Muhammad ibn al-Qasim
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim | |
---|---|
محمد بن القاسم | |
1st Governor of al-Sindh | |
In office 712–715 | |
Leader | Al-Walid I |
Preceded by | Position established |
Succeeded by | Habib ibn al-Muhallab |
Personal details | |
Born | (711) | 31 December 695
Muḥammad ibn al-Qāsim al-Thaqafī (
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim belonged to the
Sources
Information about Muhammad ibn al-Qasim and the Arab conquest of Sind in the medieval Arabic sources is limited, compared to the contemporary
Origins and early life
Muhammad was born in c. 694.
Muhammad belonged to the Abu Aqil family of the Banu Awf, one of the two principal branches of the Thaqif.
No information is provided by the Arabic sources about Muhammad's childhood and adolescence.
Al-Hajjaj was highly fond of Muhammad,[10] and considered him prestigious enough to marry his sister Zaynab,[11] though she preferred the older Thaqafite al-Hakam ibn Ayyub ibn al-Hakam, to whom she was ultimately wed.[12][13] The Kitab al-aghani refers to Muhammad at the age of 17 as "the noblest Thaqafite of his time".[14] In the summation of Baloch, "Muhammad grew up under favourable conditions into an able, energetic and cultured lad of fine tastes".[15]
Governor of Fars
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's first assignment was in the province
Fars might have also had at this time some of the rebels leftover from the revolt of
Background on Sindh
Early Muslim presence
The connection between the Hindu Sind and
Umayyad interest in Sindh
According to Wink,
Also cited as a reason for this campaign was the policy of providing refuge to Sassanids fleeing the
These Arabs were imprisoned later on by Governor Deebal Partaab Raye. A letter written by an Arab girl named Nahed who escaped from the prison of Partab Raye asked Hajjaj Bin Yusuf for help. When Hajjaj asked Dahir for the release of prisoners and compensation, the latter refused on the ground that he had no control over those. Al-Hajjaj sent Muhammad ibn al-Qasim for action against the Sindh in 711. [citation needed]
The
Conquest of valley of Sindh
Hajjaj had put more care and planning into this campaign than the second campaign.
The first town assaulted in Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's Sindh campaign was
At Aror (Rohri) Muhammad ibn al-Qasim was met by Dahir's forces and the eastern Jats in battle.[30] Dahir died in the battle, his forces were defeated and Muhammad ibn al-Qasim took control of Sindh.[30] In the wake of the battle enemy soldiers were executed, though artisans, merchants, and farmers were spared, and Dahir[clarification needed] and his chiefs, the "daughters of princes" and the usual fifth of the booty and slaves were sent to al-Hajjaj.[30]
Soon the capitals of the other provinces, Brahmanabad, Alor (Battle of Aror) and
The conquest of Sindh (and areas of
Military and political strategy
The military strategy had been outlined by Al-Hajjaj in a letter sent to Muhammad ibn al-Qasim:[33]
My ruling is given: Kill anyone belonging to the ahl-i-harb (combatants); arrest their sons and daughters for hostages and imprison them. Whoever does not fight against us...grant them aman (peace and safety) and settle their tribute [amwal] as dhimmah (protected person)...
