Majorana fermion
Standard Model of particle physics |
---|
A Majorana fermion (/maɪəˈrɑːnə/[1]), also referred to as a Majorana particle, is a fermion that is its own antiparticle. They were hypothesised by Ettore Majorana in 1937. The term is sometimes used in opposition to a Dirac fermion, which describes fermions that are not their own antiparticles.
With the exception of
In
Theory
The concept goes back to Majorana's suggestion in 1937[2] that electrically neutral spin-1/2 particles can be described by a real-valued wave equation (the Majorana equation), and would therefore be identical to their antiparticle, because the wave functions of particle and antiparticle are related by complex conjugation, which leaves the Majorana wave equation unchanged.
The difference between Majorana fermions and Dirac fermions can be expressed mathematically in terms of the creation and annihilation operators of second quantization: The creation operator creates a fermion in quantum state (described by a real wave function), whereas the annihilation operator annihilates it (or, equivalently, creates the corresponding antiparticle). For a Dirac fermion the operators and are distinct, whereas for a Majorana fermion they are identical. The ordinary fermionic annihilation and creation operators and can be written in terms of two Majorana operators and by
In supersymmetry models, neutralinos – superpartners of gauge bosons and Higgs bosons – are Majorana fermions.
Identities
Another common convention for the normalization of the Majorana fermion operator is
which can be rearranged to obtain the Majorana fermion operators as
It is easy to see that is indeed fulfilled. This convention has the advantage that the Majorana operator squares to the identity, i.e. . Using this convention, a collection of Majorana fermions ( ordinary fermions), () obey the following
and
where and are antisymmetric matrices. These are identical to the commutation relations for the real Clifford algebra in dimensions ().
Elementary particles
Because particles and antiparticles have opposite conserved charges, Majorana fermions have zero charge, hence among the fundamental particles, the only fermions that could be Majorana are
The
The seesaw mechanism is appealing because it would naturally explain why the observed neutrino masses are so small. However, if the neutrinos are Majorana then they violate the conservation of lepton number and even of B − L.
Neutrinoless double beta decay has not (yet) been observed,[3] but if it does exist, it can be viewed as two ordinary beta decay events whose resultant antineutrinos immediately annihilate each other, and is only possible if neutrinos are their own antiparticles.[4]
The high-energy analog of the neutrinoless double beta decay process is the production of same-sign charged lepton pairs in
Majorana fermions cannot possess intrinsic electric or magnetic moments, only toroidal moments.[7][8][9] Such minimal interaction with electromagnetic fields makes them potential candidates for cold dark matter.[10][11]
Majorana bound states
In superconducting materials, a quasiparticle can emerge as a Majorana fermion (non-fundamental), more commonly referred to as a Bogoliubov quasiparticle in condensed matter physics. Its existence becomes possible because a quasiparticle in a superconductor is its own antiparticle.
Mathematically, the superconductor imposes electron hole "symmetry" on the quasiparticle excitations, relating the creation operator at energy to the annihilation operator at energy . Majorana fermions can be bound to a defect at zero energy, and then the combined objects are called Majorana bound states or Majorana zero modes.[12] This name is more appropriate than Majorana fermion (although the distinction is not always made in the literature), because the statistics of these objects is no longer fermionic. Instead, the Majorana bound states are an example of non-abelian anyons: interchanging them changes the state of the system in a way that depends only on the order in which the exchange was performed. The non-abelian statistics that Majorana bound states possess allows them to be used as a building block for a topological quantum computer.[13]
A quantum vortex in certain superconductors or superfluids can trap midgap states, which is one source of Majorana bound states.[14][15][16] Shockley states at the end points of superconducting wires or line defects are an alternative, purely electrical, source.[17] An altogether different source uses the fractional quantum Hall effect as a substitute for the superconductor.[18]
Experiments in superconductivity
In 2008, Fu and Kane provided a groundbreaking development by theoretically predicting that Majorana bound states can appear at the interface between
The aforementioned experiments mark possible verifications of independent 2010 theoretical proposals from two groups[33][34] predicting the solid state manifestation of Majorana bound states in semiconducting wires proximitized to superconductors. However, it was also pointed out that some other trivial non-topological bounded states[35] could highly mimic the zero voltage conductance peak of Majorana bound state. The subtle relation between those trivial bound states and Majorana bound states was reported by the researchers in Niels Bohr Institute,[36] who can directly "watch" coalescing Andreev bound states evolving into Majorana bound states, thanks to a much cleaner semiconductor-superconductor hybrid system.
