Homo floresiensis
Homo floresiensis Temporal range:
| |
---|---|
H. floresiensis skull, Cantonal Museum of Geology , Switzerland
| |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Mammalia |
Order: | Primates |
Suborder: | Haplorhini |
Infraorder: | Simiiformes |
Family: | Hominidae |
Subfamily: | Homininae |
Tribe: | Hominini |
Genus: | Homo |
Species: | †H. floresiensis
|
Binomial name | |
†Homo floresiensis Brown et al., 2004
| |
Flores in Indonesia, shown highlighted in red |
Homo floresiensis (
The remains of an individual who would have stood about 1.1 m (3 ft 7 in) in height were discovered in 2003 at Liang Bua cave. Partial skeletons of at least nine individuals have been recovered, including one complete skull, referred to as "LB1".[2][3]
This
Specimens
Discovery
The first specimens were discovered on the Indonesian island of Flores on 2 September 2003 by a joint Australian-Indonesian team of
In 2004, a separate species Homo floresiensis was named and described by Peter Brown et al., with LB1 as the holotype. A tooth, LB2, was referred to the species.[2] LB1 is a fairly complete skeleton, including a nearly complete skull, which belonged to a 30-year-old female, and has been nicknamed "Little Lady of Flores" or "Flo".[2][8] An arm bone provisionally assigned to H. floresiensis, specimen LB3, is about 74,000 years old. The specimens are not fossilized and have been described as having "the consistency of wet blotting paper". Once exposed, the bones had to be left to dry before they could be dug up.[9][10] The discoverers proposed that a variety of features, both primitive and derived, identify these individuals as belonging to a new species.[2][4] Based on previous date estimates, the discoverers also proposed that H. floresiensis lived contemporaneously with modern humans on Flores.[11] Before publication, the discoverers were considering placing LB1 into her own genus, Sundanthropus floresianus (lit. 'Sunda human from Flores'), but reviewers of the article recommended that, despite her size, she should be placed in the genus Homo.[12]
In 2009, additional finds were reported, increasing the minimum number of individuals represented by bones to fourteen.[13] In 2015, teeth were referred to a fifteenth individual, LB15.[14]
Stone implements of a size considered appropriate to these small humans are also widely present in the cave. The implements are at horizons initially dated to 95,000 to 13,000 years ago.[3] Modern humans reached the region by around 50,000 years ago, by which time H. floresiensis is thought to have gone extinct.[1] Comparisons of the stone artifacts with those made by modern humans in East Timor indicate many technological similarities.[15]
Scandal over specimen damage
The fossils are property of the Indonesian state. In early December 2004, Indonesian paleoanthropologist
Press reports thus described the condition of the returned remains: "[including] long, deep cuts marking the lower edge of the Hobbit's jaw on both sides, said to be caused by a knife used to cut away the rubber mould ... the chin of a second Hobbit jaw was snapped off and glued back together. Whoever was responsible misaligned the pieces and put them at an incorrect angle ... The pelvis was smashed, destroying details that reveal body shape, gait and evolutionary history.",[22] causing the discovery team leader Morwood to remark, "It's sickening; Jacob was greedy and acted totally irresponsibly."[20]
Jacob, however, denied any wrongdoing. He stated that the damages occurred during transport from
In 2005, Indonesian officials forbade access to the cave. Some news media, such as the BBC, expressed the opinion that the restriction was to protect Jacob, who was considered "Indonesia's king of palaeoanthropology", from being proved wrong. Scientists were allowed to return to the cave in 2007, shortly after Jacob's death.[22]
Classification
Phylogeny and evolution
Because of the deep neighbouring Lombok Strait, Flores remained an isolated island during episodes of low sea level. Therefore, the ancestors of H. floresiensis could only have reached the island by oceanic dispersal, most likely by rafting.[25] The oldest stone tools on Flores are over 1 million years old.[26][27] Stone artifacts are absent from sites over 1.27 million years old, suggesting that the ancestors of H. floresiensis arrived after this time.[27] In 2016, fossil teeth and a partial jaw from hominins assumed to be ancestral to H. floresiensis were discovered[28] at Mata Menge, about 74 km (46 mi) from Liang Bua. They date to about 700,000 years ago[29] and are noted by Australian archaeologist Gerrit van den Bergh for being even smaller than the later fossils. Based on these, he suggested that H. floresiensis derived from a population of H. erectus and rapidly shrank.[30]
Two orthopedic studies published in 2007 reported that the
A 2009
A
DNA extraction attempt
In 2006, two teams attempted to
Congenital disorder claims
The small brain size of H. floresiensis at 417 cc prompted hypotheses that the specimens were simply H. sapiens with a birth defect, rather than the result of neurological reorganisation.[42] These claims have subsequently been rejected.[43]
