Military organization

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Military unit
)

Organization chart of the Royal Danish Army, April 1940

Military organization (

hierarchical forms (see Modern hierarchy
for terminology and approximate troop strength per hierarchical unit).

In some countries, paramilitary forces are included in a nation's armed forces, though not considered military. Armed forces that are not a part of military or paramilitary organizations, such as insurgent forces, often emulate military organizations, or use these structures.

History

The use of formalized

Roman Army
.

In modern times, executive control, management and administration of military organization is typically undertaken by governments through a

military branches that themselves command formations and units specialising in combat, combat support and combat-service support
.

Executive control, management and administration

The usually

minister of defence. In presidential systems, such as the United States, the president is the commander-in-chief, and the cabinet-level defense minister is second in command. Subordinated to that position are often secretaries
for specific major operational divisions of the armed forces as a whole, such as those that provide general support services to the military, including their dependants.

Then there are the heads of specific departmental agencies responsible for the provision and management of specific skill- and knowledge-based services such as strategic advice, capability development assessment, or military science provision of research, and design and development of technologies. Within each departmental agency will be found administrative branches responsible for further agency business specialization work.

Military branches

A mixed aircraft and ship formation of military vehicles during an exercise with USN and JASDF vehicles.

In most countries, the armed forces are divided into three military branches (also service, armed service, or military service): army, navy, and air force.

Many countries have a variation on the standard model of three basic military branches. Some nations also organize their cyber force, emergencies service, medical service, military logistics, space force, marines, and special forces such as commandos or airborne forces as independent armed services. A nation's border guard or coast guard may also be an independent branch of its military, although in many nations border guard or coast guard is a civil law enforcement agency. A number of countries have no navy, for geographical reasons.

In larger armed forces, the cultures between the different branches of the armed forces can be quite different.

Most smaller countries have a single organization that encompasses all armed forces employed by the country in question. Armies of developing countries tend to consist primarily of infantry, while developed countries armies tend to have larger units manning expensive equipment and only a fraction of personnel in infantry units.

In western militaries, a joint force is defined as a unit or formation comprising representation of combat power from two or more branches of the military.

Internal security forces

internal troops and police tactical unit, are an internal security service common in most of the world, but uncommon in countries with English common law histories where civil police are employed to enforce the law, and there are tight restrictions on how the armed forces may be used to assist.[a]

Commands, formations, and units

It is common, at least in the European and North American militaries, to refer to the building blocks of a military as commands, formations, and units.

In a military context, a command is a collection of units and formations under the control of a single officer, although during

Belgian Army
), but this does not preclude the existence of commands that are not service-based.

A formation is defined by the

wings, etc. Formation may also refer to tactical formation, the physical arrangement or disposition of troops and weapons.[3] Examples of formation in such usage include: pakfront, panzerkeil, testudo formation
, etc.

A typical unit is a homogeneous military organization (either combat, combat-support or non-combat in capability) that includes service personnel predominantly from a single arm of service, or a branch of service, and its administrative and command functions are self-contained. Any unit subordinate to another unit is considered its sub-unit or minor unit. It is not uncommon in the United States for unit and formation to be used synonymously. In Commonwealth practice, formation is not used for smaller organizations such as battalions, which are instead called "units", and their constituent platoons or companies are referred to as sub-units. In the Commonwealth, formations are divisions, brigades, etc.

Different

armed forces, and even different branches of service of the armed forces, may use the same name to denote different types of organizations. An example is the "squadron". In most navies a squadron is a formation of several ships; in most air forces it is a unit; in the U.S. Army it is a battalion-sized cavalry
unit; and in Commonwealth armies a squadron is a company-sized sub-unit.

Table of organization and equipment

A table of organization and equipment (TOE or TO&E) is a document published by the U.S. Army Force Management Support Agency that prescribes the organization, manning, and equipage of units from divisional size and down, but also including the headquarters of Corps and Armies.

It also provides information on the mission and capabilities of a unit as well as the unit's current status. A general TOE is applicable to a type of unit (for instance, infantry) rather than a specific unit (the 3rd Infantry Division). In this way, all units of the same branch (such as infantry) follow the same structural guidelines.

Modern hierarchy

Army

The following table gives an overview of some of the terms used to describe army hierarchy in armed forces across the world. Whilst it is recognized that there are differences between armies of different nations, many are modeled on the British or American models, or both.[4] However, many military units and formations go back in history for a long time, and were devised by various military thinkers throughout European history.

For example, the modern Corps was first introduced in France about 1805 by Napoleon as a more flexible tactical grouping of two or more divisions during the Napoleonic Wars.

