Jacques Monod
Jacques Monod Cannes, France | |
---|---|
Education | Sorbonne |
Known for | |
Awards |
|
Scientific career | |
Fields | |
Institutions | Pasteur Institute |
Jacques Lucien Monod (9 February 1910 – 31 May 1976) was a French
Monod and Jacob became famous for their work on the
Study of the control of expression of genes in the lac operon provided the first example of a system for the
Career and research
As a student at the
Before his doctoral work, Monod spent a year in the laboratory of Thomas Hunt Morgan at the California Institute of Technology working on Drosophila genetics. This was a true revelation for him and probably influenced him on developing a genetic conception of biochemistry and metabolism.[11]
Monod's interest in the lac operon originated from his doctoral dissertation, which explored the growth of bacteria on mixtures of sugars and documented the sequential utilization of two or more sugars.
Monod joined the Pasteur Institute in 1943 and Jacob in 1949. The experimental system ultimately used by Jacob and Monod was a common bacterium,
With
Philosophical contributions
Monod was not only a biologist but also a fine musician and esteemed writer on the
In 1970, Monod published Le hasard et la nécessité – English translation Chance and Necessity (1971) –, a book based on a series of lectures that he had given at Pomona College in 1969.[19] The book is a short but influential examination of the philosophical implications of modern biology, written for a general readership.[20] Monod acknowledges his connection to the French existentialists in the epigraph of the book, which quotes the final paragraphs of Camus's The Myth of Sisyphus. In summarizing recent progress in several areas of biology, including his own research, Monod highlights the ways in which information is found to take physical form and hence become capable of influencing events in the world. For example, the information allowing a protein enzyme to "select" only one of several similar compounds as the substrate of a chemical reaction is encoded in the precise three-dimensional shape of the enzyme; that precise shape is itself encoded by the linear sequence of amino acids constituting the protein; and that particular sequence of amino acids is encoded by the sequence of nucleotides in the gene for that enzyme.
In the title of the book, "necessity" refers to the fact that the enzyme must act as it does, catalyzing a reaction with one substrate but not another, according to the constraints imposed by its structure. While the enzyme itself cannot be said in any meaningful way to have a choice about its activity, the thrust of Jacob and Monod's Nobel prize-winning research was to show how a bacterial cell can "choose" whether or not to carry out the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. As Monod explains, one way the cell can make such a choice is by either synthesizing the enzyme or not, in response to its chemical environment. However, the synthesis/no synthesis choice is in turn governed by necessary biochemical interactions between a repressor protein, the gene for the enzyme, and the substrate of the enzyme, which interact so that the outcome (enzyme synthesis or not) differs according to the variable composition of the cell's chemical environment. The hierarchical, modular organization of this system clearly implies that additional regulatory elements can exist that govern, are governed by, or otherwise interact with any given set of regulatory components. Because, in general, the bacterial activity that results from these regulatory circuits is in accord with what is beneficial for the bacterial cell's survival at that time, the bacterium as a whole can be described as making rational choices, even though the bacterial components involved in deciding whether to make an enzyme (repressor, gene, and substrate) have no more choice about their activities than does the enzyme itself.
Monod shows a paradigm of how choice at one level of biological organization (metabolic activity) is generated by necessary (choiceless) interactions at another level (gene regulation); the ability to choose arises from a complex system of feedback loops that connect these interactions. He goes on to explain how the capacity of biological systems to retain information, combined with chance variations during the replication of information (i.e. genetic mutations) that are individually rare but commonplace in aggregate, leads to the differential preservation of that information which is most successful at maintaining and replicating itself. Monod writes that this process, acting over long periods of time, is a sufficient explanation (indeed the only plausible explanation) for the complexity and teleonomic activity of the biosphere. Hence, the combined effects of chance and necessity, which are amenable to scientific investigation, account for our existence and the universe we inhabit, without the need to invoke mystical, supernatural, or religious explanations.
While acknowledging the likely evolutionary origin of a human need for explanatory myths, in the final chapter of Chance and Necessity Monod advocates an objective (hence value-free) scientific worldview as a guide to assessing truth. He describes this as an "ethics of knowledge" that disrupts the older philosophical, mythological and religious ontologies, which claim to provide both ethical values and a standard for judging truth. For Monod, assessing truth separate from any value judgement is what frees human beings to act authentically, by requiring that they choose the ethical values that motivate their actions. He concludes that "man at last knows he is alone in the unfeeling immensity of the universe, out of which he has emerged only by chance. His destiny is nowhere spelled out, nor is his duty. The kingdom above or the darkness below: it is for him to choose".[21] While apparently bleak, in comparison to the concepts that humanity belongs to some inevitable, universal process, or that a benevolent God created and protects us, an acceptance of the scientific assessment described in the first part of the quotation is, for Monod, the only possible basis of an authentic, ethical human life. It is reasonable to conclude that Monod himself did not find this position bleak; the quotation he chose from Camus to introduce Chance and Necessity ends with the sentence: "One must imagine Sisyphus happy."