The Arabs' first concern was to facilitate the conquest of Sindh with the fewest casualties while also trying to preserve the economic infrastructure.[34] Towns were given two options: submit to Islamic authority peacefully or be attacked by force (anwattan), with the choice governing their treatment upon capture.[34] The capture of towns was usually accomplished by means of a treaty with a party from among the enemy, who were then extended special privileges and material rewards.[35] There were two types of such treaties, "Sulh" or "ahd-e-wasiq (capitulation)" and "aman (surrender/ peace)".[35] Among towns and fortresses that were captured through force of arms, Muhammad ibn al-Qasim performed executions of ahl-i-harb (fighting men) as part of his military strategy, whose surviving dependants were enslaved.[35]
Casualties
Where resistance was strong, prolonged, and intensive, often resulting in considerable Arab casualties, Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's response was dramatic, inflicting 6,000 deaths at Aror (Rohri), between 6,000 and 26,000 at Brahmanabad, 4,000 at Iskalandah (Uch), and 6,000 at Multan.[36] Conversely, in areas taken by sulh, such as Armabil, Nirun, and Aror, resistance was light and few casualties occurred.[36] Sulh appeared to be Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's preferred mode of conquest, the method used for more than 60% of the towns and tribes recorded by al-Baladhuri and the Chach Nama.[36] At one point, he was actually berated by Al-Hajjaj for being too lenient.[36] Meanwhile, the common folk were often pardoned and encouraged to continue working;[35] Al-Hajjaj ordered that this option not be granted to any inhabitant of Debal, yet Muhammad ibn al-Qasim still bestowed it upon certain groups and individuals.[36]
Reasons for success
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's success has been partly ascribed to Dahir being an unpopular Hindu king ruling over a
Along with this were:
- Superior military equipment; such as
- Troop discipline and leadership.[28]
- The concept of Jihad as a morale booster.[28]
- Religion, i.e. the widespread belief in the prophecy of Muslim success.[28][38]
- The Samanis being persuaded to submit and not take up arms because the majority of the population was Buddhist who were dissatisfied with their rulers, who were Hindu.[38]
- The labouring under disabilities of the Lohana Jats.[38]
- Defections from among Dahir's chiefs and nobles.[38]
Administration of Sindh
After the conquest, Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's task was to set up an administrative structure for a stable Muslim state that incorporated a newly conquered alien land, inhabited by non-Muslims.
Everywhere taxes (mal) and tribute (
Incorporation of ruling elite into administration
During his administration, Hindus and Buddhists were inducted into the administration as trusted advisors and governors.[28] A Hindu, Kaksa, was at one point the second most important member of his administration.[42] Dahir's prime minister and various chieftains were also incorporated into the administration.[43]
Clashes with the Jats
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (March 2009) |
Significant medieval
Religion
Lane-Poole writes that, "as a rule Muslim government was at once tolerant and economic".[45] The preference of collection of jizya over the conversion to Islam is a major economic motivator.[46][47] Hindus and Buddhists who were classified as Dhimmis had to pay mandatory Jizya instead of Zakat paid by Muslims.[48][49] Contrastingly preferential treatment was given to a small number of people who were converted to Islam by "exempting them from Jizya in lieu of paying the Zakat".[41] Muhammad ibn al-Qasim fixed the Zakat at 10% of the agricultural produce.[50] have to pay the mandatory jizya.[51][52][53] "In Al-Biruni's narrative", according to Manan Ahmed Asif – a historian of Islam in South and South East Asia, "Muhammad bin Qasim first asserts the superiority of Islam over the polytheists by committing a taboo (killing a cow) and publicly soiling the idol (giving the cow meat as an offering)" before allowing the temple to continue as a place of worship.[54]
A religious Islamic office, "sadru-I-Islam al affal", was created to oversee the secular governors.[41] The native hereditary elites were reappointed with the title of Rana. According to Yohanan Friedmann, Muhammad ibn al-Qasim declared that the Brahmins of Brahmanabad were good people.[50]
While
It has been reported that Muhammad ibn al-Qasim met with Sayyida Ruqayya bint Ali, a daughter of Ali ibn Abi Talib.[57]
Death
Al-Hajjaj died in 714, followed a year later by Caliph al-Walid I, who was succeeded by his brother Sulayman. The latter took revenge against the generals and officials who had been close to al-Hajjaj. Sulayman owed political support to al-Hajjaj's opponents and so recalled both of al-Hajjaj's successful generals Qutayba ibn Muslim, the conqueror of Transoxiana (Central Asia) and Muhammad. He also appointed the son of the distinguished general al-Muhallab ibn Abi Sufra, Yazid, who was once imprisoned and tortured by al-Hajjaj, as the governor of Fars, Kirman, Makran, and Sind; he immediately placed Muhammad in chains.[58]
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim died on 18 July 715 in Mosul which is a part of the modern-day Iraq. Some sources say that his body was transferred to Makran in Balochistan at the Hingol National Park which is part of modern-day Pakistan.
