Hanno the Navigator

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This article is about the fifth-century BC explorer. For other uses, see Hanno (disambiguation).

Hanno the Navigator
Nationality
Magonid

Hanno the Navigator (sometimes "Hannon"; Punic: 𐤇‬𐤍‬𐤀‬, ḤNʾ;[1] Greek: Ἄννων, romanized: Annōn [2]) was a Carthaginian explorer of the fifth century BC, best known for his naval exploration of the western coast of Africa. The only source of his voyage is a periplus translated into Greek. He has sometimes been identified as a king.

Historians have attempted to identify places on Hanno's route based on the periplus. According to some modern analyses of his route, Hanno's expedition could have reached as far south as Gabon; however, according to others, it could not have taken him further than southern Morocco.[3]

Biography

The name Hanno was given to many other Carthaginians. Ancient authors who discussed Hanno the Navigator did not provide direct information to identify him exactly. Some called him king, and others used the Latin words dux (leader or general) or imperator (commander or emperor).[4] The Greek translation of Hanno's periplus account names him a basileus,[5] a term which may be interpreted as "king", but was commonly used for high-level Carthaginian officials.[6]

The consensus of scholarship places Hanno in the 5th century BC

Magonid family.[8] R.C.C. Law identifies Hanno as the son of Hamilcar I.[9]

Periplus account

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Hanno's account, the periplus (lit. circumnavigation), remains extant in Greek-language manuscripts. The original version, written in the Punic language, has been lost. The Greek translation is abridged[10][11] and 101 lines long.[10] While it contains contradictions and obvious errors,[12] it is likely derived from an original Carthaginian text.[8] The periplus has survived as "the nearest we have to a specimen of Carthaginian 'literature' "[8] and one of the few extant accounts of ancient exploration penned by the explorer himself.[13]

In the fifth century, the text was translated into Greek. Over the centuries, the translation was copied several times by Greek and

Greek-speaking Roman clerks. Two copies remain extant, dating to the 9th and 14th centuries.[11] Conrad Gessner produced the first Latin translation, printed at Zurich in 1559.[14]

Summary

The "Mount Cameroon" interpretation of the route

This summary is based on a translation by Al. N. Oikonomides.

proper names
are unchanged from the translation. It reflects the views of the translator and may ignore more widely accepted theories among scholars.

As the work begins, "this is the report of the periplus of Hanno, king of the Carthaginians, into the Libyan areas of the earth beyond the Pillars of Hercules which he dedicated in the sanctuary of Kronos."[16] With 60 ships and 30,000 people, Hanno intends to found cities along the African coast. He first founds one city, then sails some distance and founds five others.[note 2] Arriving at a river, the Carthaginians meet the Lixitae, a friendly nomadic tribe. They learn of the nearby Ethiopians, and taking aboard several Lixitae, set sail again. At the small island Kerne, another settlement is built. Around the lake Chretes and an unnamed river, there are savage men and large wild beasts[note 3] respectively. After returning to Kerne, they sail further south down Africa, finding Ethiopians whose language even the Lixitae interpreters do not understand. Passing further, Hanno finds an "immense opening of the sea",[17] from which fires may be sighted. At a bay called the "Horn of the West", they land on an island where humans live. The Carthaginians hurry away in fear[note 4] and reach lands where there are many flames. A very tall mountain is there. Finally arriving at a bay, the "Horn of the South", there is an island with hostile, hirsute men named "Gorillas" (see § Gorillai). Three of them are killed, their skins brought home to Carthage. Having run out of provisions, they do not sail further. The periplus abruptly ends here[10] without discussing the return journey.

Textual criticism

Both ancient and modern authors have criticized the work. Most attempts to locate the places described in the periplus based on the reported sailing distances and directions have failed.[12] To make the text more accurate, scholars have tried textual criticism. Ultimately, the Carthaginians probably edited the real account to protect their trade: other countries would not be able to identify the places described, while Carthaginians could still boast about their accomplishments.[12]

Oikonomides theorizes that the hypothetical Punic manuscript that was translated into Greek was incomplete itself: it left out the later parts of the original periplus. The ending of the narrative is abrupt, and it would also have been logically impossible for the expedition to end as described. Therefore, he argues, the final two lines must have been inserted to compensate for an incomplete manuscript.[10]

Expedition

Carthage dispatched Hanno at the head of a fleet of 60 ships to explore and

indigenous peoples
on his journey and met with a variety of welcomes.

The gold trade was a foundation of the Carthaginian empire since the fifth century BC. It may have been the original motivation for Carthaginian exploration of sub-Saharan Africa.[19] The purpose of Hanno's voyage was to secure the gold route to west Africa.[12]

A number of modern scholars have commented upon Hanno's voyage. In many cases, the analysis has been to refine information and interpretation of the original account. William Smith points out that the complement of personnel totalled 30,000, and that the core mission included the intent to found Carthaginian (or in the older parlance 'Libyophoenician') towns.

weasel words] have questioned whether this many people accompanied Hanno on his expedition, and suggest 5,000 is a more accurate number.[6] R. C. C. Law notes that "It is a measure of the obscurity of the problem that while some commentators have argued that Hanno reached the Gabon area, others have taken him no further than southern Morocco."[3]

Harden reports a consensus that the expedition reached at least as far as

Gambia. However, Harden mentions disagreement as to the farthest limit of Hanno's explorations: Sierra Leone, Cameroon, or Gabon. He notes the description of Mount Cameroon, a 4,040-metre (13,250 ft) volcano, more closely matches Hanno's description than Guinea's 890-metre (2,920 ft) Mount Kakoulima. Warmington prefers Mount Kakoulima, considering Mount Cameroon too distant.[23]

