Grunwick dispute
The Grunwick dispute was a British industrial dispute involving trade union recognition at the Grunwick Film Processing Laboratories in Chapter Road, Dollis Hill in the London suburb of Willesden, that led to a two-year strike between 1976 and 1978.[1]
During a decade of industrial unrest, the Grunwick dispute became a
The incumbent Labour government commissioned the Scarman Inquiry, chaired by Lord Scarman, which recommended both union recognition and re-instatement of the workers, but the employer, backed by the right-wing National Association For Freedom (NAFF) and the Conservative Party, rejected the recommendations. The TUC subsequently withdrew their support and the workers' strike committee announced the end of the dispute in June 1978. The repercussions of the strike for British industrial relations were far-reaching, significantly weakening the British trades union movement. The Conservative Party and other members of the right wing saw this as a major political and ideological victory, preparing the ground for Conservative success in the 1979 general election and their subsequent curbing of the unions' power in the 1980s.[8]
Background
Grunwick Film Processing Laboratories was a photographic finishing and processing business, trading under a variety of brand names including Bonusprint, Doubleprint and Tripleprint, founded in 1965 by George Ward, John Hickey and Tony Grundy.[14] At the time of the dispute, the firm operated on a postal basis, in which customers mailed undeveloped films and payment to the laboratory and received finished photographs back through the postal service. The growth of amateur colour photography meant that small High Street chemists which had previously serviced this market "could no longer afford the equipment to develop family snapshots, and the photo-processing field was left wide open for larger, specialist companies" such as Grunwick.[15] In 1973, there had been a previous dispute over union recognition at Grunwick, and a number of workers who joined the
MP
Although there were allegations that the working conditions at Grunwick resembled those of a
Strike
Dismissals
The strike was sparked by the dismissal of Devshi Bhudia, at the firm's Chapter Road premises, on Friday 20 August 1976 for working too slowly. Three others, Chandrakant Patel, Bharat Patel and Suresh Ruparelia, walked out in support of him. At 6:55 pm Jayaben Desai put on her coat to leave and was called into the office, where she was dismissed for doing so.
ACAS involvement
Having signed up as members of APEX, the pickets returned to Grunwick where 50 more workers walked out demanding the right to join the union. The pickets also headed to Grunwick's nearby Cobbold Road premises where a further 25 workers walked out and joined the strike.[1] According to APEX's subsequent testimony at the Scarman Inquiry, their grievance with the company consisted of "low pay, long hours with compulsory overtime, petty restrictions imposed on working people, a bullying attitude on the part of supervision, and frequent dismissals and threats of dismissals," leading to "the expressed intention of bringing in trade union representation."[6]: 7:33 On 24 August 1976 Grunwick made an offer to reinstate all striking employees if they dropped their demand for union representation, which was rejected. On 2 September 1976 all 137 striking workers were dismissed from the company's employ. In the intervening period, APEX had declared the strike "official" and sought a meeting with Grunwick management, as did, informally, the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas). The company refused to meet with APEX or ACAS.[3] On 5 September 1976 the general secretary of APEX, Roy Grantham, requested that the Secretary of State for Employment, Albert Booth, establish a court of inquiry into the dispute. On 7 September Grantham addressed the TUC's Annual Congress regarding the Grunwick dispute. As a result, on 7 October 1976 Len Murray, General Secretary of the TUC, requested trade unions give "all possible assistance" to the strikers, including "boycotting Grunwick's services."[1][15] Acting on the advice of Albert Booth, on 15 October 1976 APEX formally requested ACAS to take up the case under section 11 of the Employment Protection Act 1975 (c.71).[15][18]
Union of Post Office Workers' boycott
When the strike began, members of the
Definition of "worker"
ACAS were empowered by section 11 of the Employment Protection Act (EPA) to "ascertain the opinions of workers to whom the issue relates", but Grunwick, backed by NAFF, disputed that the strikers should be included, on the grounds that they had been dismissed and so were no longer "workers" of the company.[29] John Stacey, Grunwick's personnel manager, said "The truth is that we do not care what their opinions are."[29] In the meantime, the company awarded a 15% pay rise to non-striking workers on the understanding that they would not join the union.[1][29] In response, UPW said it would consider resuming its boycott of Grunwick if the firm would not co-operate with ACAS.[30] Harold Walker, the Minister of State for Employment, also urged Grunwick to co-operate with ACAS to end the dispute and criticised the involvement of NAFF, saying that this was not the first time that this "ultra right wing political organisation [had] sought to interfere in industrial disputes, with harmful consequences."