NATO Symbol Name
Nature
Strength Constituent units Commander or leader
Combatant Command[5] or equivalent
region[b][4]
theater
Command 1,000,000–10,000,000 4+ army groups OF-10:
front
Command 400,000–1,000,000[4] 2+ armies OF-10 field marshal
OF-9: general, army general, or colonel general
field army or bureau of special operations [6] Command 100,000–200,000 2–4 corps OF-10: field marshal
OF-9: general, army general, or colonel general

OF 9: Lieutenant General

corps or regional military command [7] Formation 20,000–60,000 2+ divisions OF-9: general or army general
corps general, or colonel general[d]
OF-7: major general[e]

division or military operation command or armoured operation command [8] Formation 6,000–25,000 2–8 brigades or regiments OF-8: lieutenant general
OF-8 or OF-7: divisional general
OF-7: major general or
OF-6: senior colonel[f]OF-7: Brigadier general

brigade or tactical operation command [9] Formation 3,000–5,000[4] 2+ regiments or groups, or
3–8 battalions or equivalent
OF-7: major general
OF-7 or OF-6:

regiment or group Unit 1,000–3,000 2+ battalions or equivalent OF-5: colonel

battalion or equivalent
regiment (some countries for some arms only)
squadron (US Cavalry)
squadron (some countries for aviation)
cohort
Unit 300–1,000 2–6 sub-units (companies or equivalent) OF-4: lieutenant colonel

artillery battery
squadron (some countries for some arms only)
U.S. cavalry troop
centuria
Unit or
Subunit
100–250 2–8 platoons or equivalent OF-3:
chief warrant officer

staffel[10] or echelon[11] Sub-subunit 50–90 2 platoons/troops or 6–10 sections OF-2:
master warrant officer

platoon or equivalent
troop (some countries for some arms only)
Sub-subunit 20–50 2+ Section, or vehicles OF-1: first or second lieutenant
OR-7: warrant officer

section or patrol - 12–24 2–3 squads or 3–6 fireteams OR-6: staff sergeant
OR-5: sergeant

squad - 6–12 2–3 fireteams or 1+ cell OR-5: sergeant
OR-4: corporal

team or crew - 2–4 n/a OR-3: lance corporal to OR-5: sergeant

OR-2: private first class

Rungs may be skipped in this ladder: for example, typically NATO forces skip from battalion to brigade. Likewise, only large military powers may have organizations at the top levels and different armies and countries may also use traditional names, creating considerable confusion: for example, a British or Canadian armored regiment (battalion) is divided into squadrons (companies) and troops (platoons), whereas an American cavalry squadron (battalion) is divided into troops (companies) and platoons. In the French system (used by many African countries) the company is divided into sections (platoons) composed of 3 x "groupes de combat" of 7 soldiers, plus a group of vehicle crews and a HQ that includes 2 x snipers.[citation needed]

theatre are all large formations that vary significantly between armed forces in size and hierarchy position. While divisions were the traditional level at which support elements (field artillery, hospital, logistics and maintenance, etc.) were added to the unit structure, since World War II, many brigades now have such support units, and since the 1980s, regiments also have been receiving support elements. A regiment with such support elements is called a regimental combat team in US military parlance, or a battlegroup in the UK and other forces. Canadian Army doctrine also includes the combat team
which is a company of infantry augmented with tanks, or a squadron of tanks augmented with infantry, or the combination of a full company of infantry with a full squadron of tanks.

During

Strategic Directions
.

Navy

Naval organization at the flotilla level and higher is less commonly abided by, as ships operate in smaller or larger groups in various situations that may change at a moment's notice. However, there is some common terminology used throughout navies to communicate the general concept of how many vessels might be in a unit.

Navies are generally organized into groups for a specific purpose, usually strategic, and these organizational groupings appear and disappear frequently based on the conditions and demands placed upon a navy. This contrasts with army organization where units remain static, with the same men and equipment, over long periods of time.

Unit Name Vessel types No. of Vessels Officer in command
Combatant Command (US)[5] or Navy or Admiralty All vessels in a navy 2+ Fleets
Grand Admiral or Admiral
Fleet All vessels in an ocean or general region 2+ Battle Fleets
Vice Admiral
Battle Fleet (US, 1922–1941) A large number of vessels of all types 2+
Task Forces
Vice Admiral
(US) A collection of complementary vessels 2+
Task Groups, Divisions or Flotillas
Rear Admiral (upper half) or Rear Admiral
Task Group
Usually capital ships 2+ large vessels
Division Admiral
Flotilla or Task Group A small number of vessels, usually of the same or similar types 2+ Squadrons
Flotilla Admiral
Squadron or Task Unit Small vessels A small number of vessels, usually of the same or similar types Captain or Commander
Task Element A single vessel One
Lieutenant

The five-star ranks of

rear-admiral (two-star rank), commodore (one-star rank) or even a captain
.

warrant officers. Usually, the smaller the vessel, the lower the rank of the ship's commander. For example, patrol boats are often commanded by ensigns
, while frigates are rarely commanded by an officer below the rank of commander.

