New York accent
The
The following is an overview of the phonological structures and variations within the accent.
Vowels
Pure vowels (Monophthongs) | ||
---|---|---|
English diaphoneme | New York City realization | Example words |
/æ/ | [æ] ⓘ | act, pal, trap |
[ɛə~eə~ɪə] ⓘ
|
bath, mad, pass | |
/ɑː/ | [ɑ~ɑ̈~ɒ(ə)] ⓘ | blah, father |
/ɒ/ | [ɑ~ɑ̈] ⓘ | bother, lot, wasp |
[ɔə~oə~ʊə] | dog, loss, cloth | |
/ɔː/ | all, bought, taught, saw | |
/ɛ/ | [ɛ] | dress, met, bread |
/ə/ | [ə] | about, syrup, arena |
/ɪ/ | [ɪ~ɪ̈] | hit, skim, tip |
/iː/ | [i~ɪi][4][5] | beam, chic, fleet |
/ʌ/ | [ʌ̈] | bus, flood |
/ʊ/ | [ʊ] | book, put, should |
/uː/ | [u] or [ʊu~ɤʊ~ɤu][5] | food, glue, new |
Diphthongs | ||
/aɪ/ | [ɑɪ~ɒɪ~äɪ] ⓘ | ride, shine, try |
[äɪ] ⓘ | bright, dice, pike | |
/aʊ/ | [a̟ʊ~æʊ][6] | now, ouch, scout |
/eɪ/ | [eɪ~ɛɪ] ⓘ | lake, paid, rein |
/ɔɪ/ | [ɔɪ~oɪ] ⓘ | boy, choice, moist |
/oʊ/ | [ɔʊ~ʌʊ] | goat, oh, show |
Vowels followed by /r/ | ||
/ɑːr/ | [ɒə] ⓘ (rhotic: [ɒɹ~ɑɹ]; older: [ɑ̈ə]) |
barn, car, park |
/ɪər/ | [ɪə~iə] ⓘ (rhotic: [ɪɹ~iɹ]) | fear, peer, tier |
/ɛər/ | [ɛə~eə] (rhotic: [ɛɹ~eɹ]) | bare, bear, there |
/ɜːr/ | [ɝ] ⓘ (older: [əɪ]) | burn, first, herd |
[ɝ] or [ʌ(ː)~ʌə][7][8] | her, were, stir | |
/ər/ | [ə] (rhotic: [ɚ]) | doctor, martyr, pervade |
/ɔːr/ | [ɔə~oɐ] (rhotic: [ɔɹ~oɹ]) | hoarse, horse, poor score, tour, war |
/ʊər/ | ||
/jʊər/ | [juə~juɐ] (rhotic: [juɹ])[9] | cure, Europe, pure |
- raised and tensed to an ingliding diphthong of the type [ɛə~eə] or even [ɪə]. Meanwhile, the latter set of words retains a more typical lax and low-front [æ] sound. A strongly related (but slightly different) split occurs likewise in Philadelphia and Baltimore accents.
/æ/ raising in North American English[17] Following
consonantExample
words[18]New York City,
New Orleans[19]Baltimore,
Philadelphia[20]Midland US,
New England,
Pittsburgh,
Western USSouthern
USCanada, Northern
Mountain USMinnesota,
WisconsinGreat Lakes
USNon-prevocalic
/m, n/fan, lamb, stand [ɛə][21][A][B] [ɛə][21] [ɛə~ɛjə][24] [ɛə][25] [ɛə][26] Prevocalic
/m, n/animal, planet,
Spanish[æ] /ŋ/[27] frank, language [ɛː~eɪ~æ][28] [æ~æɛə][24] [ɛː~ɛj][25] [eː~ej][29] Non-prevocalic
/ɡ/bag, drag [ɛə][A] [æ][C] [æ][21] Prevocalic /ɡ/ dragon, magazine [æ] Non-prevocalic
/b, d, ʃ/grab, flash, sad [ɛə][A] [æ][D][31] [ɛə][31] Non-prevocalic
/f, θ, s/ask, bath, half,
glass[ɛə][A] Otherwise as, back, happy,
locality[æ][E] - ^ a b c d In New York City and Philadelphia, most function words (am, can, had, etc.) and some learned or less common words (alas, carafe, lad, etc.) have [æ].[22]
- ^ In Philadelphia, the irregular verbs began, ran, and swam have [æ].[23]
- ^ In Philadelphia, bad, mad, and glad alone in this context have [ɛə].[22]
- Canadian Shift.[30]
- ^ In New York City, certain lexical exceptions exist (like avenue being tense) and variability is common before /dʒ/ and /z/ as in imagine, magic, and jazz.[32]
In New Orleans, [ɛə] additionally occurs before /v/ and /z/.[33]
- Conservative /oʊ/ and /u/: /oʊ/ as in goat usually does not undergo fronting; instead, it remains [oʊ] and may even have a lowered starting point. Relatedly, /u/ as in GOOSE is not fronted and remains a back vowel [u] or [ʊu], although it may be more fronted following a Mary–marry–merry distinction, in which the vowels in words like marry [ˈmæɹi], merry [ˈmɛɹi], and Mary [ˈmeɹi] ~ [ˈmɛəɹi] do not merge.[37] The vowels in furry [ˈfɝi] and hurry [ˈhʌɹi] are commonly distinct. Also, words like orange, horrible, Florida and forest are pronounced with /ɒ/ or /ɑ/, the same stressed vowel as part, not with the same vowel as port as in much of the rest of the United States.[37]
/ɒr/ and prevocalic /ɔːr/ by dialect Distribution ofReceived
PronunciationGeneral
AmericanMetropolitan New
York, Philadelphia,
some Southern US,
some New EnglandCanada Only borrow, sorrow, sorry, (to)morrow /ɒr/ /ɑːr/ /ɒr/ or /ɑːr/ /ɔːr/ Forest, Florida, historic, moral, porridge, etc. /ɔːr/ Forum, memorial, oral, storage, story, etc. /ɔːr/ /ɔːr/ - Back vowel chain shift before /r/: /ɔr/, as in Tory, bore, or shore merges with a tongue movement upward in the mouth to /ʊər/, as in tour, boor, or sure. This is followed by the possibility of /ɑr/, as in tarry or bar, also moving upward (with rounding) towards /ɒr/~/ɔr/. In non-rhotic New York City speech, this means that born can be [bʊən] and barn can be [bɒən]. This shift also applies to instances of /ɔ/ not before /r/, so caught can be [kʊət]. However, unlike the firmness of this shift in Philadelphia English, the entire process is still transitioning and variable in New York City English[38] and may be stigmatized and reversing among some younger speakers.[39]
