History of the British Raj
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (November 2023) |
Colonial India | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
After the
The British Raj lasted until 1947, when the
The East India Company was an English and later British joint-stock company.[1] It was formed to trade in the Indian Ocean region, initially with Mughal India and the East Indies, and later with Qing China. The company ended up seizing control of large parts of the Indian subcontinent, colonised parts of Southeast Asia, and colonised Hong Kong after a war with Qing China.
Prelude
Effects on the economy
In the later half of the 19th century, both the direct administration of India by the
The rush of technology was also changing the agricultural economy in India: by the last decade of the 19th century, a large fraction of some raw materials—not only cotton, but also some food-grains—were being exported to faraway markets.[7] Consequently, many small farmers, dependent on the whims of those markets, lost land, animals, and equipment to money-lenders.[7] More tellingly, the latter half of the 19th century also saw an increase in the number of large-scale famines in India. Although famines were not new to the subcontinent, these were particularly severe, with tens of millions dying,[citation needed] and with many critics, both British and Indian, laying the blame at the doorsteps of the lumbering colonial administrations.[7]
-
Lord Ripon, the Liberal Viceroy of India, who instituted the Famine Code
-
TheAgra canal(c. 1873), a year away from completion. The canal was closed to navigation in 1904 to increase irrigation and aid in famine-prevention.
-
Railway map of India in 1909. Railway construction in India had begun in 1853.
-
A 1903 stereographic image ofBombay, by Underwood and Underwood. The station was completed in 1888.
In terms of the longer lasting effects and legacies of the economic impact of the British Raj, the impact predominantly stems from the irregular investment of areas of infrastructure. Simon Carey explains how the investment into Indian society was 'narrowly focused' and favoured the growth of transportation of goods and workers.[8] Therefore, India has since seen an uneven economic development of society. For example, Acemoglu et al. (2001) identify how the inability of certain areas of rural India to cope with disease and famine best explain this uneven development of the nation.[9] Carey also points out that a lasting impact of the British Raj is the transformation of India into an agricultural trading economy.[10] Therefore, some areas of India, predominantly in affluent urban areas, have benefited from the legacies of the British Raj in the long term due to the transformation of Indian economic culture to a production based economy. However, the majority of Indian society has experienced a negative impact of the British Raj, especially in rural and suburban areas, due to the focus of investment into transport such as railways and canals rather than into healthcare and primary education.[original research?]
Beginnings of self-government
The first steps were taken toward self-government in British India in the late 19th century with the appointment of Indian counsellors to advise the British viceroy and the establishment of provincial councils with Indian members; the British subsequently widened participation in legislative councils with the
The
The Morley-Minto Reforms were a milestone. Step by step, the elective principle was introduced for membership in Indian legislative councils. The "electorate" was limited, however, to a small group of upper-class Indians. These elected members increasingly became an "opposition" to the "official government". The Communal electorates were later extended to other communities and made a political factor of the Indian tendency toward group identification through religion.
-
John Morley, the Secretary of State for India from 1905 to 1910, and Gladstonian Liberal. The Indian Councils Act 1909, also known as the Minto-Morley Reforms allowed Indians to be elected to the Legislative Council.
-
Picture post card of the Gordon Highlanders marching pastKing George V and Queen Mary at the Delhi Durbar on 12 December 1911, when the King was crowned Emperor of India.
-
Indian medical orderlies attending to wounded soldiers with the Mesopotamian Expeditionary Force in Mesopotamia during World War I.
World War I and its causes
In 1916, in the face of new strength demonstrated by the nationalists with the signing of the
Earlier, at the onset of World War I, the reassignment of most of the British army in India to Europe and
Consequently, in 1917, even as Edwin Montagu announced the new constitutional reforms,
With the end of World War I, there was also a change in the economic climate. By year's end 1919, 1.5 million Indians had served in the armed services in either combatant or non-combatant roles, and India had provided £146 million in revenue for the war.
