Insect biodiversity

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Insect biodiversity accounts for a large proportion of all biodiversity on the planet—over half of the estimated 1.5 million organism species described are classified as insects.[1][2]

A pie chart of described eukaryote species, showing just over half of these to be insects

Species diversity

Estimates of the total number of insect species or those within specific

orders are often highly variable. Globally, averages of these predictions estimate there are around 1.5 million beetle species and 5.5 million insect species, with around 1 million insect species currently found and described.[3] Between 950,000–1,000,000 of all described animal species are considered insects, so over 50% of all described eukaryotes
(1.8 million species) are insects (see illustration). With only 950,000 known non-insects, if the actual total number of insects is 5.5 million, they may represent over 80% of the total, and with only about 20,000 new species of all organisms being described each year, most insect species likely will remain undescribed, unless species descriptions greatly increase in rate.

Of the 24 identified

assassin bugs). At least 900,000 described species — about 90% of all known insects — belong to the five aforementioned orders, each of which has over 100,000 species, while the next (sixth) most diverse order, Orthoptera (locusts, grasshoppers and crickets
), has just under 24,000 species.

Number of described extant insect species[3]
Order Extant species described
Archaeognatha 513
Zygentoma 560
Ephemeroptera
3,240
Odonata 5,899
Orthoptera 23,855
Phasmatodea 3,014
Embioptera 463
Grylloblattodea
34
Mantophasmatodea
15
Plecoptera 3,743
Dermaptera
1,978
Zoraptera 37
Mantodea
2,400
Blattodea 7,314
Psocoptera 5,720
Phthiraptera
5,102
Thysanoptera
5,864
Hemiptera 103,590
Hymenoptera 116,861
Strepsiptera 609
Coleoptera
386,500
Neuroptera 5,868
Megaloptera 354
Raphidioptera
254
Trichoptera
14,391
Lepidoptera 157,338
Diptera
155,477
Siphonaptera
2,075
Mecoptera 757

The fossil record concerning insects stretches back for hundreds of millions of years. It suggests there are ongoing background levels of both

insect extinction, with the Cretaceous–Paleogene being the second highest. Insect diversity has recovered after past mass extinctions, due to periods where new species originate with increased frequency, though the recovery can take millions of years.[4]

In the Holocene

Several studies seemed to indicate that some insect populations are in decline in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, and has also been popularized as the windshield phenomenon. For many studies, factors such as abundance, biomass, and species richness are often found to be declining for some, but not all locations in many studies; some species are in decline while others are not.[5] Every species is affected in different ways by changes in the environment, and it cannot be inferred that there is a consistent decrease across different insect groups. When conditions change, some species easily adapt to the change while others struggle to survive.[6]

Concerns of

indigenous ones put the native species under stress, and as a result they are more likely to succumb to pathogens and parasites.[6]

As of 2017, at least 66 insect species extinctions had been recorded in the previous 500 years, which generally occurred on oceanic islands.

Diptera, Orthoptera and Hemiptera. Data from the past from which to calculate trends is largely unavailable, and what does exist is mostly related to Western Europe and North America. Insect population assessments that have been undertaken were largely concentrated on the more popular insect groups, butterflies and moths, bees, dragonflies and beetles.[14]

Some studies have suggested a large proportion of insect species (up to a third of the known species) are threatened with extinction in the 21st century, such as a 2019 review by Sánchez-Bayo and Wyckhuys,[14] though ecologist Manu Sanders notes that many of these findings are often biased limited to specific geographic areas and specific groups of species.[15] The methodology of the Sánchez-Bayo & Wyckhuys study has been questioned; the search string used to sift through the scientific literature was "(insect* + decline* + survey)". This meant that the authors identified studies finding insect declines, but may have missed those that found increases in insect populations or stability.[5][15] In assessing the study methodology, an editorial in Global Change Biology stated, "An unbiased review of the literature would still find declines, but estimates based on this 'unidirectional' methodology are not credible.[5] However, according to the authors of that review "more than half of the surveys were obtained from references cited in other reports" and "the 73 insect surveys cover all species in a particular taxon – irrespective of them exhibiting declines, stable or increasing trends in their distribution or abundance".[16] Entomology professor Simon Leather suggested that media reports of an "Ecological Armageddon" may be exaggerated and advocated for more funding to allow better collection of long term data on the decline.[17]