Microcephaly
Prior to Jacob's removal of the fossils, American neuroanthropologist
In 2005, the original discoverers of H. floresiensis, after unearthing more specimens, countered that the skeptics had mistakenly attributed the height of H. floresiensis to microcephaly.[3] Falk stated that Martin's assertions were unsubstantiated.[48] In 2006, Australian palaeoanthropologist Debbie Argue and colleagues also concluded that the finds are indeed a new species.[49] In 2007, Falk found that H. floresiensis brains were similar in shape to modern humans, and the frontal and temporal lobes were well-developed, which would not have been the case were they microcephalic.[50]
In 2008, Greek palaeontologist George Lyras and colleagues said that LB1 falls outside the range of variation for human microcephalic skulls.[51] However, a 2013 comparison of the LB1 endocast to a set of 100 normocephalic and 17 microcephalic endocasts showed that there is a wide variation in microcephalic brain shape ratios and that in these ratios the group as such is not clearly distinct from normocephalics. The LB1 brain shape nevertheless aligns slightly better with the microcephalic sample, with the shape at the extreme edge of the normocephalic group.[52] A 2016 pathological analysis of LB1's skull revealed no pathologies nor evidence of microcephaly, and concluded that LB1 is a separate species.[53]
Laron syndrome
A 2007 study postulated that the skeletons were those of humans who suffered from Laron syndrome, which was first reported in 1966, and is most common in inbreeding populations, which may have been the scenario on the small island. It causes a short stature and small skull, and many conditions seen in Laron syndrome patients are also exhibited in H. floresiensis. The estimated height of LB1 is at the lower end of the average for afflicted human women, but the endocranial volume is much smaller than anything exhibited in Laron syndrome patients. DNA analysis would be required to support this theory.[54]
Congenital iodine deficiency syndrome
In 2008 Australian researcher Peter Obendorf—who studies
However, Falk's scans of LB1's pituitary fossa show that it is not larger than usual.[56] Also, in 2009, anthropologists Colin Groves and Catharine FitzGerald compared the Flores bones with those of ten people who had had cretinism, and found no overlap.[57][58] Obendorf and colleagues rejected Groves and FitzGerald's argument the following year.[59] A 2012 study similar to Groves and FitzGeralds' also found no evidence of congenital iodine deficiency syndrome.[60]
Down syndrome
In 2014, physical anthropologist Maciej Henneberg and colleagues claimed that LB1 suffered from Down syndrome, and that the remains of other individuals at the Flores site were merely normal modern humans.[61] However, there are a number of characteristics shared by both LB1 and LB6 as well as other known early humans and absent in H. sapiens, such as the lack of a chin.[62] In 2016, a comparative study concluded that LB1 did not exhibit a sufficient number of Down syndrome characteristics to support a diagnosis.[63]
Anatomy
The most important and obvious identifying features of Homo floresiensis are its small body and small cranial capacity. Brown and Morwood also identified a number of additional, less obvious features that might distinguish LB1 from modern H. sapiens, including the form of the teeth, the absence of a chin, and a lesser torsion in the lower end of the humerus (upper arm bone). Each of these putative distinguishing features has been heavily scrutinized by the scientific community, with different research groups reaching differing conclusions as to whether these features support the original designation of a new species,[49] or whether they identify LB1 as a severely pathological H. sapiens.[47]
A 2015 study of the dental morphology of forty teeth of H. floresiensis compared to 450 teeth of living and extinct human species, states that they had "primitive canine-premolar and advanced molar morphologies," which is unique among hominins.[37]
The discovery of additional partial skeletons[3] has verified the existence of some features found in LB1, such as the lack of a chin, but Jacob and other research teams argue that these features do not distinguish LB1 from local modern humans.[47] Lyras et al. have asserted, based on 3D-morphometrics, that the skull of LB1 differs significantly from all H. sapiens skulls, including those of small-bodied individuals and microcephalics, and is more similar to the skull of Homo erectus.[51] Ian Tattersall argues that the species is wrongly classified as Homo floresiensis as it is far too archaic to assign to the genus Homo.[64]
Size
LB1's height is estimated to have been 1.06 m (3 ft 6 in). The height of a second skeleton, LB8, has been estimated at 1.09 m (3 ft 7 in) based on
Their short stature was likely due to insular dwarfism, where size decreases as a response to fewer resources in an island ecosystem.[2][69] In 2006, Indonesian palaeoanthropologist Teuku Jacob and colleagues said that LB1 has a similar stature to the Rampasasa pygmies who inhabit the island, and that size can vary substantially in pygmy populations.[47] A 2018 study refuted the possibility of Rampasasa pygmies descending from H. floresiensis, concluding that "multiple independent instances of hominin insular dwarfism occurred on Flores". However, as no genetic material from H. floresiensis was examined, a truly definitive conclusion cannot be made.[70]