To combat what it saw as a coming crisis, the government now drafted the Rowlatt committee's recommendations into two
Montagu–Chelmsford Report 1919
Meanwhile, Montagu and Chelmsford themselves finally presented their report in July 1918 after a long fact-finding trip through India the previous winter.[23] After more discussion by the government and parliament in Britain, and another tour by the Franchise and Functions Committee for the purpose of identifying who among the Indian population could vote in future elections, the Government of India Act 1919 (also known as the Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms) was passed in December 1919.[23] The new Act enlarged the provincial councils and converted the Imperial Legislative Council into an enlarged Central Legislative Assembly. It also repealed the Government of India's recourse to the "official majority" in unfavourable votes.[23] Although departments like defence, foreign affairs, criminal law, communications and income-tax were retained by the Viceroy and the central government in New Delhi, other departments like public health, education, land-revenue and local self-government were transferred to the provinces.[23] The provinces themselves were now to be administered under a new dyarchical system, whereby some areas like education, agriculture, infrastructure development, and local self-government became the preserve of Indian ministers and legislatures, and ultimately the Indian electorates, while others like irrigation, land-revenue, police, prisons, and control of media remained within the purview of the British governor and his executive council.[23] The new Act also made it easier for Indians to be admitted into the civil service and the army officer corps.
A greater number of Indians were now enfranchised, although, for voting at the national level, they constituted only 10% of the total adult male population, many of whom were still illiterate.
Round Table Conferences 1930–31–32
The three
Willingdon imprisons leaders of Congress
In 1932 the Viceroy, Lord Willingdon, after the failure of the three Round Table Conferences (India) in London, now confronted Gandhi's Congress in action. The India Office told Willingdon that he should conciliate only those elements of Indian opinion that were willing to work with the Raj. That did not include Gandhi and the Indian National Congress, which launched its Civil Disobedience Movement on 4 January 1932. Therefore, Willingdon took decisive action.[27] He imprisoned Gandhi. He outlawed the Congress; he rounded up all members of the Working Committee and the Provincial Committees and imprisoned them; and he banned Congress youth organisations. In total he imprisoned 80,000 Indian activists. Without most of their leaders, protests were uneven and disorganised, boycotts were ineffective, illegal youth organisations proliferated but were ineffective, more women became involved, and there was terrorism, especially in the North-West Frontier Province. Gandhi remained in prison until 1933.[28][29] Willingdon relied on his military secretary, Hastings Ismay, for his personal safety.[30]
Communal Award: 1932
MacDonald, trying to resolve the critical issue of how Indians would be represented, on 16 August 1932 announced the
Government of India Act (1935)
In 1935, after the failure of the Round Table Conferences, the British Parliament approved the
World War II
India played a major role in the Allied war effort against both Japan and Germany. It provided over 2 million soldiers, who fought numerous campaigns in the Middle East, and in the India-Burma front and also supplied billions of pounds to the British war effort. The Muslim and Sikh populations were strongly supportive of the British war effort, but the Hindu population was divided. Congress opposed the war, and tens of thousands of its leaders were imprisoned in 1942–45.[34][35][36] A major famine in eastern India led to hundreds of thousands of deaths by starvation, and remains a highly controversial issue regarding Churchill's reluctance to provide emergency food relief.[37]
With the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, declared war on India's behalf without consulting Indian leaders, leading the Congress provincial ministries to resign in protest. The Muslim League, in contrast, supported Britain in the war effort; however, it now took the view that Muslims would be unfairly treated in an independent India dominated by the Congress. Hindus not affiliated with the Congress typically supported the war. The two major Sikh factions, the Unionists and the Akali Dal, supported Britain and successfully urged large numbers of Sikhs to volunteer for the army.[38]
Quit India movement or the Bharat Chhodo Andolan
The British sent a high level Cripps Mission in 1942 to secure Indian nationalists' co-operation in the war effort in exchange for postwar independence and dominion status. Congress demanded immediate independence and the mission failed. Gandhi then launched the Quit India Movement in August 1942, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the British from India or face nationwide civil disobedience. Along with thousands of other Congress leaders, Gandhi was immediately imprisoned, and the country erupted in violent local episodes led by students and later by peasant political groups, especially in Eastern United Provinces, Bihar, and western Bengal. According to John F. Riddick, from 9 August 1942 to 21 September 1942, the Quit India movement:
- attacked 550 post offices, 250 railway stations, damaged many rail lines, destroyed 70 police stations, and burned or damaged 85 other government buildings. There were about 2,500 instances of telegraph wires being cut....The Government of India deployed 57 battalions of British troops to restore order.[39]
The police and army crushed the resistance in months. Nationalist leaders were imprisoned until the end of World War 2.[40]
Ultimately, the British government realised that India was ungovernable in the long run, and the question for the postwar era became how to exit gracefully and peacefully.
