1, 2009, pp. 56–58
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Pleșa, p. 49
- ISBN 973-0-02533-9
- ^ Jela, p. 48
- ^ Enache, p. 171
- ^ Jela, p. 48
- ^ a b (in Romanian) Ion Mihai Pacepa, "Opinii. E timpul ca Securitatea să fie repudiată (IV)", in Jurnalul Național, March 18, 2006
- ^ Bottoni (2010), p. 93. See also Banu et al., p. 392; Deletant (2005), p. 291
- ^ Enache, pp. 171–172
- ^ (in Romanian) Mariana Iancu, "Tragica moarte a vestitului chirurg Ion Simionescu în lagărul de muncă de la Peninsula: a fost omorât sau s-a sinucis?", in Adevărul (Constanța edition), January 8, 2019
- ^ Jela, p. 16
- ^ Jela, p. 48
- ^ Gabriel Stelian Manea, "Gulagul românesc și personajele sale: comandanți de lagăr și ofițeri politici la canalul Dunăre–Marea Neagră în literatura memorialistică", in Analele Asociației Naționale a Tinerilor Istorici din Moldova, Vol. 11, 2014, p. 232
- ^ (in Romanian) Dumitru Lăcătușu, Eugen Alimănescu, justițiar sau criminal?, Contributors.ro, April 25, 2014
- ^ Hossu Longin, pp. 210–211
- ^ Jela, pp. 32, 39, 73, 78, 79
- ISBN 973-86421-1-6
- ^ Sorin D. Ivănescu, "Rolul Securității în procesul de colectivizare a agriculturii", in Zargidava. Revistă de Istorie, Vol. VII, 2008, p. 189
- ^ Moisa, p. 250
- ^ Moisa, pp. 250–251
- ^ Iancu & Țârău, p. 272; Moisa, p. 252
- ^ Iancu & Țârău, p. 281
- ^ Hrițcu, p. 319
- ^ Hrițcu, pp. 324, 326
- ^ Hrițcu, p. 326
- ^ Vasile Valentin, "Supraveghere, imixtiune și control asupra Bisericii Evanghelice CA în primele două decenii postbelice", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. IX, Issues 1–2, 2016, pp. 28–30
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 28, 30–31
- ^ Banu et al., pp. 398–408; Demetriade, pp. 37–41, 51–55, 58–63, 84, 86–93, 100–101
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 140–141
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 40, 58–63, 84–88
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 84–85
- ^ Boldur-Lățescu, p. 36
- ^ Mircea Stănescu, "O victimă băcăuană a reeducării comuniste: Corneliu Niță", in Acta Bacoviensia. Anuarul Arhivelor Bacău, Vol. XVI, 2021, pp. 263–270
- ^ Troncotă, p. 241
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 82–83
- ^ Demetriade, p. 56
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 50–54, 97–98
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 97–100
- ^ Banu et al., p. 282; Deletant (2005), p. 303
- ^ Levy, pp. 157, 250, 324
- ^ Câmpeanu, pp. 226, 230
- ^ Deletant (1994), p. 918
- ^ Jela, pp. 48, 267–268. See also Deletant (1994), pp. 922, 923–924
- ^ Deletant (1994), pp. 918–919
- ^ Apostol, pp. 136–137
- ^ Levy, p. 146
- ^ Levy, p. 148
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 231
- ^ Câmpeanu, p. 230
- ^ Apostol, pp. 137–139. See also Levy, p. 322
- ^ (in Romanian) Toma Roman Jr., "Dezvăluiri uluitoare. Despre Ceaușescu, Sadoveanu, Brucan, la începuturile comunismului în România", in Jurnalul Național, January 10, 2013
- ^ (in Romanian) "Pătrășcanu a primit un glonț în ceafă", in Jurnalul Național, March 8, 2004
- ^ (in Romanian) Marius Oprea, Istoria fără perdea. Arestarea lui Pătrășcanu a fost dispusă de KGB din ordinul lui Stalin, dar uciderea sa a fost opera lui Dej, executată de Securitate (I), Mediafax, September 13, 2020
- ^ Bottoni, p. 115
- ^ Șiperco, pp. 178–183
- ^ Oprea (1996), p. 50
- ^ Oprea (1996), pp. 51–52
- ^ Catalan & Stănescu, p. 41
- ^ Banu et al., pp. 76–77, 87–88
- ^ Cioroianu, pp. 44–45
- ^ Bottoni, p. 93
- ^ Dorin Dobrincu, "Rezistența armată anticomunistă din Munții Făgăraș – versantul nordic. 'Grupul carpatic făgărășan'/Grupul Ion Gavrilă (1949/1950–1955/1956)", in Anuarul Institutului de Istorie G. Barițiu din Cluj-Napoca, Vol. XLVI, 2007, pp. 471–476
