Memristor
Leon Chua (1971) | |
Electronic symbol | |
---|---|
A memristor (
Chua and Kang later generalized the concept to memristive systems.
The identification of memristive properties in electronic devices has attracted controversy. Experimentally, the ideal memristor has yet to be demonstrated.[3][4]
As a fundamental electrical component
Chua in his 1971 paper identified a theoretical symmetry between the non-linear resistor (voltage vs. current), non-linear capacitor (voltage vs. charge), and non-linear inductor (magnetic flux linkage vs. current). From this symmetry he inferred the characteristics of a fourth fundamental non-linear circuit element, linking magnetic flux and charge, which he called the memristor. In contrast to a linear (or non-linear) resistor, the memristor has a dynamic relationship between current and voltage, including a memory of past voltages or currents. Other scientists had proposed dynamic memory resistors such as the memistor of Bernard Widrow, but Chua introduced a mathematical generality.
Derivation and characteristics
The memristor was originally defined in terms of a non-linear functional relationship between magnetic flux linkage Φm(t) and the amount of electric charge that has flowed, q(t):[1]
The magnetic flux linkage, Φm, is generalized from the circuit characteristic of an inductor. It does not represent a magnetic field here. Its physical meaning is discussed below. The symbol Φm may be regarded as the integral of voltage over time.[5]
In the relationship between Φm and q, the derivative of one with respect to the other depends on the value of one or the other, and so each memristor is characterized by its memristance function describing the charge-dependent rate of change of flux with charge.
Substituting the flux as the time integral of the voltage, and charge as the time integral of current, the more convenient forms are;
To relate the memristor to the resistor, capacitor, and inductor, it is helpful to isolate the term M(q), which characterizes the device, and write it as a differential equation.
Device | Characteristic property (units) | Differential equation |
---|---|---|
Resistor (R) | Resistance (V / A, or ohm, Ω) | R = dV / dI |
Capacitor (C) | Capacitance (C / V, or farad) | C = dq / dV |
Inductor (L) | Inductance (Wb / A, or henry) | L = dΦm / dI |
Memristor (M) | Memristance (Wb / C, or ohm) | M = dΦm / dq |
The above table covers all meaningful ratios of differentials of I, q, Φm, and V. No device can relate dI to dq, or dΦm to dV, because I is the derivative of q and Φm is the integral of V.
It can be inferred from this that memristance is charge-dependent
This equation reveals that memristance defines a linear relationship between current and voltage, as long as M does not vary with charge. Nonzero current implies time varying charge.
Furthermore, the memristor is static if no current is applied. If I(t) = 0, we find V(t) = 0 and M(t) is constant. This is the essence of the memory effect.
Analogously, we can define a as memductance.[1]
The
As long as M(q(t)) varies little, such as under alternating current, the memristor will appear as a constant resistor. If M(q(t)) increases rapidly, however, current and power consumption will quickly stop.
M(q) is physically restricted to be positive for all values of q (assuming the device is passive and does not become
Modelling and validation
In order to understand the nature of memristor function, some knowledge of fundamental circuit theoretic concepts is useful, starting with the concept of device modeling.[6]
Engineers and scientists seldom analyze a physical system in its original form. Instead, they construct a model which approximates the behaviour of the system. By analyzing the behaviour of the model, they hope to predict the behaviour of the actual system. The primary reason for constructing models is that physical systems are usually too complex to be amenable to a practical analysis.
In the 20th century, work was done on devices where researchers did not recognize the memristive characteristics. This has raised the suggestion that such devices should be recognised as memristors.[6] Pershin and Di Ventra[3] have proposed a test that can help to resolve some of the long-standing controversies about whether an ideal memristor does actually exist or is a purely mathematical concept.
The rest of this article primarily addresses memristors as related to
Superconducting memristor component
Dr. Paul Penfield, in a 1974 MIT technical report
One of the terms in the current through a Josephson junction is of the form:
where is a constant based on the physical superconducting materials, is the voltage across the junction and is the current through the junction.
Through the late 20th century, research regarding this phase-dependent conductance in Josephson junctions was carried out.[8][9][10][11] A more comprehensive approach to extracting this phase-dependent conductance appeared with Peotta and DiVentra's seminal paper in 2014.[12]
Memristor circuits
Due to the practical difficulty of studying the ideal memristor, we will discuss other electrical devices which can be modelled using memristors. For a mathematical description of a memristive device (systems), see Theory.
A discharge tube can be modelled as a memristive device, with resistance being a function of the number of conduction electrons .[2]
is the voltage across the discharge tube, is the current flowing through it and is the number of conduction electrons. A simple memristance function is . and are parameters depending on the dimensions of the tube and the gas fillings. An experimental identification of memristive behaviour is the "pinched hysteresis loop" in the plane. For an experiment that shows such a characteristic for a common discharge tube, see "A physical memristor Lissajous figure" (YouTube). The video also illustrates how to understand deviations in the pinched hysteresis characteristics of physical memristors.[13][14]
Thermistors can be modelled as memristive devices.[14]
is a material constant, is the absolute body temperature of the thermistor, is the ambient temperature (both temperatures in Kelvin), denotes the cold temperature resistance at , is the heat capacitance and is the dissipation constant for the thermistor.
A fundamental phenomenon that has hardly been studied is memristive behaviour in pn-junctions.[15] The memristor plays a crucial role in mimicking the charge storage effect in the diode base, and is also responsible for the conductivity modulation phenomenon (that is so important during forward transients).
Criticisms
In 2008, a team at
The HP Labs result was published in the scientific journal Nature.[17][19] Following this claim, Leon Chua has argued that the memristor definition could be generalized to cover all forms of two-terminal non-volatile memory devices based on resistance switching effects.
