Indo-Pacific
The Indo-Pacific is a vast biogeographic region of Earth.
In a narrow sense, sometimes known as the Indo-West Pacific or Indo-Pacific Asia, it comprises the tropical waters of the Indian Ocean, the western and central Pacific Ocean, and the seas connecting the two. It does not include the temperate and polar regions of the Indian and Pacific oceans, nor the Tropical Eastern Pacific, along the Pacific coast of the Americas, which is also a distinct marine realm. The term is especially useful in marine biology, ichthyology, and similar fields, since many marine habitats are continuously connected from Madagascar to Japan and Oceania, and a number of species occur over that range, but are not found in the Atlantic Ocean.
The region has an exceptionally high
The term first appeared in academic use in
In its widest sense, the term geopolitically covers all nations and islands surrounding either the Indian Ocean or the Pacific Ocean, encompassing mainland African and Asian nations who border these oceans, such as
Subdivisions
The WWF and Nature Conservancy divide the Indo-Pacific into 3 realms (or subrealms), and each of these into 25 marine provinces and 77 ecoregions (Marine Ecoregions of the World; MEOW) based on data-driven expert opinion.[10] Other schemes for subdivision of the Indo-Pacific have included: 5 provinces, based on endemism in fishes;[11][12] 3 regions split into 10 provinces based on dissimilarity of fish assemblages,[13] 11 provinces based on range boundaries in corals,[14] 12 divisions split into 124 ecoregions based on biogeographic clustering from coral distributions[15] and finally 8 realms from distributions of 65,000 marine species.[16] All but the last of these schemes were tested against one another by an international consortium of marine scientists using genetic data from 56 Indo-Pacific species, with the reasoning that genetic data should reflect the evolutionary processes that structure the Indo-Pacific.[17] While there was no clear winning scheme, and all schemes were supported by data from at least one species, the genetic data in general favored schemes with few subdivisions, supporting the Indo-Pacific as relatively unstructured biogeographic realm - possibly the world's largest. Below are briefly described the 3 MEOW realms of the Indo-Pacific:
Central Indo-Pacific
The Central Indo-Pacific includes the numerous seas and straits connecting the Indian and Pacific oceans, including the seas surrounding the
Eastern Indo-Pacific
The Eastern Indo-Pacific surrounds the mostly volcanic islands of the central Pacific Ocean, extending from the Marshall Islands in the west through central and southeastern Polynesia to Hawaii, to the west coast of Chile. The World Wide Fund for Nature believe the region ends at Chile's Easter Island and Isla Salas y Gómez, although it is sometimes extended even further to include Chile's Desventuradas Islands and Juan Fernández Islands.[18][19][20][10]
Western Indo-Pacific
The Western Indo-Pacific covers the western and central portion of the Indian Ocean, including Africa's east coast, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Andaman Sea, as well as the coastal waters surrounding Madagascar, Seychelles, the Comoros, the Mascarene Islands, Maldives, and the Chagos Archipelago.[10]
Ecology
Some seashore and coastal plants are found throughout most of the region, including the trees
The trees
Economic region
The "Indo-Pacific" has been an economic idea since its early formulation in
In the 21st century, with the rising involvement of the United States in the new growth areas of Asia, the idea of the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor (IPEC) emerged during the U.S.–India Strategic Dialogue of 2013. The Secretary of State John Kerry referred to the potential of the Indo-Pacific Economic Corridor in transforming the prospects for development and investments as well as for trade and transit between the economies of South and Southeast Asia Indo-Pacific economic corridor.[22]
K. Yhome in his scholarly study has mapped out the potential for various emerging trans-regional corridors in Asia along with the challenges of linking IPEC into the larger web of regional economic integration initiatives taking shape in the region in 2017.[23]
On 23 May 2022, the president of the United States, Joe Biden, launched the
- Connected Economy: through digital economy rules, data localization, AI, privacy.
- Resilient Economy: through better supply chain commitments that better anticipate and prevent disruptions in supply chains.
- Clean Economy: with commitments to decarbonization, and green infrastructure.
