Natural theology
Part of a series on the |
Philosophy of religion |
---|
Philosophy of religion article index |
Natural theology, once also termed physico-theology,[1] is a type of theology that seeks to provide arguments for theological topics (such as the existence of a deity) based on reason and the discoveries of science, the project of arguing for the existence of God on the basis of observed natural facts, and through natural phenomena viewed as divine, or complexities of nature seen as evidence of a divine plan (see predestination) or Will of God, which includes nature itself.[2]
This distinguishes it from
For
The ideals of natural theology can be traced back to the
Marcus Terentius Varro (116–27 BCE) established a distinction between political theology (the social functions of religion), natural theology and mythical theology. His terminology became part of the Stoic tradition and then Christianity through Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas.[10]
Ancient Greece
Besides
Ancient Rome
Middle Ages
From the 8th century CE, the
Early modern
William Derham (1657–1735) continued Ray's tradition of natural theology in two of his own works, Physico-Theology, published during 1713, and Astro-Theology, 1714. These later influenced the work of William Paley.[21]
Nineteenth century
William Paley, an important influence on Charles Darwin,[22] gave a well-known rendition of the teleological argument for God. During 1802 he published Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity collected from the Appearances of Nature.[23] In this he described the Watchmaker analogy, for which he is probably best known. His book, which was one of the most-published books of the 19th and 20th centuries, presents a number of teleological and cosmological arguments for the existence of God. The book served as a template for many subsequent natural theologies during the 19th century.[24]
The Bridgewater Treatises were eight works "the Power, Wisdom, and Goodness of God, as manifested in the Creation" published during the years 1833 to 1836. They were written by eight scientific authors appointed by the President of the Royal Society using an £8000 bequest from Francis Henry Egerton, 8th Earl of Bridgewater. The series, which was widely read, offered extensive discussion concerning the relationship between religion and science, and many of the authors offered observations on natural theology, although their views on the subject differed widely.[25] Responding critically to one of the series, Charles Babbage published what he termed The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise: A Fragment.[26]
Professor of chemistry and natural history Edward Hitchcock also studied and wrote on natural theology. He attempted to unify and reconcile science and religion, emphasizing geology. His major work of this type was The Religion of Geology and its Connected Sciences (1851).[27]
The
Criticism
The ideas of natural theology did not come without criticism. Many opposed the idea of natural theology, but some philosophers had a greater influence, including David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Søren Kierkegaard, and Charles Darwin. Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics also heavily opposed the entirety of natural theology.[29]
David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion played a major role in Hume's standpoint on natural theology. Hume's ideas heavily stem from the idea of natural belief.[30] It was stated that, "Hume's doctrine of natural belief allows that certain beliefs are justifiably held by all men without regard to the quality of the evidence which may be produced in their favour".[30] However, Hume's argument also stems from the design argument.[31] The design argument comes from people being labeled as morally good or evil.[31] Hume's argument claims that if we restrict ourselves to the idea of good and evil, that we must also assign this to the designer as well.[31] Hume states, "I will allow that pain or misery in man is compatible with infinite power and goodness in the Deity...A mere possible compatibility is not sufficient. You must prove these pure, unmixt, and uncontrollable attributes...".[31] Hume argues for the idea of a morally perfect deity and requires evidence for anything besides that.[31] Hume's arguments against natural theology had a wide influence on many philosophers.[32]
Charles Darwin's criticism of the theory had a broader impact on scientists and commoners.[32] Darwin's theories showed that humans and animals developed through an evolutionary process. This implied that a chemical reaction was occurring; but it had no influence from the idea of God.[32] However, Darwin's ideas did not erase the question of how the original ideas of matter came to be.[32]
Faith and fideism
Immanuel Kant and Søren Kierkegaard had similar ideas about natural theology.[33] Kant's ideas focused more on the natural dialect of reason, while Kierkegaard focused more on the dialect of understanding.[33] Both men suggest that "the natural dialect leads to the question of God".[33] Kant argues for the idea that reason leads to the ideas of God as a regulative principle.[33] Kierkegaard argues that the idea of understanding will ultimately lead itself to becoming faith.[clarification needed][34] Both of these men argue that the idea of God cannot be based solely on the idea of reason, that the dialect and ideals will transcend into faith.[clarification needed][33]
Søren Kierkegaard questioned the existence of God, rejecting all rational arguments for God's existence (including the teleological argument) on the grounds that reason is inevitably accompanied by doubt.[36] He proposed that the argument from design does not take into consideration future events which may serve to undermine the proof of God's existence: the argument would never finish proving God's existence.[37] In the Philosophical Fragments, Kierkegaard writes:
The works of God are such that only God can perform them. Just so, but where then are the works of the God? The works from which I would deduce his existence are not directly and immediately given. The wisdom in nature, the goodness, the wisdom in the governance of the world – are all these manifest, perhaps, upon the very face of things? Are we not here confronted with the most terrible temptations to doubt, and is it not impossible finally to dispose of all these doubts? But from such an order of things I will surely not attempt to prove God's existence; and even if I began I would never finish, and would in addition have to live constantly in suspense, lest something so terrible should suddenly happen that my bit of proof would be demolished.