These devices are intended for applications in
According to the original 1971 definition, the memristor is the fourth fundamental circuit element, forming a non-linear relationship between electric charge and magnetic flux linkage. In 2011,
In 2011, Meuffels and Schroeder noted that one of the early memristor papers included a mistaken assumption regarding ionic conduction.
In a kind of
Within this context, Meuffels and Soni[21] pointed to a fundamental thermodynamic principle: Non-volatile information storage requires the existence of free-energy barriers that separate the distinct internal memory states of a system from each other; otherwise, one would be faced with an "indifferent" situation, and the system would arbitrarily fluctuate from one memory state to another just under the influence of thermal fluctuations. When unprotected against thermal fluctuations, the internal memory states exhibit some diffusive dynamics, which causes state degradation.[22] The free-energy barriers must therefore be high enough to ensure a low bit-error probability of bit operation.[39] Consequently, there is always a lower limit of energy requirement – depending on the required bit-error probability – for intentionally changing a bit value in any memory device.[39][40]
In the general concept of memristive system the defining equations are (see Theory):
where u(t) is an input signal, and y(t) is an output signal. The vector x represents a set of n state variables describing the different internal memory states of the device. ẋ is the time-dependent rate of change of the state vector x with time.
When one wants to go beyond mere curve fitting and aims at a real physical modeling of non-volatile memory elements, e.g., resistive random-access memory devices, one has to keep an eye on the aforementioned physical correlations. To check the adequacy of the proposed model and its resulting state equations, the input signal u(t) can be superposed with a stochastic term ξ(t), which takes into account the existence of inevitable thermal fluctuations. The dynamic state equation in its general form then finally reads:
where ξ(t) is, e.g., white Gaussian current or voltage noise. On base of an analytical or numerical analysis of the time-dependent response of the system towards noise, a decision on the physical validity of the modeling approach can be made, e.g., would the system be able to retain its memory states in power-off mode?
Such an analysis was performed by Di Ventra and Pershin[22] with regard to the genuine current-controlled memristor. As the proposed dynamic state equation provides no physical mechanism enabling such a memristor to cope with inevitable thermal fluctuations, a current-controlled memristor would erratically change its state in course of time just under the influence of current noise.[22][41] Di Ventra and Pershin[22] thus concluded that memristors whose resistance (memory) states depend solely on the current or voltage history would be unable to protect their memory states against unavoidable Johnson–Nyquist noise and permanently suffer from information loss, a so-called "stochastic catastrophe". A current-controlled memristor can thus not exist as a solid-state device in physical reality.
The above-mentioned thermodynamic principle furthermore implies that the operation of two-terminal non-volatile memory devices (e.g. "resistance-switching" memory devices (
A "resistance switching" event can simply be enforced by setting the external bias to a value above a certain threshold value. This is the trivial case, i.e., the free-energy barrier for the transition {i} → {j} is reduced to zero. In case one applies biases below the threshold value, there is still a finite probability that the device will switch in course of time (triggered by a random thermal fluctuation), but – as one is dealing with probabilistic processes – it is impossible to predict when the switching event will occur. That is the basic reason for the stochastic nature of all observed resistance-switching (
When a two-terminal non-volatile memory device is found to be in a distinct resistance state {j}, there exists therefore no physical one-to-one relationship between its present state and its foregoing voltage history. The switching behavior of individual non-volatile memory devices thus cannot be described within the mathematical framework proposed for memristor/memristive systems.
An extra thermodynamic curiosity arises from the definition that memristors/memristive devices should energetically act like resistors. The instantaneous electrical power entering such a device is completely dissipated as Joule heat to the surrounding, so no extra energy remains in the system after it has been brought from one resistance state xi to another one xj. Thus, the internal energy of the memristor device in state xi, U(V, T, xi), would be the same as in state xj, U(V, T, xj), even though these different states would give rise to different device's resistances, which itself must be caused by physical alterations of the device's material.
Other researchers noted that memristor models based on the assumption of linear
A 2014 article from researchers of
Martin Reynolds, an electrical engineering analyst with research outfit Gartner, commented that while HP was being sloppy in calling their device a memristor, critics were being pedantic in saying that it was not a memristor.[44]
Experimental tests
- The Lissajous curve in the voltage–current plane is a pinched hysteresis loop when driven by any bipolar periodic voltage or current without respect to initial conditions.
- The area of each lobe of the pinched hysteresis loop shrinks as the frequency of the forcing signal increases.
- As the frequency tends to infinity, the hysteresis loop degenerates to a straight line through the origin, whose slope depends on the amplitude and shape of the forcing signal.
According to Chua
Experimental evidence shows that redox-based resistance memory (
Theory
In 2008, researchers from HP Labs introduced a model for a memristance function based on thin films of titanium dioxide.[17] For RON ≪ ROFF the memristance function was determined to be
where ROFF represents the high resistance state, RON represents the low resistance state, μv represents the mobility of dopants in the thin film, and D represents the film thickness. The HP Labs group noted that "window functions" were necessary to compensate for differences between experimental measurements and their memristor model due to non-linear ionic drift and boundary effects.
Operation as a switch
For some memristors, applied current or voltage causes substantial change in resistance. Such devices may be characterized as switches by investigating the time and energy that must be spent to achieve a desired change in resistance. This assumes that the applied voltage remains constant. Solving for energy dissipation during a single switching event reveals that for a memristor to switch from Ron to Roff in time Ton to Toff, the charge must change by ΔQ = Qon−Qoff.
Substituting V = I(q)M(q), and then ∫dq/V = ∆Q/V for constant VTo produces the final expression. This power characteristic differs fundamentally from that of a
The type of memristor described by Williams ceases to be ideal after switching over its entire resistance range, creating hysteresis, also called the "hard-switching regime".[17] Another kind of switch would have a cyclic M(q) so that each off-on event would be followed by an on-off event under constant bias. Such a device would act as a memristor under all conditions, but would be less practical.
