Media freedom in Azerbaijan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Most Azerbaijanis receive their information from mainstream television, which is unswervingly pro-government and under strict government control. According to a 2012 report of the

NGO "Institute for Reporters' Freedom and Safety (IRFS)" Azerbaijani citizens are unable to access objective and reliable news on human rights issues relevant to Azerbaijan and the population is under-informed about matters of public interest.[1]

Press Freedom Index, with a score of 58.48.[2] Freedom House ranks Azerbaijan as "Not Free".[3]

The authorities use a range of measures to restrict freedom of the media within the country. Opposition and independent media outlets and journalists have their access to print-houses and distribution networks limited, or can find themselves facing defamation charges and crippling fines and are subject to intimidation tactics, including imprisonment on fabricated charges.[4]

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty is banned in Azerbaijan since 2009.[5]

Reporters Without Borders has called on the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) to firmly condemn Azerbaijan for tolerating escalating press freedom violations.[6]

In 2015 Azerbaijan had the biggest number of journalists imprisoned in Europe and Central Asia, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, and was the 5th most censored country in the world, ahead of Iran and China.[7]

Activists such as

Ell and Nikki won the 2011 contest (these activists described its title as ironic.)[8] The issues included harassment of journalists, and the organisations met with the EBU on 1 May 2012 to discuss the problems.[9]

Background

In recent years, the government has increased its control over internet and harassment of internet activists and bloggers. Media freedom groups have expressed particular concern about the government's surveillance of journalists' internet and telephone communications.[10]

The crackdown on journalists is accompanied by the intimidation and arrest of freedom of expression and human rights activists, such as Intigam Aliyev, Rasul Jafarov and Leyle Yunus who were arrested in 2014. Many of them had to leave the country out of concern for their safety.[10] Assaults on journalists and activists are rarely prosecuted. This is not true for the proceedings issued against journalists that are object of political motivated criminal proceedings carried out in order to influence and hinder their work under pretexts. As a consequence of such an environment, self-censorship is widespread among Azerbaijani journalists.[11]

The majority of print and broadcast media are controlled by the government and its allies. In some cases media outlets are controlled through nominal intermediaries. The lack of laws on transparency of media ownership makes it difficult to identify the true owners of media outlets.[10] The few independent media outlets are struggling to survive.[10] Most journalists work without contracts and social security, and receive irregular salaries.[10]

Attacks and threats against journalists

Threats, physical attacks, harassment against journalists are common. Nearly 100 journalists were victims of physical assault in 2003. More than 50 were attacked covering violent clashes between the security forces and demonstrators after the 2003 presidential elections. The International Federation of Journalists recorded 15 attacks on journalists in 2013.

Other legislative measures - from hooliganism to the possession of drugs and weapons, treason, and tax evasion - are regularly used by authorities to punish and prevent critical reporting.[12]

Unfair trials and imprisoned journalists

Azerbaijani authorities have imprisoned several notable journalists. The Committee to Protect Journalists has stated the charges against many journalists are "fabricated" and "politicized".[18] At the end of 2014, eight journalists remained behind bars.[12] International instances such as the Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe have consistently refuted the justifications by the Azerbaijani authorities that jailed journalists had been prosecuted and sentenced for common crimes.[14] Prison conditions for journalists are reported as dire, with routine ill-treatment and denial of medical care.[12] More than 10 journalists remain in jail in Azerbaijan by the end of 2015. They include:[15]

  • Seymur Hazi, a columnist for the newspaper Azadliq, on a charge of hooliganism;
  • Parviz Hashimli, a journalist, on charges of smuggling and illegal storage and sale of firearms;
  • Nijat Aliyev, editor-in-chief of the azadxeber.az news website, on various charges, including drug possession and inciting hatred;
  • Rashad Ramazanov, an independent blogger, on charges of illegal storage and sale of drugs.

The full list of cases of imprisoned journalists in the last years is the following:

Refusal of access and arbitrary expulsions

A number of foreign journalists have also been refused entry to Azerbaijan or have been expelled from the country for reporting unfavorably on domestic and foreign matters.

