Human–dinosaur coexistence

Edit links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Illustration from the first edition of The Lost World (1912), depicting a human and an (outdated) Stegosaurus

The coexistence of avian

dinosaurs (birds) and humans is well established historically and in modern times. The coexistence of non-avian dinosaurs and humans exists only as a recurring motif in speculative fiction, because in the real world non-avian dinosaurs have at no point coexisted with humans.[1]

The notion that non-avian

cryptids, though such identifications are often based on outdated or incorrect ideas about dinosaur biology and life appearance[3][4] and often ignores the cultural/artistic context.[2]

Scientists consider the idea that non-avian dinosaurs survived to the present day to be untenable, with known cases of so-called "living fossils" (such as coelacanths) being far from analogous to large-bodied land vertebrates. It would require unprecedented ghost lineages without fossils for tens of millions of years and sharply contrast with the relatively good fossil record of dinosaurs and other groups in the Mesozoic.[4]

Birds

See also: Evolution of birds
A falconer (a human) with a Harris's hawk (a dinosaur)

Birds evolved from a group of theropod dinosaurs (

Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction about 66 million years ago, while the genus Homo emerged only about 3 million years ago, leaving a period of tens of millions of years between the last dinosaurs and the first humans.[6]

The most massive birds known to have coexisted with humans are the

terror birds of South America since most (perhaps all) species appear to already have been extinct before humans arrived.[7] The most massive dinosaur alive today is the ostrich[11] and the smallest is the bee hummingbird
.

Fiction and mythology

alternative history in which dinosaurs do not go extinct, such as the 2015 Pixar film The Good Dinosaur and the fantasy book series Dinotopia
.

Many Young Earth creationists believe that non-avian dinosaurs coexisted with humans.[12][13] Since Young Earth creationists believe the Earth to only be a few thousand years old, their worldview is incompatible with the scientific understanding of geological history and the fossil record. Dinosaur fossils are by different groups of Young Earth creationists either interpreted as hoaxes, sometimes said to be orchestrated by Satan, or as the remains of creatures that cannot have lived as long ago as science has determined. The second explanation implies that dinosaurs would have coexisted with humans.[13] Some creationists further believe that dinosaurs survived the Biblical flood since the Bible states that "every kind of land animal" did.[12] Creationists also tend to reject the fossil evidence that many non-avian dinosaurs were feathered, since this is among the evidence that birds descended from them through evolution.[14]

Some proponents have claimed that mythological reptiles such as dragons and the Behemoth are historical descriptions of dinosaurs.[15][16][17] Although many modern depictions of dragons share certain similarities with dinosaurs, this is a recent artistic development spurred by the discovery of dinosaur fossils in the nineteenth century onwards. Earlier depictions of dragons tended to have far fewer such similarities, for instance being less bulky and more serpentine.[18]

Historical artwork and artifacts

Misinterpretations

The "dinosaur of Ta Prohm", erroneously identified by some as a depiction of a stegosaur

In some cases, historical artwork has been interpreted as depicting non-avian dinosaurs. Although there is artwork that in cases share superficial resemblances with some dinosaur species, identifying them as such often involves ignoring both the context of the artwork itself and dinosaur biology.[2] Some examples of historical art, particularly from Ancient Rome and Egypt, that has been interpreted as dinosaurian by pseudoscientists are conventionally seen as depictions of crocodiles.[2]

An often cited example of a supposed non-avian dinosaur depicted in historical art is a hand-sized carving at Ta Prohm, allegedly of a stegosaur. The series of "plates" along the animal's back are however more likely to be stylized lotus leaves or petals, which are shown around numerous other animal and human figures in medieval Cambodian art, including in other carvings at the same temple. The creature is furthermore depicted with large ear flaps or horns, structures that are not known in stegosaurs.[2]

Humans hunting the "krokodilopardalis" in the Nile mosaic of Palestrina (1st century BCE)

Another example is a creature referred to as a krokodilopardalis ("crocodile leopard") in the 1st century BCE Nile mosaic of Palestrina. Some creationists have identified this creature as a theropod dinosaur, though the krokodilopardalis looks virtually nothing like one; it has a quadrupedal stance and clearly mammalian paws.[2]

Some proponents of human and non-avian dinosaur coexistence have equated the Mesopotamian

cryptozoologists reject this idea however, given that the mušḫuššu clearly combines various features of different animals in an arrangement not actually reminiscent of a dinosaur.[13]

Hoaxes

Footprints

One claim made by some proponents of human-dinosaur coexistence is that non-avian dinosaur footprints have been found together with human footprints, with one particular site of note being Paluxy River in Texas. The supposed human tracks in the rock have all been identified to consist of dinosaur tracks eroded to an elongated shape and deliberate hoaxes. There have been documented cases of Young Earth creationists covering up portions of the dinosaur tracks with sand, photographing them, and reproducing the (often low-quality) photographs in print and film.[19]

During the Great Depression, some footprints carved to resemble human feet were sold to tourists in the vicinity of the Paluxy River tracksite; these were recognized as fakes by the paleontologist Roland T. Bird, though helped him to discover the original tracksite in 1940.[19]

Artifacts

One of the Ica stones, featuring outdated depictions of a theropod (right; notably upright and dragging its tail on the ground) and sauropod (bottom)

Many hoaxes have been presented as historical depictions of dinosaurs and have been used as evidence for the idea that non-avian dinosaurs coexisted with humans. Notable such "artifacts" include the Granby Stone Idol (a known hoax depicting a sauropod together with incorrectly rendered Chinese symbols), the Acámbaro figures (a large set of dinosaur-like figurines now known to have been made shortly before their supposed discovery), the Ica stones (stones with dinosaurs carved on them, admitted to have been hoaxed by their creator), and the Tucson artifacts (which include a sword inscribed with a dinosaur, exposed as a hoax for decades).[2]

Even though virtually all such objects have been exposed as hoaxes, many continue to erroneously be used as "evidence".

Tyrannosaurus rex, though shown nearly upright with its tail dragging behind it on the ground. This depiction is in-line with how T. rex was depicted in the 1960s (when the stones were "found") but does not reflect current scientific understanding.[3]

Cryptozoology

Many

cryptids have been suggested by cryptozoologists to be living representatives or descendants of various extinct animals, including non-avian dinosaurs. The suggested scenarios for how such organisms are supposed to have survived are often highly flawed, contradicting the abundant data on known geological events and the fossil record. The supposed identifications are also often only based on reconstructions of extinct organisms, consequently limiting them to species often appearing in popular literature as well as views on them now considered to be outdated.[4] As a general example, cryptozoological identifications of various supposed lake monsters often default to identifying them as living plesiosaurs, despite numerous other groups both extinct and extant being more similar in appearance and biology.[4]

One of the more well-known "dinosaur cryptids" is Mokele-mbembe, said to dwell in the Congo River and identified by some cryptozoologists as a possible sauropod. Mokele-mbembe is said to be an amphibious swamp-dweller. This reflects outdated popular views of sauropods common in the twentieth century and presumably stems from artistic depictions in that time, though shares little resemblance with the lifestyle modern research suggests sauropods had.[4] Some researchers have raised concerns that the idea of a "living dinosaur in darkest Africa" is intertwined with the racist ideologies that were once used to justify the colonization of the continent in that it paints Africa as a land still stuck in premodern times, ripe for exploration by more "scientifically advanced" foreigners.[13]

Similarly, some cryptozoologists have also suggested that several Native American legends concerning horned water monsters are identifiable with crested hadrosaurs, with the horns equated with their crests. This identification derives from the outdated idea that hadrosaurs were amphibious, common in the twentieth century but now discredited.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Did Humans and Dinosaurs Ever Live Together?". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 2022-03-29.
  2. ^
    ISBN 978-1-5275-3138-3
    .
  3. ^
    ISBN 978-1-57859-466-5
    .
  4. ^ a b c d e f Naish, Darren (2001). "Sea serpents, seals and coelacanths: an attempt at a holistic approach to the identity of large aquatic cryptids". Fortean Studies. 7: 75–94.
  5. PMID 19095929
    .
  6. Science Daily. March 13, 2009. Archived
    from the original on April 2, 2014.
  7. ^
    ISBN 978-0-19-252245-0
    .
  8. ^
    ISBN 978-0-313-08394-5
    .
  9. ISBN 978-1-118-29105-4
    .
  10. ^ Yirka, Bob; Phys.org (18 March 2014). "DNA evidence suggests humans hunted moa to extinction". phys.org. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  11. ISBN 978-1-328-78736-1
    .
  12. ^
    ISBN 978-0-19-751661-4
    .
  13. ^
    S2CID 242074437
    .
  14. ISSN 1091-2339
    . Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  15. ^ Keil, C.F. and Delitzsch, F., Commentary on the Old Testament, Vol. IV, Job, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, p. 357, 1988.
  16. ^ Hanson, A. and Hanson, M., The Book of Job, SCM Press, London, p. 112, 1953.
  17. ^ Driver, S.R. and Gray, G.B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Job, T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, Part II, p. 326, 1921.
  18. ISSN 0146-9339
    .
  19. ^
    ISBN 978-0-8047-1770-0
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human–dinosaur_coexistence&oldid=1220233984"