Memristive systems
In the more general concept of an n-th order memristive system the defining equations are
where u(t) is an input signal, y(t) is an output signal, the vector x represents a set of n state variables describing the device, and g and f are
The pure memristor is a particular case of these equations, namely when x depends only on charge (x = q) and since the charge is related to the current via the time derivative dq/dt = i(t). Thus for pure memristors f (i.e. the rate of change of the state) must be equal or proportional to the current i(t) .
Pinched hysteresis
One of the resulting properties of memristors and memristive systems is the existence of a pinched
Memristive networks and mathematical models of circuit interactions
The concept of memristive networks was first introduced by Leon Chua in his 1965 paper "Memristive Devices and Systems." Chua proposed the use of memristive devices as a means of building artificial neural networks that could simulate the behavior of the human brain. In fact, memristive devices in circuits have complex interactions due to Kirchhoff's laws. A memristive network is a type of artificial neural network that is based on memristive devices, which are electronic components that exhibit the property of memristance. In a memristive network, the memristive devices are used to simulate the behavior of neurons and synapses in the human brain. The network consists of layers of memristive devices, each of which is connected to other layers through a set of weights. These weights are adjusted during the training process, allowing the network to learn and adapt to new input data. One advantage of memristive networks is that they can be implemented using relatively simple and inexpensive hardware, making them an attractive option for developing low-cost artificial intelligence systems. They also have the potential to be more energy efficient than traditional artificial neural networks, as they can store and process information using less power. However, the field of memristive networks is still in the early stages of development, and more research is needed to fully understand their capabilities and limitations. For the simplest model with only memristive devices with voltage generators in series, there is an exact and in closed form equation (Caravelli–Traversa–Di Ventra equation, CTDV)[49] which describes the evolution of the internal memory of the network for each device. For a simple memristor model (but not realistic) of a switch between two resistance values, given by the Williams-Strukov model , with , there is a set of nonlinearly coupled differential equations that takes the form:
where is the diagonal matrix with elements on the diagonal, are based on the memristors physical parameters. The vector is the vector of voltage generators in series to the memristors. The circuit topology enters only in the projector operator , defined in terms of the cycle matrix of the graph. The equation provides a concise mathematical description of the interactions due to Kirchhoff 's laws. Interestingly, the equation shares many properties in common with a Hopfield network, such as the existence of Lyapunov functions and classical tunnelling phenomena.[50] In the context of memristive networks, the CTD equation may be used to predict the behavior of memristive devices under different operating conditions, or to design and optimize memristive circuits for specific applications.
Extended systems
Some researchers have raised the question of the scientific legitimacy of HP's memristor models in explaining the behavior of
One example[51] attempts to extend the memristive systems framework by including dynamic systems incorporating higher-order derivatives of the input signal u(t) as a series expansion
where m is a positive integer, u(t) is an input signal, y(t) is an output signal, the vector x represents a set of n state variables describing the device, and the functions g and f are continuous functions. This equation produces the same zero-crossing hysteresis curves as memristive systems but with a different frequency response than that predicted by memristive systems.
Another example suggests including an offset value to account for an observed nanobattery effect which violates the predicted zero-crossing pinched hysteresis effect.[25]
Implementation of hysteretic current-voltage memristors
There exist implementations of memristors with a hysteretic current-voltage curve or with both hysteretic current-voltage curve and hysteretic flux-charge curve [arXiv:2403.20051]. Memristors with hysteretic current-voltage curve use a resistance dependent on the history of the current and voltage and bode well for the future of memory technology due to their simple structure, high energy efficiency, and high integration [DOI: 10.1002/aisy.202200053].
Titanium dioxide memristor
Interest in the memristor revived when an experimental solid-state version was reported by
Although not cited in HP's initial reports on their
The HP device is composed of a thin (50
Memristance is displayed only when both the doped layer and depleted layer contribute to resistance. When enough charge has passed through the memristor that the ions can no longer move, the device enters hysteresis. It ceases to integrate q=∫I dt, but rather keeps q at an upper bound and M fixed, thus acting as a constant resistor until current is reversed.
Memory applications of thin-film oxides had been an area of active investigation for some time. IBM published an article in 2000 regarding structures similar to that described by Williams.[57] Samsung has a U.S. patent for oxide-vacancy based switches similar to that described by Williams.[58]
In April 2010, HP labs announced that they had practical memristors working at 1 ns (~1 GHz) switching times and 3 nm by 3 nm sizes,[59] which bodes well for the future of the technology.[60] At these densities it could easily rival the current sub-25 nm flash memory technology.
Silicon dioxide memristor
It seems that memristance has been reported in
However, hysteretic conductance in silicon was associated to memristive effects only in 2009. [62] More recently, beginning in 2012, Tony Kenyon, Adnan Mehonic and their group clearly demonstrated that the resistive switching in silicon oxide thin films is due to the formation of oxygen vacancy filaments in defect-engineered silicon dioxide, having probed directly the movement of oxygen under electrical bias, and imaged the resultant conductive filaments using conductive atomic force microscopy. [63]
Polymeric memristor
In 2004, Krieger and Spitzer described dynamic doping of polymer and inorganic dielectric-like materials that improved the switching characteristics and retention required to create functioning nonvolatile memory cells.
In July 2008, Erokhin and Fontana claimed to have developed a polymeric memristor before the more recently announced titanium dioxide memristor.[65]
In 2010, Alibart, Gamrat, Vuillaume et al.[66] introduced a new hybrid organic/nanoparticle device (the NOMFET : Nanoparticle Organic Memory Field Effect Transistor), which behaves as a memristor[67] and which exhibits the main behavior of a biological spiking synapse. This device, also called a synapstor (synapse transistor), was used to demonstrate a neuro-inspired circuit (associative memory showing a pavlovian learning).[68]
In 2012, Crupi, Pradhan and Tozer described a proof of concept design to create neural synaptic memory circuits using organic ion-based memristors.