Consonants
While the following consonantal features are central to the common stereotype of a "New York City accent", they are not entirely ubiquitous in New York City. By contrast, the vocalic (vowel) variations in pronunciation as described above are far more typical of New York City–area speakers than the consonantal features listed below, which carry a much greater stigma than do the dialect's vocalic variations:
- labialized [ɹ̠ʷ] in New York City English, particularly when it appears as the first consonant in a syllable.[46]
- Non-rhoticity (or r-lessness): The traditional metropolitan New York accent is non-rhotic; in other words, the sound [ɹ] does not appear at the end of a syllable or immediately before a consonant. Thus, there is no [ɹ] in words like here [hɪə], butter [ˈbʌɾə], layer [ˈɫeɪ.ə], or park [pʰɒək] (with the vowel rounded due to the low-back chain shift, though [pʰɑ̈ək] for earlier twentieth-century speakers). However, modern New York City English is variably rhotic for the most part; in fact, the New York accent can vary between pronounced and silenced [ɹ] in similar phonetic environments, even in the same word when repeated.[47] Also, while a significant number drop r-coloring from the schwa /ə/ and most other vowels at least some of the time, as in butter, most current speakers retain r-coloring in the sequence /ɜːr/ (e.g., worker [ˈwɝkə]), as detailed in the previous section.[46] Non-rhotic speakers usually exhibit a linking R and frequently an intrusive R as well, like speakers of most other non-rhotic dialects.[48][49][50]
- Rhoticity (or r-fulness): In more modern times, the post-vocalic /r/ has become more prominent, with many current New York City speakers using rhoticity to at least some degree. When Metro New Yorkers are more conscious of what they are saying, the /r/ typically becomes more evident in their speech. In terms of social stratification, the lower class of New York City tends to use rhoticity less than the middle and upper classes. Also, rhoticity is noticeably based on age since younger generations are more likely to pronounce /r/ in coda position.[51][49][50]
- Non-rhoticity (or r-lessness): The traditional metropolitan New York accent is
- elided[54][55] or glottalized following /n/ in words like painting [ˈpʰeɪnɪŋ] and fountain [ˈfaʊnʔn̩]; glottalization, in particular, is reported to sometimes appear in a wider range of contexts in New York City speech than in other American dialects, appearing, for example, before syllabic /l/ (e.g., bottle [ˈbɑ̈ʔɫ̩]).[56][57] At the same time, before a pause, a released final stop is often more common than a glottal stop in New York City accents than in General American ones; for example, bat as [bæt̪] rather than [bæʔ].[58]
- The universal usage of "alveolar ridge, though this variant was not as "clear" as in British Received Pronunciation.[60]
- Also, /l/ is reported as commonly becoming postalveolar before /j/, making a word like William for some speakers [ˈwɪʎjɨm] or even [ˈwɪjɨm].[60]
- Vocalization of /l/: L-vocalization is common in New York City though it is perhaps not as pervasive as in some other dialects. Like its fellow liquid /r/, it may be vocalized when it appears finally or before a consonant (e.g., [sɛo] sell, [mɪok] milk).[61]
- The universal usage of "
- stop consonants, famously like [t] and [d], or affricates [tθ] and [dð].[62] Labov (1966) found this alternation to vary by class, with the non-fricative forms appearing more regularly in lower- and working-class speech. Unlike the reported changes with /r/, the variation with /θ/ and /ð/ appears to be stable.[50] Historical dialect documents suggest th-stopping probably originated from the massive influence of German, Italian, Irish, and Yiddish speakers who immigrated to the city starting in the mid–nineteenth century.[63]
- Reduction of /hj/ to /j/: Metro New Yorkers typically do not allow /h/ to precede /j/; this gives pronunciations like yuman /ˈjumən/ and yooge /judʒ/ for human and huge.[61]
Variability
Social and geographic variation
Despite common references to a "
In New Jersey
Though geographic differences are not a primary factor in the internal variation of features within the dialect, the prevalence of the dialect's features as a whole does vary within the metropolitan area based on distance from the city proper, notably in
Ethnic variation
The classic New York City dialect is centered on middle- and working-class
The many
One area revealing robustly unique patterns is New York City English among
African American New Yorkers typically speak a New York variant of