In 1945, when the World War 2 had almost come to an end, the Labour Party of the United Kingdom won elections with a promise to provide independence to India.[41][42] The jailed political prisoners were released the same year.[43]
Bose and the Indian National Army (INA)
Bose's Indian National Army surrendered with the recapture of Singapore; Bose died in a plane crash soon thereafter.
The British demanded
Finances
Britain borrowed everywhere it could and made heavy purchases of equipment and supplies in India during the war.[52] Previously India owed Britain large sums; now it was reversed.[53] Britain's sterling balances around the world amounted to £3.4 billion in 1945; India's share was £1.3 billion (equivalent to $US 74 billion in 2016 dollars.)[54][55] In this way the Raj treasury accumulated very large sterling reserves of British pounds that was owed to it by the British treasury. However, Britain treated this as a long-term loan with no interest and no specified repayment date. Just when the money would be made available by London was an issue, for the British treasury was nearly empty by 1945. India's balances totalled to Rs. 17.24 billion in March 1946; of that sum Rs. 15.12 billion [£1.134 billion] was split between India and Pakistan when they became independent in August 1947. They finally got the money and India spent all its share by 1957 which included buying back British owned assets in India.[56]
Transfer of Power
The
In January 1946, a number of mutinies broke out in the armed services, starting with
Also in early 1946, new elections were called in India in which the Congress won electoral victories in eight of the eleven provinces.
Later that year, the Labour government in Britain, its exchequer exhausted by the recently concluded World War II, decided to end British rule of India, and in early 1947, Britain announced its intention to transfer power no later than June 1948.
As independence approached, the violence between Hindus and Muslims in the provinces of Punjab and Bengal continued unabated. With the British army unprepared for the potential for increased violence, the new viceroy,
Many millions of Muslim, Sikh, and Hindu refugees trekked across the newly drawn borders. In Punjab, where the new border lines divided the Sikh regions in half, massive bloodshed followed; in Bengal and Bihar, where Gandhi's presence assuaged communal tempers, the violence was more limited. In all, anywhere between 250,000 and 500,000 people on both sides of the new borders died in the violence.[64] On 14 August 1947, the new Dominion of Pakistan came into being, with Muhammad Ali Jinnah sworn in as its first Governor General in Karachi. The following day, 15 August 1947, India, now a smaller Union of India, became an independent country with official ceremonies taking place in New Delhi, with Jawaharlal Nehru assuming the office of the prime minister, and the viceroy, Louis Mountbatten, stayed on as its first Governor General.
See also
- British Raj
- Company rule in India
- British East India Company
Notes
- ^ The Dutch East India Company was the first to issue public stock.
- ^ (Stein 2001, p. 259), (Oldenburg 2007)
- ^ (Oldenburg 2007), (Stein 2001, p. 258)
- ^ a b (Oldenburg 2007)
- ^ (Stein 2001, p. 258)
- ^ (Stein 2001, p. 159)
- ^ a b c (Stein 2001, p. 260)
- ^ Carey 2012
- ^ Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson 2001
- ^ Carey 2012
- ^ a b c d Brown 1994, pp. 197–198
- ^ Olympic Games Antwerp 1920: Official Report Archived 5 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Nombre de bations representees, p. 168. Quote: "31 Nations avaient accepté l'invitation du Comité Olympique Belge:... la Grèce – la Hollande Les Indes Anglaises – l'Italie – le Japon ..."