In 2012, Erokhin and co-authors have demonstrated a stochastic three-dimensional matrix with capabilities for learning and adapting based on polymeric memristor.[70]
Layered memristor
In 2014, Bessonov et al. reported a flexible memristive device comprising a
Atomristor
Atomristor is defined as the electrical devices showing memristive behavior in atomically thin nanomaterials or atomic sheets. In 2018, Ge and Wu et al.
Ferroelectric memristor
The
Carbon nanotube memristor
In 2013, Ageev, Blinov et al.[78] reported observing memristor effect in structure based on vertically aligned carbon nanotubes studying bundles of CNT by scanning tunneling microscope.
Later it was found[79] that CNT memristive switching is observed when a nanotube has a non-uniform elastic strain ΔL0. It was shown that the memristive switching mechanism of strained СNT is based on the formation and subsequent redistribution of non-uniform elastic strain and piezoelectric field Edef in the nanotube under the influence of an external electric field E(x,t).
Biomolecular memristor
Biomaterials have been evaluated for use in artificial synapses and have shown potential for application in neuromorphic systems.[80] In particular, the feasibility of using a collagen‐based biomemristor as an artificial synaptic device has been investigated,[81] whereas a synaptic device based on lignin demonstrated rising or lowering current with consecutive voltage sweeps depending on the sign of the voltage[82] furthermore a natural silk fibroin demonstrated memristive properties;[83] spin-memristive systems based on biomolecules are also being studied.[84]
In 2012,
Spin memristive systems
Spintronic memristor
Chen and Wang, researchers at disk-drive manufacturer
Memristance in a magnetic tunnel junction
The
Extrinsic mechanism
Based on research performed between 1999 and 2003, Bowen et al. published experiments in 2006 on a
Reports on MgO-based memristive switching within MgO-based MTJs appeared starting in 2008[91] and 2009.[92] While the drift of oxygen vacancies within the insulating MgO layer has been proposed to describe the observed memristive effects,[92] another explanation could be charge trapping/detrapping on the localized states of oxygen vacancies[93] and its impact[94] on spintronics. This highlights the importance of understanding what role oxygen vacancies play in the memristive operation of devices that deploy complex oxides with an intrinsic property such as ferroelectricity[95] or multiferroicity.[96]
Intrinsic mechanism
The magnetization state of a MTJ can be controlled by Spin-transfer torque, and can thus, through this intrinsic physical mechanism, exhibit memristive behavior. This spin torque is induced by current flowing through the junction, and leads to an efficient means of achieving a MRAM. However, the length of time the current flows through the junction determines the amount of current needed, i.e., charge is the key variable.[97]
The combination of intrinsic (spin-transfer torque) and extrinsic (resistive switching) mechanisms naturally leads to a second-order memristive system described by the state vector x = (x1,x2), where x1 describes the magnetic state of the electrodes and x2 denotes the resistive state of the MgO barrier. In this case the change of x1 is current-controlled (spin torque is due to a high current density) whereas the change of x2 is voltage-controlled (the drift of oxygen vacancies is due to high electric fields). The presence of both effects in a memristive magnetic tunnel junction led to the idea of a nanoscopic synapse-neuron system.[98]
Spin memristive system
A fundamentally different mechanism for memristive behavior has been proposed by Pershin and
Self-directed channel memristor
In 2017, Kris Campbell formally introduced the self-directed channel (SDC) memristor.[102] The SDC device is the first memristive device available commercially to researchers, students and electronics enthusiast worldwide.[103] The SDC device is operational immediately after fabrication. In the Ge2Se3 active layer, Ge-Ge homopolar bonds are found and switching occurs. The three layers consisting of Ge2Se3/Ag/Ge2Se3, directly below the top tungsten electrode, mix together during deposition and jointly form the silver-source layer. A layer of SnSe is between these two layers ensuring that the silver-source layer is not in direct contact with the active layer. Since silver does not migrate into the active layer at high temperatures, and the active layer maintains a high glass transition temperature of about 350 °C (662 °F), the device has significantly higher processing and operating temperatures at 250 °C (482 °F) and at least 150 °C (302 °F), respectively. These processing and operating temperatures are higher than most ion-conducting chalcogenide device types, including the S-based glasses (e.g. GeS) that need to be photodoped or thermally annealed. These factors allow the SDC device to operate over a wide range of temperatures, including long-term continuous operation at 150 °C (302 °F).
Implementation of hysteretic flux-charge memristors
There exist implementations of memristors with both hysteretic current-voltage curve and hysteretic flux-charge curve [arXiv:2403.20051]. Memristors with both hysteretic current-voltage curve and hysteretic flux-charge curve use a memristance dependent on the history of the flux and charge. Those memristors can merge the functionality of the arithmetic logic unit and of the memory unit without data transfer [DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201303365].
Time-integrated Formingfree memristor
Time-integrated Formingfree (TiF) memristors reveal a hysteretic flux-charge curve with two distinguishable branches in the positive bias range and with two distinguishable branches in the negative bias range. And TiF memristors also reveal a hysteretic current-voltage curve with two distinguishable branches in the positive bias range and with two distinguishable branches in the negative bias range. The memristance state of a TiF memristor can be controlled by both the flux and the charge [DOI: 10.1063/1.4775718]. A TiF memristor was first demonstrated by Heidemarie Schmidt and her team in 2011 [DOI: 10.1063/1.3601113]. This TiF memristor is composed of a BiFeO3 thin film between metallically conducting electrodes, one gold, the other platinum. The hysteretic flux-charge curve of the TiF memristor changes its slope continuously in one branch in the positive and in one branch in the negative bias range (write branches) and has a constant slope in one branch in the positive and in one branch in the negative bias range (read branches) [arXiv:2403.20051]. According to Leon O. Chua [Reference 1: 10.1.1.189.3614] the slope of the flux-charge curve corresponds to the memristance of a memristor or to its internal state variables. The TiF memristors can be considered as memristors with a constant memristance in the two read branches and with a reconfigurable memristance in the two write branches. The physical memristor model which describes the hysteretic current-voltage curves of the TiF memristor implements static and dynamic internal state variables in the two read branches and in the two write branches [arXiv:2402.10358].
