Louis Hartz

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Louis Hartz (April 8, 1919 – January 20, 1986)

political theory and comparative history.[1]

Early years

Hartz was born in

Omaha World Herald
.

Academic career

Hartz graduated in 1940, spent a year traveling abroad on a fellowship, and returned to Harvard as a teaching fellow in 1942. He earned his doctorate in 1946 and became a full professor of government in 1956. Hartz was known at Harvard for his talented and charismatic teaching. He retired in 1974 because of ill health.[1]

The Liberal Tradition in America

Hartz is best known for his classic book The Liberal Tradition in America (1955), which presented a view of the United States’s past that sought to explain its conspicuous absence of ideologies. Hartz argued that American political development occurs within the context of an enduring, underlying

Lockean liberal consensus,[2]
which has shaped and narrowed the landscape of possibilities for U.S. political thought and behavior. Hartz attributed the triumph of the liberal worldview in America, amongst other reasons, to:

Hartz also wanted to explain the failure of

classic liberalism was the major barrier.[3]

The Founding of New Societies

Hartz edited and wrote substantial sections of The Founding of New Societies (1964), wherein he developed and expanded upon his “fragment thesis.”

French Canada to be fragments of feudal Europe; the United States, English Canada, and Dutch South Africa to be liberal fragments; and Australia and English South Africa
to be "radical" fragments (incorporating the nonsocialist working class radicalism of Britain in the early 19th century).

Later years and death

Hartz led a normal life until a sudden unexplained emotional disturbance changed his entire personality in 1971. He refused all medical help. He divorced in 1972, rejected all his friends, and feuded intensely with students, faculty and administrators. In 1974 he resigned from Harvard, but his scholarly skills and interests continued to remain strong. Hartz spent his last years living in London, New Delhi, New York City, then Istanbul, where he died of an epileptic seizure in January 1986.[1][3]

Legacy

In 1956, the

universities today, in part because of the extensive, longrunning criticism and commentary that Hartz's ideas have generated.[1]

The Canadian context of Hartz's fragment thesis was disseminated and elaborated upon by Gad Horowitz, in the latter’s essay "Conservatism, Liberalism and Socialism in Canada: An Interpretation" (1966). Horowitz's use and interpretation of Hartz has been influential in Canadian political theory, and was still being actively debated well into the 21st century.

In Australia, Hartz's fragment thesis "received respectful attention, but ... did not win assent or committed followers", according to historian

Australian Economic History Review dedicated an issue to analysis of Hartz's theory.[6]

Bibliography

Books

  • Economic Policy and Democratic Thought: Pennsylvania 1776-1860. 1948. Harvard University Press.
  • The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. 1955. Harcourt, Brace.
  • The Founding of New Societies: Studies in the History of the United States, Latin America, South Africa, Canada, and Australia. 1964. Harcourt, Brace & World. (edited).
  • A Synthesis of World History, (Zurich, 1984).[7]
  • The Necessity of Choice: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought. Edited with an introduction by Paul Roazen. 1990.

Selected articles

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Margolick, David (January 24, 1986). "LOUIS HARTZ OF HARVARD DIES; EX-PROFESSOR OF GOVERNMENT" – via NYTimes.com.
  2. ^ a b Judis, John. "Ten Books Any Student of American History Must Read". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  3. ^ .
  4. OCLC 48958283.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link
    )
  5. .
  6. ^ "Australia and the Hartz 'fragment' thesis". Australian Economic History Review. XIII (2). September 1973.
  7. ^ Riley, Patrick. "II. Louis Hartz: The Final Years, the Unknown Work" in Political Theory, vol. 16 (3), (Aug 1988), p. 377.

Sources

Further reading

  • Abbott, Philip. "Still Louis Hartz after All These Years: A Defense of the Liberal Society Thesis," Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Mar., 2005), pp. 93–109 in JSTOR
  • Ericson, David and Louisa Green, eds. The Liberal Tradition in American Politics: Reassessing the Legacy of American Liberalism. 1999. Routledge.
  • Hulliung, Mark, ed. The American Liberal Tradition Reconsidered: The Contested Legacy of Louis Hartz (University Press of Kansas; 2010) 285 pages; essays by scholars that reevaluate Hartz's argument that the United States is inherently liberal.
  • Kloppenberg, James T. "In Retrospect: Louis Hartz's "The Liberal Tradition in America," Reviews in American History, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Sept. 2001), pp. 460–478 in JSTOR
  • Smith, Rogers. “Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America.” American Political Science Review 1993. 87(3): 549-566.