Political interferences

The president Ilham Aliyev and his party control most of media and informations, despite the official 1998 ban on censorship.[12] Political parties use economic pressure to control the media, mostly through advertisement.[12]

  • After a week of harassments the Institute for Reporters' Freedom and Safety (IRFS) and the Media Rights Institute were forced to fled the country in August 2014. Obyektiv TV, the TV program of IRFS, was showing stories about freedom of expression and human rights. In the same days the International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX), who was supporting independent media, had to close his office.[12]
  • In December 2014 the Baku office of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty was closed down by the authorities following a trumped-up criminal case. RFE/RL journalists were individually targeted, taken from homes for police questioning.[12]

Defamation lawsuits

Defamation is a criminal offense punishable by up to three years in prison. At the same time journalists that damage the honor and the dignity of the president can be punished up to two years in prison. The government in this way can make pressure on independent journalists and opposition media. Since 2013 defamation include internet content, too.[12]

  • The newspaper Azadliq was accused several times of defamation and, after having paid high fines, stopped in July 2014 the print version due to financial problems.[12]

Cyber-attacks

In the recent years had strengthen the control on the internet activities of bloggers, social-media activists and journalists.[12] The blogger Elsevar Mursalli was imprisoned for alleged drug possession and released in October.[12]

In 2013 the government blocked an image-sharing website about security service. At the same time, Azadliq and RFE/RL (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty) reported cyber-attacks.[12]

Smear campaigns

  • Since 2012 the leading investigative journalist
    Radio Free Europe had been a frequent target of harassment, blackmail and online smear campaigns.[12] Ismaylova was subject to gross violation of her privacy, and secretly-recorded intimate images of her were posted online in March 2013 in an attempt to discredit her. She called upon the European Court of Human Rights to order Azerbaijani authorities to protect her from threats and violences in October 2013.[14]
    In 2014 she was tried and imprisoned.
  • Azeri journalist and human rights activist
    Global Voices, she stated that she branded as a "traitor" and that the blackmail escalated into death threats towards her and her family.[41] The threats have caused her to refrain from visiting her native Azerbaijan in a self-imposed exile in Turkey.[39] The threats were largely condemned by numerous international organizations including PEN International[40] and its affiliates English PEN[42] and PEN Center USA.[43] PEN has called upon the Azerbaijani and Turkish government to "ensure her safety and to investigate all threats of violence made against her."[40] The Index on Censorship has also condemned the threats and has called upon the "international community to put pressure on Azerbaijan to respect freedom of expression."[44]

Internet censorship and surveillance

The Azerbaijani government has increased its control over the internet, harassing social media activists, bloggers and online journalists. The email and telephone communications of journalists have been denounced as under surveillance. Real-life intimidations are used to deter online criticism, rather than content blocking. Legal norms criminalising online defamation have deterred social media mobilisation too, together with the arrests of bloggers and activists. DDoS attacks against independent outlets such as Azadliq and RFE/RL have been reported.[12] Some websites are simply blocked, such as 24saat.org, xural.com, and monitortv.info.[45]

On 3 March 2017, Mehman Huseynov, popular video blogger and activist, was arrested in the courtroom of Suraxanı raion court of Baku and sentenced to two years imprisonment on charges of defamation. Huseynov is well known for his investigative journalism, focused on corruption among the Azerbaijani elite. Most recently, he had posted pictures online of luxury properties, which he said were owned by government officials. He has long been subject to pressure by the authorities, and has been under a travel ban for several years.[46]

Transparency of media ownership

Transparency of media ownership refers to the public availability of accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date information about media ownership structures. A legal regime guaranteeing transparency of media ownership makes possible for the public as well as for media authorities to find out who effectively owns, controls and influences the media as well as media influence on political parties or state bodies.