The static and dynamic internal state variables of a non-linear memristors can be used to implement operations on non-linear memristors representing linear, non-linear, and even transcendental, e.g. exponential or logarithmic, input-output functions.
The transport characteristics of the TiF memristor in the small current – small voltage range are non-linear. This non-linearity well compares to the non-linear characteristics in the small current – small voltage range of the basic former and present building blocks in the arithmetic logic unit of von-Neumann computers, i.e. of vacuum tubes and of transistors. In contrast to vacuum tubes and transistors, the signal output of hysteretic flux-charge memristors, i.e. of TiF memristors, is not lost when the operation power is switched off before storing the signal output to the memory. Therefore, hysteretic flux-charge memristors are said to merge the functionality of the arithmetic logic unit and of the memory unit without data transfer [DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201303365]. The transport characteristics in the small current – small voltage range of hysteretic current-voltage memristors are linear. This explains why hysteretic current-voltage memristors are well established memory units and why they can not merge the functionality of the arithmetic logic unit and of the memory unit without data transfer [arXiv:2403.20051].
Potential applications
Memristors remain a laboratory curiosity, as yet made in insufficient numbers to gain any commercial applications. Despite this lack of mass availability, according to Allied Market Research the memristor market was worth $3.2 million in 2015 and was at the time projected to be worth $79.0 million by 2022.[104] In fact, it was worth $190.0 million in 2022.[105]
A potential application of memristors is in analog memories for superconducting quantum computers.[12]
Memristors can potentially be fashioned into
Memristors have applications in
In 2009, a simple electronic circuit[123] consisting of an LC network and a memristor was used to model experiments on adaptive behavior of unicellular organisms.[124] It was shown that subjected to a train of periodic pulses, the circuit learns and anticipates the next pulse similar to the behavior of slime molds Physarum polycephalum where the viscosity of channels in the cytoplasm responds to periodic environment changes.[124] Applications of such circuits may include, e.g., pattern recognition. The DARPA SyNAPSE project funded HP Labs, in collaboration with the Boston University Neuromorphics Lab, has been developing neuromorphic architectures which may be based on memristive systems. In 2010, Versace and Chandler described the MoNETA (Modular Neural Exploring Traveling Agent) model.[125] MoNETA is the first large-scale neural network model to implement whole-brain circuits to power a virtual and robotic agent using memristive hardware.[126] Application of the memristor crossbar structure in the construction of an analog soft computing system was demonstrated by Merrikh-Bayat and Shouraki.[127] In 2011, they showed[128] how memristor crossbars can be combined with fuzzy logic to create an analog memristive neuro-fuzzy computing system with fuzzy input and output terminals. Learning is based on the creation of fuzzy relations inspired from Hebbian learning rule.
In 2013 Leon Chua published a tutorial underlining the broad span of complex phenomena and applications that memristors span and how they can be used as non-volatile analog memories and can mimic classic habituation and learning phenomena.[129]
Derivative devices
Memistor and memtransistor
The memistor and memtransistor are transistor-based devices which include memristor function.
Memcapacitors and meminductors
In 2009, Di Ventra, Pershin, and Chua extended[130] the notion of memristive systems to capacitive and inductive elements in the form of memcapacitors and meminductors, whose properties depend on the state and history of the system, further extended in 2013 by Di Ventra and Pershin.[22]
Memfractance and memfractor, 2nd- and 3rd-order memristor, memcapacitor and meminductor
In September 2014,
History
Precursors
Theoretical description
Twenty-first century
On May 1, 2008, Strukov, Snider, Stewart, and Williams published an article in Nature identifying a link between the two-terminal resistance switching behavior found in nanoscale systems and memristors.[17]
On 23 January 2009,
In July 2014, the MeMOSat/
On 7 July 2015, Knowm Inc announced Self Directed Channel (SDC) memristors commercially.[138] These devices remain available in small numbers.
On 13 July 2018, MemSat (Memristor Satellite) was launched to fly a memristor evaluation payload.[139]
In 2021,
In May 2023, TECHiFAB GmbH [https://techifab.com/] announced TiF memristors commercially. [arXiv: 2403.20051, arXiv: 2402.10358] These TiF memristors remain available in small and medium numbers.
In the September 2023 issue of Science Magazine, Chinese scientists Wenbin Zhang et al. described the development and testing of a memristor-based integrated circuit, designed to dramatically increase the speed and efficiency of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence tasks, optimized for Edge Computing applications.[142]
See also
- 3D XPoint
- Electrical element
- Hybrid Memory Cube
- List of emerging technologies
- Neuromorphic engineering
- Trancitor
References
- ^ .
- ^ S2CID 6008332
- ^ S2CID 53506924.
- ^ S2CID 202577242.
- North-Holland, p. 37, Eq. (2.80)
- ^ ISBN 978-3-319-67325-7.
- ^ Paul L. Penfield Jr. (1974). "1. Frequency-Power Formulas for Josephson Junctions". V. Microwave and Millimeter Wave Techniques (PDF) (Report). pp. 31–32. QPR No. 113.
- ^ Langenberg, D. N. (1974), "Physical Interpretation of the term and implications for detectors" (PDF), Revue de Physique Appliquée, 9: 35–40,
- ISBN 978-1-4684-2690-8.
- ^ S2CID 119020953
- S2CID 13061426.