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Brown 1994, pp. 203–204
- ^ a b c Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, p. 166
- ^ a b c Brown 1994, pp. 201–203
- ^ Lovett 1920, pp. 94, 187–191
- ^ Sarkar 1921, p. 137
- ^ Tinker 1968, p. 92
- ^ a b c Spear 1990, p. 190
- ^ a b c Brown 1994, pp. 195–196
- ^ a b c Stein 2001, p. 304
- ^ Ludden 2002, p. 208
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Brown 1994, pp. 205–207
- ISBN 978-0-19-577389-7.
- ISBN 978-0-19-906606-3.
- ISBN 9780852297605.
- ISBN 9780313322808.
- ^ Brian Roger Tomlinson, The Indian National Congress and the Raj, 1929–1942: the penultimate phase (Springer, 1976).
- ^ Rosemary Rees. India 1900–47 (Heineman, 2006) p 122
- ISBN 978-0-8371-6280-5.
- .
- ^ (Low 1993, pp. 40, 156)
- ^ a b (Low 1993, p. 154)
- ^ Srinath Raghavan, India's War: World War II and the Making of Modern South Asia (2016).
- ^ Yasmin Khan, India At War: The Subcontinent and the Second World War (2015).
- ^ Lawrence James, Raj: the making and remaking of British India (1997) pp 545–85
- ^ Madhusree Mukerjee, Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II (2010).
- ISBN 9781349234103.
- ^ John F. Riddick, The History of British India: A Chronology (2006) p 115
- ^ Srinath Raghavan, India's War: World War II and the Making of Modern South Asia (2016) pp 233–75.
- ISBN 978-0-429-96865-5.
The Labour Party promised independence for India in its campaign in the general election of 1945.
- ISBN 978-0-19-564228-5.
Labour Party had promised freedom for India if they came to power
- ^ Naveen Sharma (1990). Right to Property in India. Deep & Deep Publications. p. 36.
- ^ Chaudhuri 1953, p. 355
- ^ a b Low 1993, p. 31
- ^ Lebra 1977, p. 23
- ^ Lebra 1977, p. 31
- ISBN 978-1-135-76456-2.
- ^ Marston2014, pp. 130–132: "Many Indian Army POWs were perplexed by Congress's sudden support for the INA"
- ^ Singh 2003, p. 98.
- ^ Sarkar 1983, p. 420
- ISBN 0-521-22802-6.
- ^ Srinath Raghavan, India's War: World War II and the Making of Modern South Asia (2016) pp 339–47.
- ^ See "Pounds Sterling to Dollars: Historical Conversion of Currency"
- ^ Marcelo de Paiva Abreu, "India as a creditor: sterling balances, 1940–1953." (Department of Economics, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, 2015) online
- ISBN 9788171884292.
- ISBN 9781108621236.
- ^ Haq, Mushir U. (1970). Muslim politics in modern India, 1857-1947. Meenakshi Prakashan. p. 114.
This was also reflected in one of the resolutions of the Azad Muslim Conference, an organization which attempted to be representative of all the various nationalist Muslim parties and groups in India.
- ^ a b Ahmed, Ishtiaq (27 May 2016). "The dissenters". The Friday Times.
However, the book is a tribute to the role of one Muslim leader who steadfastly opposed the Partition of India: the Sindhi leader Allah Bakhsh Soomro. Allah Bakhsh belonged to a landed family. He founded the Sindh People's Party in 1934, which later came to be known as 'Ittehad' or 'Unity Party'. ... Allah Bakhsh was totally opposed to the Muslim League's demand for the creation of Pakistan through a division of India on a religious basis. Consequently, he established the Azad Muslim Conference. In its Delhi session held during April 27–30, 1940 some 1400 delegates took part. They belonged mainly to the lower castes and working class. The famous scholar of Indian Islam, Wilfred Cantwell Smith, feels that the delegates represented a 'majority of India's Muslims'. Among those who attended the conference were representatives of many Islamic theologians and women also took part in the deliberations ... Shamsul Islam argues that the All-India Muslim League at times used intimidation and coercion to silence any opposition among Muslims to its demand for Partition. He calls such tactics of the Muslim League as a 'Reign of Terror'. He gives examples from all over India including the NWFP where the Khudai Khidmatgars remain opposed to the Partition of India.
- ^ a b c Ali, Afsar (17 July 2017). "Partition of India and Patriotism of Indian Muslims". The Milli Gazette.