Aside from smaller body size, the specimens seem to otherwise resemble H. erectus, a species known to have been living in Southeast Asia at times coincident with earlier finds purported to be of H. floresiensis.[3]
Brain
In addition to a small body size, H. floresiensis had a remarkably small
Smaller size does not appear to have affected mental faculties, as Brodmann area 10 on the prefrontal cortex, which is associated with cognition, is about the same size as that of modern humans.[44] H. floresiensis is also associated with evidence for advanced behaviours, such as the use of fire, butchering, and stone tool manufacturing.[3][4]
Limbs
The angle of humeral torsion is much less than in modern humans.[2][3][4] The humeral head of modern humans is twisted between 145 and 165 degrees to the plane of the elbow joint, whereas it is 120 degrees in H. floresiensis. This may have provided an advantage when arm-swinging, and, in tandem with the unusual morphology of the shoulder girdle and short clavicle, would have displaced the shoulders slightly forward into an almost shrugging position. The shrugging position would have compensated for the lower range of motion in the arm, allowing for similar maneuverability in the elbows as modern humans. [32] The wrist bones are similar to those of apes and Australopithecus. They are significantly different from those of modern humans, lacking features which evolved at least 800,000 years ago. [31]
The leg bones are more robust than those of modern humans.[2][3][4] The feet were unusually flat and long in relation with the rest of the body.[72] As a result, when walking, they would have had to have bent the knees further back than modern humans do. This caused a high-stepping gait and low walking speed.[73] The toes had an unusual shape and the big toe was very short.[74]
Culture
The cave yielded over ten thousand stone artefacts, mainly lithic flakes, surprising considering H. floresiensis's small brain. This has led some researchers to theorize that H. floresiensis inherited their tool-making skills from H. erectus.[75] Points, perforators, blades, and microblades were associated with remains of the extinct elephant-relative Stegodon. It has therefore been proposed that H. floresiensis hunted juvenile Stegodon. Similar artefacts are found at the Soa Basin 50 km (31 mi) south, associated with Stegodon and Komodo dragon remains, and are attributed to a likely ancestral population of H. erectus.[2][3][4] Other authors have doubted the extent of hunting of Stegodon by H. floresiensis, noting the rarity of cut marks on remains of Stegodon found at Liang Bua, suggesting that they would have faced intense competition for carcasses with other predators, like the Komodo dragon, the giant stork Leptoptilos robustus, and vultures, and that it was possible that their main prey was instead the giant rats endemic to the island, which are found abundantly at Liang Bua. While it was initially suggested that H. floresiensis was capable of using fire, the supporting evidence for this claim was later found to be unreliable.[43]
Extinction
The youngest H. floresiensis bone remains in the cave date to 60,000 years ago, and the youngest stone tools to 50,000 years ago. The previous estimate of 12,000 BCE was due to an undetected unconformity in the cave stratigraphy. Their disappearance is close to the time that modern humans reached the area, suggesting that the initial encounter caused or contributed to their extinction.[76]
Anthropologist
Paleoecology
During the late Early Pleistocene-Late Pleistocene before the arrival of Homo sapiens, Flores exhibited a depauperate ecosystem with relatively few terrestrial vetebrate species, including the dwarf
"Hobbit" nickname
Homo floresiensis was swiftly nicknamed "the hobbit" by the discoverers, after the fictional race popularized in J. R. R. Tolkien's book The Hobbit, and some of the discoverers suggested naming the species H. hobbitus.[12]
In October 2012, a New Zealand scientist due to give a public lecture on Homo floresiensis was told by the Tolkien Estate that he was not allowed to use the word "hobbit" in promoting the lecture.[80]
In 2012, the American film studio The Asylum, which produces low-budget "mockbuster" films,[81] planned to release a movie entitled Age of the Hobbits depicting a "peace-loving" community of H. floresiensis "enslaved by the Java Men, a race of flesh-eating dragon-riders."[82] The film was intended to piggyback on the success of Peter Jackson's film The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.[83] The film was blocked from release due to a legal dispute about using the word "hobbit."[83] The Asylum argued that the film did not violate the Tolkien copyright because the film was about H. floresiensis, "uniformly referred to as 'Hobbits' in the scientific community."[82] The film was later retitled Clash of the Empires.
