Laundry detergent

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The two forms of laundry detergent: powder and liquid

Liquid laundry detergents in a Chinese supermarket, April 2020

Laundry detergent is a type of detergent (cleaning agent) used for cleaning dirty laundry (clothes). Laundry detergent is manufactured in powder (washing powder) and liquid form.

While powdered and liquid detergents hold roughly equal share of the worldwide laundry detergent market in terms of value, powdered detergents are sold twice as much compared to liquids in terms of volume.[1]

History

FEWA, an early laundry detergent from Germany

From ancient times, chemical additives were used to facilitate the mechanical washing of textile fibers with water. The earliest recorded evidence of the production of soap-like materials dates back to around 2800 BC in ancient Babylon.[2]

German chemical companies developed an

tetrapropylene, used in household detergents production, caused a fast growth of domestic use in the late 1940s.[3]

Soils

Washing laundry involves removing mixed soils from fiber surfaces. From a chemical viewpoint, soils can be grouped into:

Soils difficult to remove are

Components

Laundry detergents may contain builders (50% by weight, approximately), surfactants (15%), bleach (7%), enzymes (2%), soil

fragrances, dyes, fillers and formulation aids.[4]

Builders

Builders (also called

cations present in these dissolved minerals, particularly calcium and magnesium ions, can react with surfactants to form soap scum which is much less effective for cleaning and can precipitate onto both fabric and washing machine components. Builders remove mineral ions responsible for hard water through precipitation, chelation, or ion exchange. In addition, they help remove soil by dispersion
.

The earliest builders were

.

Alkali builders may also enhance performance by changing the pH of the wash. Hydrophilic fibers like cotton will naturally have a negative surface charge in water, whereas synthetic fibers are comparatively neutral. The negative charge is further increased by the adsorption of anionic surfactants. With increasing pH, soil and fibers become more negatively charged, resulting in increased mutual repulsion. The optimum pH range for good detergency is 9–10.5.[5] Alkalis may also enhance wash performance via the saponification of fats.

Builder and surfactant work synergistically to achieve soil removal, and the washing effect of the builder may exceed that of the surfactant. With hydrophilic fibers like cotton, wool, polyamide and polyacrylonitrile, sodium triphosphate removes soil more effectively than a surfactant alone. It is expected that when washing hydrophobic fibers like polyesters and polyolefins, the effectiveness of the surfactant surpasses that of the builder, however this is not the case.[6]

Surfactants

Anionic surfactants: branched alkylbenzenesulfonate, linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, and a soap.

Surfactants are responsible for most of the cleaning performance in laundry detergent. They provide this by

emulsification of soil into the water and also by reducing the water's surface tension to improve wetting
.

Laundry detergents contain mostly anionic and non-ionic surfactants. Cationic surfactants are normally incompatible with anionic detergents and have poor cleaning efficiency; they are employed only for certain special effects, as

Zwitterionic
surfactants are rarely employed in laundry detergents mainly for cost reasons. Most detergents use a combination of various surfactants to balance their performance.

Until the 1950s,

have found increasing application at the expense of LAS.

Since the 1970s, nonionic surfactants like

glucamides appeared as co-surfactants, and alkyl polyglycosides have been used in specialty detergents for fine fabrics.[4]

Bleaches

Despite the name, modern laundry bleaches do not include household bleach (

humic acids, and carotenoid pigments). Hydrogen peroxide is insufficiently active as a bleach at temperature below 60 °C (140 °F), which traditionally made hot washes the norm. The development of bleach activators in the 1970s and 1980s allowed for cooler washing temperatures to be effective. These compounds, such as tetraacetylethylenediamine (TAED), react with hydrogen peroxide to produce peracetic acid, which is an even more effective bleach, particularly at lower temperatures.[4]

Enzymes

The use of enzymes for laundry was introduced in 1913 by

Otto Rohm
. The first preparation was a pancreatic extract obtained from slaughtered animals, which was unstable against alkali and bleach. Only in the latter part of the century with the availability of thermally robust bacterial enzymes did this technology become mainstream.

Enzymes are required to degrade stubborn stains composed of

α-amylases for carbohydrates, and cellulases
for cellulose.

Other ingredients

Many other ingredients are added depending on the expected circumstances of use. Such additives modify the

polar water-soluble polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, to which the dyes preferentially bind. Antiredeposition agents such as carboxymethyl cellulose are used to prevent fine soil particles from reattaching to the product being cleaned.[4] Commercial or industrial laundries may make use of a laundry sour
during the final rinse cycle to neutralise any remaining alkali surfactants and remove acid-sensitive stains.

A number of ingredients affect aesthetic properties of the item to be cleaned or the detergent itself before or during use. These agents include

).

Market

Worldwide, while liquid and powdered detergents hold roughly equal market share in terms of value, powdered laundry detergent is more widely used. In 2018, sales of powdered detergent measured 14 million metric tons, double that of liquids. While liquid detergent is widely used in many Western countries, powdered detergent is popular in Africa, India, China, Latin America, and other emerging markets. Powders also hold significant market share in eastern Europe and in some western European countries due to their advantage over liquids in whitening clothes. According to Desmet Ballestra, designer and builder of chemical plants and detergent-making equipment, powdered detergents have a 30–35% market share in western Europe. According to Lubrizol, the powdered detergent market is growing by 2 percent annually.[1]

Environmental concerns

Phosphates in detergent became an environmental concern in the 1950s and the subject of bans in later years.[9] Phosphates make laundry cleaner but also cause eutrophication, particularly with poor wastewater treatment.[10]

A 2013 academic study of fragranced laundry products found "more than 25 VOCs emitted from dryer vents, with the highest concentrations of acetaldehyde, acetone, and ethanol. Seven of these VOCs are classified as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and two as carcinogenic HAPs (acetaldehyde and benzene)".[11]

The

regulated
in many countries, e.g., Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United States, Canada, and Japan.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c McCoy, Michael (27 January 2019). "Almost extinct in the US, powdered laundry detergents thrive elsewhere in the world". Chemical & Engineering News. American Chemical Society. Archived from the original on 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019.
  2. from the original on 20 August 2016. The earliest recorded evidence of the production of soap-like materials dates back to around 2800 BCE in ancient Babylon.
  3. ^ a b Spriggs, John (July 1975), An economical of the development of substitutes with some illustrative examples and implications for the beef industry (PDF), Staff paper series, University of Minnesota, pp. 34–37, retrieved 9 May 2008
  4. ^
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. ^ Knud-Hansen, Chris (February 1994). "HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE PHOSPHATE DETERGENT CONFLICT". www.colorado.edu. CONFLICT RESEARCH CONSORTIUM. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010. Retrieved 21 March 2017.
  9. PMID 28951681
    .
  10. ^ Anne C. Steinemann, "Chemical Emissions from Residential Dryer Vents During Use of Fragranced Laundry Products", Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, March 2013, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 151–156.

External links