- ^ a b Sah, M.; et al. (2015), "A Generic Model of Memristors with Parasitic Components", IEEE TCAS I: Regular Papers, 62 (3): 891–898
- ^ .
- ^ S2CID 4367148.
- ^ Memristor FAQ, Hewlett-Packard, retrieved 2010-09-03
- S2CID 27319894. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2018-03-26. Retrieved 2018-03-26.
- ^ a b Clarke, P. (2012-05-23), "Memristor is 200 years old, say academics", EE Times, retrieved 2012-05-25
- ^ arXiv:1207.7319 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
- ^ S2CID 14892809
- S2CID 1408810.
- PMID 30030498.
- ^ PMID 23612312
- ^ Marks, P. (2008-04-30), "Engineers find 'missing link' of electronics", New Scientist, retrieved 2008-04-30
- S2CID 187510377.
- ^ HP 100TB Memristor drives by 2018 – if you're lucky, admits tech titan, 2013-11-01
- ^ Artificial synapses could lead to advanced computer memory and machines that mimic biological brains, HRL Laboratories, 2012-03-23, retrieved 2012-03-30
- ^ Bush, S. (2008-05-02), "HP nano device implements memristor", Electronics Weekly
- ^ a b Kanellos, M. (2008-04-30), "HP makes memory from a once theoretical circuit", CNET News, retrieved 2008-04-30
- ^ Mellor, C. (2011-10-10), "HP and Hynix to produce the memristor goods by 2013", The Register, retrieved 2012-03-07
- ^ Courtland, R. (2011-04-01). "Memristors...Made of Blood?". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved 2012-03-07.
- S2CID 46437206.
- , retrieved 2012-03-07
- ^ EETimes, retrieved 2012-03-02
- ^ a b Marks, P. (2012-02-23), "Online spat over who joins memristor club", New Scientist, retrieved 2012-03-19
- ^
Meuffels, P.; Schroeder, H. (2011), "Comment on "Exponential ionic drift: fast switching and low volatility of thin-film memristors" by D. B. Strukov and R. S. Williams in Appl. Phys. A (2009) 94: 515–519", S2CID 95168959
- ^ a b
Kish, Laszlo B.; Granqvist, Claes G.; Khatri, Sunil P.; Wen, He (2014). "Demons: Maxwell's demon, Szilard's engine and Landauer's erasure–dissipation". International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series. 33: 1460364. S2CID 44851287.
- ISBN 978-1-4673-8335-6.
- S2CID 2237458
- ]
- S2CID 18673562.
- ^ Garling, C. (2012-07-25), "Wonks question HP's claim to computer-memory missing link", Wired.com, retrieved 2012-09-23
- ^ Chua, L. (2012-06-13), Memristors: Past, Present and future (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-08, retrieved 2013-01-12
- S2CID 12665998
- ^
Pershin, Y. V.; Di Ventra, M. (2011), "Memory effects in complex materials and nanoscale systems", S2CID 119098973
- ^ Biolek, D.; Biolek, Z.; Biolkova, V. (2011), "Pinched hysteresis loops of ideal memristors, memcapacitors and meminductors must be 'self-crossing'",
- S2CID 6758362.
- S2CID 231847346.
- ^
Mouttet, B. (2012). "Memresistors and non-memristive zero-crossing hysteresis curves". arXiv:1201.2626 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
- ^ Fildes, J. (2007-11-13), Getting More from Moore's Law, BBC News, retrieved 2008-04-30
- ^ Taylor, A. G. (2007), "Nanotechnology in the Northwest" (PDF), Bulletin for Electrical and Electronic Engineers of Oregon, 51 (1): 1
- ^ Stanley Williams, HP Labs, archived from the original on 2011-07-19, retrieved 2011-03-20
- ^ a b Argall, F. (1968), "Switching Phenomena in Titanium Oxide Thin Films",
- ^ Terabe, K.; Hasegawa, T.; Liang, C.; Aono, M. (2007), "Control of local ion transport to create unique functional nanodevices based on ionic conductors",
- ^
Beck, A.; et al. (2000), "Reproducible switching effect in thin oxide films for memory applications", doi:10.1063/1.126902
- ^ Stefanovich, Genrikh; Cho, Choong-rae; Yoo, In-kyeong; Lee, Eun-hong; Cho, Sung-il; Moon, Chang-wook (2006) "Electrode structure having at least two oxide layers and non-volatile memory device having the same" U.S. patent 7,417,271
- ^ Finding the Missing Memristor - R. Stanley Williams
- ^
Markoff, J. (2010-04-07), "H.P. Sees a Revolution in Memory Chip", New York Times
- S2CID 7625839.
- ^ Ben-Jamaa, M. H.; Carrara, S.; Georgiou, J.; Archontas, N.; De Micheli, G. (2009), "Fabrication of memristors with poly-crystalline silicon nanowires", Proceedings of 9th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 1 (1): 152–154
- doi:10.1063/1.3701581.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - ^
Krieger, J. H.; Spitzer, S. M. (2004), "Non-traditional, Non-volatile Memory Based on Switching and Retention Phenomena in Polymeric Thin Films", Proceedings of the 2004 Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium, S2CID 7189710
- ^
Erokhin, V.; Fontana, M. P. (2008). "Electrochemically controlled polymeric device: A memristor (and more) found two years ago". arXiv:0807.0333 [cond-mat.soft].
- S2CID 16335153.
- S2CID 18687826.
- S2CID 16972302.
- ^ Crupi, M.; Pradhan, L.; Tozer, S. (2012), "Modelling Neural Plasticity with Memristors" (PDF), IEEE Canadian Review, 68: 10–14
- .
- ^
Bessonov, A. A.; et al. (2014), "Layered memristive and memcapacitive switches for printable electronics", PMID 25384168
- PMID 29236504.
- S2CID 73505661.
- PMID 29955064.
