Inflationism
Inflationism is a heterodox economic, fiscal, or monetary policy, that predicts that a substantial level of inflation is harmless, desirable or even advantageous. Similarly, inflationist economists advocate for an inflationist policy.
Mainstream economics holds that inflation is a necessary evil, and advocates a low, stable level of inflation, and thus is largely opposed to inflationist policies – some inflation is necessary, but inflation beyond a low level is not desirable. However, deflation is often seen as a worse or equal danger, particularly within Keynesian economics, as well as Monetarist economics and in the theory of debt deflation.
Inflationism is not accepted within the economics community, and is often conflated with
Political debate
In political debate, inflationism is opposed to hard currency, which believes that the real value of currency should be maintained.
In late 19th century United States, the
Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security but [also] at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.
Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose. [1]
Schools of economic thought
Inflationism is most associated with, and a charge most leveled against, schools of economic thought which advocate government action, either fiscal policy or monetary policy, to achieve full employment. Such schools often have heterodox views on monetary economics
The early 19th century
The contemporary
Neoclassical economics has often argued a deflationist policy; during the Great Depression, many mainstream economists argued that nominal wages should fall, as they had in 19th century economic crises, thus returning prices and employment to equilibrium. This was opposed by Keynesian economics, which argued that a general cut in wages reduced demand, worsening the crisis, without improving employment.
Contemporary advocacy
While few, if any, economists argue that inflation is a good thing in itself, some argue for a generally higher level of inflation, either in general or in the context of
Three contemporary arguments for higher inflation, the first two from the mainstream school of Keynesian economics and advocated by prominent economists,[2] the latter from the heterodox school of Post-Keynesian economics, are:
- added flexibility in monetary policy;
- wage stickiness; and
- decreasing real burden of debt.
- Added flexibility in monetary policy
A high inflation rate with a low nominal interest rate result in a
- Wage stickiness
Inflation decreases the real value of wages, in the absence of corresponding wage rises. In the theory of
Collective bargaining in the Netherlands and Japan has at times yielded nominal wage cuts, in the belief that high real labor costs were causing unemployment.
- Decreasing real burden of debt
In the theory of
In this context, the direct result of inflation is a transfer of wealth from creditors to debtors – the creditors receive less in real terms than they would have before, while the debtors pay less, assuming that the debts would in fact have been repaid, and not defaulted on. Formally, this is a de facto debt restructuring, with reduction of the real value of principal, and may benefit creditors if it results in the debts being serviced (paid in part), rather than defaulted on.
A related argument is by
See also
- Asset price inflation
- Chronic inflation
- Inflation hedge
- Debt monetization or Deficit financing
- Monetary inflation
- Statism
- Neo-Chartalism
Notes
- ^ Properly, the real interest rate in this case is but the linear approximation is widely used; see Fisher equation for details.
References
This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2010) |
- ^ John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1919. pp. 235-248. PBS.org - Keynes on Inflation
- ^ a b c Krugman, Paul (February 13, 2010), "The Case For Higher Inflation", The New York Times
- ^ Interview with Olivier Blanchard: IMF Explores Contours of Future Macroeconomic Policy, by Jeremy Clift, IMF Survey online, February 12, 2010
- ^ Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy, IMF, February 12, 2010
- ^ Near-Rational Wage and Price Setting and the Optimal Rates of Inflation and Unemployment, George A. Akerlof, William T. Dickens, and George L. Perry, May 15, 2000
External links
- Inflation, explained by Pete Smith, directed by Zion Myers (1933), pro-inflation movie (IMDb)