- Fair Economy: with recommendation to strengthen efforts to crack down on corruption, effective tax implementation, anti-money laundering, and anti-bribery regimes.[24]
Geopolitical context
Origins
The German geopolitician
Contemporary use
The Japanese Prime Minister
Since 2011, the term "Indo-Pacific" is being used increasingly in geopolitical discourse.[30][31]
In 2013, Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa proposed an "Indo-Pacific Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation" to restore trust, manage unresolved territory disputes, and help countries deal with change in the region.[32] In 2013, U.S. officials have begun using the term "Indo-Asia Pacific".[33]
In 2019, the United States Department of State published a document formalizing the concept of a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific", to be sustained among members of "the Quad", a partnership of four Indo-Pacific democracies led by the United States, in concert with Australia, India, and Japan.[34] "Indo-Pacific" has also featured prominently in top-level U.S. strategic documents such as the 2017 National Security Strategy,[35] the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review,[36] and the 2018 National Defense Strategy.[37] According to Felix Heiduk and Gudrun Wacker at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, the concept of a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" is aimed at containing China and the "Indo-Pacific" is "primarily understood as a U.S.-led containment strategy directed against China" in Beijing.[38] Australian scholar Rory Medcalf has argued that "The Indo-Pacific...does not exclude or contain China, though it does dilute China’s influence."[39] It has been argued that the concept of the Indo-Pacific may lead to a change in popular "mental maps" of how the world is understood in strategic terms.[40]
The term's profile was raised when it found mention in the joint statement issued by the Indian Prime Minister
The term was also used in 2019 by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in its statement ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP),[45] though the bloc also still uses the longstanding term "Asia-Pacific" which is preferred by China and Russia.[46] Its use by ASEAN is arguably an attempt by the bloc at balance-of-power hedging[47] between competing visions for the region between the US and China. However, it is also clear that ASEAN does not share the exact same understanding of the term as the US,[48] and its AOIP statement specifically states[45] that it envisions continuing to play a "central and strategic role" in the region.
Criticism
The Australian Citizens Party, a minor party associated with the US-led Rouche movement, criticises the "Indo-Pacific" vision as a reenactment of Nazi strategy, given the concept's link to Karl Haushofer.[49]
Former Prime Minister of Australia Paul Keating, in a televised address at the National Press Club, criticised the notion of the "Indo-Pacific" as a construct of the United States in its diplomatic war with China:[50]
The United States says, well, that's all very interesting. But look, if you behave yourself, you Chinese. You can be a stakeholder in our system. And look, you wouldn't have to be Xi Jinping or anybody, to take the view of your Chinese Nationalist say, "Well, hang on, let me get this right. We are already one and a quarter times bigger than you, will soon be twice as big as you, and we may be two and a half times as big as you. But we can be a stakeholder in your system, is that it?" I mean, it’d make a cat laugh.
See also
- AUKUS
- Asia-Pacific
- Austronesian peoples
- China Rim
- East of Suez
- Orient
- Valeriepieris circle
- Geography of Asia
- United States Indo-Pacific Command
- Global Southeast
References
- ^ S2CID 25927433.
- ^ .
- ISBN 0-86542-256-7.
- ^ S2CID 236226422.
- ^ a b "India's understanding of the Quad & Indo-Pacific: Distinct narrative or a flawed one?". Orf.
- ^ "The broadening spectrum of India–Mexico ties". Orf.
- ^ "Where is Canada? The missing Indo-Pacific player: Stephen Nagy for Inside Policy". 21 March 2022.
- ^ "Africa a low presence in the first Indo-Pacific forum". 25 February 2022.
- S2CID 235724917.
- ^ S2CID 29150840.
- ^ Briggs, J.C. (1974). Marine Zoogeography. McGraw-Hill.
- S2CID 56455379.
- PMID 24386083.
- PMID 23698011.
- ISSN 2296-7745.
- PMID 29051522.
- S2CID 149934700.
- PMID 26734732.
- ProQuest 920291064.
- ^ Udvardy, Miklos D.F. "A Classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the World" (PDF). UNESCO. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 May 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- ^ a b "Central Polynesian tropical moist forests". Terrestrial Ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund.
