Health 2.0
"Health 2.0" is a term introduced in the mid-2000s, as the subset of health care technologies mirroring the wider Web 2.0 movement. It has been defined variously as including social media, user-generated content, and cloud-based and mobile technologies. Some Health 2.0 proponents see these technologies as empowering patients to have greater control over their own health care and diminishing medical paternalism. Critics of the technologies have expressed concerns about possible misinformation and violations of patient privacy.
History
Health 2.0 built on the possibilities for changing health care, which started with the introduction of eHealth in the mid-1990s following the emergence of the World Wide Web. In the mid-2000s, following the widespread adoption both of the Internet and of easy to use tools for communication, social networking, and self-publishing, there was spate of media attention to and increasing interest from patients, clinicians, and medical librarians in using these tools for health care and medical purposes.[1][2]
Early examples of Health 2.0 were the use of a specific set of Web tools (
Current use
While the "2.0" moniker was originally associated with concepts like collaboration, openness, participation, and
Public Health 2.0
Public Health 2.0 is a movement within public health that aims to make the field more accessible to the general public and more user-driven. The term is used in three senses. In the first sense, "Public Health 2.0" is similar to "Health 2.0" and describes the ways in which traditional public health practitioners and institutions are reaching out (or could reach out) to the public through social media and health blogs.[7][8]
In the second sense, "Public Health 2.0" describes public health research that uses data gathered from social networking sites, search engine queries, cell phones, or other technologies.[9] A recent example is the proposal of statistical framework that utilizes online user-generated content (from social media or search engine queries) to estimate the impact of an influenza vaccination campaign in the UK.[10]
In the third sense, "Public Health 2.0" is used to describe public health activities that are completely user-driven.
Definitions
The "traditional" definition of "Health 2.0" focused on technology as an enabler for care collaboration: "The use of social software t-weight tools to promote collaboration between patients, their caregivers, medical professionals, and other stakeholders in health."[14]
In 2011, Indu Subaiya redefined Health 2.0[15] as the use in health care of new cloud, Saas, mobile, and device technologies that are:
- Adaptable technologies which easily allow other tools and applications to link and integrate with them, primarily through use of accessible APIs
- Focused on the user experience, bringing in the principles of user-centered design
- Data driven, in that they both create data and present data to the user in order to help improve decision making
This wider definition allows recognition of what is or what isn't a Health 2.0 technology. Typically, enterprise-based, customized client-server systems are not, while more open, cloud based systems fit the definition. However, this line was blurring by 2011-2 as more enterprise vendors started to introduce cloud-based systems and native applications for new devices like smartphones and tablets.
In addition, Health 2.0 has several competing terms, each with its own followers—if not exact definitions—including
- Personalized search that looks into the long tail but cares about the user experience
- Communities that capture the accumulated knowledge of patients, caregivers, and clinicians, and explains it to the world
- Intelligent tools for content delivery—and transactions
- Better integration of data with content
Wider health system definitions
In the late 2000s, several commentators used Health 2.0 as a moniker for a wider concept of system reform, seeking a participatory process between patient and clinician: "New concept of health care wherein all the constituents (patients, physicians, providers, and payers) focus on health care value (outcomes/price) and use competition at the medical condition level over the full cycle of care as the catalyst for improving the safety, efficiency, and quality of health care".[16]
Health 2.0 defines the combination of health data and health information with (patient) experience, through the use of ICT, enabling the citizen to become an active and responsible partner in his/her own health and care pathway.[17]
Health 2.0 is participatory healthcare. Enabled by information, software, and communities that we collect or create, we the patients can be effective partners in our own healthcare, and we the people can participate in reshaping the health system itself.[18]
Definitions of
Overview
Health 2.0 refers to the use of a diverse set of technologies including
Much of the potential for change from Health 2.0 is facilitated by combining technology driven trends such as Personal Health Records with social networking —"[which] may lead to a powerful new generation of health applications, where people share parts of their electronic health records with other consumers and 'crowdsource' the collective wisdom of other patients and professionals."
A hypothetical example demonstrates the increased engagement of a patient operating in a Health 2.0 setting: a patient goes to see their
Level of use of Web 2.0 in health care
Partly due to weak definitions, the novelty of the endeavor and its nature as an entrepreneurial (rather than academic) movement, little empirical evidence exists to explain how much Web 2.0 is being used in general. While it has been estimated that nearly one-third of the 100 million Americans who have looked for health information online say that they or people they know have been significantly helped by what they found,[26] this study considers only the broader use of the Internet for health management.
A study examining physician practices has suggested that a segment of 245,000 physicians in the U.S are using Web 2.0 for their practice, indicating that use is beyond the stage of the early adopter with regard to physicians and Web 2.0.[27]
Types of Web 2.0 technology in health care
The following are examples of uses that have been documented in academic literature.
Purpose | Description | Case example in academic literature | Users |
---|---|---|---|
Staying informed | Used to stay informed of latest developments in a particular field | Podcasts, RSS, and search tools[2] | All (medical professionals and public) |
Medical education | Use for professional development for doctors, and public health promotion for by public health professionals and the general public | How podcasts can be used on the move to increase total available educational time[29] or the many applications of these tools to public health[30] | All (medical professionals and public) |
Collaboration and practice | Web 2.0 tools use in daily practice for medical professionals to find information and make decisions | Google searches revealed the correct diagnosis in 15 out of 26 cases (58%, 95% confidence interval 38% to 77%) in a 2005 study[31] | Doctors, nurses |
Managing a particular disease | Patients who use search tools to find out information about a particular condition | Shown that patients have different patterns of usage depending on if they are newly diagnosed or managing a severe long-term illness. Long-term patients are more likely to connect to a community in Health 2.0[32] | Public |
Sharing data for research | Completing patient-reported outcomes and aggregating the data for personal and scientific research | Disease specific communities for patients with rare conditions aggregate data on treatments, symptoms, and outcomes to improve their decision making ability and carry out scientific research such as observational trials[33] | All (medical professionals and public) |
Criticism of the use of Web 2.0 in health care
Hughes et al. (2009) argue there are four major tensions represented in the literature on Health/Medicine 2.0. These concern:[3]
- the lack of clear definitions
- issues around the loss of control over information that doctors perceive
- safety and the dangers of inaccurate information
- issues of ownership and privacy
Several criticisms have been raised about the use of Web 2.0 in health care. Firstly,
See also
- e-Patient
- Health 3.0
- Patient opinion leader
- Digital health
References
- ^ "Health 2.0: Technology and society: Is the outbreak of cancer videos, bulimia blogs and other forms of 'user generated' medical information a healthy trend?". The Economist. September 6, 2007. pp. 73–74.
- ^ PMID 17185707.
- ^ PMID 18682374.
- Chronic Disease, 4(3): 75
- ^ PMID 18725354.
- ^ Krueger; Providers, Trackers, & Money: What You Need to Know About Health 2.0 http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2014/01/14/providers-trackers-money-what-you-need-to-know-about-health-2-0/
- PMID 19433834.
- PMID 19254656.
- ^ "Public Health 2.0: Spreading like a virus" (PDF). 24 April 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
- .
- ^ DLSPH Conference Planning Committee. "Public Health 2.0 FAQs". Public Health 2.0 Conference. Archived from the original on 5 February 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
- ^ D. Parvaz (26 April 2011). "Crowdsourcing Japan's radiation levels". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
- S2CID 11413676.
- ^ Adapted from Jane Sarasohn-Kahn's "Wisdom of Patients" report, by Matthew Holt, Last updated June 6, 2008
- ^ Subaiya/Holt; Introduction & Definition of Health 2.0, Health 2.0 Europe Conference 2011: http://www.health2con.com/tv/?p=2047&viddlertime=572.524[permanent dead link]
- ^ Last updated on May 25, 2007 Scott Shreeve, MD - January 24, 2007)
- ^ "Patient 2.0 Empowerment", Lodewijk Bos, Andy Marsh, Denis Carroll, Sanjeev Gupta, Mike Rees, Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Semantic Web & Web Services SWWS08, Hamid R. Arabnia, Andy Marsh (eds), pp. 164–167, 2008, http://www.icmcc.org/pdf/ICMCCSWWS08.pdf Archived 2009-02-19 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Ted Eytan MD, June 6, 2008, http://www.tedeytan.com/2008/06/13/1089
- ^ Eysenbach, Gunther. Medicine 2.0 Congress Website launched (and: Definition of Medicine 2.0 / Health 2.0)
- ^ Gunther Eysenbach's random research rants (Blog). URL: http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/2008/03/medicine-20-congress-website-launched.html. Accessed: 2008-03-07
- PMID 20542857.
- S2CID 5375141.
- S2CID 12262724.
- PMID 7089608.
- S2CID 205565125.
- ^ Levy, M. 2007. Online Health. Assessing the Risk and Opportunity of Social and One-to-One Media. Jupiter Research. Accessed at http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:vision/103/id=98795/ Archived 2008-11-28 at the Wayback Machine on 20/1/2008
- ^ Manhattan Research, LLC. 2007. White Paper: Physicians and Web 2.0: 5 Things You Should Know about the Evolving Online Landscape for Physicians. Accessed at "White Paper: "Physicians and Web 2.0" from Manhattan Research". Archived from the original on 2008-01-25. Retrieved 2008-01-28. on 20/1/2008
- PMID 25842175.
- S2CID 41131481.
- PMID 17572979.
- ^ PMID 17098763.
- ^ Ferguson, T. ePatients white paper. www.e-patients.net. 2007. URL: http://www.e-patients.net/e-Patients_White_Paper.pdf Archived 2008-07-23 at the Wayback Machine on 22/1/08
- PMID 18999176.
- PMID 24841406.
- ^ Ojalvo, H. E. (1996). Online advice: Good medicine or cyber-quackery? Retrieved September 22, 2007 from http://www.acponline.org/journals/news/dec96/cybrquak.htm Archived 2008-05-17 at the Wayback Machine
- PMID 19745316.
- S2CID 7393830.
- PMID 24659212.
- PMID 23406655.
- PMID 25665960.
- ^ a b Economist, The. 2007. Health 2.0 : Technology and society: Is the outbreak of cancer videos, bulimia blogs and other forms of "user generated" medical information a healthy trend? The Economist, September 6: 73-74
External links
- "Web Site Harnesses Power of Social Networks", The Washington Post, October 19, 2009