[31] Grunwick would not turn over the names and addresses of those still working to ACAS, or allow them access to the workers, saying that it would only do so if their opinions were canvassed while those of the strikers were not taken into consideration. The company explained "We are bound by the opinion of the loyal workers inside our company" and would not heed those of the strikers "outside".[32] The draft report prepared by ACAS, who had been unable to canvass all of the workers, recommended recognition of APEX by Grunwick for negotiation purposes.[33] Grunwick responded to the draft by seeking legal advice to challenge the recommendation, centred on the definition of "worker".[32] The union maintained that if Grunwick's submission was proved in law, it would render the employment provisions of the EPA meaningless and create a legal loophole whereby employers could "dismiss with impunity workers who asked for recognition."[34]
On 18 April 1977 the company served a writ on ACAS, claiming that it had exceeded its authority by canvassing the opinions of the strikers
The appeal was heard by the
Extension of picketing
By March 1977, picketing had also begun outside London chemists' shops in an effort to stop them doing business with Grunwick. Grunwick attempted to take out an injunction restraining pickets from demonstrating outside shops and handing out what the company alleged were "defamatory leaflets". In the High Court Mr Justice Gibson refused to grant the injunction, saying that he would not interfere with peaceful picketing in a trade dispute. The company was unable to provide evidence of violence by the pickets, and as the strike committee claimed that they could justify their allegations in a court of law the judge declined to restrain the distribution of leaflets.[40]
Mass pickets
The dispute, and the attendant media coverage, became far more heated for a few weeks in June and July 1977 when mass-pickets formed of trade unionists and supporters from across London tried to stop non-striking Grunwick workers from entering the workplace. Police responded with greater numbers and more aggressive tactics, and violence broke out on a number of occasions.
The local Brent Trades Council, led by its president, veteran construction union activist and Communist Party industrial organiser Tom Durkin, and its secretary, TGWU activist
On 22 June delegations from trades councils, several constituency Labour parties and a great many trade unions (including miners and print workers) attended the mass-picket. The attendance of the president of the Yorkshire area of the National Union of Mineworkers, Arthur Scargill, and a delegation of mineworkers from as far afield as Yorkshire, South Wales and Kent, was highlighted by the media. There were clashes between police and pickets (and a large number of arrests) when police tried to escort buses carrying non-striking employees into the Grunwick plant and bloody scenes between the police and the pickets were broadcast on television.
The Labour government decided to commission an inquiry under
Aftermath
The Scarman Inquiry recommended the reinstatement of the strikers, said that the management had acted "within the letter but outside the spirit of the law" and that union recognition could "help the company as well as the employees". Ward rejected the report, the strikers were not reinstated and the union was not recognised. A House of Lords ruling upheld Ward's right not to recognise a union. The strike's support from other unions "slipped away"[10] leaving the strikers to call off their action on 14 July 1978, nearly two years after it had begun. Their demands for collective bargaining were never met.[10]
A 2016 BBC radio documentary, Grunwick Changed Me, described how the involvement of white, working class men in support of Asian women strikers was seen as a turning point in race relations in the United Kingdom.[41]
Political involvement
Three ministers in the
References
- ^ a b c d e f "Grunwick: Chronology of events". University of Leeds. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
- ^ "Your 1970s: Strikes and blackouts". BBC News. 7 June 2007. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
- ^ a b "Grunwick strike, 1976–1978". Working Class Movement Library. 11 May 2010. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
- ISSN 0026-7961.
- Morning Star. London.
- ^ a b c d Produced/Directed: Deep Sehgal. Narrated: Veronika Hyks (January 2003). "Time Shift: The Grunwick Strike". Time Shift. Season 1. Episode 1. Bristol, England. BBC. BBC Four.
- ^ Travis, Alan (28 December 2007). "Callaghan had Scargill watched as Grunwick dispute escalated". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 4 September 2010.
- ^ a b "The Grunwick Strike". BBC. 9 March 2010. Retrieved 4 September 2010.
- Institute of Race Relations. Archived from the originalon 27 September 2011. Retrieved 4 September 2010.
- ^ a b c Manzoor, Sarfraz (20 January 2010). "How Asian women made trade union history and shattered stereotypes". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
- ^ "The strike at Grunwicks 1976–1978 – 30 years on". Socialist Appeal. 5 September 2007. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 4 September 2010.
- ^ ISSN 1754-4653. Retrieved 5 September 2010.
- ^ Sivanandan, A. (1977). "Grunwick". Race & Class. 19 (1). Retrieved 6 September 2010. Reprinted at libcom.org.