- S2CID 249221166.
- S2CID 226285710.
- ^
Chanthbouala, A.; et al. (2012), "A ferroelectric memristor", S2CID 10372470
- S2CID 53003312.
- .
- S2CID 219912115.
- S2CID 104277945.
- PMID 28837313.
- S2CID 137399893.
- S2CID 231595640.
- S2CID 139445142.
- S2CID 234542676.
- ^
Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Xi, H.; Dimitrov, D. (2009), "Spintronic Memristor through Spin Torque Induced Magnetization Motion", S2CID 39590957
- ^ Savage, N. (2009-03-16). "Spintronic Memristor". IEEE Spectrum. Archived from the original on 2010-12-24. Retrieved 2011-03-20.
- S2CID 119221544.
- ^ Bowen, M.; Maurice, J.-L.; Barthe´le´my, A.; Prod’homme, P.; Jacquet, E.; Contour, J.-P.; Imhoff, D.; Colliex, C. (2006). "Bias-crafted magnetic tunnel junctions with bistable spin-dependent states". Applied Physics Letters. 89 (10): 103517. .
- ^ Halley, D.; Majjad, H.; Bowen, M.; Najjari, N.; Henry, Y.; Ulhaq-Bouillet, C.; Weber, W.; Bertoni, G.; Verbeeck, J.; Van Tendeloo, G. (2008). "Electrical switching in Fe/Cr/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions". Applied Physics Letters. 92 (21): 212115. .
- ^ a b
Krzysteczko, P.; Günter, R.; Thomas, A. (2009), "Memristive switching of MgO based magnetic tunnel junctions", S2CID 15383692
- ^ Bertin, Eric; Halley, David; Henry, Yves; Najjari, Nabil; Majjad, Hicham; Bowen, Martin; DaCosta, Victor; Arabski, Jacek; Doudin, Bernard (2011), "Random barrier double-well model for resistive switching in tunnel barriers", Journal of Applied Physics, 109 (8): 013712–013712–5, , retrieved 2014-12-15
- ^
Schleicher, F.; Halisdemir, U.; Lacour, D.; Gallart, M.; Boukari, S.; Schmerber, G.; Davesne, V.; Panissod, P.; Halley, D.; Majjad, H.; Henry, Y.; Leconte, B.; Boulard, A.; Spor, D.; Beyer, N.; Kieber, C.; Sternitzky, E.; Cregut, O.; Ziegler, M.; Montaigne, F.; Beaurepaire, E.; Gilliot, P.; Hehn, M.; Bowen, M. (2014-08-04), "Localized states in advanced dielectrics from the vantage of spin- and symmetry-polarized tunnelling across MgO", Nature Communications, 5: 4547, PMID 25088937
- ^
Garcia, V.; Bibes, M.; Bocher, L.; Valencia, S.; Kronast, F.; Crassous, A.; Moya, X.; Enouz-Vedrenne, S.; Gloter, A.; Imhoff, D.; Deranlot, C.; Mathur, N. D.; Fusil, S.; Bouzehouane, K.; Barthelemy, A. (2010-02-26), "Ferroelectric Control of Spin Polarization", Science, 327 (5969): 1106–1110, S2CID 206524358
- ^
Pantel, D.; Goetze, S.; Hesse, D.; Alexe, M. (2012-02-26), "Reversible electrical switching of spin polarization in multiferroic tunnel junctions", Nature Materials, 11 (4): 289–293, PMID 22367005
- ^ Huai, Y. (December 2008), "Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM): Challenges and Prospects" (PDF), AAPPS Bulletin, 18 (6): 33–40, archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-23
- ^
Krzysteczko, P.; Münchenberger, J.; Schäfers, M.; Reiss, G.; Thomas, A. (2012), "The Memristive Magnetic Tunnel Junction as a Nanoscopic Synapse-Neuron System", S2CID 205242867
- ^ "Massimiliano Di Ventra's Homepage". physics.ucsd.edu.
- ^
Pershin, Y. V.; Di Ventra, M. (2008), "Spin memristive systems: Spin memory effects in semiconductor spintronics", S2CID 10938532
- ^
Pershin, Y. V.; Di Ventra, M. (2008), "Current-voltage characteristics of semiconductor/ferromagnet junctions in the spin-blockade regime", S2CID 119604218
- ^
Campbell, K. (January 2017), "Self-directed channel memristor for high temperature operation", Microelectronics Journal, 59: 10–14, S2CID 27889124
- ^ Knowm Memristors, Knowm Inc
- ^ "Memristor Market Expected to Reach $79.0 Million by 2020, Globally - Allied Market Research". Archived from the original on 2017-02-26. Retrieved 2017-02-25.
- ^ "Groundbreaking Memristor Technology Set to Disrupt Electronics Industry, Fueling a Projected $2.6 Billion Market Growth by 2028". 2023-09-27.
- ^ Johnson, R. C. (2008-04-30), "'Missing link' memristor created", EE Times, retrieved 2008-04-30
- ^ "Finding the Missing Memristor - R. Stanley Williams", Youtube, 2010-01-22
- ^
Markoff, J. (2008-05-01), "H.P. Reports Big Advance in Memory Chip Design", New York Times, retrieved 2008-05-01
- ^ Gutmann, E. (2008-05-01), "Maintaining Moore's law with new memristor circuits", Ars Technica, retrieved 2008-05-01
- ^ Palmer, J. (2012-05-18), "Memristors in silicon promising for dense, fast memory", BBC News, retrieved 2012-05-18
- ^ Snider, Gregory Stuart (2004) "Architecture and methods for computing with reconfigurable resistor crossbars" U.S. patent 7,203,789
- ^ Mouttet, Blaise Laurent (2006) "Programmable crossbar signal processor" U.S. patent 7,302,513
- .