- ^ a b (Judd 2004, pp. 172–173)
- ^ (Judd 2004, p. 172)
- ^ Abid, Abdul Majeed (29 December 2014). "The forgotten massacre". The Nation.
On the same dates, Muslim League-led mobs fell with determination and full preparations on the helpless Hindus and Sikhs scattered in the villages of Multan, Rawalpindi, Campbellpur, Jhelum and Sargodha. The murderous mobs were well supplied with arms, such as daggers, swords, spears and fire-arms. (A former civil servant mentioned in his autobiography that weapon supplies had been sent from the NWFP and money was supplied by Delhi-based politicians.) They had bands of stabbers and their auxiliaries, who covered the assailant, ambushed the victim and disposed of his body if necessary. These bands were monetarily subsidized by the Muslim League, and cash payments were made to individual assassins based on the numbers of Hindus and Sikhs who they had killed. There were also regular patrolling parties in jeeps which went about sniping and picking off any stray Hindus and Sikhs. ... Thousands of non-combatants including women and children were killed or injured by mobs, supported by the All India Muslim League.
- ^ (Khosla 2001, p. 299)
Surveys and reference books
- Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar (2004), From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India, New Delhi and London: Orient Longmans. Pp. xx, 548., ISBN 81-250-2596-0.
- Brown, Judith M. (1994), Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy, Oxford and New York: ISBN 0-19-873113-2.
- Buckland, C.E. Dictionary of Indian Biography (1906) 495pp full text
- Copland, Ian (2001), India 1885–1947: The Unmaking of an Empire (Seminar Studies in History Series), Harlow and London: Pearson Longmans. Pp. 160, ISBN 0-582-38173-8.
- Judd, Dennis (2004), The Lion and the Tiger: The Rise and Fall of the British Raj, 1600–1947, Oxford and New York: ISBN 0-19-280358-1.
- Keay, John (2000), India: A History, New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, ISBN 0-87113-800-X
- Ludden, David (2002), India And South Asia: A Short History, Oxford: Oneworld Publications. Pp. xii, 306, ISBN 1-85168-237-6, archived from the originalon 16 July 2011, retrieved 4 May 2008
- Markovits, Claude, ed. (2005), A History of Modern India 1480–1950 (Anthem South Asian Studies), Anthem Press. Pp. 607, ISBN 1-84331-152-6.
- Metcalf, Barbara; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2006), A Concise History of Modern India (Cambridge Concise Histories), Cambridge and New York: ISBN 0-521-68225-8.
- Peers, Douglas M. (2006), India under Colonial Rule 1700–1885, Harlow and London: Pearson Longmans. Pp. xvi, 163, ISBN 0-582-31738-X.
- Rees, Rosemary. India 1900–47 (Heineman, 2006), textbook.
- Riddick, John F. Who Was Who in British India (1998); 5000 entries excerpt
- Robb, Peter (2004), A History of India (Palgrave Essential Histories), Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. xiv, 344, ISBN 0-333-69129-6.
- Sarkar, Sumit (1983), Modern India: 1885–1947, Delhi: Macmillan India Ltd. Pp. xiv, 486, ISBN 0-333-90425-7.
- ISBN 0-14-013836-6.
- Stein, Burton (2001), A History of India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv, 432, ISBN 0-19-565446-3.
- ISBN 0-19-516678-7.
Monographs and collections
- ISBN 0-521-38650-0.
- ISBN 0-521-66360-1
- Brown, Judith M.; Louis, Wm. Roger, eds. (2001), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Twentieth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 800, ISBN 0-19-924679-3
- Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan (1998), Imperial Power and Popular Politics: Class, Resistance and the State in India, 1850–1950, (Cambridge Studies in Indian History & Society). Cambridge and London: ISBN 0-521-59692-0.
- Copland, Ian (2002), Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917–1947, (Cambridge Studies in Indian History & Society). Cambridge and London: ISBN 0-521-89436-0.
- Gilmartin, David. 1988. Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press. 258 pages. ISBN 0-520-06249-3.
- Gould, William (2004), Hindu Nationalism and the Language of Politics in Late Colonial India, (Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society). Cambridge and London: ISBN 0-521-83061-3.