Claims of pending mass insect extinctions or "insect apocalypse" based on a subset of studies have been popularized in news reports, but often make claims extrapolated beyond the study data or hyperbolize study findings.[18] The Entomological Society of America has stated there are not sufficient data to predict an imminent mass extinction of insects.[18] For some insect groups such as some butterflies, bees, and beetles, declines in abundance and diversity have been documented in European studies. Other areas have shown increases in some insect species, although trends in most regions are currently unknown. It is difficult to assess long-term trends in insect abundance or diversity because historical measurements are generally not known for many species. Robust data to assess at-risk areas or species is especially lacking for arctic and tropical regions and a majority of the southern hemisphere.[18]

Conservation

Queen Alexandra's birdwing (Ornithoptera alexandrae) of Papua New Guinea

While biodiversity loss is a global problem, conserving habitat for species of insects is uncommon and generally of low priority, although there are exceptions. More commonly insect conservation occurs indirectly, either through the setting aside of large portions of land using "wilderness preservation" as the motive, or through protection of "charismatic vertebrates". Some studies estimate that global insect populations are in rapid decline, perhaps by as much as 80% in recent decades. The windshield phenomenon describes people noticing vastly fewer insects flying into the path of their cars after long drives, and this may reflect worldwide loss of insect abundance.

Single-species insect conservation can preserve other species indirectly; this preservation-by-default is referred to as the

Danaus plexippus
), are in need of special conservation methods. One species may require several habitat locations, even across international boundaries, for the different periods of their migratory patterns.

Insect conservation has been labelled in the past as a concern only for the affluent. The developing country of Papua New Guinea has a "happily ever after" ending in their attempts to preserve the world's largest butterfly, Queen Alexandra's birdwing (Ornithoptera alexandrae). This species is restricted to a very small range of habitat due to specificity in their diet. In the international market of insect collecting, the butterfly can retrieve up to US$2000. In 1978, the government of Papua New Guinea set up the Insect Farming and Trading Agency (IFTA) to regulate the exploitation and conservation of Queen Alexandra's birdwing and other valuable butterflies.

Agriculture

In

biological control of pests.[citation needed
]

In the United States alone, pollination by bees accounts for over US$9 billion of economic revenue.[20] According to some estimates, over ⅓ of the human diet can be traced directly or indirectly to bee pollination.[21] Losses of key pollinators have been reported in at least one region or country on every continent except Antarctica, which has no pollinators. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [22] concluded that with the global decline in the amount of pollinators, there is not a complete loss of fruit or seeds, but a significant decrease in quantity and viability in fruits, and a lower number of seeds.

See also

References

  1. PMID 26034274. Retrieved 21 September 2017.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  2. ^ Smithsonian. "Numbers of Insects (Species and Individuals)". BugInfo. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
  3. ^
    S2CID 23755007
    .
  4. ^ .
  5. ^ .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. ^ .
  13. ^ a b Saunders, Manu (16 February 2019). "Insectageddon is a great story. But what are the facts?". Ecology is not a dirty word. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  14. S2CID 150059494
    .
  15. ^ a b c "Global Insect Biodiversity: Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). Entomological Society of America. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
  16. ^ US Fish and Wildlife Service. "Conserving the Nature of America". ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved 21 September 2017.
  17. ^ W. S. Robinson, R. Nowogrodski & R. A. Morse. (1989). "Pollination parameters". Gleanings in Bee Culture. 117: 148–152.
  18. ^ S. E. McGregor (1976). Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. USDA Agriculture Handbook 496, Washington, D.C.
  19. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D. C.