- ^ Iuliu Crăcană, "Drept și Justiție în România comunistă (III). Un conflict între două instituții represive — Securitatea și Procuratura", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. VI, Issues 1–2, 2013, p. 192. See also Banu et al., p. 388
- ^ Banu et al., p. 393
- ^ (in Romanian) Mihai Pelin, "Final fără glorie — Siguranța și Securitatea versus Legația Franței (2)", in Jurnalul Național, August 31, 2006
- ^ Jela, p. 89
- ^ Hossu Longin, pp. 134–135
- ^ Boldur-Lățescu, p. 39
- ^ Gheran, pp. 442–443
- ^ Iuliu Crăcană, "Recenzii. Note de lectură. George Pavel Vuza, Însemnările unui procuror sau Procuratura văzută din interior, Cuvânt înainte de Dan Tudor Vuza, postfață de Dinu C. Giurescu", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. II, Issue 1, 2009, pp. 259–264
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 471
- ^ Troncotă, pp. 250–251
- ^ Troncotă, p. 253
- ^ Banu et al., pp. 408–416
- ^ Banu et al., p. 411
- ^ Demetriade, pp. 141–144
- ^ Troncotă, p. 241
- ^ Banu et al., p. 326
- ^ Banu et al., pp. 332–334
- ^ Bottoni (2008), pp. 289–292
- ^ Bottoni (2008) pp. 265–266 & (2010), p. 233
- ^ Bottoni (2008), p. 328
- ISBN 9786067100143
- ^ Demetriade, p. 62
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 324–325. See also Popa, p. 41
- ^ Jánosi, pp. 94–95
- ^ Jánosi, p. 110
- ^ Demetriade, p. 38
- ^ Gheran, p. 470; Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 324–325. See also Popa, p. 41
- ^ Banu et al., p. 315
- ^ Banu et al., p. 320
- ^ Banu et al., p. 335
- ^ David & Țibuleac, pp. 54–58
- ISBN 978-606-644-036-3
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 325
- ^ Stanciu, p. 432. See also Banu et al., p. 397
- ^ Troncotă, p. 240
- ^ Popa, p. 139. See also Gheran, p. 470
- ^ David & Țibuleac, p. 58
- ^ Banu et al., pp. 396–397; Gheran, pp. 469–470; Mihalache, p. 186; Popa, p. 41; Stanciu, pp. 432–433
- ^ Popa, p. 41; Tismăneanu (2005), p. 325; Troncotă, p. 239. See also Apostol, p. 139; Deletant (2005), p. 327; Dobre et al., p. 471; Gheran, p. 470; Jela, p. 49
- ^ Jela, p. 49
- ^ Jela, p. 49
- ^ Apostol, p. 139
- ^ Stanciu, p. 433
- ^ Dobre et al., p. 43
- ^ Popa, p. 41
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 240–241
- ^ Jela, p. 49
- ^ Deletant (2005), p. 327
- ^ Câmpeanu, pp. 54–55
- ^ Jela, p. 49. See also Popa, p. 41
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 325
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 325
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), p. 325
- ^ (in Romanian) Dan Stanca, "Actualitatea: Istoria ca experiență personală", in România Literară, Issue 23/2016
- ^ Daniel Iftene, "Comunistul ca personaj negativ în filmul românesc de după 1989", in Transilvania, Issue 11/2019, p. 125
- ^ Câmpeanu, pp. 43–44
- ^ Tismăneanu (2005), pp. 43, 161
- ^ Mihalache, p. 191
References
- ISBN 978-606-8006-60-4
- Florian Banu et al., Securitatea (1948–1989). Monografie, Vol. I. Târgoviște: ISBN 978-606-537-357-0
- Georghe Boldur-Lățescu, "Fenomenul Pitești din perspectiva actualității", in Memoria. Revista Gândirii Arestate, Issue 84, 2013, pp. 35–43.
- Stefano Bottoni,
- Sztálin a székelyeknél. A Magyar Autonóm Tartomány története (1952–1960). Miercurea Ciuc: Pro-Print Könyvkiadó, 2008. ISBN 978-973-8468-80-1
- Transilvania roșie. Comunismul român și problema națională 1944–1965. Cluj-Napoca: Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities & ISBN 978-606-92512-0-1
- Sztálin a székelyeknél. A Magyar Autonóm Tartomány története (1952–1960). Miercurea Ciuc: Pro-Print Könyvkiadó, 2008.
- ISBN 973-683-840-4
- (in Romanian) Gabriel Catalan, Mircea Stănescu, "Scurtă istorie a Securității", in Sfera Politicii, Vol. XII, Issue 109, 2004, pp. 38–53.
- ISBN 973-669-175-6
- Aurel V. David, Mihai Viorel Țibuleac, "Amintiri din activitatea de securitate și gardă", in Vitralii – Lumini și Umbre, Vol. VIII, Issue 30, March–May 2017, pp. 53–62.
- Dennis Deletant,
- "Considerații privind lupta dusă de Gheorghiu-Dej pentru obținerea supremației în cadrul partidului (1945—1948)", in Revista Istorică, Vol. V, Issues 9–10, September–October 1994, pp. 907–926.
- "Romania", in Krzysztof Persak, ISBN 83-89078-82-1
- Mihai Demetriade, "Istoricul Serviciului de contrainformații penitenciare (1949–1967)", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. VIII, Issue 2, 2015, pp. 7–180.
- Florica Dobre, Liviu Marius Bejenaru, Clara Cosmineanu-Mareș, Monica Grigore, Alina Ilinca, Oana Ionel, Nicoleta Ionescu-Gură, Elisabeta Neagoe-Pleșa, Liviu Pleșa, Membrii C.C. al P.C.R. (1945–1989). Dicționar. Bucharest: ISBN 973-45-0486-X
- George Enache, "Misiunile Securității în problema 'Culte' la începuturile regimului comunist", in Analele Universității Dunărea de Jos Galați, Series 19: Istorie, Vol. VIII, 2009, pp. 167–192.
- Niculae Gheran, Arta de a fi păgubaș. 3: Îndărătul cortinei. Bucharest: Editura Biblioteca Bucureștilor, 2012. ISBN 978-606-8337-24-1
- ISBN 978-973-50-1520-6
- Luminița Hrițcu, "Utilizarea rețelei informative în reprimarea rezistenței armate anticomuniste", in ISBN 973-86421-1-6
- Gheorghe Iancu, Virgiliu Țârău, "Un episod din implicarea Securității în colectivizarea agriculturii românești", in Anuarul Institutului de Istorie Cluj-Napoca, Vol. XXXVII, 1998, pp. 267–290.
- Csongor Jánosi, "A magyar–román belügyi és állambiztonsági kapcsolatok 1955–1965 között", in Pro Minoritate, Summer 2017, pp. 86–125
- Doina Jela, Lexiconul negru. Unelte ale represiunii comuniste. Bucharest: Humanitas, 2001. ISBN 973-50-0132-2
- Robert Levy, Ana Pauker: The Rise and Fall of a Jewish Communist. Berkeley & Los Angeles: ISBN 0-520-22395-0
- Andi Mihalache, "Memoria epocii Gheorghiu‑Dej: literatura autobiografică și posteritățile compensatorii ale comunismului românesc", in Anuarul Institutului de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului și Memoria Exilului Românesc, Vols. V–VI, 2010–2011, pp. 179–193.
- Gabriel Moisa, "Aspecte privind colectivizarea forțată a agriculturii în Transilvania", in Crizia. Muzeul Țării Crișurilor, Vol. XXIX, 1999, pp. 246–261.
- Marius Oprea, "Radiografia unei înscenări. 'Devierea de dreapta'", in Dosarele Istoriei, Vol. I, Issue 2, 1996, pp. 48–53.
- Liviu Pleșa, "Cadrele Securității în timpul lui Teohari Georgescu", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. IV, Issues 1–2, 2011, pp. 9–56.
- Ioan C. Popa, "Din Transnistria, la conducerea Securității Poporului", in Magazin Istoric, September 2008, pp. 38–41.
- Andrei Șiperco, "Fragmente din relatările lui Mișu Dulgheru, fost șef al Direcției Cercetări Penale din D.G.S.P.: arestarea, regimul de detenție și judecarea sa de către tribunalul suprem", in Caietele CNSAS, Vol. VIII, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 177–191.
- Cezar Stanciu, "A Comparative Insight into Nicolae Ceaușescu’s Strategies of Power Consolidation", in Revista Portuguesa de História, Vol. XLV, 2014, pp. 415–437.
- ISBN 973-681-899-3
- Cristian Troncotă, "Politica de cadre în instituția securității regimului comunist din România (1948–1964) (I)", in Revista Istorică, Vol. X, Issues 3–4, May–August 1999, pp. 235–256.