- Hyam, Ronald (2007), Britain's Declining Empire: The Road to Decolonisation 1918–1968., Cambridge University Press., ISBN 978-0-521-86649-1.
- Jalal, Ayesha (1993), The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 334 pages, ISBN 0-521-45850-1.
- Khan, Yasmin (2007), The Great Partition: The Making of India and Pakistan, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 250 pages, ISBN 978-0-300-12078-3
- Khosla, G. D. (2001), "Stern Reckoning", in Page, David; Inder Singh, Anita; Moon, Penderal; Khosla, G. D.; Hasan, Mushirul (eds.), The Partition Omnibus: Prelude to Partition/the Origins of the Partition of India 1936-1947/Divide and Quit/Stern Reckoning, Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-565850-7
- ISBN 0-231-03995-6
- Low, D. A. (1993), Eclipse of Empire, Cambridge and London: ISBN 0-521-45754-8.
- Low, D. A. (2002), Britain and Indian Nationalism: The Imprint of Amibiguity 1929–1942, Cambridge and London: ISBN 0-521-89261-9.
- Low, D. A., ed. (2004) [1977], Congress & the Raj: Facets of the Indian Struggle 1917–47, New Delhi and Oxford: ISBN 0-19-568367-6.
- Marston, Daniel (2014), The Indian Army and End of the Raj, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-89975-8
- Metcalf, Thomas R. (1991), The Aftermath of Revolt: India, 1857–1870, Riverdale Co. Pub. Pp. 352, ISBN 81-85054-99-1
- Metcalf, Thomas R. (1997), Ideologies of the Raj, Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 256, ISBN 0-521-58937-1
- Porter, Andrew, ed. (2001), Oxford History of the British Empire: Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 800, ISBN 0-19-924678-5
- Ramusack, Barbara (2004), The Indian Princes and their States (The New Cambridge History of India), Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 324, ISBN 0-521-03989-4
- Shaikh, Farzana. 1989. Community and Consensus in Islam: Muslim Representation in Colonial India, 1860—1947. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 272 pages. ISBN 0-521-36328-4.
- Singh, Harkirat (2003), INA Trials and the Raj, Atlantic Publishers, ISBN 81-269-0316-3
- Wolpert, Stanley (2006), Shameful Flight: The Last Years of the British Empire in India, Oxford and New York: ISBN 0-19-515198-4.
Articles in journals or collections
- Acemoglu, Daron; Johnson, Simon; Robinson, James A. (December 2001), "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation", The American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1369–1401, JSTOR 2677930
- Banthia, Jayant; Dyson, Tim (December 1999), "Smallpox in Nineteenth-Century India", Population and Development Review, 25 (4), Population Council: 649–689, PMID 22053410
- Brown, Judith M. (2001), "India", in Brown, Judith M.; Louis, Wm. Roger (eds.), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Twentieth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 421–446, ISBN 0-19-924679-3
- Carey, Simon (2012), "The Legacy of British Colonialism in India Post 1947", The New Zealand Review of Economics and Finance, 2: 37–47, ISSN 2324-478X
- JSTOR 2752872
- Derbyshire, I. D. (1987), "Economic Change and the Railways in North India, 1860–1914", Population Studies, 21 (3), Cambridge University Press: 521–545, S2CID 146480332
- Dyson, Tim (March 1991), "On the Demography of South Asian Famines: Part I", Population Studies, 45 (1), Taylor & Francis: 5–25, PMID 11622922
- Dyson, Tim (July 1991), "On the Demography of South Asian Famines: Part II", Population Studies, 45 (2), Taylor & Francis: 279–297, PMID 11622922
- Gilmartin, David (November 1994), "Scientific Empire and Imperial Science: Colonialism and Irrigation Technology in the Indus Basin", The Journal of Asian Studies, 53 (4), Association for Asian Studies: 1127–1149, S2CID 161655860
- Goswami, Manu (October 1998), "From Swadeshi to Swaraj: Nation, Economy, Territory in Colonial South Asia, 1870 to 1907", Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40 (4), Cambridge University Press: 609–636, S2CID 145013372
- Harnetty, Peter (July 1991), "'Deindustrialization' Revisited: The Handloom Weavers of the Central Provinces of India, c. 1800–1947", Modern Asian Studies, 25 (3), Cambridge University Press: 455–510, S2CID 144468476
- Klein, Ira (1988), "Plague, Policy and Popular Unrest in British India", Modern Asian Studies, 22 (4), Cambridge University Press: 723–755, S2CID 42173746
- Klein, Ira (July 2000), "Materialism, Mutiny and Modernization in British India", Modern Asian Studies, 34 (3), Cambridge University Press: 545–580, S2CID 143348610
- Moore, Robin J. (2001a), "Imperial India, 1858–1914", in Porter, Andrew (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 422–446, ISBN 0-19-924678-5
- Moore, Robin J. (2001b), "India in the 1940s", in Winks, Robin (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–242, ISBN 0-19-924680-7
- Overby, Stephanie (17 May 2019), "The top 10 IT outsourcing service providers of the year", CIO
- Ray, Rajat Kanta (July 1995), "Asian Capital in the Age of European Domination: The Rise of the Bazaar, 1800–1914", Modern Asian Studies, 29 (3), Cambridge University Press: 449–554, S2CID 145744242
- Raychaudhuri, Tapan (2001), "India, 1858 to the 1930s", in Winks, Robin (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–230, ISBN 0-19-924680-7
- Robb, Peter (May 1997), "The Colonial State and Constructions of Indian Identity: An Example on the Northeast Frontier in the 1880s", Modern Asian Studies, 31 (2), Cambridge University Press: 245–283, S2CID 145299102
- Roy, Tirthankar (Summer 2002), "Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3), American Economic Association: 109–130, JSTOR 3216953
- JSTOR 2142669
- Simmons, Colin (1985), "'De-Industrialization', Industrialization and the Indian Economy, c. 1850–1947", Modern Asian Studies, 19 (3), Cambridge University Press: 593–622, S2CID 144581168
- Talbot, Ian (2001), "Pakistan's Emergence", in Winks, Robin (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–263, ISBN 0-19-924680-7
- Tinker, Hugh (1968), "India in the First World War and after.", Journal of Contemporary History, 3 (4), Sage Publications: 89–107, S2CID 150456443.
- Tomlinson, B. R. (2001), "Economics and Empire: The Periphery and the Imperial Economy", in Porter, Andrew (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–74, ISBN 0-19-924678-5
- Washbrook, D. A. (2001), "India, 1818–1860: The Two Faces of Colonialism", in Porter, Andrew (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 395–421, ISBN 0-19-924678-5
- Watts, Sheldon (November 1999), "British Development Policies and Malaria in India 1897-c. 1929", Past & Present, 165 (1), Oxford University Press: 141–181, PMID 22043526
- Wylie, Diana (2001), "Disease, Diet, and Gender: Late Twentieth Century Perspectives on Empire", in Winks, Robin (ed.), Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–289, ISBN 0-19-924680-7
Classic Histories and Gazetteers
- Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. IV (1907), The Indian Empire, Administrative, Published under the authority of His Majesty's Secretary of State for India in Council, Oxford at the Clarendon Press. Pp. xxx, 1 map, 552.
- Lovett, Sir Verney (1920), A History of the Indian Nationalist Movement, New York, Frederick A. Stokes Company, ISBN 81-7536-249-9
- Majumdar, R. C.; Raychaudhuri, H. C.; Datta, Kalikinkar (1950), An Advanced History of India, London: Macmillan and Company Limited. 2nd edition. Pp. xiii, 1122, 7 maps, 5 coloured maps..
- Smith, Vincent A. (1921), India in the British Period: Being Part III of the Oxford History of India, Oxford: At the Clarendon Press. 2nd edition. Pp. xxiv, 316 (469–784).
Tertiary Sources
- Oldenburg, Philip (2007), "India: Movement for Freedom", Encarta Encyclopedia, archived from the original on 31 October 2009.
- Wolpert, Stanley (2007), "India: British Imperial Power 1858–1947 (Indian nationalism and the British response, 1885–1920; Prelude to Independence, 1920–1947)", Encyclopædia Britannica.