Kermack–McKendrick theory

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Kermack–McKendrick theory is a

compartmental models discussed here. The text is somewhat difficult to read, compared to modern papers, but the important feature is it was a model where the age-of-infection affected the transmission and removal rates.[citation needed
]

Because of their seminal importance to the field of theoretical epidemiology, these articles were republished in the

Epidemic model (1927)

In its initial form, Kermack–McKendrick theory is a partial differential-equation model that structures the infected population in terms of age-of-infection, while using simple compartments for people who are susceptible (S), infected (I), and recovered/removed (R). Specified initial conditions would change over time according to

where is a

Dirac delta-function
and the infection pressure

This formulation is equivalent to defining the incidence of infection . Only in the special case when the removal rate and the transmission rate are constant for all ages can the epidemic dynamics be expressed in terms of the prevalence , leading to the standard compartmental

SIR model
. This model only accounts for infection and removal events, which are sufficient to describe a simple epidemic, including the threshold condition necessary for an epidemic to start, but can not explain endemic disease transmission or recurring epidemics.

Endemic disease (1932, 1933)

In their subsequent articles, Kermack and McKendrick extended their theory to allow for birth, migration, and death, as well as imperfect immunity. In modern notation, their model can be represented as

where is the immigration rate of susceptibles, bj is the per-capita birth rate for state j, mj is the per-capita mortality rate of individuals in state j, is the relative-risk of infection to recovered individuals who are partially immune, and the infection pressure

Kermack and McKendrick were able to show that it admits a stationary solution where disease is endemic, as long as the supply of susceptible individuals is sufficiently large. This model is difficult to analyze in its full generality, and a number of open questions remain regarding its dynamics.

See also

References