In 1973, Jacques Monod was one of the signatories of the Humanist Manifesto II.[22]
Sociologist Howard L. Kaye has suggested that Monod failed in his attempt to banish "mind and purpose from the phenomenon of life" in the name of science.[23] It may be more accurate to suggest that Monod sought to include mind and purpose within the purview of scientific investigation, rather than attributing them to supernatural or divine causes. While Monod does not explicitly address mind or consciousness, his scientific research demonstrated that biology includes feedback loops that govern interacting systems of biochemical reactions, so that the system as a whole can be described as having a purpose and making choices. Monod's philosophical writing indicates that he recognized the implication that such systems could arise and be elaborated upon by evolution through natural selection. The importance of Monod's work as a bridge between the chance and necessity of evolution and biochemistry on the one hand, and the human realm of choice and ethics on the other, can be judged by his influence on philosophers, biologists and computer scientists such as Daniel Dennett, Douglas Hofstadter, Marvin Minsky and Richard Dawkins.
Awards and honours
In addition to sharing a Nobel Prize, Monod was also a recipient of the
Personal life
Monod was born in Paris to an American mother from
In 1938 he married Odette Bruhl (d.1972).[27]
During
Monod, then a professor at the Sorbonne, supported the student protests of May 68 and, along with several fellow Nobel laureates, appealed to president Charles de Gaulle on the students' behalf.[14]
Jacques Monod died of leukemia in 1976 and was buried in the Cimetière du Grand Jas in Cannes on the French Riviera.
Quotations
- "The first scientific postulate is the objectivity of nature: nature does not have any intention or goal."[4]
- "Anything found to be true of E. coli must also be true of elephants."[30][31]
- “If [the emergence of the human species] was unique, as may perhaps have been the appearance of life itself, then before it did appear its chances of doing so were infinitely slender. The universe was not pregnant with life nor the biosphere with man. Our number came up in the Monte Carlo game.”[21]
References
- ^ PMID 11615735.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1965 François Jacob, André Lwoff, Jacques Monod". Nobelprize.org. Retrieved 30 June 2010.
- ISBN 0-87969-476-9
- ^ ISBN 0-394-46615-2
- ISBN 0-231-03431-8
- ISBN 0-87969-478-5. History of molecular biology recounted through the lives and work of the major figures, including Monod.
- ISBN 1-55581-281-3. Jacques Monod seen by persons who interacted with him as a scientist.
- ]
- PMID 330816.
- ^ a b c d Jacques Monod on Nobelprize.org , accessed 11 October 2020 with the Nobel Lecture on December 11, 1965 From Enzymatic Adaption to Allosteric Transitions
- PMID 26170444.
- ^ Biography of Jacques Monod at Nobel e-Museum
- ^ Video interview with Jacques Monod Vega Science Trust
- ^ ISBN 978-0307952332.
- .
- PMID 13936070.
- PMID 14343300.
- S2CID 15031017.
- ^ Monod, Jacques (1971). Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Translated by Austryn Wainhouse. New York: Alfred A. Knopf – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Monod, Jacques (1971). Chance and Necessity. p. xii.
- ^ ISBN 0-394-46615-2.
- ^ "Humanist Manifesto II". American Humanist Association. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 10 October 2012.
- ^ Kaye, Howard L. The Social Meaning of Modern Biology (Transaction Publishers 1997), p. 75
- ^ "Jacques Lucien Monod". American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved 14 September 2022.
- ^ "Jacques Monod". www.nasonline.org. Retrieved 14 September 2022.
- ^ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved 14 September 2022.
- ISBN 0-902-198-84-X. Archived from the original(PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
- ^ Prial, Frank (1 June 1976). "Jacques Monod, Nobel Biologist, Dies; Thought Existence Is Based on Chance". The New York Times. Retrieved 30 October 2020.
- JSTOR 26378785.
- ^ Monod adapted this aphorism from an expression of the same idea made in 1926 by the Dutch microbiologist Albert Kluyver: “From the elephant to butyric acid bacterium—it is all the same!”
- S2CID 23614433.
Further reading
- ISBN 978-0307952349.
External links
- Jacques Monod on Nobelprize.org
- Works by or about Jacques Monod at Internet Archive