Irreversible Damage

Page semi-protected
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters
ISBN
978-1-68451-031-3

Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters is a 2020 book by

rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD).[1][2][3] ROGD is not recognized as a medical diagnosis by any major professional institution nor is it backed by credible scientific evidence.[1]

Shrier states that there was a "sudden, severe spike in

gender-affirming care") as treatment for gender dysphoria in young people.[5]

Response to the book has been mixed. Positive reviews mostly endorsed Shrier's thesis, while much of the criticism focused on the book's use of anecdotes and other issues with its evidence. There were several boycotts aimed at the book which characterized it as

misgendering
.

Summary

Shrier states that she began to investigate adolescent-onset gender dysphoria after being contacted by the mother of a young adult with no apparent history of

the ensuing controversy and endorses Littman's findings.[9] She states that online trans influencers, on websites like Twitter, Tumblr and TikTok, frequently encourage questioning youth to identify as trans, experiment with breast binding and testosterone, and disown or lie to unsupportive family members.[10]

Shrier criticizes transgender-related curricula and policies in schools.[11] She describes parents distressed by their children's transgender identification or transition.[12] She critiques the gender-affirming model of care[13] and profiles its critics: Kenneth Zucker, Ray Blanchard, J. Michael Bailey, Lisa Marchiano, and Paul R. McHugh.[14] Shrier discusses trans activism and related controversies, including sex-specific privacy concerns; passing versus trans visibility; the role of celebrities in increasing trans acceptance; conflict between transgender people and lesbians or radical feminists; transfeminine/male-to-female athletes competing in girls' and women's sports; the use of trans-inclusive language; intersectionality; and identity politics.[15] She argues that medical interventions such as puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries include risks. As an example, she describes a transgender person who became disabled after a failed surgery.[16] She also profiles detransitioned young women.[17]

Background and publication history

Shrier in an interview in 2020

Shrier attended

Oxford University and earned a J.D. at Yale Law School.[18][19]

The contentious concept of

Lisa Littman.[1][2][3] ROGD is not recognized as a medical diagnosis by any major professional institution and is not backed by credible scientific evidence.[1]

Irreversible Damage was first published in June 2020 by

autism.[24] Her remarks sparked calls by Spotify employees for the Rogan podcast episode to be removed from the platform,[24][25] but the company denied the request.[26]

Chase Ross, a transgender YouTuber interviewed by Shrier for Irreversible Damage, apologized in 2021 for his participation in the book, claiming he was misled about the book's contents and the author's intent.[1]

Marketing and distribution

In June 2020,

Amazon suspended a paid advertising campaign for the book one week prior to publication. Amazon stated this was because the book "infers or claims to diagnose, treat, or question sexual orientation."[2] In April 2021, employees petitioned Amazon to stop selling the book; a company official responded that the book did not violate Amazon's content policies and the company would continue to offer it.[27] In March 2022, a group called No Hate at Amazon circulated a petition demanding that Amazon stop selling Irreversible Damage and Johnny the Walrus and demanded that Amazon set up an oversight board that would allow employees to democratically determine what content can be sold on Amazon. At least 500 people signed the petition, which was presented to Amazon leadership in the summer of 2021. Some employees quit working for Amazon over the company's refusal to stop selling Irreversible Damage and Johnny the Walrus.[28]

In November 2020,

misgendering subjects. Shrier had stated, "I refer to biologically female teens caught up in this transgender craze as 'she' and 'her'", which Tracy wrote is "a choice by the author that disrespects transgender teens' gender identity and falsely assumes that all trans boys or non-binary individuals assigned female at birth have the same biological makeup."[7] In February 2021, Target again withdrew the book from sale.[27]

In April 2021, a petition was launched to have the Halifax Public Library system remove their two copies of the book from circulation. The library refused, citing intellectual freedom and stating that removal would constitute censorship. Following this, Halifax Pride announced it would no longer hold events at any Halifax library locations.[33]

In July 2021, the American Booksellers Association, a non-profit trade association that promotes independent bookstores, issued an apology for including the book in a monthly mailing, calling the decision to do so a "serious, violent incident" and characterizing the book as "anti-trans".[20] This set off further controversy, with some arguing the association was now trying to censor the book, and others saying the apology was insufficient.[34]

Chase Strangio, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), tweeted that "stopping the circulation of this book and these ideas is 100% a hill I will die on." Strangio later deleted the tweet, saying he was not calling for a government ban but "to create the information climate for the market to be more supportive of trans self-determination".[35]

The book has been translated into multiple languages and foreign-language versions have been released in other countries such as Spain,[36] France, Hungary[37] and Israel where a speech by Shrier drew protesters.[38]

Backlashes against the book have led to termination of its publication in Japan.[39]

Reception

Responses to the book have been divided.

