HMS Little Belt (1807)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

HMS Little Belt, at right, and the USS President fire upon each other
History
Danish Navy EnsignDenmark
NameLillebælt
NamesakeThe Little Belt strait off Jutland
BuilderFugelsang at the Royal Shipyard, Copenhagen
Launched31 August 1801
In serviceFebruary 1802
CapturedCaptured by British at the Battle of Copenhagen on 7 September 1807
Royal Navy EnsignUnited Kingdom
NameHMS Little Belt
AcquiredCaptured at the Battle of Copenhagen on 7 September 1807
CommissionedApril 1808
FateSold in 1811
General characteristics [1]
Class and type20-gun post ship
Tons burthen460 594 (bm)
Length116 ft 4 in (35.5 m) (overall); 94 ft 0 in (28.7 m) (keel)
Beam30 ft 4 in (9.2 m)
Depth of hold12 ft 5+12 in (3.8 m)
PropulsionSails
Complement121
ArmamentDanish service: 20 x 30-pounder carronades + 2 x 8-pounder chase guns British service: 18 x 32-pounder carronades + 2 x 9-pounder chase guns

Lillebælt was a Danish 22-gun warship launched in 1801. The Danes surrendered her to the

single-ship action in 1811 while the United States of America was at peace with Great Britain, USS President fired on Little Belt, ostensibly believing her to be HMS Guerriere, which had recently impressed a sailor from USS Spitfire. History is not sure who fired first, both sides claiming the other had fired initially. This action was the eponymous "Little Belt affair". British captain Arthur Batt Bingham
maintained that the Americans fired first and that although his vessel had suffered heavy casualties he had not at any time surrendered. Little Belt was broken up in 1819.

Career

She was built in 1801 to a design by P.C. Hohlenberg as the 460-ton Danish 22-gun let fregat (light frigate or corvette) Lillebælt.

brig-sloop Calypso to Britain, arriving on 24 October at Woolwich. She was fitted there until 14 May 1809.[1]

The Royal Navy commissioned her under the anglicised version of her name and placed under the command of John Crispo.

- a location of great strategic and symbolic importance to Danes.

By 1808 she was off the African coast, but later returned to Britain.[5]

In May 1809 she recaptured and sent into Portsmouth the Swedish ship Neptunus, which had been taken while sailing from Alicante.[6] Then on 23 June Little Belt sailed for North America.[7] Around this time the Royal Navy rescinded a decision to rename her Espion.[1]

On 27 September 1810

Saint Malo, under the command of a Joseph Wittevronghel, a Dane. San Joseph was one year old, about 100 tons burthen (bm), and armed with 14 guns though she was pierced for 16. She had only been out one day when the British captured her and had taken nothing. Little Belt had been in company with Wolverine during the chase.[8][9][a]

Crispo was promoted to

Halifax
to operate off the North American coast.

By early 1811, Little Belt was in the Caribbean. On 25 March 1811, Little Belt captured the Spanish vessel Empressa.[b] At the time Little Belt was apparently under the command of Thomas Prickett.[12] Colibri was either accompanying Little Belt or in sight of the capture and so shared in the prize money.[13] Little Belt sent Empresa, which had been sailing to Africa, into Bermuda, where she arrived about 10 April.[14]

Little Belt affair

On 19 April Rear-Admiral

Halifax. Sawyer warned Bingham to be careful to avoid a clash with the Americans and to stay out of American ports except in the case of dire necessity. In the event, Bingham did not locate Guerriere, and continued to cruise along the coast.[15]

On the morning of 10 May, as Little Belt was some 48 miles east of

John Rodgers had mistaken Little Belt for another British warship which had recently been observed pressing American sailors.[16] Bingham claimed President then opened fire on Little Belt, although the Americans claimed the same of the British. Regardless, an engagement began, lasting three-quarters of an hour. The British observed that President had a fire on board as she drew away.[15]