- ^ "Obituaries: George Ward". The Daily Telegraph. London. 24 April 2012. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g Forbes, Andy (December 1978). "In the Wake of Grunwick". Marxism Today: 386–391.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-415-15289-1.
- ^ a b c d Symon, Penny (6 November 1976). "Firm's mail collected after union ends ban". The Times. No. 59854. London. p. 3.
- ^ a b c d "Concern about non-delivery of mail to mail order firm involved in industrial dispute". The Times. No. 59851. London. 3 November 1976. p. 6.
- ^ Rossiter, Ann (January 1977). "Risking Gossip and Disgrace: Asian Women Strike". Spare Rib (54): 18.
- ^ "Strikers in saris". The Guardian. London. 20 January 2010. Retrieved 5 September 2010.
- ^ "George Ward and Grunwick Apology". Socialist Worker. 12 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 December 2010. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
- ISSN 1754-4653. Retrieved 8 September 2010.
- ^ Grantham, Roy (24 December 1976). "Union recognition". The Times. No. 59895. London. p. 13.
- ^ Brar, Harpal, ed. (July–August 2006). "'Old' Labour's betrayal of Grunwick". Lalkar. Retrieved 5 September 2010.
- ^ a b Jones, Tim (3 November 1976). "MPs say postal delivery ban is illegal". The Times. No. 59851. London. p. 2.
- ^ "Postmen put themselves off side". The Times. No. 59852. London. 4 November 1976. p. 17.
- ^ Noyes, Hugh (5 November 1976). "Postal workers' union calls off ban on mail delivery to firm as Commons debates its action". The Times. No. 59853. London. p. 2.
- ^ a b Symon, Penny (10 November 1976). "Firm drops action over mail". The Times. No. 59857. London. p. 4.
- ^ a b c Thomas, Christopher (3 December 1976). "Company may bring test case to define 'worker'". The Times. No. 59877. London. p. 4.
- ^ Jones, Tim (13 December 1976). "Postmen may resume action against firm". The Times. No. 59885. London. p. 4.
- ^ "Plea to Grunwick to cooperate in inquiry". The Times. No. 59893. London. 22 December 1976. p. 6.
- ^ a b Thomas, Christopher (12 February 1977). "Company takes legal advice over union recognition". The Times. No. 59932. London. p. 3.
- ^ "Blow to hopes of peace at Grunwick". The Times. No. 59934. London. 15 February 1977. p. 4.
- ^ "TUC asked to help in union recognition battle". The Times. No. 59956. London. 19 March 1977. p. 2.
- ^ Jones, Tim (19 April 1977). "Strike-bound firm serves writ on Acas". The Times. No. 59981. London. p. 2.
- ^ a b c Godfrey, Peter (13 July 1977). "High court dismisses Grunwick claim against Acas report". The Times. No. 60054. London. p. 1.
- ^ "Court of Appeal Acas recommendation to recognize union declared void". The Times. No. 60069. London. 30 July 1977. p. 23.
- ^ a b Parker, Robert (2 August 1977). "Acas will appeal to Lords over Grunwick ruling". The Times. London. p. 1.
- ^ "Acas' inability to question stay-at-work employees renders report void". The Times. No. 60187. London. 15 December 1977. p. 20.
- ^ "Judge refuses injunction against shop pickets". The Times. No. 59950. London. 12 March 1977. p. 3.
- ^ "Grunwick Changed Me". Seriously... 17 August 2016. BBC Radio. Retrieved 17 August 2016.
- ISBN 978-0-140-52325-6.
- ISBN 978-0-566-00268-7.
- ISBN 978-0-00-638753-4.
Further reading
- ISBN 978-0-853-15413-6.
- Durkin, Tom (1978). Grunwick: Bravery and Betrayal. London: Brent Trades Council.
- Ward, George (1977). Fort Grunwick. London: Maurice Temple Smith. ISBN 978-0-851-17146-3.
DVD
- Brent Trades Union Council, The Great Grunwick Strike 1976–1978 (Director Chris Thomas, 2007)
External links
- Bell, Bethan; Mahmood, Shabnam (10 September 2016). "Grunwick dispute: What did the 'strikers in saris' achieve?". BBC News. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
- "1977: Home Secretary jeered on picket line". BBC News. 2008. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
- McGowan, Jack (2008). "'Dispute', 'Battle', 'Siege', 'Farce'? Grunwick 30 Years On". Contemporary British History. 22 (3): 383–406. S2CID 145095450.
- Catalogue of the Grunwick dispute archives, held at the Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick