Mixed government
Part of the Politics series |
Basic forms of government |
---|
List of countries by system of government |
Politics portal |
Mixed government (or a mixed constitution) is a form of government that combines elements of
Unlike classical democracy, aristocracy or monarchy, under a mixed government rulers are elected by citizens rather than acquiring their positions by inheritance or
The concept of a mixed government was studied during the Renaissance and the Age of Reason by Tomás Fernández de Medrano, Niccolò Machiavelli, Giambattista Vico, Immanuel Kant, Thomas Hobbes and others. It was and still is a very important theory among supporters of republicanism. Various schools have described modern polities, such as the European Union and the United States, as possessing mixed constitutions.
Ancient Greek philosophers
- democracy: government by the many
- oligarchy: government by the few
- timocracy: government by the honored or valued
- tyranny: government by one for himself
- aristocracy: government by the best (Plato's ideal form of government)
Plato found flaws with all existing forms of government and thus concluded that aristocracy, which emphasizes virtue and wisdom, is the purest form of government.
Polybius argued that most states have a government system that is composed of "more than one" of these basic principles, which then was called a mixed government system.[2]
Roman Era
Part of the Politics series |
Republicanism |
---|
Politics portal |
The ideal of a mixed government was popularized by Polybius, who saw the Roman Republic as a manifestation of Aristotle's theory (Millar, 2002). Monarchy was embodied by the consuls, the aristocracy by the Senate and democracy by the elections and great public gatherings of the assemblies. Each institution complements and also checks the others, presumably guaranteeing stability and prosperity. Polybius was very influential and his ideas were embraced by Cicero (Millar, 2002).
Middle Ages
Renaissance, Reformation and Enlightenment
Cicero became extremely well regarded during the Renaissance and many of his ideas were embraced. Polybius was also rediscovered and the positive view of mixed governments became a central aspect of Renaissance political science integrated into the developing notion of republicanism. In order to minimise the misuse of political power, John Calvin advocated a mixture of aristocracy and democracy as the best form of government. He praised the advantages of democracy: "It is an invaluable gift if God allows a people to elect its overlords and magistrates". To further safeguard the rights and liberties of those who are ordinary, Calvin also favored the distribution of power to several political institutions (separation of powers).[3] Mixed government theories became extremely popular in the Enlightenment and were discussed in detail by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Giambattista Vico, Montesquieu, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant. Apart from his contemporaries, only Montesquieu became widely acknowledged as the author of a concept of separation of powers (although he wrote rather on their "distribution").[4]
According to some scholars, for example, Heinrich August Winkler, the notion also influenced the writers of the
The "father" of the American constitution, James Madison, stated in Federalist Paper No. 40 that the Constitutional Convention of 1787 created a mixed constitution. Madison referred to Polybius in Federalist Paper No. 63.[11] However, much more important was that "most" ideas that the American Revolutionaries put into their political system "were a part of the great tradition of the eighteenth-century commonwealthmen, the radical Whig ideology".[12]
Modern era
United States
One school of scholarship based mainly in the United States considers mixed government to be the central characteristic of a republic and holds that the United States has rule by the one (the President; monarchy), the few (the Senate; aristocracy), and the many (House of Representatives; democracy).[13] Another school of thought in the U.S. says the Supreme Court has taken on the role of "The Best" in recent decades, ensuring a continuing separation of authority by offsetting the direct election of senators and preserving the mixing of democracy, aristocracy and monarchy.[14]
European Union
According to a view, in the
See also
- Anacyclosis
- Constitutionalism
- Constitutional economics
- Crowned republic
- Fusion of powers
- Rule according to higher law
- Plato's Republic
- Aristotle's Politics
- Separation of powers
References
- ^ Headlam, James Wycliffe (1891). Election by Lot at Athens. Cambridge, Univ. Press. p. 12.
- ISBN 978-3-406-59235-5, p. 179
- ^ Jan Weerda, Calvin, in: Evangelisches Soziallexikon, Third Edition, Stuttgart (Germany), 1958, col. 210
- ^ Winkler (2012), pp. 184ff
- ^ Winkler (2012), p. 301
- ^ Heinrich August Winkler (2012), pp. 151ff
- ISBN 978-0-19-531588-2, pp. 51-52
- ^ Winkler (2012), pp. 142ff
- ^ Middlekauff (2005), pp. 136ff
- ISBN 978-0-465-00235-1, pp. 7-8
- ^ Cf. Heinrich August Winkler (2012), pp. 290ff
- ^ Middlekauff (2005), p. 51
- ^ "Constitution Day 2021: Mixed Government, Bicameralism, and the Creation of the U.S. Senate". U.S. Senate. September 17, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
- ^ Rosen, Zivi S. (2006). "The Irony of Populism: The Republican Shift and the Inevitability of American Aristocracy" (PDF). Regent University Law Review. 18: 287–89. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
- ^ Explaining the stability of the EU through the concept of a Mixed Constitution.
External links
- Polybius and the Founding Fathers: the separation of powers
- De Republica Anglorum, Sir Thomas Smyth's description of the English Constitution under Queen Elizabeth I