The Spectator Australia,[41] by The Economist,[42] by Emily Hourican in the Irish Independent,[43] by Madeleine Kearns in the National Review,[44] by Christina Patterson in The Sunday Times,[45] by Naomi Schaefer Riley in Commentary,[46] and by Janice Turner in The Times of London.[47] It received mixed reviews from the theologian Tina Beattie in The Tablet[22] and the psychologist Christopher Ferguson in a Psychology Today blogpost.[48] It was negatively reviewed by Sarah Fonseca in the Los Angeles Review of Books[49] and by Jack Turban, a fellow in psychiatry and researcher in transgender mental health, in a Psychology Today blogpost.[5] Science-Based Medicine retracted a positive review by the physician Harriet Hall[50] and subsequently published a series of articles criticizing the book.[51]

The Economist included Irreversible Damage among its books of the year for 2020.

Debra W. Soh's The End of Gender. She stated that Shrier's book provided "a personal, inquisitive, and often moving narrative".[44] Naomi Schaefer Riley wrote that Shrier was correct to ask "what's ailing" adolescents who appeared to suddenly begin identifying as transgender. She endorsed Shrier's criticisms of transgender healthcare and online transgender activism.[46] Janice Turner called the book "fearless", remarking on the controversy surrounding it and endorsing its conclusions.[47]

Tina Beattie called the book "a disturbing, infuriating and compelling study". She criticized Shrier's use of anecdotes from parents or professionals, apparently unbeknownst to the subjects themselves. She wrote that, while "many of Shrier's claims may be open to challenge", the reported increase in cases of adolescent-onset dysphoria "should be a cause for much greater caution and disquiet than is currently the case".[22] Christopher Ferguson wrote that Shrier had "some valid ideas" and that he was "not willing to dismiss her thesis entirely", but also that she failed to "carefully hew" to science and that "high-quality, preregistered, open science, scientific efforts" were needed in the area.[48]

Sarah Fonseca condemned the book for its presentation, substance, and sourcing.[49] Historian Ben Miller compared the cover's design, "with the little white girl's reproductive organs obliterated by a black hole," to that of Nazi propaganda posters.[53][54] Psychiatrist Jack Turban accused Shrier of promoting the denial of gender-affirming medical care from transgender youth, which he called a fringe position rejected by several professional societies. He also accused Shrier of misinterpreting and omitting scientific evidence to support her book's claims and criticized her for portraying transgender youth based on interviews with parents, and for "crass and offensive language."[5]

