Gravettian

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Gravettian
(33,000–22,000 BP)
Venus figurines
Preceded byAurignacian
Followed bySolutrean, Epigravettian
Defined byDorothy Garrod, 1938[3]

The Gravettian was an

archaeological industry of the European Upper Paleolithic that succeeded the Aurignacian circa 33,000 years BP.[1][4] It is archaeologically the last European culture many consider unified,[5] and had mostly disappeared by c. 22,000 BP, close to the Last Glacial Maximum, although some elements lasted until c. 17,000 BP.[2] In Spain and France, it was succeeded by the Solutrean, and developed into or continued as the Epigravettian in Italy, the Balkans, Ukraine[6] and Russia.[7]

The Gravettian culture is known for

Vestonice cluster (while the older Aurignacian cultural complex is associated with the human remains of Goyet Q116-1).[9]

Gravettian culture

The Venus of Moravany, made of mammoth tusk ivory

The Gravettians were hunter-gatherers who lived in a bitterly cold period of European prehistory, and the Gravettian lifestyle was shaped by the climate. Pleniglacial environmental changes forced them to adapt. West and Central Europe were extremely cold during this period. Archaeologists usually describe two regional variants: the western Gravettian, known mainly from cave sites in France, Spain and Britain, and the eastern Gravettian in Central Europe and Russia. The eastern Gravettians, which include the Pavlovian culture, were specialized mammoth hunters,[8] whose remains are usually found not in caves but in open air sites.

Gravettian culture thrived on their ability to hunt animals. They utilized a variety of tools and hunting strategies. Compared to theorized hunting techniques of

Neanderthals and earlier human groups, Gravettian hunting culture appears much more mobile and complex. They lived in caves or semi-subterranean or rounded dwellings which were typically arranged in small "villages". Gravettians are thought to have been innovative in the development of tools such as blunted-back knives, tanged arrowheads and boomerangs.[8] Other innovations include the use of woven nets and oil lamps made of stone.[10]
Blades and bladelets were used to make decorations and bone tools from animal remains.

Gravettian culture extends across a large geographic region, as far as

Venus figurines made from clay or ivory, as well as jewelry objects. The fertility deities mostly date from the early period; there are over 100 known surviving examples. They conform to a very specific physical type, with large breasts, broad hips and prominent posteriors. The statuettes tend to lack facial details, and their limbs are often broken off.[12]

During the post glacial period, evidence of the culture begins to disappear from northern Europe but was continued in areas around the Mediterranean.[12]

The

Vestonice Cluster).[15]

Diet

The Lady of Brassempouy from the Western Gravettian

Animals were a primary food source for humans of the Gravettian period.[16] Since Europe was extremely cold during this period, they preferred food sources high in energy and fat content. Testing comparisons among various human remains reveal that populations at higher latitudes placed greater dietary emphasis on meat. A defining trait distinguishing Gravettian people was their ease of mobility compared to their Neanderthal counterparts. Modern humans developed the technology and social organization that enabled them to migrate with their food source whereas Neanderthals were not adept at travelling, even with relatively sedentary herds.[17]

With their ability to move with the herds, Gravettian diets incorporated a huge variety of animal prey. The main factors were the animal's age and size. For example, first year deer offered hides most suitable for clothing, while fourth year deer contained far more meat.[18] Gravettian diet included larger animals such as mammoths, hyenas, wolves, and reindeer killed with stone or bone tools, as well as hares and foxes captured with nets.[19] This time period is classified by the strong emphasis on meat consumption because agriculture had not been fully introduced nor utilized. In addition, the climate was not favorable to stable crop cultivation.[16]

Coastal Gravettians were able to avail of marine protein. From remains found in Italy and

carbon dating reveals that 20–30% of Gravettian diets of coastal peoples consisted of sea animals.[20][21] Populations of lower latitudes relied more on shellfish and fish while higher latitudes' diets consisted of seals.[21]

Physical type

Burial with jewellery at Sungir, Russia, c. 30,000 BC
M.M. Gerasimov

Physical remains of people of the Gravettian have revealed that they were tall and relatively slender people. The male height of the Gravettian culture ranged between 179 and 188 centimetres (5 ft 10 in and 6 ft 2 in) tall with an average of 183.5 centimetres (6 ft 0.2 in), which is exceptionally tall not only for that period of prehistory, but for all periods of history.[22][23]

They were fairly slender and normally weighed between 67–73 kilograms (148–161 lb), although they would likely have had a higher ratio of lean muscle mass compared to body fat in comparison to modern humans as a result of a very physically active and demanding lifestyle. The females of the Gravettian were much shorter, standing 158 centimetres (5 ft 2 in) on average, with an average weight of 54 kilograms (119 lb). Examinations of Gravettian skulls reveal that high cheekbones were common among them.[24][25][26]

Hunting

Reconstruction of clothing and bone ornaments.

