Lundomys
Lundomys Temporal range: Late Pleistocene to Recent (Lujanian)
| |
---|---|
cranium of L. molitor. The illustrated mandible represents a different species.
| |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Mammalia |
Order: | Rodentia |
Family: | Cricetidae |
Subfamily: | Sigmodontinae |
Genus: | Lundomys Voss & Carleton, 1993 |
Species: | L. molitor
|
Binomial name | |
Lundomys molitor (Winge, 1887)
| |
Distribution of Lundomys molitor in South America. The current distribution is in red, and fossil records outside the current range are in blue. | |
Synonyms[2] | |
|
Lundomys molitor, also known as Lund's amphibious rat[3] or the greater marsh rat,[4] is a semiaquatic rat species from southeastern South America.
Its distribution is now restricted to Uruguay and nearby Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, but it previously ranged northward into Minas Gerais, Brazil, and southward into eastern Argentina. The Argentine form may have been distinct from the living form from Brazil and Uruguay. L. molitor is a large rodent, with the head and body length averaging 193 mm (7.6 in), characterized by a long tail, large hindfeet, and long and dense fur. It builds nests above the water, supported by reeds, and it is not currently threatened.
Its external morphology is similar to that of Holochilus brasiliensis, and over the course of its complex taxonomic history it has been confused with that species, but other features support its placement in a distinct genus, Lundomys. Within the family Cricetidae and subfamily Sigmodontinae, it is a member of a group of specialized oryzomyine rodents that also includes Holochilus, Noronhomys, Carletonomys, and Pseudoryzomys.
Taxonomy
Lundomys molitor was first described in 1888 by Danish zoologist
In 1926, American zoologist
In a 1980 article, Argentine zoologist Elio Massoia recognized the resemblance between Winge's Hesperomys molitor and Hershkovitz's Holochilus magnus, and recommended that the former be reclassified as a species of Holochilus, Holochilus molitor.[10] When American zoologists Voss and Carleton restudied Winge's material in a 1993 paper, they were unable to find any consistent differences between the two and accordingly considered them to pertain to the same species.[11] In addition, they reviewed the differences between this species and other Holochilus and concluded that these were significant enough to place the former in a distinct genus, which they named Lundomys after Lund, who had collected the original material.[2] Since then, the species has been known as Lundomys molitor.[3]
In the same paper in which they described Lundomys, Voss and Carleton also, for the first time, diagnosed the tribe
Voss and Carleton had found some support for a close relationship between Holochilus, Lundomys, and Pseudoryzomys within Oryzomyini.
Description
Lundomys molitor is among the largest living oryzomyines, rivaled only by some large forms of
The front part of the skull is notably broad.
The molars are slightly more high-crowned (
The
Distribution and ecology
Lundomys molitor has been found as a living animal only in Uruguay and nearby Rio Grande do Sul; records of live specimens from eastern Argentina and Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, have not been confirmed.[8] It is rarely encountered, and has been collected in only one location in Rio Grande do Sul, but this may be due to insufficient efforts to locate it, rather than genuine rarity.[42] Its distribution is generally limited to areas with mean winter temperatures over 12 °C (54 °F), mean annual temperatures over 18 °C (64 °F), annual rainfall over 1,100 mm (43 in), and a long rainy season averaging over 200 days. It is usually found in swamps or near streams.[43]
Remains of Lundomys have been found at six Pleistocene localities in
Natural history
Lundomys molitor is semiaquatic in habits, spending much of its time in the water, and is active during the night.
Conservation status
The species' conservation status is currently assessed as "least concern" by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, reflecting a relatively wide distribution and the absence of evidence for a decline in populations. Several of the areas where it occurs are protected, but the destruction of its habitat may pose a threat to its continued existence.[1]
Footnotes
- ^ Measurements for head and body length and tail length are from 10 specimens, and those for hindfoot length are from 12 specimens, all from Uruguay.
References
- ^ a b González et al., 2016
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 5
- ^ a b Musser and Carleton, 2005, p. 1124
- ^ González et al., 2016; Duff and Lawson, 2004, p. 56
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 6
- ^ Pardiñas et al., 2008, pp. 556–557
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 3
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 10
- ^ Oliveira et al. in Freitas et al., 1983
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, pp. 3, 6
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 4
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 31
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993
- ^ Musser and Carleton, 2005; Weksler, 2006
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 1
- ^ Steppan, 1996; Carleton and Olson, 1999
- ^ Pardiñas, 2008, p. 1275
- ^ Weksler, 2006
- ^ Pardiñas, 2008
- ^ Weksler, 2006, table 8; Voss and Myers, 1991, table 1; Ray, 1962, tables 7, 11
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 13
- ^ a b c Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 7
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 6; Weksler, 2006, p. 23
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 7; Weksler, 2006, pp. 24–25
- ^ Weksler, 2006, pp. 19, 23
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993; Weksler, 2006, table 5
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, table 2.