Historically, navies were far more rigid in structure. Ships were collected in divisions, which in turn were collected in numbered squadrons, which comprised a numbered fleet. Permission for a vessel to leave one unit and join another would have to be approved on paper.

The modern U.S. Navy is primarily based on a number of standard groupings of vessels, including the carrier strike group and the expeditionary strike group.[citation needed]

Additionally, naval organization continues aboard a single ship. The complement forms three or four departments (such as tactical and engineering), each of which has a number of divisions, followed by work centers.

Air force

The organizational structures of air forces vary between nations: some air forces (such as the

Soviet Air Force) have an Army-style organizational structure. The modern Royal Canadian Air Force uses Air division
as the formation between wings and the entire air command. Like the RAF, Canadian wings consist of squadrons.

NATO Symbol
(for Army comparison)
Unit Name
(USAF/RAF/Other air forces)
No. of personnel No. of aircraft No. of subordinate units
(USAF/RAF)
Officer in command
(USAF/RAF)

Combatant Command[5] or national air force Entire air force Entire air force All
Major Commands / Commands
Air Chf Mshl

Major Command / Command
Varies Varies Varies by Region or Duty
Air Chf Mshl

No USAF equivalent/
Tactical Air Force
/ Air army[14]
Varies by Region or Duty Varies Varies by Region or Duty
Air Mshl

Numbered Air Force/No RAF equivalent Varies by Region or Duty Varies 2+ Wings/Groups
Lt-Gen
/ N/A

No USAF equivalent/No RAF equivalent
/Aviation Division /Air division
Varies by Region or Duty Varies 2+ Wings/Groups
Maj-Gen or Div-Gen

EAGs
)
/Russian aviation brigade/Air Brigade
1,000–5,000 48–200 2+ Groups/Wings
Air Cdre

Station

/Russian aviation regiment
300–1,000 17–48 3–4 Squadrons/3–10 Flights
Wg Cdr

Squadron 100–300 7–16 3–4 Flights
Sqn Ldr

Flight or flying staffel[15] 20–100 4–6 2 or more Sections plus maintenance and support crew
Flt Lt

Staffel[16] or echelon[17] 40–160 6-12 1-2 Sections plus maintenance and support crew
Staff Captain

Section 10–40 n/a–2 n/a
Senior NCO

Element 8–12 n/a n/a
Junior NCO

Detail or crew 2–4 n/a n/a
Junior NCO

Task force

A

Second World War
and the Cold War.

Within NATO, a

Joint Task Force
(JTF) would be such a temporary grouping that includes elements from more than one armed service, a Combined Task Force (CTF) would be such a temporary grouping that includes elements from more than one nation, and a Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) would be such a temporary grouping that includes elements of more than one armed service and more than one nation.

See also

Explanatory notes

  1. Insurrection Act specifically permits the president to use federal military force to restore public order in extreme emergency situations: the Act was implemented during the "Rodney King Riots" in Los Angeles.[citation needed
    ]
  2. ^ in the US this command is termed an army region
  3. ^ Some countries such as Brazil.
  4. ^ Eastern Bloc
  5. PLAGF
  6. PLAGF

References

  1. ^ United States Department of Defense, DOD Dictionary Archived 2008-12-23 at the Wayback Machine
  2. ^ Fomin, N. N., Great Soviet Encyclopaedia (Russian: Большая Советская Энциклопедия), Moscow, 1978
  3. ^ Shorter Oxford English Dictionary
  4. ^ a b c d "Military Units: Army". US Department of Defense. Retrieved 2023-05-18.
  5. ^ a b c FM 1-02 Operational Terms and Graphics. US DoD. 21 September 2004. pp. 5–37.
  6. .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. ^ APP-6C NATO Joint Military Symbology. NATO. May 2011. pp. 2–25.
  11. ^ APP-6 Military Symbols for Land Based Systems. NATO. July 1986. pp. B8.
  12. ^ "Доклад НКО август 1939. doklad-nko-8-39.shtml". Armor.kiev.ua. Retrieved 2013-11-20.
  13. ^ Центральный государственный архив Советской армии (с июня 1992 г. Российский государственный военный архив). В двух томах. Том 2. Путеводитель. 1993 (in Russian). Guides.rusarchives.ru. Archived from the original on 2015-07-04. Retrieved 2013-11-20.
  14. ^ http://www.airpages.ru/ru/vvs1.shtml Red Army VVS Organisation(rus)
  15. ^ APP-6D NATO Joint Military Symbology. NATO Standardization Office. October 2017. pp. B-6, B-8.
  16. ^ APP-6C NATO Joint Military Symbology. NATO. May 2011. p. B8.
  17. ^ APP-6 Military Symbols for Land Based Systems. NATO. July 1986. pp. 2–25.