Montezuma (Sessions opera)

Edit links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Cortez and Malinche meet Montezuma in Tenochtitlán

Montezuma is an

Aztec language, Nahuatl, as well as Spanish, Latin, and French.[1]

Though Sessions did not receive Borgese's libretto (in first draft) until 1941, and work on the opera proceeded in an irregular fashion after ("Sessions thought that the end of his labor was in sight in the summer of 1952. He was mistaken, and the work on Montezuma was suspended"), the opera incorporates, essentially unchanged, sketches (from Sessions' notebooks) dating from the late 1930s, and was completed on October 15, 1963.[2]

Performance history

Montezuma was first performed on 19 April 1964 at the

Deutsche Oper in Berlin
, in a German translation.

The American premiere (and the first performance with the original English libretto) was given on 31 March 1976 by the Opera Company of Boston, conducted by Sarah Caldwell. The cast included Richard Lewis (Montezuma), Alexander Stevenson (Bernal Díaz del Castillo, the Young), Donald Gramm (Bernal Díaz del Castillo, the Old), Brent Ellis (Cortez), Phyllis Bryn-Julson (Malinche), Alan Crofoot (Jerónimo Aguilar/veteran), and Eunice Alberts as Cuaximatl.[3]

The New York City premiere was given in February, 1982 by the Juilliard American Opera Center, conducted by

Hei-Kyung Hong.[5] The scenery was designed by Ming Cho Lee, costume design by Nan Cibula, and the lighting was by Beverly Emmons
.

Roles

Role Voice type Premiere Cast
19 April 1964[6]
(Conductor: Heinrich Hollreiser)
Bernal Díaz del Castillo, the Old
bass
 Ernst Krukowski
Bernal Díaz del Castillo, the Young tenor Karl Ernst Mercker
Cacamatzin tenor Martin Vantin
Cuauhtemoc[7] baritone Barry McDaniel
Cuaximatl mezzo-soprano Yonako Nagano
Fray Olmedo de la Merced bass Manfred Röhrl
Guidela baritone
Hernán Cortez baritone William Dooley
Itlamal soprano Marina Türke
Malinche soprano Annabelle Bernard
Jeronimo Aguilar baritone Walter Dicks
Montezuma tenor Helmut Melchert
Netzahualcoyotl bass Martti Talvela
Passer-by 1 baritone Wilhelm Lang
Passer-by 2 baritone Robert Koffmane
Pedro de Alvarado tenor Loren Driscoll
A Soldier of Cortez's Army tenor Cornelis van Dijk
Teuhtlilli, an ambassador of Montezuma tenor Helmut Krebs
Veteran baritone Hanns Heinz Nissen

Reception

Former British Prime Minister Edward Heath, after hearing the US premiere in Boston in 1976, said "I found it fascinating. … I liked the subject—one of the few instances of an important event in history where the British played no part. In the tragedy of Montezuma we share no responsibility".[8] The opera contains human sacrifice, burning at the stake, stabbing, stoning, rule by terror, cannibalism, a love story, war, homesickness, intrigue, a ritual dance, and the supernatural.[9][clarification needed]

Frank J. Oteri asks whether Montezuma and the operas of Dallapiccola ought to be regarded as being among the "important 12-tone operas", along with Berg's Lulu, Schoenberg's Moses und Aron, and Zimmermann's Die Soldaten.[10] Andrea Olmstead agrees that Montezuma may aptly be compared with Berg's Lulu and Wozzeck, but primarily because of their shared extensive use of ostinato rhythms.[11] Michael Steinberg says that it is "arguably the richest opera yet written by an American composer", and like Olmstead compares it to Wozzeck and Lulu (as well as to Les Troyens, Moses und Aron, War and Peace, and Palestrina) because, like them, Montezuma has long remained a "legend".[12] Andrew Porter echos the "legendary" characterization and the comparison to Pfitzner's Palestrina, adding that these two operas, as well as Busoni's Doktor Faust, Hindemith's Harmonie der Welt, and Dallapiccola's Ulisse are "both personal and closely argued". At the same time, he cautions that "both text and music are insistent, unrelaxed, and reject passive acceptance", placing unusually high demands on the audience through the combination of Borgese's "Wardour Street diction" and Sessions's musical setting, which frequently superimposes two different vocal settings or accompanies the voices with orchestration that "amounts in performance to stiff competition".[13] Patrick Smith agrees with the comparison to Moses und Aron because both are works "of the mind rather than of the opera stage". However, he does not find Sessions the match of Schoenberg's "ramrod genius", so that Montezuma "remains a tableau-oratorio" in which the salient moments (including a love duet inspired by Verdi's Otello) fail to be "drawn into a cohesive and ongoing whole." He finds the opera's greatest defect is its libretto, a "farrago of poetasty", which is "a ghastly example of self-parody that even a Robert Benchley could not have topped".[14] John Harbison similarly finds parallels between the act-1 endings of both Montezuma and Otello, but also notes similarities to Aida and Tristan und Isolde.