See also
- Denisovan – Asian archaic human
- Ebu gogo – small humanoid creatures in the folklore of Flores
- Homo luzonensis – Archaic human from Luzon, Philippines
- Timeline of human evolution
- Neanderthal – Extinct Eurasian species or subspecies of archaic humans
- Orang Pendak– short humanoid creatures said to inhabit remote, mountainous forests on the islands of Sumatra and Borneo
References
Citation
- ^ S2CID 4469009.
- ^ S2CID 26441.
- ^ S2CID 4302539.
- ^ S2CID 4358548.
- S2CID 4469009.
- ^ Ritter, Malcolm (30 March 2016). "Study: Indonesia "hobbit" fossils older than first thought". Associated Press. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
- ^ Amos, Jonathan (30 March 2016). "Age of 'Hobbit' species revised". BBC News. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
- .(subscription required)
- PMID 15510116.
- ^ Morwood and van Oosterzee 2007
- ^ McKie, Robin (21 February 2010). "How a hobbit is rewriting the history of the human race". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 February 2010.
- ^ PMID 20229502.
- ^ Morwood M. J., Sutikna T., Saptomo E. W., Jatmiko, Hobbs D. R., Westaway K. E. 2009. "Preface: research at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia". Journal of Human Evolution 57: 437–449
- ^ Kaifu Y., Kono R. T., Sutikna T., Saptomo E. W., Jatmiko, Rokus Due Awe, et al. 2015. "Descriptions of the dental remains of Homo floresiensis". Anthropological Science. 123: 129–145
- PMID 27886810.
- ^ Morwood & van Oosterzee (2007) ch. 9
- ^ a b Connor, Steve (30 November 2004). "'Hobbit woman' remains spark row among academics". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 12 December 2004.
- ^ "Fight over access to 'hobbit' bones – being-human". New Scientist. 11 December 2004.
- ^ "Professor fuels row over Hobbit man fossils". The Times. London, UK. 3 December 2004.
- ^ a b c "Hobbits triumph tempered by tragedy". Sydney Morning Herald. 5 March 2005.
- ^ Powledge, Tabitha M. (28 February 2005). "Flores hominid bones returned". The Scientist. Retrieved 28 February 2009.
- ^ a b c "Hobbit cave digs set to restart". BBC News. 25 January 2007.
- ^ Culotta E. 2005. "Paleoanthropology—new 'hobbits' bolster species, but origins still a mystery". Science 310: 208–209
- ^ Morwood & van Oosterzee (2007) ch. 9, pp. 230–231
- S2CID 56035748.
- S2CID 205219871.
- ^ S2CID 252290750.
- PMID 27279191.
- S2CID 28608179.
- S2CID 205249218.
- ^ S2CID 42081240.
- ^ a b Larson et al. 2007 (preprint online Archived 13 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine)
- PMID 18347737.
- PMID 19628252.
- S2CID 4392759.
- PMID 26202999.
- ^ PMID 26624612.
- S2CID 245784713.
- PMID 28438318.
- S2CID 49670311.
- . Retrieved 1 October 2011.
- PMID 19254807.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-19-935535-8, retrieved 13 March 2023)
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - ^ S2CID 43166136.
- PMID 16224005.
- ^ von Bredow, Rafaela (1 September 2006). "Indonesia's "Hobbit": A Huge Fight over a Little Man". Der Spiegel.
- ^ PMID 16938848.
- ^ .
- ^ PMID 16919706.
- PMID 17277082.
- ^ ]
- PMID 23408553.
- PMID 27086053.
- PMID 17596857.
- ^ PMID 18319214.
- ^ "Homo floresiensis: Making Sense of the Small-Bodied Hominin Fossils from Flores | Learn Science at Scitable". www.nature.com. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
- .
- ISSN 0262-4079.
- PMID 20885948.
- PMID 22277102.
- PMID 25092311.
- PMID 25659745.
- PMID 27275928.
- ^ Tattersall, 2015, p. 194
- ^ "Pygmy". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 8 January 2008.
- JSTOR 681964.
- ^ "Weber ch. 5". Andaman.org. Archived from the original on 10 July 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2011.
- ^ "Hobbit-Like Human Ancestor Found in Asia". National Geographic News. 27 October 2004. Archived from the original on 5 September 2019. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
- .
- PMID 30072539.
- PMID 19424156.
- PMID 19062072.
- ^ Blaszczyk, Maria B.; Vaughan, Christopher L. (2007). "Re-interpreting the evidence for bipedality in Homo floresiensis". South African Journal of Science. 103 (103): 103.
- ^ Callaway, Ewen (16 April 2008). "Flores 'hobbit' walked more like a clown than Frodo". New Scientist. Vol. 3. pp. 983–984.
- ^ Moore, Mark. "How the Homo floresiensis kept their tools as they shrank into island life". Phys Org. The Conversation. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
- S2CID 87482781.
- ^ Barash, David P. (30 June 2022). "'Between Ape and Human' Review: The Hobbits of Flores Island". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 4 May 2023.
- PMID 31010543.
- PMID 35845853.
- ^ Lee, Julian (24 October 2012). "Hobbit makers ban uni from using 'hobbit'". 3 News NZ. Archived from the original on 7 June 2013. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
- ^ Somma, Brandon (4 January 2013). "Masters of the Mockbuster:What The Asylum Is All About". The Artifice.
- ^ a b "The Hobbit producers sue 'mockbuster' film company". BBC. 8 November 2012. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
- ^ a b Fritz, Ben (10 December 2012). "'Hobbit' knockoff release blocked by judge". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 December 2012.
Sources
- ISBN 978-0-520-26670-4.
- Larson, S.G., Jungers, W.L., Morwood, M.J.; et al. (December 2007). "Homo floresiensis and the evolution of the hominin shoulder". Journal of Human Evolution. 53 (6): 718–31. PMID 17692894.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - Martin, R. D.; MacLarnon, A. M.; Phillips, J. L.; Dussubieux, L.; Williams, P. R.; Dobyns, W. B. (19 May 2006). "Comment on "The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis"". PMID 16709768.
- Morwood, Mike; van Oosterzee, Penny (2007). A New Human: The Startling Discovery and Strange Story of the "Hobbits" of Flores, Indonesia. Smithsonian Books. ISBN 978-0-06-089908-0.
- Stringer, Chris (2011). The Origin of Our Species. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-1-84614-140-9.
- ISBN 978-1-137-27889-0.
- Weber, George. "Lonely islands: The Andamanese (Ch. 5)". Andaman Association. Archived from the original on 10 July 2012.
- Knepper, Gert M. (2019): Floresmens - Het leven van Theo Verhoeven, missionaris en archeoloog. ISBN 978-9-46-3892476(Bookscout, Soest, The Netherlands) (= a biography of the discoverer of the Liang Bua, in Dutch)
External links
- Media related to Homo floresiensis at Wikimedia Commons
- Data related to Homo floresiensis at Wikispecies
- Hawks, John. Blog of a professor of anthropology who closely follows this topic.
- "Another diagnosis for a hobbit" (online). 3 July 2007.
- "The Liang Bua report" (online). 10 August 2007.
- "The forelimb and hindlimb remains from Liang Bua cave" (online). 18 December 2008.
- "Hominin remains from Mata Menge, Flores" (online). 8 June 2016.
- Scientific American Interview with Professor Brown 27 October 2004
- National Geographic News article on H. floresiensis
- Homo floresiensis - The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
- Obendorf, Peter; Oxnard, Charles E.; Kefford, Ben J. (5 March 2008). "Were Homo floresiensis just a population of myxoedematous endemic cretin Homo sapiens?". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. -1 (–1): –1. Blog commentary on the Obendorf paper.
- Washington University in St. Louis Virtual Endocasts of the "Hobbit" – Electronic Radiology Laboratory
- Nova's Alien from Earth documentary website, complete program available through Watch Online feature
- Hobbits in the Haystack: Homo floresiensis and Human Evolutions – Turkhana Basin Institute presentment at the Seventh Stony Brook Human Evolution Symposium
- Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).