Mauritius sheldgoose
Mauritius sheldgoose | |
---|---|
1893 illustrations of the first known carpometacarpus wing-bone | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Aves |
Order: | Anseriformes |
Family: | Anatidae |
Genus: | Alopochen |
Species: | †A. mauritiana
|
Binomial name | |
†Alopochen mauritiana | |
Location of Mauritius | |
Synonyms | |
|
The Mauritius sheldgoose (Alopochen mauritiana), also known as the Mauritius shelduck, is an
One contemporary account states that the Mauritius sheldgoose had wings that were half black and half white, and that the bird was not very large. The species may also be depicted in one illustration. Fossil elements show that it was smaller than the Egyptian goose, but with more robust legs. Little is known about the habits of the Mauritius sheldgoose, accounts indicate they were very tame, were grazers, lived in groups, and usually stayed on the north side of the island except for during the dry season when they were forced to the other side to drink. Their robust legs indicate they were becoming more terrestrial, which is supported by accounts stating they avoided water. The species was considered highly palatable by travellers, and while abundant in 1681, it declined quickly thereafter, being declared extinct in 1698. It was probably driven to extinction due to overhunting and predation by introduced animals, particularly cats.
Taxonomy
Because the contemporary accounts of geese on Mauritius did not mention a
In 1987, the British ornithologist
The French palaeontologist Cécile Mourer-Chauviré and colleagues stated in 1999 that while the Mauritius sheldgoose was similar to the Malagasy and Réunion sheldgeese, it may have been
Reflecting changing historical classifications and definitions, the Mauritius sheldgoose has also been referred to by
Description
The best contemporary description of the Mauritius sheldgoose, and the only one that indicates what it looked like, is that of the English traveller John Marshall from 1668:[13]
Here are many geese, the halfe of their wings towards the end, are black, and the other halfe white. They are not large but fat and good [to eat].[2]
The holotype carpometacarpus of the Mauritius sheldgoose has a strongly projecting alular
Additional fossil elements show that the Mauritius sheldgoose was smaller than the Egyptian goose, but with more robust legs, a feature it had in common with the Réunion sheldgoose.[2] The pelvis of the Mauritius sheldgoose is also similar in size to that of the brant goose, measuring 70 mm (2.8 in) from the front brim of the acetabulum (the socket in the hip where the femur attaches) to the hind end of the ischium (which forms the back part of the pelvis), and generally agrees with the pelvis of ducks and geese.[3] While the bill of the Mauritius sheldgoose is unknown, that of the Réunion sheldgoose was distinct in being shorter than that of the Egyptian goose.[4]
Possible depiction
In 2004, Cheke attempted to identify a drawing of a bird that had been declared a dodo by the British historian
Cheke, who had previously researched the history of the dodo, found no documentary or ornithological arguments for this identification, and expressed puzzlement over it and other of Grove's conclusions. After contacting the
Behaviour and ecology
Little is known about the habits of the Mauritius sheldgoose.[2] The Dutch soldier Johannes Pretorius' 1660s report about his stay on Mauritius is the most detailed contemporary account of its behaviour:
Geese are also here in abundance. They are a little larger than ducks, very tame and stupid, seldom in the water, eating grass, sometimes 40 or 50 or even a 100 together. When they are being shot, the ones that are not hit by the hail stay put and do not fly away. They usually keep to the north side of the island, far away from where the people live, except in the dry season when they are forced to drink on the other side of the island, and sometimes near the lodge.[19]
Hume and the British historian Ria Winters stated in 2015 that like many geese, the Mauritius sheldgoose was a grazer, and pointed out that Mauritius once had seven endemic species of grass, two of which are now extinct, as well as other species.[19]
Hume suggested in 2017 that the relatively robust legs of the Mauritius sheldgoose may indicate it was becoming more terrestrial, supported by the 1681 ship's log of the President which stated:
Up a little within the woods are several ponds and lakes of water with great numbers of flamingoes and gray teal and geese; but for the geese these are most in the woods or dry ponds.[2]
Many other endemic species of Mauritius were lost after human colonisation of the island, so the
Extinction
Travellers to Mauritius and Réunion made repeat mentions of highly palatable geese and ducks, and geese were listed among the favourite prey of hunters there. Cheke stated in 1987 that the Mauritius sheldgoose were considered abundant in 1681, but quickly declined thereafter; the French explorer
References
- ^ BirdLife International (2016). "Alopochen mauritianus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-4729-3744-5.
- ^ .
- ^ hdl:10088/2005.
- ^ Oustalet, M. E. (1896). "Notice sur la faune ornithologique ancienne et moderne des Iles Mascareignes et en particulier de I'lle Maurice" [Notice on the ancient and modern ornithological fauna of the Mascarenes and Mauritius in particular]. Annales des Sciences Naturelles; Zoologie (in French). 8 (3): 102–103.
- ^ OCLC 191907718.
- .
- ISBN 978-0-486-21869-4.
- ISBN 978-0-511-73576-9.
- .
- ^ ISSN 2052-6458.
- ISBN 978-0-8014-3954-4.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-7136-6544-4.
- ^ Hume, J. P. (2013). Göhlich, U. B.; Kroh, A. (eds.). "A synopsis of the pre-human avifauna of the Mascarene Islands". Proceedings of the 8th International Meeting of Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution: 208.
- ^ "Alopochen mauritiana (Mauritian Shelduck) – Avibase". avibase.bsc-eoc.org. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
- ^ .
- ISBN 978-0-521-56513-4.
- .
- ^ S2CID 84473440.
- .
- .
- ISBN 978-0-521-11331-1.
- ^ Cheke, A. S. (2013). "Extinct birds of the Mascarenes and Seychelles – a review of the causes of extinction in the light of an important new publication on extinct birds". Phelsuma. 21: 4–19.