— Søren Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments[37]
Fideists may reject attempts to prove God's existence.[38]
See also
References
- ^ "Physicotheology | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Chignell, Andrew; Pereboom, Derk (2020), "Natural Theology and Natural Religion", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 9 October 2020
- ^ McGrath, Alister (2022). "Natural Theology". St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology.
- ^ Wahlberg, Mats (2020), "Divine Revelation", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 9 October 2020
- ^ "Natural Theology | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ a b Swinburne, Richard (2007). "THE REVIVAL OF NATURAL THEOLOGY". Archivio di Filosofia. 75: 303–322 – via JSTOR.
- ^ McGrath, Alister (2022). "Natural Theology". St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology.
- ISBN 978-0-567-08464-4.
usually assigned to the late first century BCE
- ^ a b "Plato, Timaeus".
- ^ McGrath, Alister (2022). "Natural Theology". St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology.
- ^ "Plato, Laws".
- ^ "Marcus Terentius Varro | Roman author". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- ^ "Charles Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Past and Present" (PDF). earth.northwestern.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 June 2010.
- ISBN 9004089853.
- ^ Hedley Brooke, John. Science and Religion. 1991.
- ^ "DOES THE EMPIRICAL NATURE OF SCIENCE CONTRADICT THE REVELATORY NATURE OF FAITH? - Edge.org". edge.org.
- ^ "Thomas Aquinas' Five Ways (Part 2): Contingency, Goodness, Design". thatreligiousstudieswebsite.com.
- ISBN 0-85244-516-4.
- ^ "Principles of Natural Theology 2". maritain.nd.edu. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ Youpa, Andrew (2016), "Leibniz's Ethics", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 9 October 2020
- ^ Weber, AS., Nineteenth-Century Science: An Anthology, Broadview Press, 2000, p. 18.
- ISBN 9789814583992.
- ^ Paley, William (2006). Natural Theology, Matthew Daniel Eddy and David M. Knight (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Eddy, Matthew Daniel (2013). "Nineteenth Century Natural Theology". The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology.
- OCLC 1298713346.
- ^ Babbage, Charles (24 October 2018). "The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise. A Fragment". John Murray – via Google Books.
- ^ Hitchcock, Edward. "Making of America Books: The religion of geology and its connected sciences". University of Michigan. Retrieved 8 August 2009.[page needed]
- ^ See Gifford Lectures online database accessed 15 October 2010.
- ^ – via JSTOR.
- ^ S2CID 170299604.
- ^ S2CID 170294685– via JSTOR.
- ^ a b c d Swinburne, Richard (2007). "The Revival of Natural Theology". Archivio di Filosofia. 75: 303–322 – via JSTOR.
- ^ – via JSTOR.
- ^ Pourmohammadi, Na'imeh (2013). "KIERKEGAARD AND THE ASH'ARITES ON REASON AND THEOLOGY". Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica. 105: 591–609 – via JSTOR.
- JSTOR 2023755– via JSTOR.
- ISBN 978-1-78087-092-2.
- ^ a b Søren Kierkegaard, Philosophical Fragments (1844).
- ^ "Arguments for the existence of God" (PDF). Hodder Education. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 October 2022.
Further reading
- A Bridgewater Treatise for the 21st Century. Science. (Vol 301, p. 1051, 22 August 2003). A review by Robert T. Pennock of philosopher of science Michael Ruse's book Darwin & Design.
- Babbage, C., The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise; Murray, 1837 (reissued by ISBN 978-1-108-00000-0)
- Bascom, John, Natural Theology (1880)
- John B. Cobb, A Christian Natural Theology, 1965 (online edition)
- Connolly, Brendan, The Natural Religion, 2008; ISBN 978-0-9558313-0-0
- Hauerwas, Stanley, With the Grain of the Universe: The Church's Witness and Natural Theology ISBN 1-58743-016-9
- Hernández Valencia, J.S. La teología natural de la tradición metafísica milesia, ABT 7 (2022), 139-162 [1]
- Paley, W., Natural Theology. Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature; Bridgewater Treatises, Faulder, 1803 (reissued by ISBN 978-1-108-00355-1)
- Polkinghorne, J. and Oord, T.J., The Polkinghorne Reader] : Science, Faith, and the Search for Meaning (SPCK and Templeton Foundation Press, 2010) ISBN 978-0-281-06053-5
- Topham, J. R. Reading the Book of Nature: How Eight Bestsellers Reconnected Christianity and the Sciences on the Eve of the Victorian Age, University of Chicago Press, 2022; ISBN 978-0-226-81576-4
- Waters, B.V. (2015). "Toward a new kalām cosmological argument". Cogent Arts & Humanities. 2 (1). .
External links
- Apollos.ws A Christian site surveying arguments for the existence of God and responses to common arguments against.
- Toward a new kalām cosmological argument
- Catholic Encyclopedia article Bridgewater Treatises
- Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume
- Babbage, Charles The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise 2nd edn. 1838, London: John Murray.
- Natural Theology article in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy