High king

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A high king is a

king of kings
. The high kings of history usually ruled over lands of cultural unity; thus high kings differentiate from emperors who control culturally different lands, and feudal monarchs, where subordinates assume lesser positions. High kings can be chosen by lesser rulers through elections, or be put into power by force through conquest of weaker kingdoms.

High kingship

In history and literature, high kings may be found where there is a high degree of cultural unity, along with sufficient political fragmentation that the high king's subordinates style themselves kings. In this respect, high kingships frequently differ from empires, which are culturally as well as politically heterogeneous, as well as from feudal monarchies, where the subordinate rulers take lesser titles (such as duke or count) and may be, at least in theory, subject to appointment and dismissal by the sovereign.

In this model, a high king might be chosen from among a group of kings in his personal capacity, for instance by election or on the basis of genealogical superiority. Alternatively, the high kingship might be attached to the kingship of one of the constituent kingdoms, either permanently or when one kingdom is able to assert supremacy over the others. The high king's authority over other kings is usually limited, and in some high kingships his duties are largely ceremonial or restricted to occasions such as war that create a need for a unified command structure.

Historical high kings

Rulers who have been termed "high king" (by their contemporaries or by modern observers) include:

  • the King of the Britons, such as the legendary King Arthur, Uther Pendragon, and possibly Vortigern, have been termed "High King of Britain."
  • the ruler of the Picts.
  • the "Bretwalda" was essentially the high king of the Anglo-Saxons, though the name is rarely translated as such.
  • some
    anax
    )
  • the most powerful king of the various Etruscan city-states
  • Mepe-Umaglesi (most high king) was a predicate of the
    Mepe-Mepeta
    (king of kings)
  • in Lithuania, the title of Didysis Kunigaikštis is more accurately translated as "high king", although it is traditionally rendered as "grand duke"
  • in ancient Sumer, the rulers of all Sumer held the title of Nam-Lugal (high king).[1]
  • In

    Imperial Germany, the German Emperor (Deutscher Kaiser), who was also the King of Prussia, could be considered a contemporary "high king", as he held seniority over the other monarchs of the empire (three kings, six grand dukes, five reigning dukes and seven reigning princes
    ) as "president of the confederation".

    The

    Yang di-Pertuan Agong (literally "supreme lord") in Malaysia could probably be seen as a "high king", as he is elected from among nine Malay rulers of the states (seven sultans, a raja, and a Yang di-Pertuan Besar-literally "great lord") by the Conference of Rulers
    (through informal agreement, on a rotational basis). In practice, however, the term "high king" is rarely applied to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (king).

    Adhiraja or Adiraja is the comparable term of high king in the

    title inflation
    which soon led to most being rather mediocre or even petty in real power, which led to compound titles (among other efforts) being used in an attempt to distinguish some among their ranks.

    King Gojong declared the Korean Empire in 1897 and assumed the title of Hwangje, or "emperor" (the Korean rendition of the Chinese
    "huang di").

    Originally, the rulers of Wa (), an ancient name of Japan, was known as the "Grand King of Yamato" (大和大王, Yamato-ōkimi) or the "Kings of Wa" (倭国王, Wakoku-ō) prior to the 7th century. It was later changed to become the Emperor of Japan (天皇, Tennō).

    The title "

    shahanshah) and the Emperor of Ethiopia. Similarly, the Imperial Mongolian title Khagan is sometimes translated as Khan
    of Khans.

    In fiction

    See also

    References

    1. ^ Dawson, Doyne. The First Armies. London: Cassell & Co. 2001, p. 80.