Magical thinking
Magical thinking, or superstitious thinking,
The precise definition of magical thinking may vary subtly when used by different theorists or among different fields of study. In anthropology, the posited causality is between religious ritual, prayer, sacrifice, or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense.
In psychology, magical thinking is the belief that one's thoughts by themselves can bring about effects in the world or that thinking something corresponds with doing it.[6] These beliefs can cause a person to experience an irrational fear of performing certain acts or having certain thoughts because of an assumed correlation between doing so and threatening calamities.[1]
In
Types
Direct effect
Sigmund Freud believed that magical thinking was produced by cognitive developmental factors. He described practitioners of magic as projecting their mental states onto the world around them, similar to a common phase in child development.[12] From toddlerhood to early school age, children will often link the outside world with their internal consciousness, e.g. "It is raining because I am sad."
Symbolic approaches
Another theory of magical thinking is the symbolic approach. Leading thinkers of this category, including Stanley J. Tambiah, believe that magic is meant to be expressive, rather than instrumental. As opposed to the direct, mimetic thinking of Frazer, Tambiah asserts that magic utilizes abstract analogies to express a desired state, along the lines of metonymy or metaphor.[13]
An important question raised by this interpretation is how mere symbols could exert material effects. One possible answer lies in
Causes
According to theories of anxiety relief and control, people turn to magical beliefs when there exists a sense of uncertainty and potential danger, and with little access to logical or scientific responses to such danger. Magic is used to restore a sense of control over circumstance. In support of this theory, research indicates that superstitious behavior is invoked more often in high stress situations, especially by people with a greater desire for control.[16][17]
Another potential reason for the persistence of magic rituals is that the rituals prompt their own use by creating a feeling of insecurity and then proposing themselves as precautions.
Some scholars believe that
Phenomenological approach
Ariel Glucklich tries to understand magic from a subjective perspective, attempting to comprehend magic on a phenomenological, experientially based level. Glucklich seeks to describe the attitude that magical practitioners feel what he calls "magical consciousness" or the "magical experience". He explains that it is based upon "the awareness of the interrelatedness of all things in the world by means of simple but refined sense perception."[23]
Another phenomenological model is that of Gilbert Lewis, who argues that "habit is unthinking". He believes that those practicing magic do not think of an explanatory theory behind their actions any more than the average person tries to grasp the pharmaceutical workings of aspirin.
Social
Anthropology
In
Researchers have identified two possible principles as the formal causes of the attribution of false causal relationships:
- the temporal contiguity of two events
- "associative thinking", the association of entities based upon their resemblance to one another
Prominent Victorian theorists identified associative thinking (a common feature of practitioners of magic) as a characteristic form of irrationality. As with all forms of magical thinking, association-based and similarities-based notions of causality are not always said to be the practice of magic by a magician. For example, the doctrine of signatures held that similarities between plant parts and body parts indicated their efficacy in treating diseases of those body parts, and was a part of Western medicine during the Middle Ages. This association-based thinking is a vivid example of the general human application of the representativeness heuristic.[26]
In How Natives Think (1925),
Despite the view that magic is less than rational and entails an inferior concept of causality, in The Savage Mind (1966), Claude Lévi-Strauss suggested that magical procedures are relatively effective in exerting control over the environment. This outlook has generated alternative theories of magical thinking, such as the symbolic and psychological approaches, and softened the contrast between "educated" and "primitive" thinking: "Magical thinking is no less characteristic of our own mundane intellectual activity than it is of Zande curing practices."[33][n 1]
Cultural differences
Along similar lines, Michael F. Brown argues that the
One theory of substantive difference is that of the open versus closed society. Horton describes this as one of the key dissimilarities between traditional thought and Western science. He suggests that the scientific worldview is distinguished from a magical one by the scientific method and by skepticism, requiring the falsifiability of any scientific hypothesis. He notes that for native peoples "there is no developed awareness of alternatives to the established body of theoretical texts."[37] He notes that all further differences between traditional and Western thought can be understood as a result of this factor. He says that because there are no alternatives in societies based on magical thought, a theory does not need to be objectively judged to be valid.