- ^ Snider, Greg (2003) "Molecular-junction-nanowire-crossbar-based neural network" U.S. patent 7,359,888
- ^ Mouttet, Blaise Laurent (2007) "Crossbar control circuit" U.S. patent 7,609,086
- ^ Pino, Robinson E. (2010) "Reconfigurable electronic circuit" U.S. patent 7,902,857
- S2CID 57248729.
- ^ Mouttet, Blaise Laurent (2009) "Memristor crossbar neural interface" U.S. patent 7,902,867
- ^ Kang, Hee Bok (2009) "RFID device with memory unit having memristor characteristics" U.S. patent 8,113,437
- .
- .
- ^
Chattopadhyay, A.; Rakosi, Z. (2011). "Combinational logic synthesis for material implication". 2011 IEEE/IFIP 19th International Conference on VLSI and System-on-Chip. p. 200. S2CID 32278896.
- ^
Pershin, Y. V.; La Fontaine, S.; Di Ventra, M. (2009), "Memristive model of amoeba learning", S2CID 9820970
- ^ a b
Saigusa, T.; Tero, A.; Nakagaki, T.; Kuramoto, Y. (2008), "Amoebae Anticipate Periodic Events" (PDF), S2CID 14710241
- ^
Versace, M.; Chandler, B. (2010-11-23). "MoNETA: A Mind Made from Memristors". S2CID 45300119.
- S2CID 16307308
- ^
Merrikh-Bayat, F.; Bagheri-Shouraki, S.; Rohani, A. (2011), "Memristor crossbar-based hardware implementation of IDS method", S2CID 3163846
- ^ Merrikh-Bayat, F.; Bagheri-Shouraki, S. (2011). "Efficient neuro-fuzzy system and its Memristor Crossbar-based Hardware Implementation". ].
- ^
Chua, L. (2013). "Memristor, Hodgkin-Huxley, and Edge of Chaos". S2CID 34999101.
- ^ a b
Di Ventra, M.; Pershin, Y. V.; Chua, L. (2009), "Circuit elements with memory: memristors, memcapacitors and meminductors", S2CID 7136764
- ^ Abdelhouahad, M.-S.; Lozi, R.; Chua, L. (September 2014), "Memfractance: A Mathematical Paradigm for Circuit Elements with Memory" (PDF),
- ^
Prodromakis, T.; Toumazou, C.; Chua, L. (June 2012), "Two centuries of memristors", PMID 22614504
- ^
Barella, M. (2016), "LabOSat: Low cost measurement platform designed for hazardous environments", 2016 Seventh Argentine Conference on Embedded Systems (CASE), pp. 1–6, S2CID 10263318
- Telam. 2014-07-21.
- ^ Barella, M. (2019), "Studying ReRAM devices at Low Earth Orbits using the LabOSat platform",
- ^ "UNSAM - Universidad Nacional de San Martín". www.unsam.edu.ar.
- Telam. 2016-06-22.
- ^ "Startup Beats HP, Hynix to Memristor Learning". EE Times. 2015-07-05.
- ^ "MemSat". Gunter Space Page. 2018-05-22.
- ^ "MIT and Ericsson Collaborates to Research New Generation of Energy-Efficient Computing Networks - News". eepower.com.
- ^ "MIT and Ericsson Set Goals for Zero-power Devices and a New Field—"Lithionics" - News". www.allaboutcircuits.com.
- S2CID 261736380.
Further reading
- Chen, Dongmin; Chua, Leon O.; Hwang, Cheol Seong; Wang, Shih-Yuan; Waser, Rainer; Williams, R. Stanley; Yang, Jianhua, eds. (March 2011). "Special Issue: Memristive and Resistive Devices and Systems". Applied Physics A. 102 (4).
- Mazumder, P.; Kang, S. M.; Waser, R., eds. (June 2012). "Special Issue: MEMRISTORS: DEVICES, MODELS, AND APPLICATIONS". .
- Tetzlaff, Ronald, ed. (2013). Memristors and Memristive Systems. ISBN 978-1-4614-9068-5.
- Adamatzky, Andrew; Chua, Leon, eds. (2013). Memristor Networks. S2CID 39739718.
- Atkin, Keith (May 2013). "An introduction to the memristor". Physics Education. 48 (3): 317–321. S2CID 121268844.
- Gale, Ella (2014-10-01). "TiO2-based memristors and ReRAM: materials, mechanisms and models (a review)". Semiconductor Science and Technology. 29 (10): 104004. S2CID 5686212.
- Traversa, Fabio Lorenzo; Di Ventra, Massimiliano (November 2015). "Universal Memcomputing Machines". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 26 (11): 2702–2715. S2CID 1406042.
- Caravelli, Francesco; Carbajal, Juan Pablo (January 2019). "Memristors for the curious outsiders". Technologies. 6 (4): 118. S2CID 54464654.
- Maan, Akshay Kumar; Jayadevi, Deepthi Anirudhan; James, Alex Pappachen (August 2017). "A Survey of Memristive Threshold Logic Circuits". IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 28 (8): 1734–1746. S2CID 1798273.
- Ghosh, M., Singh, A., Borah, S. S., Vista, J., Ranjan, A., Kumar, S. (2022). "MOSFET-based memristor for high-frequency signal processing". IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 69 (5): 2248–2255. S2CID 247889089.
- Singh, A., Borah, S. S., Ghosh, M. (2021), Simple grounded meminductor emulator using transconductance amplifier, IEEE
External links
- Finding the missing memristor on YouTube
- Interactive database of memristor papers (2013)
- Simonite, Tom (2015-04-21). "Machine Dreams". Technology Review. Retrieved 2017-12-05.
- "Leon Chua: A bulb versus Google go player" - (in Polish) an interview with Leon Chua, the creator of memristor
- "Leon Chua: A bulb versus Google go player" - (in English) an interview with Leon Chua, the creator of memristor