Mauri
Mauri (from which derives the English term "Moors") was the Latin designation for the Berber population of Mauretania, located in the west side of North Africa on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, Mauretania Tingitana and Mauretania Caesariensis, in present-day Morocco and northwestern Algeria.
Name
Mauri (Μαῦροι) by
Roman period
In 44 AD, the Roman Empire incorporated the region as the province of Mauretania, later divided into Mauretania Caesariensis and Mauretania Tingitana. The area around Carthage was already part of Africa Proconsularis. Roman rule was effective enough so that these provinces became integrated into the empire.
Mauri raids into the southern
By the early Christian era, the byname
When Aurelian marched against Zenobia in 272, his army included Moorish cavalry.[5] The Notitia Dignitatum mentions Roman cavalry units called Equites Mauri, or Moorish cavalry. Many Mauri were enlisted in the Roman army and were well known as members of the comitatus, the emperor's mobile army, prior to the reign of Diocletian.[6] Jones cites the record of a consular interrogation from Numidia in 320, in which a Latin grammarian named Victor stated that his father was a decurion in Cirta (modern Constantine), and his grandfather served in the comitatus, 'for our family is of Moorish origin'.[7]
By the time of Diocletian, Moorish cavalry were no longer part of the mobile field army, but rather were stationed along the Persian and Danube borders. There was one regiment of Equites Mauri in "each of the six provinces from Mesopotamia to Arabia".[8] The Mauri were part of a larger group called Equites Illyricani, indicating previous service in Illyricum.[5]
While many Mauri were part of the Roman empire, others resisted Roman rule. As Gibbon related for the years 296–297, "From the Nile to Mount Atlas, Africa was in arms."
In the 370s, Mauri raided the Roman towns of Northwest Africa.
Firmus' brother Gildo, also a Moorish chieftain, joined the Romans and helped defeat Firmus' revolt. As a reward, he was given the post of magister utriusque militiae per Africam, or master of foot soldiers and cavalry for Africa.[14] In 397 he broke his allegiance to the Western Empire, then under the control of the child emperor Honorius and his master of soldiers Stilicho. Gildo withheld the corn ships from Rome and declared allegiance to Stilicho's enemy Eutropius in Constantinople. Eutropius sent encouragement but no troops or money. The Roman Senate declared Gildo a public enemy (hostis publicus).[15]
Gildo had another brother called Mascezel. At some point, Gildo executed Mascezel's children.[16] Because of this, Mascezel helped the Romans defeat his brother's rebellion. With Mascezel's help, a Roman force of 5000 men defeated Gildo and restored control over northwest Africa to the Western Empire. Stilicho then saw to it that Mascezel was eliminated. To replace Gildo, Stilicho put his brother-in-law Bathanarius in charge of military affairs in Africa in 401.[17]
In the late 4th and early 5th centuries, large numbers of troops from the mobile imperial field army (the comitatus) were permanently stationed in Africa to maintain order against the Moors. A.H.M. Jones estimated that out of a total of 113,000 men in the comitatus 23000 were stationed in Africa. These troops were in addition to the limitanei, the permanent border armies; but the limitanei were insufficient against the Moors and so portions of the field army were placed alongside them. These troops were, according to Jones, then unavailable for their original purpose, which was to respond to barbarian invasions rapidly and wherever necessary.[18]
In 411–412, the
In the year 412, the limitanei (permanently stationed border guards) of
Byzantine period
After
The Vandal king
Hilderic (523–530) was not able to control Mauri attacks.[24] In 530 he was deposed and replaced with Gelimer. The Byzantine Emperor, Justinian, used this as an excuse for invasion, as he had treaty relations with Hilderic. Justinian's general Belisarius quickly reestablished control over the former Roman province of Africa. King Gelimer sought refuge with a Mauri chieftain in the city of Medeus on Mount Papua. There, he was besieged for three months, until the city's suffering became too unbearable and he surrendered.[25]
Otherwise, for the most part the Mauri did not resist Belisarius, but waited for the outcome of the battle and gave their allegiance to the Byzantines when it was done.