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 15
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 16; Weksler, 2006, pp. 34–35
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 16
- ^ Weksler, 2006, p. 40; Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 17
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 17
- ^ Weksler, 2006, p. 47
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 19
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 20; Weksler, 2006, fig. 25
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 20; Weksler, 2006, p. 49
- ^ Weksler, 2006, p. 45
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 20
- ^ Weksler, 2006, pp. 42–43
- ^ Weksler, 2006, p. 43
- ^ Freitas et al., 1983; Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 10
- ^ González et al., 2016; Bonvicino et al., 2008
- ^ Teta and Pardiñas, 2006, p. 179
- ^ Oliveira and Kerber, 2009; Ubilla et al., 2004
- ^ Voss and Myers, 1991, table 5, p. 429
- ^ Teta and Pardiñas, 2006
- ^ Teta and Pardiñas, 2006, p. 180
- ^ Pardiñas and Lezcano, 1995, pp. 258–259
- ^ Pardiñas and Deschamps, 1995, p. 850
- ^ Pardiñas and Deschamps, 1995, table 2
- ^ Pardiñas, 2008, table 1
- ^ a b Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 34
- ^ Carleton and Olson, 1999, p. 52
- ^ Hershkovitz, 1955, p. 658
- ^ Sierra de Soriano in Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 34
- ^ Barley in Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 34
- ^ Tuttle in Voss and Carleton, 1993, p. 32
- ^ Lareschi et al., 2006; Nava et al., 2010, table 1
- ^ Voss and Carleton, 1993, pp. 32–34
Literature cited
- Bonvicino, C.R., Oliveira, J.A. and D'Andrea, P.S. 2008. Guia dos Roedores do Brasil, com chaves para gêneros baseadas em characteres externos. Série de Manuais Técnicos 11:1–120. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa – OPAS/OMS (in Portuguese).
- Carleton, M.D. and Olson, S.L. 1999. Amerigo Vespucci and the rat of Fernando de Noronha: a new genus and species of Rodentia (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) from a volcanic island off Brazil's continental shelf. American Museum Novitates 3256:1–59.
- Duff, A. and Lawson, A. 2004. Mammals of the World: A checklist. New Haven: A & C Black, 312 pp. ISBN 0-7136-6021-X.
- Freitas, T.R.O., Mattevi, M.S., Oliveira, L.F.B., Souza, M.J., Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y. and Salzano, F.M. 1983. Chromosome relationships in three representatives of the genus Holochilus (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from Brazil (subscription required). Genetica 61:13–20.
- Gonzalez, E.; D'elia, G.; Pardinas, U. (2017) [errata version of 2016 assessment]. "Lundomys molitor". .
- Hershkovitz, P.M. 1955. South American marsh rats, genus Holochilus, with a summary of sigmodont rodents. Fieldiana Zoology 37:619–673.
- Lareschi, M., Gettinger, D., Venzal, J.M., Arzua, M., Nieri-Bastos, F.A., Barros-Battesti, D.M. and Gonzalez, E.M. 2006. Primer registro de ácaros (Gamasida: Laelapidae) parásitos de roedores silvestres en Uruguay, con nuevos registros de hospedadores. Neotropical Entomology 35(5):596–601 (in Spanish).
- OCLC 62265494.
- Nava, S., Venzal, J.M., Labruna, M.B., Mastropaolo, M., González, E.M., Mangold, A.J. and Guglielmone, A.A. 2010. Hosts, distribution and genetic divergence (16S rDNA) of Amblyomma dubitatum (Acari: Ixodidae) (subscription required). Experimental and Applied Acarology 51(4):335–351.
- Oliveira, É.V. and Kerber, L. 2009. Paleontologia e aspectos geológicos das sucessões do final do Neógeno no sudoeste do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Gaea 5(1):21–34 (in Spanish).
- Pardiñas, U.F.J. 2008. A new genus of oryzomyine rodent (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) from the Pleistocene of Argentina (subscription required). Journal of Mammalogy 89(5):1270–1278.
- Pardiñas, U.F.J. and Deschamps, C. 1996. Sigmodontinos (Mammalia, Rodentia) Pleistocenicos del sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina): Aspectos sistematicos, paleozoogeograficos y paleoambientales. Estudios Geológicos 52:367–379 (in Spanish).
- Pardiñas, U.F.J. and Lezcano, M.J. 1995. Cricetidos (Mammalia: Rodentia) del Pleistoceno tardio del nordeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Aspectos sistematicos y paleoambientales. Ameghiniana 32(3):249–265 (in Spanish).
- Pardiñas, U.F.J., D'Elía, G. and Teta, P. 2008. Una introducción a los mayores sigmodontinos vivientes: Revisión de Kunsia Hershkovitz, 1966 y descripción de un nuevo género (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 66(3–4):509–594.
- Ray, C.E. 1962. The Oryzomyine Rodents of the Antillean Subregion. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Harvard University, 211 pp.
- Steppan, S.J. 1996. A new species of Holochilus (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) from the Middle Pleistocene of Bolivia and its phylogenetic significance (subscription required). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16(3):522–530.
- Teta, P. and Pardiñas, U.F.J. 2006. "Pleistocene record of marsh rats of the genus Lundomys in southern South America: Paleoclimatic significance". Current Research in the Pleistocene 23:179–181.
- Ubilla, M., Perea, D., Aguilar, C.G. and Lorenzo, N. 2004. Late Pleistocene vertebrates from northern Uruguay: tools for biostratigraphic, climatic and environmental reconstruction (subscription required). Quaternary International 114:129–142.
- Voss, R.S. and Carleton, M.D. 1993. A new genus for Hesperomys molitor Winge and Holochilus magnus Hershkovitz (Mammalia, Muridae) with an analysis of its phylogenetic relationships. American Museum Novitates 3085:1–39.
- Voss, R.S. and Myers, P. 1991. Pseudoryzomys simplex (Rodentia: Muridae) and the significance of Lund's collections from the caves of Lagoa Santa, Brazil. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 206:414–432.
- Weksler, M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of oryzomyine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 296:1–149.