- ^ Sundararaman, Shankari (10 February 2017). "Indo-Pacific economic corridor: A vision in progress". Orf. Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ISBN 978-81-86818-26-8.
- ^ "FACT SHEET: In Asia, President Biden and a Dozen Indo-Pacific Partners Launch the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity". The White House. 23 May 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2022.
- ^ ""Confluence of the Two Seas" Speech by H.E.Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan at the Parliament of the Republic of India". mofa.go.jp. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 22 August 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ "Maritime Policy Archives". orfonline.org. Observer Research Foundation. Archived from the original on 6 December 2017. Retrieved 6 December 2017.[full citation needed]
- S2CID 153632833.
- S2CID 153576791.
- ISBN 978-0-9874958-0-8. Archived from the original(PDF) on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ Amane, Yamazaki (28 February 2020). "The PRC's Cautious Stance on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy". China Brief. 20 (4). Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 7 March 2020.
- OCLC 1127546396.
- ^ Georgieff, Jack (17 May 2013). "An Indo-Pacific Treaty: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?". The Diplomat. Retrieved 7 April 2022.
- ^ Miles, Donna (8 February 2013). "Locklear Calls for Indo-Asia-Pacific Cooperation" (Press release). United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 10 February 2013.
- ^ A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: United States Department of State. 4 November 2019. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ National Security Strategy of the United States of America (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: White House. December 2017. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ Nuclear Posture Review (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: Office of the Secretary of Defense. February 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military's Competitive Edge (PDF). Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Defense. 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- . Retrieved 19 November 2022.
- ^ Medcalf, Rory (July 2019). "Indo-Pacific Visions: Giving Solidarity a Chance" (PDF). Asia Policy. 14 (3): 80.
- S2CID 154762903– via Academia.edu.
- ^ "Joint Statement - United States and India: Prosperity Through Partnership". Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. 27 June 2017. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ Khurana, Gurpreet S. (14 November 2017). "Opinion: Trump's new Cold War alliance in Asia is dangerous". The Washington Post. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ "Prime Minister's Keynote Address at Shangri La Dialogue". Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. 1 June 2018. Retrieved 9 December 2021.
- ^ a b Tamer, Cenk (11 March 2021). "Terminology of the Geopolitical Power Struggle: "Asia-Pacific" or "Indo-Pacific"?". ANKASAM. Archived from the original on 27 November 2022.
- ^ a b "ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific". ASEAN. 23 June 2019. Archived from the original on 28 February 2024.
- ^ Ghosh, Sanchari (3 May 2023). "Opinion - With the Rise of the 'Indo-Pacific', Has the 'Asia-Pacific' Faded Away?". E-International Relations. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023.
- ^ Sukma, Rizal (19 November 2019). "Indonesia, ASEAN and shaping the Indo-Pacific idea". East Asia Forum. Archived from the original on 12 August 2023.
- ^ Kamaruddin, Nurliana (5 August 2019). "ASEAN's strategic engagement in the unwieldy Indo-Pacific". The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. Archived from the original on 9 June 2023.
- ^ Bardon, Richard (20 January 2021). "The Nazi roots of the 'Indo-Pacific strategy'". citizensparty.org.au. Australian Citizens Party. Retrieved 20 June 2021.
- ^ "Australia's long march into Asia". Workers BushTelegraph. 14 November 2021. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
Further reading
- Doyle, Timothy; Rumley, Dennis (2020). The Rise and Return of the Indo-Pacific. Oxford: OUP.
- Auslin, Michael R., ed. (2020). Asia's New Geopolitics: Essays on Reshaping the Indo-Pacific. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. excerpt
- Medcalf, Rory (2020). Indo-Pacific Empire: China, America and the Contest for the World's Pivotal Region. excerpt
- J. Cannon, Brendon; Rossiter, Ash, eds. (August 2018). Rising Powers Quarterly. 3 (2). special issue on "The "Indo-Pacific" – Regional Dynamics in the 21st Century's New Geopolitical Center of Gravity"
- 2018 United States Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific