Marcus Mettius

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Marcus Mettius or Metius (fl. mid-1st century BC) was a supporter of Julius Caesar in the 50s and 40s BC.

Diplomatic envoy

During the first year of the

ius gentium, the customary law of international relations,[2] but it has been observed that Ariovistus's charge may not have been groundless.[3]

Since Ariovistus had been declared a Friend of the Roman People (amicus

equestrian order; trade with the Germanic peoples at the time might have involved slaves, animals, or goods.[5] Caesar says only that he chose Mettius for the mission because of his ties to Ariovistus,[6]
and provides no further information about the man's social rank, ethnicity, or occupation.

Monetalis

In 44 BC, Mettius was a moneyer (monetalis), one of four men (IIIIviri) minting both in his own name and in Caesar's. His fellow moneyers were L. Aemilius Buca, P. Sepulius Macer, and C. Cossutius Maridianus.[7]

Coins from this period with iconography of Juno Sospita bear the name of M. Mettius. The reverse of one coin[8] features Sospita in a biga (two-horse chariot) holding a shield and spear and wearing her distinctive goat-horned headdress. On another, the obverse depicts Sospita and a coiled snake, with an image of Victory in a biga on the reverse. A third type shows a girl and snake facing each other.[9]

The cult of Juno Sospita was based in

T.P. Wiseman, however, noted that Mettii are found in Liguria and the ethnically Celtic upper Po Valley, and speculated whether Mettius had "adopted a Lanuvine coin type to divert attention from his real origin?"[10]

References

  1. ^ Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Gallico 1.46 and 52. On the hospitium between Ariovistus and Mettius, see Andrew Wallace-Hadrill, Patronage in Ancient Society (Routledge, 1989), p. 140 online.
  2. ^ Daniel Peretz, "The Roman Interpreter and His Diplomatic and Military Roles," Historia 55 (2006), p. 454.
  3. ^ John H. Collins, “Caesar as Political Propagandist,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1.1 (1972), p. 930 online: "it is hard to avoid the feeling that if we had an independent report of the incident from the German side we should learn that the envoys' conduct was not quite so diplomatically correct as Caesar has represented it"; also N.J.E. Austin and N.B. Rankov Exploratio: Military and Political Intelligence in the Roman World from the Second Punic War to the Battle of Adrianople (Routledge, 1995), p. 55.
  4. ^ This assumption is common enough to have been noted in a student textbook for Caesar's commentaries edited by Francis W. Kelsey (Boston, 1918), p. 117 online.
  5. T.P. Wiseman under "Monetalis" following
    . None of these have a basis in the text of the Bellum Gallicum.
  6. ^ Bellum Gallicum 1.46.4: qui hospitio Ariovisti utebatur.
  7. T.R.S. Broughton
    , The Magistrates of the Roman Republic (American Philological Association, 1952), vol. 2, pp. 446.
  8. ^ See Coin Archives.
  9. ^ Gary D. Farney, Ethnic Identity and Aristocratic Competition in Republican Rome (Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 274 online.
  10. ^ T.P. Wiseman, New Men in the Roman Senate (Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 241, as cited by Farney.