The Law on Mass Media provides that print media ownership must be disclosed publicly. However, the law does not regulate transparency of media's financial resources and flows.[47] This is a particularly concerning point in a country where, according to some experts, the state and one single oligarch owns more than 90 percent of the country's media.[48]

Overall, according to Access-Info Europe, an NGO advocating for enhancing access to information, the legislative framework for transparency is vague and requires little ownership information to be disclosed.[49]

As a consequence, in practice it is difficult to obtain comprehensive information on the ownership structures of some media outlets, in particular private broadcasters.[47] In fact, in June 2012, some amendments to the Law on the Registration of Legal Entities, on Commercial Secrecy and the Law on Obtaining of Information further worsened the transparency situation since information about corporate owners and their shareholdings of private media have been declared commercial secrets and deleted from public websites and registers.[49] This makes possible for members of Parliament and other public officials that are banned from owning a business to not to be accountable to public scrutiny.[48]

There is a lack of political willingness in improving transparency of media ownership in Azerbaijan, where many media outlets, in particular print media, are controlled by persons or companies connected to the political power, from both and editorial and financial point of view.[47] In some cases, this control is exerted through nominal intermediaries.[50] Transparency of media ownership has been a neglected issue amid the frequent and vibrant public debates on the challenges and problems affecting media freedom in the country.[51] Further, the practice, not the law, for broadcast media sees the government to strictly control ownership and any changes in ownership in the broadcast sector. In such a context, the media regulatory authority does not enforce sanctions without the order of the Presidential Administration.[49]

Access to public information

Background

Access to public information and freedom of information (FOI) refer to the right of access to information held by public bodies also known as "right to know". Access to public information is considered of fundamental importance for the effective functioning of democratic systems, as it enhances governments' and public officials' accountability, boosting people participation and allowing their informed participation into public life. The fundamental premise of the right of access to public information is that the information held by governmental institutions is in principle public and may be concealed only on the basis of legitimate reasons which should be detailed in the law.[52]

The Law on Access to Information was adopted in Azerbaijan in 2005. The Law entitles citizens of Azerbaijan to send, both as individuals and legal entities, requests for information to any public institution as well as the agency in charge of managing public finance, and get the corresponding answer.[53] It is an "ambitious information access Law", according to Revenue Watch Institute (RWI). However a monitoring report by RWI and the Open Society Institute (OSI) found that the reality of access to information fell short of the ideal. According to the research carried out, Azerbaijani officials were in poor compliance with the 2005 law - over half of the inquiries made were ignored, while the 65 inquiries that received responses included 16 refusals of information and 3 incomplete answers. Few oil companies responded to the request.[54]

Organisation Article 19 also found that there were inadequate mechanisms to facilitate information requests from the public, and no dedicated public information offices in Ministries. In addition, their report found an entrenched culture of secrecy within Azerbaijani government institutions and a lack of awareness of the right to information among the public.[54]

FOI provisions under the law

Under the law, responses to requests for information is due within seven days and, if necessary, no later than in 24 hours. A public authority may refuse to reply to the request only when it is not the owner of the information, the disclosure of the requested information is restricted by law, the request does not contain information for identifying the information requested, the applicant is not entitled to request such information, or when he/she has not provided information on his/her identity.[55]

The law defines two categories of information, i.e. "public information" and "information with limited access". Two types of information fall within the definition of "information with limited access", as defined by the law: secret information (state secrets), and confidential information (proprietary, professional, commercial, investigative or judicial secrets, and personal information). Since 2012, commercial confidentiality includes also "information about founders (participants) of legal entities and their share in equity capital, and this significantly hampers journalistic anti-corruption investigations".[55]

The law established the set up of the Commissioner for Information Issues, in charge of supervising the implementation of the law. However, over the six years that followed its establishment, the Office failed to comply with its duties. As a consequence, in 2011 the Parliament amended the relevant legislation, abandoning the idea of the Commissioner position, and instead entrusting the Ombudsman for Human Rights with the former responsibilities of the Commissioner for Information.[55]

Access to public information in practice

Media outlets and journalists face several problems when trying to access public information. Such problems, however, are unevenly distributed as some public authorities offer complete and timely answers to FOI requests in most cases while many other institutions widely ignore journalists' requests.[55] Some ministries make decisions to limit the access of journalists to information. Problems of access to public information are not limited to authorities' illegal refusals to respond to information requests. Indeed, journalists' right to access information are violated both by the courts and the Parliament.[56] For instance, in 2013 there were cases of journalists to whom was impeded to cover trials even though all the hearings were open. In 2013, the Parliament impeded journalists to bring their equipment and smartphones to the meeting rooms following the episode of a video recorded by a journalist on a smartphone and published on the Internet showing MPs voting with e-cards on behalf of their colleagues.[56]

In January 2014, the Minister of education signed a decree to forbid educational institutions, including universities, to make information public without approval from the Ministry's press service. Acting in compliance with this decree, the security service of the Baku State University impeded journalists from covering a students' protest. As a result, journalists who wanted to interview students were injured and their equipment was broken.[55]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Semi-annual Azerbaijan freedom of expression report, January 01 – July 01, 2012" (PDF; 3,0 MB). Retrieved 21 February 2013
  2. ^ "Azerbaijan : Hope quickly dashed | Reporters without borders". RSF. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  3. ^ "Azerbaijan: Freedom on the Net 2021 Country Report". Freedom House. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  4. ^ 10 Most Censored Countries. CPJ. Retrieved 20 February 2013
  5. ^ Azerbaijan - Reporters Without Borders Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 22 February 2013
  6. ^ a b "Reporters Without Borders". Archived from the original on November 27, 2006. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  7. ^ "Baku 2015: Press freedom, Azerbaijan, and the European Games". Committee to Protect Journalists. 2015-06-11. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  8. ^ Amazing Azerbaijan - Documentary. Retrieved 4 August 2013
  9. ^ EBU holds Workshop on Media Freedom in Azerbaijan Archived 2012-05-16 at the Wayback Machine. EBU. Retrieved 4 August 2013
  10. ^ a b c d e "Freedom of the Press 2015. Azerbaijan". FreedomHouse.org. Freedom House. 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
  11. ^ "Between state control and self-censorship. ROG Report regarding the condition of the media in Azerbaijan" (PDF). Reporters without border. 2012. Retrieved 10 May 2017. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Freedom House, Azerbaijan 2015 Press Freedom report
  13. osce.org
    . Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  14. ^ a b c d e Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, The Protection of media freedom in Europe Archived 2016-07-02 at the Wayback Machine.Background report prepared by Mr William Horsley, special representative for media freedom of the Association of European Journalists
  15. ^ a b "OSCE Representative condemns killing of journalist in Azerbaijan, calls on President Aliyev to ensure safety of journalists and free media". www.osce.org. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  16. ^ "OSCE media freedom representative condemns assault on journalists in Azerbaijan". www.osce.org. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  17. ^ "Mijatović calls on authorities in Azerbaijan to ensure safety of journalists and free speech advocates". www.osce.org. Retrieved 2022-02-21.
  18. ^ a b "In Azerbaijan, crackdown on press as contest nears". Committee to Protect Journalists. 2 April 2012.
  19. ^ "Azerbaijan arrests two Islamic activists". Hürriyet Daily News.
  20. ^ "В Азербайджане осужден главный редактор Islamazeri.az Рамин Байрамов" (in Russian). Kavkazsky Uzel. 7 March 2012. Archived from the original on 18 April 2015. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
  21. ^ "Azerbaijan: Authorities determined to silence dissent to ensure successful Eurovision". Amnesty International. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 2 May 2012.
  22. ^ "In Azerbaijan, reporter convicted on drug charges". The Committee to Protect Journalists. 12 June 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  23. ^ "Azerbaijan: Reporter Sentenced on Spurious Charges". Human Rights Watch. 12 June 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
