Neurophenomenology
Neurophenomenology refers to a scientific research program aimed to address the hard problem of consciousness in a pragmatic way.[1] It combines neuroscience with phenomenology in order to study experience, mind, and consciousness with an emphasis on the embodied condition of the human mind.[2] The field is very much linked to fields such as neuropsychology, neuroanthropology and behavioral neuroscience (also known as biopsychology) and the study of phenomenology in psychology.
Overview
The label was coined by C. Laughlin, J. McManus and E. d'Aquili in 1990.[3] However, the term was appropriated and given a distinctive understanding by the cognitive neuroscientist Francisco Varela in the mid-1990s,[4] whose work has inspired many philosophers and neuroscientists to continue with this new direction of research.
Phenomenology is a philosophical method of inquiry of everyday experience. The focus in phenomenology is on the examination of different phenomena (from Greek, phainomenon, "that which shows itself") as they appear to consciousness, i.e. in a first-person perspective. Thus, phenomenology is a discipline particularly useful for understanding how it is that appearances present themselves to us and how it is that we attribute meaning to them.[5][6]
Neuroscience is the scientific study of the brain, and deals with the third-person aspects of consciousness.[7] Some scientists studying consciousness believe that the exclusive utilization of either first- or third-person methods will not provide answers to the difficult questions of consciousness.[8]
Historically,
Naturally, phenomenology and neuroscience find a convergence of common interests. However, primarily because of ontological disagreements between phenomenology and
See also
- Antonio Damasio
- Autopoiesis
- Biogenetic structuralism
- Biosemiotics
- Embodied cognition
- Francisco Varela
- Hubert Dreyfus
- Walter Freeman
References
- PMID 12795206.
- ISBN 978-0-19-856951-0.
- OCLC 20759009.
- ^ Varela, F.J. (1 April 1996). "Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 3 (4): 330–349.
- ^ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Phenomenology
- ^ Gallagher, S. and Zahavi, D. 2008. The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge, Chapter 2.
- ^ "Neuroscience". c.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 21 July 2021.
- ^ Engel, Andreas K.; Friston, Karl J.; Kragic, Danica, eds. (2016). The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
- ^ Debate Between D. Chalmers and D. Dennett: The Fantasy of First-Person Science
- ^ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Edmund Husserl
- ISBN 9781107699052.
- Evan Thompson (7 October 2014). "Phenomenology and Naturalism: Examining the Relationship between Human Experience and Nature". Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (Review).
- ^ "Hubert Dreyfus 'Intelligence Without Representation: Merleau-Ponty's Critique of Mental Representation'". Archived from the original on 2008-12-01. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
Further reading
- MacLennan, Bruce J. (April 2019). S2CID 171757240.
- Andrieu, Bernard (2006). "Brains in the Flesh: Prospects for a Neurophenomenology" (PDF). Janus Head. 9 (1).
- Petitot, Jean (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3610-7.
External links
- Eugenio Borrelli page: Phenomenology and Cognitive Science at the Wayback Machine (archived 2012-02-18)
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Phenomenology
- Francisco Varela's Articles on Neurophenomenology and First-person Methods
- Michael Winkelman at archive.today (archived 2012-12-09)
- http://www.neurophenomenology.com
- Hubert Dreyfus 'Intelligence Without Representation: Merleau-Ponty's Critique of Mental Representation'
- Debate Between D. Chalmers and D. Dennett: The Fantasy of First-Person Science