In 2014, evidence of Majorana bound states was also observed using a low-temperature scanning tunneling microscope, by scientists at Princeton University.[37][38] These experiments resolved the predicted signatures of localized Majorana bound states – zero energy modes – at the ends of ferromagnetic (iron) chains on the surface of a superconductor (lead) with strong spin-orbit coupling. Follow up experiments at lower temperatures probed these end states with higher energy resolution and showed their robustness when the chains are buried by layers of lead.[39] Experiments with spin-polarized STM tips have also been used, in 2017, to distinguish these end modes from trivial zero energy modes that can form due to magnetic defects in a superconductor, providing important evidence (beyond zero bias peaks) for the interpretation of the zero energy mode at the end of the chains as a Majorana bound state.[40] More experiments finding evidence for Majorana bound states in chains have also been carried out with other types of magnetic chains, particularly chains manipulated atom-by-atom to make a spin helix on the surface of a superconductor.[41][42]
Majorana fermions may also emerge as quasiparticles in quantum spin liquids, and were observed by researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, working in collaboration with Max Planck Institute and University of Cambridge on 4 April 2016.[43]
Chiral Majorana fermions were claimed to be detected in 2017 by Q.L. He et al., in a quantum anomalous Hall effect/superconductor hybrid device.[44][45] In this system, Majorana fermions edge mode will give a rise to a conductance edge current. Subsequent experiments by other groups, however, could not reproduce these findings.[46][47][48] In November 2022, the article by He et al. was retracted by the editors,[49] because "analysis of the raw and published data revealed serious irregularities and discrepancies".
On 16 August 2018, a strong evidence for the existence of Majorana bound states (or Majorana
Majorana bound states in quantum error correction
One of the causes of interest in Majorana bound states is that they could be used in quantum error correcting codes.[54][55] This process is done by creating so called 'twist defects' in codes such as the toric code[56] which carry unpaired Majorana modes.[57] The Majoranas are then "braided" by being physically moved around each other in 2D sheets or networks of nanowires.[58] This braiding process forms a projective representation of the braid group.[59]
Such a realization of Majoranas would allow them to be used to store and process
Majorana bound states in Kitaev chains
In February 2023
References
- YouTube, uploaded 19 April 2013, retrieved 5 October 2014; and also based on the pronunciation of physicist's name.
- S2CID 18973190.
- ^
Rodejohann, Werner (2011). "Neutrino-less double beta decay and particle physics". S2CID 119102859.
- ^
Schechter, J.; Valle, J.W.F. (1982). "Neutrinoless double-β decay in SU(2) x U(1) theories" (PDF). hdl:10550/47205.
- .
- S2CID 42414212.
- S2CID 1935565.
- PMID 9956279.
- PMID 10040354.
- S2CID 14251522.
- S2CID 15472526.
- .
- S2CID 119628297.
- PMID 9998953.
- S2CID 118970615.
- S2CID 119427877.
- S2CID 9458459.
- .
- S2CID 7618062.
- S2CID 15398390.
- S2CID 206021454.
- S2CID 54577113.
- .
- ^ Amos, Jonathan (13 April 2012). "Majorana particle glimpsed in lab". BBC News. Retrieved 15 April 2012.
- S2CID 18447180.
- S2CID 119104344.
- S2CID 119549172.
- S2CID 119240318.
- S2CID 119297473.
- S2CID 118487534.
- PMID 25434375.
- PMID 26792013.
- S2CID 8863469.
- S2CID 14736864.
- S2CID 9579343.
- S2CID 5219260.
- S2CID 206561257.
- ^ "Majorana fermion: Physicists observe elusive particle that is its own antiparticle". Phys.org (Press release). 2 October 2014. Retrieved 3 October 2014.
- S2CID 85510646.
- S2CID 29851188.
- PMID 29756034.
- S2CID 232335790.
- S2CID 3406627.
- S2CID 3904085.
- ^ Conover, Emily (20 July 2017). "Majorana fermion detected in a quantum layer cake". Science News (sciencenews.org).
- S2CID 209677626.
- S2CID 240657983.
- ^ "The case of the elusive Majorana: The so-called 'angel particle' is still a mystery". ScienceDaily (Press release). Penn State. 3 January 2020.
A 2017 report of the discovery of a particular kind of Majorana fermion – the chiral Majorana fermion, referred to as the 'angel particle' – is likely a false alarm, according to new research.
- ^ "Editorial Retraction". Science. 378 (6621): 718.
- S2CID 52021577.
- S2CID 3706042.
- PMID 33436594.
- S2CID 207852777.
- S2CID 119628297.
- S2CID 116918566.
- S2CID 5285193.
- S2CID 118701510.
- ^ "Why Majoranas are cool: Braiding and quantum computation". topocondmat.org. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
- S2CID 96451256.
- S2CID 36122810.
- S2CID 249712114.
- S2CID 257616165.
- S2CID 250872768.
Further reading
- Pal, Palash B. (2011) [12 October 2010]. "Dirac, Majorana, and Weyl fermions". S2CID 118685467.