In children
According to
Children between ages 2 and 7 would be classified under his
Grief
It was discovered that children often feel that they are responsible for an event or events occurring or are capable of reversing an event simply by thinking about it and wishing for a change: namely, "magical thinking".[39] Make-believe and fantasy are an integral part of life at this age and are often used to explain the inexplicable.[40][41]
According to Piaget, children within this age group are often "
Magical thinking is found particularly in children's explanations of experiences about death, whether the death of a family member or pet, or their own illness or impending death. These experiences are often new for a young child, who at that point has no experience to give understanding of the ramifications of the event.[43] A child may feel that they are responsible for what has happened, simply because they were upset with the person who died, or perhaps played with the pet too roughly. There may also be the idea that if the child wishes it hard enough, or performs just the right act, the person or pet may choose to come back, and not be dead any longer.[44]
When considering their own illness or impending death, some children may feel that they are being punished for doing something wrong, or not doing something they should have, and therefore have become ill.[45] If a child's ideas about an event are incorrect because of their magical thinking, there is a possibility that the conclusions the child makes could result in long-term beliefs and behaviours that create difficulty for the child as they mature.[46]
Related terms
"Quasi-magical thinking" describes "cases in which people act as if they erroneously believe that their action influences the outcome, even though they do not really hold that belief".[47] People may realize that a superstitious intuition is logically false, but act as if it were true because they do not exert an effort to correct the intuition.[48]
See also
- Cognitive bias
- Faith
- Illusion of control
- Law of attraction (New Thought)
- Mythopoeic thought
- Psychology of religion
- Psychological theories of magic
- Schizotypal personality disorder
- Synchronicity
- Tinkerbell effect
- The Year of Magical Thinking, an account of how mourning the death of a spouse led to magical thinking.
Notes
- Azande practice of curing epilepsy by eating the burnt skull of a red bush monkey, based on the apparent similarity of epileptic movements and those of the monkeys, was discussed in Evans-Pritchard 1937, p. 487.
References
- ^ a b c d Bennett, Bo. "Magical Thinking". Logically Fallacious. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
- ^ a b Carroll RT (12 Sep 2014). "Magical thinking". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-521-60834-3.
- S2CID 25440192.
- ISSN 0022-3050.
- ^ Colman, Andrew M. (2012). A Dictionary of Psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- ISBN 978-0-89042-554-1.
- ISBN 978-1-4511-0047-1.
- PMID 29684178.
- ^ Barkataki B (2019). Explaining obsessive-compulsive symptoms? A transcultural exploration of magical thinking and OCD in India and Australia (PhD). Curtin university.
- ^ Glucklich 1997, pp. 59–61, 205–12
- ^ Glucklich 1997, pp. 53–5
- ^ Brown, Michael F. (1993). Thinking About Magic. Greenwood Press. pp. 5–7.
- ^ Glucklich 1997, pp. 60–2
- ^ Glucklich 1997, pp. 49–53
- S2CID 145223253.
- .
- ^ S2CID 145218875.
- ^ "Why Rituals Work". Scientific American. Retrieved 2015-12-17.
- ^ Glucklich 1997, pp. 50–68
- S2CID 145507695.
- S2CID 245911255.
- ^ Glucklich 1997, p. 12
- ^ Lewis, Gilbert. The Look of Magic. University of Cambridge.
- S2CID 1160061.
- ^ Nisbett, D.; Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. pp. 115–8.
- ^ Glucklich, Ariel (1997). The End of Magic. Oxford University Press. pp. 32–3.
- ^ Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1977). Theories of Primitive Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 26–7.
- ^ Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, Magic, and Oracles Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- ^ Frazer, James (1915) [1911]. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.
- ^ Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien (1925). How Natives Think. Knopf. p. 36.
- ^ Lévy-Bruhl 1925, p. 76
- S2CID 29780746.
- ^ Horton 1967b, p. 171
- ^ Brown, Michael F. (1986). Tsewa's Gift: Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. University of Alabama Press.
- ^ Brown 1993, p. 2
- ^ Horton 1967b, p. 155
- ^ Piaget, Jean (1929). The child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- PMID 22198004.
- .
- ^ Webb, N. (2010). "The child and death". In Webb, N.B. (ed.). Helping Bereaved Children: A Handbook for Practitioners. New York: Guildford. pp. 5–6.
- ^ S2CID 37763796.
- ^ Webb 2010, p. 51
- ].
- PMID 8106926.
- S2CID 146429165.
- S2CID 29570235.
- S2CID 14384232.
Further reading
- ISBN 9780061452642.
- .
- Hutson, Matthew (2012). The 7 Laws of Magical Thinking: How Irrational Beliefs Keep Us Happy, Healthy, and Sane. ISBN 9781594630873.
- Serban, George (1982). The Tyranny of Magical Thinking. New York: ISBN 978-0525241409. This work discusses how and why the magical thinking of childhood can carry into adulthood, causing various maladaptions and psychopathologies.
- Vyse, Stuart (1997). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. ISBN 9780195136340.
External links
- Hutson, Matthew (2008). "Magical thinking". Psychology Today. Vol. March–April. pp. 89–95.
- Stevens, Phillips Jr. (November–December 2001). "Magical thinking in complementary and alternative medicine". Skeptical Inquirer. 25 (6). Archived from the original on 2010-06-03. Retrieved 2010-09-22.