  24. ^ "Azerbaijan's Leyla Yunus, human rights defender, held". BBC News. 29 April 2014. Archived from the original on Jan 20, 2024.
  25. ^ "Leyla Yunus's Husband Arrested In Azerbaijan". RFE/RL. 5 August 2014. Retrieved 25 August 2014.
  26. ^ "Azerbaijan: Further information: Leyla Yunus in failing health in prison". Amnesty International. August 12, 2014. Archived from the original on Sep 29, 2023.
  27. ^ "PACE rapporteur denounces arrest of Azerbaijani human rights defender Leyla Yunus on treason charges". PACE: News. Aug 3, 2014. Archived from the original on Mar 11, 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  28. ^ Robbins, Gary (August 14, 2014). "Ongoing Detentions and Arrests of Peaceful Activists in Azerbaijan" (PDF). United States Mission to the OSCE. Archived from the original (PDF) on Oct 25, 2020.
  29. ^ "Azerbaijan: Prominent human rights defender Leyla Yunus, IPD Director and a member of OMCT General Assembly, sentenced to three months pre-trial detention". OMCT. July 31, 2014. Archived from the original on Apr 2, 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  30. ^ "Nobel Women: Release human rights activist Leyla Yunus". Nobel Women’s Initiative. 14 August 2014. Archived from the original on Apr 3, 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  31. ^ "Repression unleashed against information freedom defenders". Reporters Without Borders. 18 August 2014. Archived from the original on Mar 18, 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  32. ^ "Azerbaijan: Leading Rights Defender Arrested - Human Rights Watch". 5 August 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  33. ^ "Citing ethnicity, Azerbaijan bars photojournalist." Committee to Protect Journalists. 7 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2011.
  34. ^ "Foreign reporters denied entry as territorial dispute escalates." Reporters Without Borders. 6 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2011.
  35. ^ "Press Watchdogs Criticize Azerbaijan for Photojournalist Ban." Asbarez. 8 July 2011. Retrieved 9 July 2011.
  36. ^ "Ossigeno per l'informazione". Archived from the original on 2017-07-03. Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  37. ^ "Arzu Geybullayeva, freelance journalist".
  38. ^ "Agos'un Azeri muhabiri hedef gösterildi" (in Turkish). Radikal. 9 October 2014. radikal
  39. ^ a b Tan, Vera (3 November 2015). "Death Threats Keep Azeri Journalist Abroad". Global Journalist.
  40. ^ a b c "Azerbaijan: Journalist and political analyst Arzu Geybullayeva threatened". PEN international. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015.
  41. ^ "Journalists under threat, the Geybullayeva case". Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso. 22 July 2015.
  42. ^ "Azerbaijan/Turkey: Arzu Geybullayeva, journalist and political analyst, threatened". English PEN.
  43. ^ "Azerbaijan/Turkey: Journalist and Political Analyst Arzu Geybullayeva Threatened". PEN Center USA. Archived from the original on 2016-03-12. Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  44. ^ "Azerbaijan: Journalist Arzu Geybulla threatened". Index on Censorship.
  45. ^ "What's the point of Azerbaijan's National Press Day?". www.hrw.org. Retrieved 2022-04-24.
  46. ^ "Azerbaijani journalist Mehman Huseynov detained overnight". European Federation of Journalists. 2017-01-11. Retrieved 2017-03-17.
  47. ^ a b c "Media" (PDF). Transparency International - Azerbaijan. 2014. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  48. ^ a b "Azerbaijan" (PDF). IREX (Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016). 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  49. ^ a b c "Azerbaijan TMO Consultation". Access-Info Europe. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  50. ^ "Azerbaijan: Freedom of the Press 2016". Freedom House. 2016. Archived from the original on Jan 16, 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  51. ^ "Media regulator must level the playing field". Institute for Reporters' Freedom and Safety. 11 April 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  52. ^ "Freedom of Information". UNESCO. Archived from the original on Nov 27, 2016. Retrieved 2016-10-16.
  53. ^ "Monitoring of the Disclosured of an Access to Public Information in the Republic of Azerbaijan" (PDF). Open Society Institute - Assistance Foundation Azerbaijan; Revenue Watch. 2009. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  54. ^ a b "Access to Information in Azerbaijan". Open Oil. Shuttleworth Funded. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  55. ^ a b c d e "Eastern Partnership Media Freedom Landscape 2014" (PDF). EaP Media Freedom Watch. 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  56. ^ a b "Report on the State of Media in Eastern Partnership Countries 2015" (PDF). Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2017.