Merton thesis
The Merton thesis is an argument about the nature of early
Although scholars are still debating it, Merton's 1936
Thesis
The Merton thesis has two separate parts: firstly, it presents a theory that science changes due to an accumulation of observations and improvement in experimental technique and
Merton focuses on English Puritanism and
Criticism
The first part of Merton's thesis has been criticized for insufficient consideration of the roles of
Merton, acknowledging the criticism, replied that the Puritan ethos was not necessary, although it did facilitate development of science.[8] He also noted that when science had acquired institutional legitimacy, it no longer needed religion, eventually becoming a counterforce, leading to religious decline. Nonetheless, early on, in Merton's view religion was a major factor that allowed the scientific revolution to occur.[1] While the Merton thesis does not explain all the causes of the scientific revolution, it does illuminate possible reasons why England was one of its driving motors and the structure of the English scientific community.[9]
Support
In 1958, American sociologist
Lenski's data supported the basic hypotheses of
Lenski traced these differences back to the
- "none of the predominantly and devoutly Catholic nations in the modern world can be classified as a leading industrial nation. Some Catholic nations – such as France, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile – are quite highly industrialized, but none of them are leaders in the technological and scientific fields, nor do they seem likely to become so. Recently [1963] some Brazilian Catholic social scientists compared their country's progress with that of the United States and concluded that the chief factor responsible for the differential rates of development is the religious heritage of the two nations."[10](pp347–349)
Puritans and Pietists both contributed to intellectual autonomy and provided intellectual tools and values important for science.[13] As an example, pietism challenged the orthodoxy via new media and formats: Periodical journals gained importance versus the former pasquills and single thesis, traditional disputation was replaced by competitive debating, which tried to gain new knowledge instead of defending orthodox scholarship.[14] It is a part of the forces that lead to modernity.[15][page needed]
References
- ^ a b c Sztompka, 2003
- ^ Cohen, 1990
- ^ Merton Awarded Nation's Highest Science Honor
- ^ a b Gregory, 1998
- ^ Becker, 1992
- ^ Ferngen, 2002
- ^ Porter & Teich 1992
- ^ Heddendorf, 1986]
- ^ Cohen, 1994
- ^ a b c d Lenski, G. (1963) [1958]. The Religious Factor: A sociological study of religion's impact on politics, economics, and family life (Revised ed.). Garden City, NY.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ O'Dea, Thomas F. (1958). The Catholic Dilemma: An inquiry into the intellectual life. New York, NY.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Christ, Frank L.; Sherry, Gerard, eds. (1961). American Catholicism and the Intellectual Ideal. New York, NY.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ Gregory, Andrew (1998). "Lecture 14 – Science and Religion in the Seventeenth-Century" (course handout). HPCS 215. The Scientific Revolution. London, UK: University College London. Archived from the original on 2006-05-13.
- ^ Gierl, Martin (1997). Pietismus und Aufklärung: theologische Polemik und die Kommunikationsreform der Wissenschaft am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts [Pietism and enlightenment, theological polemic and the reform of science communication end of the 17th century]. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
- ISBN 9781421408309– via Google Books.
Sources
- Becker, George (December 1992). "The Merton thesis: Oetinger and German Pietism, a significant negative case". S2CID 56239703.
- ISBN 978-0813515304.
- ISBN 9780226112800.
- ISBN 9780801870385.
- Gregory, Andrew (1998). "Lecture 14" (course handout). 215 – The Scientific Revolution. Archived from the original on 2006-05-13.
- Heddendorf, Russel (December 1986). "Religion, science, and the problem of modernity". Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith (JASA). 38 (4): 226–231. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
- Lenski, G. (1963). The Religious Factor: A sociological study of religion's impact on politics, economics, and family life (Revised ed.). New York, NY.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ISBN 9780521396998.
- ISBN 9781405105958.
- Also available as:
- ISBN 9780470999912– via blackwellreference.com.
Further reading
- Steven Shapin, Understanding the Merton Thesis, Isis, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Dec., 1988), pp. 594–605
- Robert K. Merton, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England