Martin Noth

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Martin Noth
Born(1902-08-03)3 August 1902
Erlangen, Rostock
Occupation(s)Taught at Bonn, Göttingen, Tübingen, Hamburg, and University of Basel
Notable workThe Deuteronomistic History
Theological work
LanguageGerman
Main interestsPre-Exilic history of the Hebrews
Notable ideasTraditional-historical approach to biblical studies

Martin Noth (3 August 1902 – 30 May 1968) was a German scholar of the Hebrew Bible who specialized in the pre-Exilic history of the Hebrews and promoted the hypothesis that the Israelite tribes in the immediate period after the settlement in Canaan were organised as a group of twelve tribes arranged around a central sanctuary on the lines of the later Greek and Italian amphictyonies.[1] With Gerhard von Rad he pioneered the traditional-historical approach to biblical studies, emphasising the role of oral traditions in the formation of the biblical texts.

Life

Noth was born in

Leipzig and taught at Greifswald and Königsberg
.

From 1939 to 1941 and 1943–45, Noth served as a German soldier during World War II. After the war he taught at Bonn, Göttingen, Tübingen, Hamburg, and University of Basel. He died during an expedition in the Negev, Israel.

Influence

Noth first attracted widespread attention with "Das System der zwölf Stämme Israels" ("The Scheme of the Twelve Tribes of Israel", 1930), positing that the Twelve Tribes of Israel did not exist prior to the covenant assembly at Shechem described in the Book of Joshua.

"A History of Pentateuchal Traditions" (1948, English translation 1972) set out a new model for the composition of the

Pentateuch as composed of blocks of traditional material accreted round some key historical experiences. He identified these experiences as "Guidance out of Egypt", "Guidance into the Arable Land", "Promise to the Patriarchs", "Guidance in the Wilderness" and "Revelation at Sinai", the details of the narrative serving to fill out the thematic outline. Later, Robert Polzin showed that some of his main conclusions were consistent with arbitrary or inconsistent use of the rules that he proposed.[4]

Even more revolutionary and influential, and quite reorienting the emphasis of modern scholarship, was The Deuteronomistic History. In this work, Noth argued that the earlier theory of several Deuteronomist redactions of the books from Joshua to Kings did not explain the facts, and instead proposed that they formed a unified "Deuteronomic history",[5] the product of a single author working in the late 7th century.

Noth also published commentaries on all the five books of the Pentateuch:

Deuteronomy. Noth considered that the book of Deuteronomy was more closely related to the following books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings (The Deuteronomistic History).[6] This theory is widely accepted today, and provides the framework for current research on the historical books of the Old Testament.[7]

Works

Books

Articles

References

  1. ^ Mayes, A. D. H. (1973), The question of the Israelite amphictyony, Hermathena, No. 116 (Winter 1973), pp. 53-65, accessed 15 May 2021
  2. ^ See entry of Martin Noth in Rostock Matrikelportal
  3. ^ Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005
  4. S2CID 53451334. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2010-06-01. Retrieved 2009-07-22.
  5. Encyclopedia Judaica. Retrieved 17 April 2015 – via Jewish Virtual Library
    .
  6. ^ "Hexateuch, Tetrateuch, and the Deuteronomic History". www.crivoice.org.
  7. OCLC 309916553.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martin_Noth&oldid=1199594480"