A.H.M. Jones states that the grave difficulties experienced by the Byzantines in establishing control over the Mauri following the conquest of the Vandal kingdom, were in large part due to a failure to supply enough money and resources to the troops stationed in Africa, and this in turn due to the numerous wars being fought by Justinian elsewhere.[32] The Mauri had taken large areas of land from the Vandals during the reign of the ineffective Hilderic, and the Byzantines never recovered these territories. Within the area of Byzantine control, almost every town was fortified, even far from the border areas. Many towns appear to have been reduced in size as populations concentrated within reduced fortified areas. In some towns the forum was fortified. All this suggests reduced prosperity and population and increased threat of war, most likely with the Mauri.[33] Jones argues that because of the failure to commit enough resources to thoroughly pacify the region, it never contributed more taxes to Justinian's government than it cost in resources to maintain control.[34] However, some Mauri were recruited into the Byzantine armies for service overseas, and at least two African regiments were raised and assigned to Egypt.[33]
A major Mauri revolt against Byzantine rule took place in 569, during the reign of Justin II, in which the praetorian prefect was killed. The following year, the magister militum was killed. In 571 another magister militum was killed.[35] During the reign of the Emperor Maurice, 582–602 there were another two, smaller, Mauri rebellions.[36]
Islamic period
The Byzantine Empire would remain in control of North Africa until the late 600s, when the Muslim conquest of the Maghreb ended Byzantine rule in Africa. After the Muslim conquest of the Maghreb, there seem to have been continued Mauri resistance for another 50 years.[37] The Chronicle of 754 still mentions Mauri but by the High Middle Ages the endonym seems to have disappeared, while Christian sources begin to apply the term Mauri, Moors to the Islamic populations of the Maghreb and Andalusia in general.
Revival of the name
The modern state of Mauritania received its name as a French colony in 1903; it was named after ancient Mauretania in spite of its being situated considerably to the south of the ancient province.
See also
- Roman-Moorish kingdoms
Notes
- ^ οἰκοῦσι δ᾽ ἐνταῦθα Μαυρούσιοι μὲν ὑπὸ τῶν Ἑλλήνων λεγόμενοι, Μαῦροι δ᾽ ὑπὸ τῶν Ῥωμαίων καὶ τῶν ἐπιχωρίων "Here dwell a people called by the Greeks Maurusii, and by the Romans and the natives Mauri" Strabo, Geographica 17.3.2. Lewis and Short, Latin Dictionary, 1879 s.v. "Mauri"
- ^ Siculus, Calpurnius (1890). "Eclogue IV". Internet Archive eclogues of Calpurnius. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
- ^ Richardson, John (1996). The Romans in Spain. Blackwell. p. 231.
- ^ Richardson, John (1996). The Romans in Spain. Blackwell. p. 232.
- ^ a b Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 57.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 53.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. pp. 52–53.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 55.
- ^ Gibbon, Edward. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire", vol. 1, p. 409.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 59.
- ^ Richardson, John (1996). The Romans in Spain. Blackwell. p. 292.
- ^ Ammianus Marcellinus. "The Roman History of Ammianus Marcellinus p. 413". Project Gutenberg Ammianus Marcellinus. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 140.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 183.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M.; Martindale, J.R.; Morris, J. (1971). Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, Volume I. pp. 395–396.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M.; Martindale, J.R.; Morris, J. (1971). Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, Volume I. p. 396.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 184.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 197.
- ^ Martindale, J.R. (1980). Prosopography of the Late Roman Empire, Volume II. Cambridge University Press. p. 108.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 203.
- ^ Jamil M. Abun-Nasr, A History of the Maghrib (Cambridge Univ., 1971) at 27, 38 & 43; Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress, The Berbers (Blackwell 1996) at 14, 24, 41–54; Henri Terrasse, History of Morocco (Casablanca: Atlantides 1952) at 39–49, esp. 43–44; Serge Lancel, Carthage (Librairie Artheme Fayard 1992, Blackwell 1995) at 396–401; Glenn Markoe, The Phoenicians, Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2000, pp. 54–56.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 260.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 263.
- ^ a b Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 273.
- ^ Procopius, Procopius: History of the wars, books III and IV. The Vandalic war, p. 265.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 274.
- ^ a b Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 277.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 278.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 283.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 287.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 293.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 298.
- ^ a b Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 300.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 300-301.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 305.
- ^ Jones, A.H.M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284–602. Oxford: Blackwell. p. 313.
- ^ c.f. Kusaila, Kahina. "The conquest of North Africa and Berber resistance" in General History of Africa.[according to whom?][year needed]