Harbison regards the opera highly, describing it as "one of four or five great operas of the century", and this in spite of the fact that, as a "continuous-flow" opera, it is the opposite of the set-piece operas he generally prefers, with clear division between aria and recitative, simple textures, frequent ensembles, and unambiguous dramatic situations and text. As the "best 'way in'" to the music's "monumental force and vivideness", he recommends listening to Sessions's cantata When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloomed (1969) and the Eighth Symphony (1968).[15] Donal Henahan said that the opera lacks, "a dramatically viable libretto and a score worth hearing sung."[16] Peter Maxwell Davies said that the libretto is "full-blown and rhetorical", but "the composer dealt with his text with such assurance that the music convincingly carried even this ponderous weight of language. ... There is little doubt that this is Sessions' masterpiece", and described Montezuma as "a huge step in the history of American music."[17] Reflecting a few days later, Davies conceded that the "profusion of musical detail obscured, for many listeners, the basic simplicity of Sessions' musical material", and that the "surface" of the music is "by no means always ingratiating" but nevertheless maintained that, "if one can take in the music as a whole, its enormous gestures and long articulations begin to fall into place, and Sessions emerges as a great lyricist with a full and virile melodic sweep." For "unprepared ears", Davies recommended the best approach is through Sessions's "readily assimilated Fifth Symphony ... the stylistic key to the most difficult section of the opera, the third and final act."[18] An unnamed correspondent for the Times, reporting on the Berlin premiere, found the score "spare and mechanical", and felt that listening "requires far more application than most theatregoers are prepared to give it". Defects included "complex scoring" and "impenetrable subtleties of the vocal line", so that the "strain on the ear is excessive".[19] After hearing both the American premiere in Boston and the 1982 Juilliard production, Peter G. Davis concurred: "the opera's flaws only become more apparent and aggravating with each hearing". Citing the "syntactically tortured libretto", combined with the thick textures of Sessions's music, "the ear becomes lost in a sea of gray monotony". In sum, "there can only be one sad conclusion: Sessions has written a terrible opera, a tragic waste of a valuable composer's precious time."[20] Martin Brody, on the contrary, finds the overlapping, complex vocal lines consistently reinforce "an ironic undercutting of virtually all the ethical and political positions taken by the characters", so that the portrayed events are "viewed as tragic and absurd in equal parts". Conceding that the language of the libretto is largely "complicated and awkward", the drama nevertheless is "psychologically and politically focussed at all times". The music is "among Sessions’s richest: dense and colourful, gesturally graphic throughout, dramatically motivated and fully integrated at all structural levels."[21]

Notes

  1. ^ Steinberg 1976, 15.
  2. ^ Prausnitz 2002, pp.211–12; 1962 date from Sessions' own condensed (autograph) score, etc. According to Olmstead’s Conversations with Roger Sessions, Borgese presented Sessions with the idea in 1935; 1962 date is the date of completion of the vocal score, but the full orchestral score, he told Olmstead, wasn’t concluded until 10/63.
  3. ^ Kessler 2008, 232–33.
  4. ^ Prausnitz 2002, 292.
  5. ^ Olmstead 2008, 329.
  6. ^ "Program of first performance, Berlin, April 19, 1964", reprinted in the preface to the vocal score of the opera (New York: Marks Music Corporation, 1965); Casaglia, Gherardo (2005). "Montezuma, 19 April 1964". L'Almanacco di Gherardo Casaglia (in Italian).
  7. ^ The spelling throughout the score and in the German cast list. The English cast list in the score misspells the name "Cuanuhtemoc". Olmstead 1985 consistently has "Cuahetemoc"; in Olmstead 2008, 335–37, the name is spelled as in the score.
  8. ^ Soria 1976, MA-5.
  9. ^ Olmstead 1985, 15; Olmstead 2008, 328.
  10. ^ Oteri 2008.
  11. ^ Olmstead 1985, 17–18.
  12. ^ Steinberg 1976, 11.
  13. ^ Porter 1976, 115, 118.
  14. ^ Smith 1976.
  15. ^ Harbison 1977, 5.
  16. ^ Henahan 1982.
  17. ^ Davies 1964a.
  18. ^ Davies 1964b.
  19. ^ Anon. 1964.
  20. ^ Davis 1982, 89.
  21. ^ Brody 1992.

Sources

Further reading

  • Bollert, Werner. 1964. "Roger Sessions: Montezuma". Musica 18 (July–August): 206.
  • Di Steffano, Giovanni. 2013. "La conquista del Messico come clash of civilizations" Il Saggiatore Musicale 20, no. 2:215–35.
  • Laufer, Edward C. 1965. "Roger Sessions: Montezuma". Perspectioves of New Music 4, no. 1 (Fall-Winter): 95–108.
  • Mason, Charles Norman. 1982. 'A Comprehensive Analysis of Roger Sessions' Opera Montezuma'. DMA diss. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
  • Oppens, K. 1982. "Von hohem Anspruch; Roger Sessions' Montezuma im New Yorker Juilliard Center". Opernwelt 23, no. 6:54
  • Peyser, Joan. 1982. "'Montezuma' Reaches New York—at Last". The New York Times (February 14): D21, 26.
  • Porter, Andrew. 1982. 'A Magnificent Epic'. The New Yorker (March): 128 & 132.
  • Rich, Alan. 1976. "Noble Savage, Noble Failure". New York Magazine (19 April): 90.
  • Rockwell, John. 1976. "Sessions Montezuma Comes to U.S." New York Times (2 April): 19.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montezuma_(Sessions_opera)&oldid=1194584488"