Clubs, stones and sticks were the primary hunting tools during the Upper Paleolithic period. Bone, antler and ivory points have all been found at sites in France; but proper stone arrowheads and throwing spears did not appear until the Solutrean period (~20,000 Before Present). Due to the primitive tools, many animals were hunted at close range.[27] The typical artefact of Gravettian industry, once considered diagnostic, is the small pointed blade with a straight blunt back. They are today known as the Gravette point,[28] and were used to hunt big game. Gravettians used nets to hunt small game, and are credited with inventing the bow and arrow.[8][citation needed]

Gravettian settlers tended towards the valleys that pooled migrating prey.[27] Examples found through discoveries in Gr. La Gala, a site in Southern Italy, show a strategic settlement based in a small valley.[29] As the settlers became more aware of the migration patterns of animals like red deer, they learned that prey herd in valleys, thereby allowing the hunters to avoid travelling long distances for food. Specifically in Gr. La Gala, the glacial topography forced the deer to pass through the areas in the valley occupied by humans.[29] Additional evidence of strategically positioned settlements include sites like Klithi in Greece, also placed to intercept migrating prey.[18]

Discoveries in the Czech Republic suggest that nets were used to capture large numbers of smaller prey, thus offering a quick and consistent food supply and thus an alternative to the feast/famine pattern of large game hunters. Evidence comes in the form of 4 mm (0.16 in) thick rope preserved on clay imprints.[19] Research suggests that although no larger net imprints have been discovered, there would be little reason for them not to be made as no further knowledge would be required for their creation.[19] The weaving of nets was likely a communal task, relying on the work of both women and children.[19]

Use of animal remains

Decorations and tools

Marks on animal ivory or horn.

The Gravettian era landscape is most closely related to the landscape of present-day Moravia. Pavlov I in southern Moravia is the most complete and complex Gravettian site to date, and a perfect model for a general understanding of Gravettian culture. In many instances, animal remains indicate both decorative and utilitarian purposes. In the case of, for example, Arctic foxes, incisors and canines were used for decoration, while their humeri and radii bones were used as tools. Similarly, the skeletons of some red foxes contain decorative incisors and canines as well as ulnas used for awls and barbs.[30]

Some animal bones were only used to create tools. Due to their shape, the ribs, fibulas, and metapodia of horses were good for awl and barb creation. In addition, the ribs were also implemented to create different types of smoothers for pelt preparation. The shapes of hare bones are also unique, and as a result, the ulnas were commonly used as awls and barbs.

molars are also documented. Some mammoth bones were used for decorative purposes. Wolf remains were often used for tool production and decoration.[30]

Genetics

Fu et al. (2016) examined the remains of fourteen Gravettians. The eight males included three samples of Y-chromosomal

Teschler et al. (2020) examined the remains of one adult male and two twin boys from a Gravettian site in Austria. All belonged to haplogroup
U5. According to Scorrano et al. (2022), "the genome of an early European individual from Kostenki 14, dated to around 37,000 years ago, demonstrated that the ancestral European gene pool was already established by that time."[33]