President then returned, and asked if Bingham had struck. Bingham replied that he had not, and President again withdrew. Rodgers sent a messenger out to the damaged Little Belt the following morning, lamenting the "unfortunate affair", and insisting that he would not have fired had Little Belt not fired first. Bingham denied this, and turned down Rodger's offer of putting into an American port for repairs. Little Belt had nine killed outright, and had 23 wounded, including two mortally, who died the day after the battle. She was also badly damaged, with numerous shots between wind and water and with her masts and rigging damaged.[15]

Bingham made for Halifax, hampered by a gale on the second day of the voyage which caused leaks. On 23 May Goree met up with Little Belt and the two then proceeded on to Halifax, which they reached on 28 May.[17]

Rodgers claimed that he had mistaken Little Belt for a frigate and was adamant that Bingham had fired first. Bingham maintained that the Americans fired first and that he had not surrendered.

Admiralty expressed their confidence in Bingham; it promoted him to post-captain on 7 February 1812.[19] The Americans continued to refuse to pay reparations, pointing out that the British had failed to make reparations after the Chesapeake–Leopard affair.[20]

On 4 August 1811, Little Belt captured the American ship Traveller.[21] Traveller had sailed from Bordeaux with a cargo of brandy, quicksilver, silks, etc. She arrived at Portsmouth on 22 March.[22]

Fate

Little Belt was paid off later that year. She was sold at Deptford in November.[1] She was broken up at Battersea, London in February 1819.[23]

The Little Belt breaking up at Battersea

Notes

  1. d; a sixth-class share, that of an ordinary seaman, was worth £1 5s 6d.[10]
  2. ^ A first-class share of the prize money was worth £124 2s 11d; a sixth-class share of the prize money was worth £2 15s 10d.[11]
  3. ^ Marshall says the signal was #275, but with the same meaning.[15]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d e f Winfield (2008), p. 241.
  2. ^ "Danish Military History website (British Design Plans of captured Danish Warships)". Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  3. ^ "No. 16067". The London Gazette. 16 September 1807. p. 1232.
  4. ^ Paine et al. (1997), p.96.
  5. ^ O'Byrne (1849), p. 242.
  6. ^ Lloyd's Marine List,[1] - accessed 30 November 2013.
  7. ^ "NMM, vessel ID 370213" (PDF). Warship Histories, vol ii. National Maritime Museum. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 August 2011. Retrieved 30 July 2011.
  8. ^ "No. 16408". The London Gazette. 25 September 1810. p. 1510.
  9. ^ "No. 16536". The London Gazette. 29 October 1811. p. 2097.
  10. ^ "No. 16536". The London Gazette. 29 October 1811. p. 2097.
  11. ^ "No. 17143". The London Gazette. 8 June 1816. p. 1098.
  12. ^ "No. 17140". The London Gazette. 28 May 1816. p. 1020.
  13. ^ "No. 17149". The London Gazette. 29 June 1816. p. 1252.
  14. ^ Lloyd's Marine List,[2] - accessed 30 November 2013.
  15. ^ a b c d Marshall (1829), Supplement, Part 3, pp.50-54.
  16. ^ Tucker (2005), p. 131.
  17. ^ James (1837), Vol. 6, pp.7-11.
  18. ^ Gosset (1986), p. 79.
  19. ^ James (1837), Vol. 6, p.14.
  20. ^ Tucker (2005), p. 132.
  21. ^ "No. 16705". The London Gazette. 20 February 1813. p. 381.
  22. ^ Lloyd's Marine List,[3] - accessed 30 November 2013.
  23. ^ Cooke, William Bernard; Cooke, George (1822). Views on the Thames. Retrieved 8 April 2018.

References

External links

  • (in Danish) Danish Naval Museum [4] has a new (2013) website. Lille Bælt Archived 31 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine is included in the list of Danish ships for which there is data.

This article includes data released under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported UK: England & Wales Licence, by the

Warship Histories
project.