The historian Raymond Mauny, in his 1955 article "La navigation sur les côtes du Sahara pendant l'antiquité", argued that the ancient navigators (Hannon, Euthymène, Scylax, etc.) could not have sailed south in the Atlantic farther than Cape Bojador. He pointed out that ancient geographers knew of the Canary Islands but nothing further south. Ships with square sails, without stern rudder, might navigate south, but the winds and currents throughout the year would prevent the return trip from Senegal to Morocco. Oared ships might be able to achieve the return northward, but only with very great difficulties. Mauny assumed that Hanno did not get farther than the Drâa. He attributed artifacts found on Mogador Island to the expedition described in the Periplus of Pseudo-Scylax and notes that no evidence of Mediterranean trade further south had yet been found. The author ends by suggesting archaeological investigation of the islands along the coast, such as Cape Verde, or the île de Herné (Dragon Island near Dakhla, Western Sahara) where ancient adventurers may have been stranded and settled.[24]

Gorillai

The end of the periplus describes an island populated with hairy and savage people. Attempts to capture the men failed. Three of the women were taken, but were so ferocious that they were killed, their skins brought home to Carthage.

Roman destruction of Carthage in 146 BC, some 350 years after Hanno's expedition.[11][26]

Hanno's interpreters of an African tribe (Lixites or Nasamonians) called the people Gorillai (in

scientifically described and named after the Gorillai. The authors did not affirmatively identify Hanno's Gorillai as the gorilla.[27]

Ancient authors' accounts

The text was known to the Roman

Arrian of Nicomedia
(c. 86–160).

Pliny the Elder

While the power of Carthage was at its height, Hanno published an account of a voyage which he made from Gades [modern

Arabia; Himilco was also sent, about the same time, to explore the remote parts of Europe.

— Pliny the Elder, The Natural History 2.67[28]

Pliny may have recorded the time vaguely because he was ignorant of the actual date.[19] His claim that Hanno completely circumnavigated Africa, reaching Arabia, is considered unrealistic by contemporary scholarship.

Arrian

Arrian mentions Hanno's voyage at the end of his Anabasis of Alexander VIII (Indica):

Hannon the Libyan set out from Carthage with Libya on his left and sailed out beyond the Pillars of Heracles into the Outer Sea, continuing his voyage then in an easterly direction for a total of thirty-five days: but when he eventually turned south he met a number of crippling obstacles—lack of water, burning heat, streams of lava gushing into the sea.

— Arrian, Indica 43.11–12[29]

Herodotus

Greek historian Herodotus, writing around 430 BC, described Carthaginian trade on the Moroccan coast (Histories 4.196[30]), though it is doubtful whether he was aware of Hanno's voyage itself.[19]

Legacy

Modern

The lunar crater Hanno is named after him.[31]

Historiography

In the 16th century, the voyage of Hanno saw increased scholarly interest from Europeans in an age when European exploration and navigation were flourishing. Already then, the extent of Hanno's voyage was debated.[32]

Notes

  1. ^
    • "Modern scholars are agreed that it is to be placed in the fifth century BC, but a more precise dating is difficult."[7]
    • "The voyages of Hanno and Himilco were undertaken ... and the general consensus sees in them two members of the Magonid family in the middle of the fifth century ..."[8]
  2. Arambys
    .
  3. ^ Hippopotami and crocodiles are the two animals mentioned.
  4. ^ The text does not record any word about an actual interaction between the Carthaginians and the unnamed people on the island.

Citations

  1. ^ Huss 1985, p. 565.
  2. ^ "Ἄννων". Logeion. University of Chicago. Archived from the original on 2 November 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2020.
  3. ^ a b Law 1978, p. 135.
  4. ^ Schmitz 1867, p. 346.
  5. ^ Hanno 1977, p. 24.
  6. ^ a b Lendering 2020, p. 2.
  7. ^ Law 1978, p. 134.
  8. ^ a b c d Warmington 1960, p. 62.
  9. ^ Law 1978, p. 121.
  10. ^ a b c d Oikonomides 1977, p. 17.
  11. ^ a b c Lendering 2020, p. 1.
  12. ^ a b c d Warmington 1960, p. 64.
  13. ^ Cary & Warmington 1929, p. 184.
  14. ^ Kroupa 2019, p. 799.
  15. ^ Hanno 1977, pp. 25, 27, 29.
  16. ^ Hanno 1977, p. 25.
  17. ^ Hanno 1977, p. 27.
  18. ^ Warmington 1960, pp. 74–76.
  19. ^ a b c Warmington 1960, p. 61.
  20. ^ Schmitz 1867, p. 346.
  21. ^ Harden 1963, p. 168.
  22. ^ Murray 1844, p. 12.
  23. ^ Warmington 1960, p. 79.
  24. ^ Mauny 1955.[page needed]
  25. ^ a b Hanno 1977, p. 29.
  26. ^ Hoyos 2010, p. 53.
  27. ^ Savage & Wyman 1847, pp. 419–420.
  28. ^ Pliny the Elder 1855, Book 2 Chapter 7
  29. ^ Arrian 2013, p. 265.
  30. ^ Herodotus 1920, 4.196.
  31. ^ "Planetary Names: Crater, craters: Hanno on Moon". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. International Astronomical Union, United States Geological Survey, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  32. ^ Kroupa 2019, p. 3.

Bibliography

Ancient

Further reading

External links

Look up periplus in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanno_the_Navigator&oldid=1209777441"