Gallery

  • Venus of Laussel, France, c. 23,000 BC
    Venus of Laussel, France, c. 23,000 BC
  • Male figurine, mammoth ivory, Anthropos, Brno
    Male figurine, mammoth ivory, Anthropos, Brno
  • Venus of Lespugue
  • Venus of Dolní Věstonice
  • Female figurines, Gravettian, Anthropos, Brno
    Female figurines, Gravettian, Anthropos, Brno
  • Upper Paleolithic art, relief of mammoth, Anthropos, Brno
    Upper Paleolithic art, relief of mammoth, Anthropos, Brno
  • Various Gravettian statuettes
    Various Gravettian statuettes
  • Shaman equipment, Brno, Gravettian
    Shaman equipment, Brno, Gravettian
  • Fish in Abri du Poisson Cave
    Fish in Abri du Poisson Cave
  • Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map
    Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map
  • Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map
    Engraving on a mammoth tusk, map
  • Gravettian necklace
    Gravettian necklace
  • Gravettian engraving (Venus of Předmostí)
    Gravettian engraving (Venus of Předmostí)
  • Venus figurine from Kostenki
    Venus figurine from Kostenki
  • Replica of the Venus of Lespugue
    Replica of the Venus of Lespugue
  • Reconstruction of the Lady of Brassempouy by Libor Balák
    Reconstruction of the Lady of Brassempouy by Libor Balák

See also

Preceded by Gravettian
33,000–24,000 cal BP
Succeeded by
Map
Selected Gravettian sites from the ROAD database (CC BY-SA 4.0 ROCEEH)


Note

  1. ^ The transition to the Epigravettian is not well-defined, and the Gravettian may be extended down to 17,000 years ago with the most inclusive definition, based on anything that may be considered Gravettian (burials, venus statues, lithics)[2]

References

  1. ^
    S2CID 163089681
    .
  2. ^ . D'ailleurs selon les auteurs et les thèmes abordés, la définition et donc les contours du Gravettien variant, parfois considérablement. Tantôt certains ensembles de la plaine russe seront intégrés sur la base des témoignages funéraires, tantôt les statuettes féminines serviront d'argument pour annexer les rives du lac Baïkal à cette supra-entité. De même, le Gravettien débuterait vers 31,000 BP ou 27,000 BP selon les régions pour finir parfois à 22,000 BP, parfois à 17,000 BP. Ce ne sont pas là de menues différences. [Besides, depending on the authors and the subjects at hand, the definition and therefore the borders of the Gravettian vary, sometimes considerably. Sometimes, certain assemblages of the Russian plains are integrated on the basis of funerary customs, other times feminine statuettes are used to annex the shores of Lake Baikal to this supra-entity. Likewise, the Gravettian would start around 31,000 or 27,000 BP depending on the region and finish sometimes at 22,000 BP, sometimes at 17,000 BP. These are not small differences.]
  3. .
  4. .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. ^
  9. ^ Fu 2016: "GoyetQ116-1 is chronologically associated with the Aurignacian cultural complex. Thus, the subsequent spread of the Vestonice Cluster, which is associated with the Gravettian cultural complex, shows that the spread of the latter culture was mediated at least in part by population movements."
  10. ^
  11. JSTOR 530244.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  12. ^
  13. . The Gravettian site of Mal'ta...
  14. . Thus, while individuals assigned to the Gravettian cultural complex in Europe are associated with the Vestonice Cluster, there is no genetic connection between them and the Mal'ta individual in Siberia despite the fact that Venus figurines are associated with both. This suggests that if this similarity is not a coincidence, it reflects diffusion of ideas rather than movements of people.
  15. ^
    PMID 15857652.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  16. .
  17. ^ a b Bogucki, P. (1999). The Origins of Human Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publications inc. p. 95.
  18. ^
    S2CID 128873468
    .
  19. .
  20. ^
    PMID 15975629.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  21. .
  22. .
  23. .
  24. .
  25. ^ Wilczyński, Jarosław (January 2015). "The Gravettian and Epigravettian settlement of Poland". Institute of Archeology of the CAS, Brno & Masaryk University. 2: 45 – via Researchgate.
  26. ^ .
  27. ^ Ehrich, Robert W.; Pleslová-Štiková, Emilie. "Aurignacian Lithic Economy: Ecological Perspectives from Southwestern France". Academia, 1968. pp. 37–41
  28. ^ .
  29. ^ a b c Nývltová-Fisáková, M. (2005). "Animal bones selected for tools and decorations". In J. Svoboda (ed.). Pavlov I southeast: A window into the gravettian lifestyles. Brno, Czech Republic: Academy of the Sciences of the Czech Republic, Institute of Archaeology. pp. 247–251.
  30. ^ Fu 2016.
  31. PMID 33159107
    .
  32. .

Sources

External links