There are two different accounts regarding the details of Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's fate:
- According to al-Baladhuri Muhammad was killed due to a family feud with the governor of Iraq. Sulayman was hostile toward Muhammad because apparently, he had followed the order of Hajjaj to declare Sulayman's right of succession void in all territories conquered by him. When Muhammad received the news of the death of al-Hajjaj he returned to Aror. Muhammad was later arrested under the orders of the Caliph by the replacement governor of Sindh, Yazid ibn Abi Kabsha al-Saksaki, who worked under the new military governor of Iraq, Yazid ibn al-Muhallab, and the new fiscal governor, the mawla Salih ibn Abd al-Rahman. Salih, whose brother was executed by al-Hajjaj, tortured Muhammad and his relatives to death. The account of his death by al-Baladhuri is brief compared to the one in the Chach Nama.[28][59][60]
- The Chach Nama narrates a tale in which Muhammad's demise is attributed to the daughters of Dahir, Surya Devi and Parimal Devi, who had been taken captive during the campaign. Upon capture their mother had been made a slave of Muhammad himself,[61] while the two sisters had been sent on as presents to the Caliph for his harem in the capital Baghdad (however Baghdad had not yet been built and the actual capital was Damascus). The account relates that they then tricked the Caliph into believing that Muhammad had violated them before sending them on and as a result of this subterfuge, Muhammad was wrapped and stitched in oxen hides,[62] and sent to Syria, which resulted in his death en route from suffocation.[63] This narrative attributes their motive for this subterfuge to securing vengeance for their father's death. Upon discovering this subterfuge, the Caliph is recorded to have been filled with remorse and ordered the sisters buried alive in a wall.[38][59][64]
Aftermath
After Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's departure, the next appointed Arab governor died on arrival. Dahir's son recaptured Brahmanabad and c. 720, he was granted pardon and included in the administration in return for converting to Islam. Soon, however, he recanted and split off when the Umayyads were embroiled in a succession crisis. Later,
Arab states in South Asia
During the
Controversy
There is controversy regarding the conquest and subsequent conversion of Sindh. This is usually voiced in two antagonistic perspectives viewing Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's actions.[67]
His conquest, as described by Stanley Lane-Poole, in Medieval India (Published in 1970 by Haskell House Publishers Ltd), was "liberal". He imposed the customary poll tax, took hostages for good conduct and spared peoples' lives and lands. He even left their shrines undesecrated: 'The temples;' he proclaimed, 'shall be inviolate, like the churches of the Christians, the synagogues of the Jews and altars of the Magians'.[68] In the same text, however, it is mentioned that "Occasional desecration of Hindu fanes took place... but such demonstrations were probably rare sops to the official conscience...", as destruction of temples and civilian massacres still took place.[69]
- Coercive conversion has been attributed to early historians such as Elliot, Cousens, Majumdar and Vaidya.[36] They hold the view that the conversion of Sindh was necessitated. Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's numerical inferiority is said to explain any instances of apparent religious toleration, with the destruction of temples seen as a reflection of the more basic, religiously motivated intolerance.[36]
- Voluntary conversion has been attributed to Thomas W. Arnold and modern Muslim historians such as Habib and Qureishi. They believe that the conquest was largely peaceful, and the conversion entirely so, and that the Arab forces enacted liberal, generous and tolerant policies.[36] These historians mention the "praiseworthy conduct of Arab Muslims" and attribute their actions to a "superior civilizational complex".[70]
Various polemical perceptions of Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism are also reflected in this debate.[71] The period of Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's rule has been called by U.T. Thakkur "the darkest period in Sindh history", with the records speaking of massive forced conversions, temple destruction, slaughters and genocides; the people of Sindh, described as inherently pacifist due to their Hindu/Buddhist religious inclinations, had to adjust to the conditions of "barbarian inroad".[72] On one extreme, the Arab Muslims are seen as being compelled by religious stricture to conquer and forcibly convert Sindh, but on the other hand, they can be seen as being respectful and tolerant of non-Muslims as part of their religious duty, with conversion being facilitated by the vitality, equality and morals of the Islamic religion.[71] Citations of towns taken either violently or bloodlessly, reading back into Arab Sindh information belonging to a later date and dubious accounts such as those of the forcible circumcision of Brahmins at Debal or Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's consideration of Hindu sentiment in forbidding the slaughter of cows are used as examples for one particular view or the other.[71]
Some historians strike a middle ground, saying that Muhammad ibn al-Qasim was torn between the political expediency of making peace with the Hindus and Buddhists; having to call upon non-Muslims to serve under him as part of his mandate to administer newly conquered land; and orthodoxy by refraining from seeking the co-operation of "infidels". It is contended that he may have struck a middle ground, conferring the status of Dhimmi upon the native Sindhis and permitting them to participate in his administration, but treating them as "non-citizens" (i.e. in the Caliphate, but not of it).[41]
While Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's warring was clearly at times brutal, he is supposed to have said of Hinduism that 'the idol temple is similar to the churches of the Christians, (to the synagogues) of the Jews and to the
Legacy
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim's presence and rule was very brief. His conquest for the Umayyads brought Sindh into the orbit of the Muslim world.
From
Port Qasim, Pakistan's second major port, is named in honor of Muhammad ibn al-Qasim.[80] Bagh Ibn Qasim is the largest park in Karachi (Sindh, Pakistan), named in honour of Muhammad ibn al-Qasim. Ibn-e-Qasim Bagh Stadium, Multan is a multi-use stadium named after Muhammad ibn al-Qasim. The Pakistan Naval Station Qasim, or PNS Qasim, is the major naval special operations base for the Amphibious Special Operations Forces in the Pakistan Navy named after Muhammad ibn al-Qasim. Bin Qasim Town in Karachi is named after Muhammad ibn al-Qasim.
See also
- Jat people in Islamic history
- Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent
- Caliphate campaigns in India
- Abdullah Shah Ghazi
- Shaikh Habib Al-Raee
Notes
- ^ The Indus River during this time flowed to the east of Nerun, but a 10th-century earthquake caused the river to change to its course
References
- ^ a b c d Gabrieli 1965, p. 281.
- ^ Gabrieli 1965, pp. 281–282.
- ^ Baloch 1953, p. 244.
- ^ a b c Gabrieli 1965, p. 282.
- ^ Lecker 2000, p. 432.
- ^ a b c d Baloch 1953, p. 243.
- ^ Baloch 1953, pp. 243–244.
- ^ Baloch 1953, p. 244, note 11.
- ^ a b c d Baloch 1953, p. 245.
- ^ a b Baloch 1953, pp. 245–246.
- ^ a b c d Friedmann 1993, p. 405.
- ^ Gabrieli 1965, p. 283.
- ^ Baloch 1953, p. 247.
- ^ Gabrieli 1965, pp. 282–283.
- ^ Baloch 1953, p. 246.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-415-96692-4
- ISBN 9789694020457
- ISBN 978-0-295-98391-2
- ISBN 978-1-62412-076-3
- ISBN 90-04-08551-3
- ^ History of al-Tabari Vol. 39, pp. 228, under "Those Who Died in the Year 111", State University of New York Press, (1998).
- ^ Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, "Tahdhib al-Tahdhib", Volume 7, pp 226, narrator no. 413.
- ^ a b c d MacLean1989, p. 126
- ^ S. A. A. Rizvi, "A socio-intellectual History of Isna Ashari Shi'is in India", Volo. 1, pp. 138, Mar'ifat Publishing House, Canberra (1986).
- ^ S. A. N. Rezavi, "The Shia Muslims", in History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization, Vol. 2, Part. 2: "Religious Movements and Institutions in Medieval India", Chapter 13, Oxford University Press (2006).
- ^ a b c d Wink 2002, p. 164
- ^ Wink 2002, pp. 51–52
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Nicholas F. Gier, From Mongols to Mughals: Religious violence in India 9th-18th centuries, Presented at the Pacific Northwest Regional Meeting American Academy of Religion, Gonzaga University, May 2006.
- ^ Shoeb, Robina (2016). "Female Sufism in Pakistan: A Case Study of Bibi Pak Daman". Pakistan Vision. 17 (1): 229.
But this version of the story is almost absent and not accepted by many historians, because Muhammad bin Qasim attacked Sindh to punish the then ruler of Sindh Raja Dahir who captured some Muslim women, and to release them he attacked Sindh.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Wink 2002, pp. 201–205
- ^ Wink 2002, p. 131
- ISBN 978-81-224-1198-0
- ^ MacLean 1989, pp. 37–39
- ^ a b MacLean 1989, pp. 37–39.
- ^ a b c d e Wink 2002, pp. 204–206
- ^ a b c d e f g h MacLean 1989, pp. 22–29.
- ^ "The fall of Multan laid the Indus valley at the feet of the conqueror. The tribes came in, 'ringing bells and beating drums and dancing,' in token of welcome. The Hindu rulers had oppressed them heavily, and the Jats and Meds and other tribes were on the side of the invaders. The work of conquest, as often happened in India, was thus aided by the disunion of the inhabitants, and jealousies of race and creed conspired to help the Muslims. To such suppliants, Mohammad Qasim gave the liberal terms that the Arabs usually offered to all but inveterate foes. He imposed the customary poll tax, took hostages for good conduct, and spared the people's lands and lives. He even left their shrines undesecrated: 'The temples,' he proclaimed, 'shall be inviolate, like the churches of the Christians, the synagogues of the Jews, and the altars of the Magians.'" Stanley Lane-Poole, Medieval India under Mohammedan Rule, 712-1764, G.P. Putnam's Sons. New York, 1970. p. 9-10
- ^ a b c d e f The Chachnamah, An Ancient History of Sind, Giving the Hindu period down to the Arab Conquest. (1900). Translated from the Persian by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg. Karachi: Commissioners Press.
- ISBN 9788170238720. Retrieved 30 July 2020 – via Google Books.
- ISBN 0226742210.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Appleby. pg. 291-292
- ^ H. M. Elliot and John Dowson, The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians, (London, 1867-1877), vol. 1, p. 203. "Kaksa took precedence in the army before all the nobles and commanders. He collected the revenue of the country and the treasury was placed under his seal. He assisted Muhammad Kásim in all of his undertakings..."
- ^ The Chach-Nama. English translation by Mirza Kalichbeg Fredunbeg. Delhi Reprint, 1979. Online version. Retrieved 3 October 2006
- ^ Chapter by S Jabir Raza Passages in the Chachnama, Zainul-Akhbar And Tarikh-i-Baihaqi, Text and Translation, from the book The Jats, Their Role and contribution to the socio-Economic Life and Polity of North and North-West India, Volume 2, pp. 43–52
- ^ Medieval India by Stanly Lane-Poole, Pub 1970, Page 10.
- ^ Habib Tiliouine, Richard J. Estes, 2016, "The State of Social Progress of Islamic Societies", Springer, page 338.
- ^ John Powell, 2010, "Weapons & Warfare: Warfare : culture and concepts", Salem Press, page 884.
- ^ (Quran 9:29) “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.”
- ^ (Sahih Bukhari Volume 4 Chapter 88) Narrated Ibn Umar that the Prophet said, "My livelihood is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated by paying Jizya."
- ^ a b Iqtidar Hisain Siddiqui, 2010, Indo-Persian historiography up to thirteenth century, Primum Books, Delhi.
- ^ Glenn, H. Patrick (2007). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press. pp. 218–219.
- ^ H. Patrick Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 219.
- ISBN 082645481X. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
- ISBN 978-0-674-97243-8.
- ^ Schimmel pg.4
- ^ a b Mohammad Yunus, Aradhana Parmar, 2003, "South Asia: A Historical Narrative", Oxford University Press, page 123.
- ^ Shoeb, Robina (2016). "Female Sufism in Pakistan: A Case Study of Bibi Pak Daman". Pakistan Vision. 17 (1): 225–229.
- ^ Wink 2002, p. 53
- ^ a b Keay, pg. 185
- ^ Wink 2002, pp. 207–
- ^ End of ‘Imad-ud-Din Muhammad ibn Qasim. The Arab Conqueror of Sind by S.M. Jaffar - Quarterly Islamic Culture, Hyderabad Deccan, Vol.19 Jan 1945
- ^ Pakistan, the cultural heritage by Aḥmad Shujāʻ Pāshā Sang-e-Meel Publications, 1998, Page 43
- ^ Balouch, Akhtar (8 April 2014). "Muhammad Bin Qasim: Predator or preacher?". Dawn. Pakistan. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ISBN 9788190891806.
- ^ Keay, pg 186-187
- ISBN 0-415-32814-4pg.102.
- ^ MacLean 1989, pp. 22–29
- ^ Medieval India by Stanley Lane-Poole, Published by Haskell House Publishers Ltd. NY 1970. Page 10
- ^ A Book of Conquest, p. 169, authored by Manan Ahmed Asif, published by Oxford University Press, 19-Sep-2016.
- ^ MacLean 1989, pp. 31–33
- ^ a b c MacLean 1989, pp. 31–33.
- ^ Sindhi Culture by U.T. Thakkur, University of Bombay 1959
- ^ Friedmann 1993, pp. 405–406.
- ^ Friedmann 1993, p. 406.
- ^ ISBN 0-521-62285-9, pg. 34.
- ISBN 1-4191-3994-0pg.45.
- ^ "Pakistan Movement". cybercity-online.net. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ a b Qasim Sodhar (17 June 2020). "Distorted history of the Subcontinent". Daily Times (newspaper). Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ^ "KARACHI: Babul Islam day observed". Dawn. Pakistan. Associated Press Of Pakistan. 7 November 2003. Retrieved 31 March 2021.
- ISBN 0-7007-0470-1
Bibliography
- Baloch, Nabi Bakhsh(October 1953). "Muhammad ibn al-Qasim: A Study of His Family Background and Personality". Islamic Culture. 27 (4): 242–271.
- JSTOR 29754928.
- ISBN 978-90-04-09419-2.
- Gier, Nicholas F. (2014), "From Mongols to Mughals : Hindu–Muslim relations in medieval India", The Origins of Religious Violence: An Asian Perspective, Lexington Books, ISBN 978-0-7391-9223-8
- Nicholas F. Gier, From Mongols to Mughals: Religious violence in India 9th-18th centuries, Presented at the Pacific Northwest Regional Meeting American Academy of Religion, Gonzaga University, May 2006.
- Lane-Poole, Stanley Medieval India under Mohammedan Rule, 712-1764, G.P. Putnam's Sons. New York, 1970
- Lecker, M. (2000). "Thakīf". In ISBN 978-90-04-11211-7.
- Schimmel, Annemarie, Islam in the Indian Subcontinent, Brill Academic Publishers, Jan 1, 1980, ISBN 90-04-06117-7
- Appleby, R Scott & Martin E Marty, Fundamentalisms Comprehended, University of Chicago Press, May 1, 2004, ISBN 0-226-50888-9
- Wink, André (1996) [first published 1990], Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Vol 1: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam (Third ed.), Brill, ISBN 0391041738
- Wink, André (2002) [first published 1990], Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Vol 1: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, Brill, ISBN 9780391041738
- Wink, André (2002) [first published 1990], Al-Hind: The Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Vol 1: Early Medieval India and the Expansion of Islam, Brill,
- Keay, John, India: A History, Grove Press, May 1, 2001, ISBN 0-8021-3797-0
- MacLean, Derryl N. (1989), Religion and Society in Arab Sind, BRILL, ISBN 90-04-08551-3
External links
- Media related to Muhammad bin Qasim at Wikimedia Commons