Skeptic.[50] Novella and Gorski later explained the retraction, concluding that both Hall's and Shrier's claims are "not supported by any evidence and [are] cobbled together with a gross misreading of the scientific evidence", and are based on "anecdotes, outliers, political discussions, and cherry-picked science". In the following weeks, the site published a series of articles about the book by guest authors and physicians Rose Lovell and AJ Eckert that also criticized the book for scientific errors, cherry-picked data, and misinformation.[19][1][51][55]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Eckert, A.J. (July 4, 2021). "Irreversible Damage to the Trans Community: A Critical Review of Abigail Shrier's book Irreversible Damage (Part One)". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
  2. ^ a b c Parsons, Vic (June 23, 2020). "Amazon refuses to advertise renowned anti-trans journalist's book suggesting trans teens are a 'contagion'". PinkNews. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  3. ^
    S2CID 247295449
    .
  4. ^
    ISSN 1068-624X
    .
  5. ^ a b c Turban, Jack (December 6, 2020). "New Book 'Irreversible Damage' Is Full of Misinformation". Psychology Today. Retrieved October 17, 2021. Shrier claims that 'in most cases—nearly 70 percent—gender dysphoria resolves,' and thus youth should not be provided gender-affirming medical care. That statistic is false.
  6. ^ Shrier 2020, Intro.
  7. ^ a b Tracy, Matt (November 13, 2020). "Bigots Swarm Twitter as Target Flip-Flops on Transphobic Book". Gay City News. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  8. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 1.
  9. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 2.
  10. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 3.
  11. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 4.
  12. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 5.
  13. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 6.
  14. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 7.
  15. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 8.
  16. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 9.
  17. ^ Shrier 2020, ch 10.
  18. ^ Strimpel, Zoe (April 30, 2022). "Abigail Shrier: Taking on the trans lobby has made me Public Enemy No 1". The Telegraph.
  19. ^ a b Lovell, Rose (July 2, 2021). "Abigail Shrier's Irreversible Damage: A Wealth of Irreversible Misinformation". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
  20. ^ a b Italie, Hillel (July 15, 2021). "Booksellers association apologizes for anti-trans mailing". AP News. Associated Press. Retrieved January 1, 2022.
  21. ^ Shrier 2020.
  22. ^
    ISSN 0039-8837
    . Retrieved October 17, 2021.
  23. ISSN 1054-4836
    . Retrieved December 19, 2020. Shrier invalidated the lived experience of trans and nonbinary kids and teens, and made numerous dangerous, entirely unsound false equivalencies. She compared transitioning among teenagers to historic adolescent phenomena such as eating disorders, self-harm, and (bafflingly) the occult, calling this age group 'the same population that gets involved in cutting, demonic possession, witchcraft, anorexia, bulimia.' She even described wanting to transition as a 'contagion' with the potential to infect other children with the same ideas, drawing yet more scientifically baseless parallels with eating disorders.
  24. ^ a b Cox, Joseph; Maiberg, Emanuel (September 16, 2020). "Spotify CEO Defends Keeping Transphobic Joe Rogan Podcasts Online". Vice. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
  25. Vulture
    . Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  26. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original
     on October 31, 2020.
  27. ^
    ISSN 0745-9696
    . Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  28. ^ O'Donovan, Caroline (June 1, 2022). "Amazon employees protest the sale of books they say are anti-trans". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
  29. ^ Halon, Yael (November 16, 2020). "Author accuses Target of caving to 'woke activists' by briefly pulling book deemed 'transphobic' on Twitter". Fox News. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  30. ^
    them.
    Retrieved December 19, 2020.
  31. ^ Valens, Ana (November 13, 2020). "Bari Weiss Defends Transphobic Book Pulled From Target". The Daily Dot.
  32. ^ Valens, Ana (November 16, 2020). "Target restocked a transphobic book because of money—not 'censorship'". The Daily Dot. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
  33. ^ Ryan, Haley (May 30, 2021). "Pride breaks with Halifax libraries after controversial book kept on shelves". CBC. Retrieved June 2, 2021.
  34. ISSN 0190-8286
    . Retrieved July 23, 2021.
  35. ISSN 1551-2940
    . Retrieved October 17, 2021.
  36. ^ Carrión, Francisco (September 14, 2021). ""La ley trans española será un desastre para las jóvenes. Son soldados de una completa revolución social"". El Independiente (in Spanish). Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  37. ^ "A nemváltoztatástól nem lesznek boldogabbak a lázadó tinédzserek". A nemváltoztatástól nem lesznek boldogabbak a lázadó tinédzserek (in Hungarian). February 17, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  38. ^ "Trans activists shut down book launch, sparking free speech debate". The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com. May 23, 2023. Retrieved May 29, 2023.
  39. ^ "Japan firm nixes translation of U.S. Book questioning trans surgery ｜ Kyodo News". December 5, 2023.
  40. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original
     on November 21, 2020.
  41. The Spectator Australia
    . Retrieved February 2, 2021.
  42. ^
    ISSN 0013-0613
    . Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  43. ISSN 0021-1222
    . Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  44. ^
    ISSN 0028-0038
    .
  45. ^ Patterson, Christina (January 3, 2021). "Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier review — the risks of transgender activism". The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  46. ^
    ISSN 0010-2601
    . Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  47. ^ a b Turner, Janice (December 30, 2020). "Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier review — resisting the 'transgender craze'". The Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020.
  48. ^ a b Ferguson, Christopher J. (January 19, 2021). "A Review of 'Irreversible Damage' by Abigail Shrier". Psychology Today.
  49. ^ a b Fonseca, Sarah (January 17, 2021). "The Constitutional Conflationists: On Abigail Shrier's 'Irreversible Damage' and the Dangerous Absurdity of Anti-Trans Trolls". Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  50. ^
    Skeptic
    .
  51. ^ a b c Novella, Steven (June 30, 2021). "The Science of Transgender Treatment". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  52. ISSN 0013-0613
    . Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  53. ISSN 0027-8378
    . Retrieved September 28, 2023.
  54. ^ London, King's College. "Historian and co-author of 'Bad Gays' discusses theories of identity and sexuality with students". King's College London. Retrieved November 12, 2023.
  55. ^ Eckert, A.J. (July 18, 2021). "Irreversible Damage to the Trans Community: A Critical Review of Abigail Shrier's Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters (Part Two)". Science-Based Medicine. Retrieved July 19, 2021.

References

  • Shrier, Abigail (2020). Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. Blackstone Publishing.
    ISBN 9781094175515
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irreversible_Damage&oldid=1218390988"