References
- ISBN 9781438431826
- ^ Labov (1966), p. 18
- ^ a b c Becker, Kara, and Newlin-Lukowicz, Luiza. "The Myth of the New York City Borough Accent: Evidence from Perception". Vol. 24.2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics, 2018. ScholarlyCommons. Web. 10 Oct. 2020.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 232
- ^ a b Heggarty, Paul; et al., eds. (2013). "Accents of English from Around the World: New York City (trad.)". University of Edinburgh. Archived from the original on March 5, 2023. Retrieved June 26, 2023.
- ^ a b Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 233
- ^ a b Labov (1966), p. 29, 242–244, 316
- ^ a b Wells (1982), pp. 508 ff.
- ^ Newman, 2014, p. 52.
- ^ Labov (1966)
- ^ a b Gordon (2004), p. 286
- ^ Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2010). "Stability and Change Along a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England". American Dialect Society 95. p. 218
- ^ Newman, Michael New York City English Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter
- ^ a b Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 235–236
- ^ Wells 1982: 514–515
- ^ Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2010). "Stability and Change Along a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England". American Dialect Society 95. p. 84.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 182.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 173–174.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 173–174, 260–261.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 173–174, 238–239.
- ^ a b c Duncan (2016), pp. 1–2.
- ^ a b Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 173.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 238.
- ^ a b Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 178, 180.
- ^ a b Boberg (2008), p. 145.
- ^ Duncan (2016), pp. 1–2; Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 175–177.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 183.
- ^ Baker, Mielke & Archangeli (2008).
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 181–182.
- ^ Boberg (2008), pp. 130, 136–137.
- ^ a b Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 82, 123, 177, 179.
- ^ Labov (2007), p. 359.
- ^ Labov (2007), p. 373.
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), pp. 145, 54, 56, 234
- ^ a b c Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006), p. 234
- ^ Gordon (2004), pp. 285, 287
- ^ a b Gordon (2004), pp. 285, 288
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:124)
- ^ Becker, Kara (August 13, 2014). "The social motivations of reversal: Raised BOUGHT in New York City English". Language in Society. 43 (4): 395–420.
- ^ Labov (1966), p. 215
- ^ Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 3." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. p. 51. "many New Yorkers who are heavy (r-0) users in words like contender, four, forth, hair, and her, are (r-1) users with NURSE."
- ^ Labov (1966), p. 216
- ^ Gordon (2004), pp. 286–287
- ^ Wells (1982), pp. 508–510
- ^ Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 3." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. p. 51.
- ^ a b Wells (1982), p. 508
- ^ David Edwards (April 24, 2016). "Chuck Todd Says Bernie Knows It's Over: 'Did We Just Hear The Bernie Sanders Exit Interview?'". Crooks and Liars. Archived from the original on May 11, 2016. Retrieved May 14, 2016.
- ^ Labov (1966)
- ^ a b Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 3." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. pp. 47–51.
- ^ a b c Gordon (2004), p. 288
- S2CID 143934434.
- ^ Wells (1982), pp. 515–516
- ^ Hubbell, 1950, pp. 26, 28, 136.
- ^ Hubbell, 1950, p. 26.
- S2CID 170993449.
- ^ Gordon (2004), pp. 288–289
- ^ Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 3." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. p. 85.
- ^ Newman, 2004, p. 85.
- ^ Newman, Michael (2014). New York City English. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
- ^ a b Hubbell, Allan Forbes (1950). The pronunciation of English in New York City: consonants and vowels. King's Crown Press.
- ^ a b c d Gordon (2004), p. 289
- ^ Labov (1966:36–37)
- ^ Newman, 2004, pp. 138-142.
- ^ Hubbell, 1950, pp. 10–11.
- ^ a b Pangilinan, Noel. "challenge". nyc24.jrn.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved November 26, 2013.
- ^ a b Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 3." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. p. 86-87.
- ^ Gordon (2004), p. 284
- ^ Newman, Michael (2014). "Chapter 2." New York City English. Berlin/NY: Mouton DeGruyter. p. 18.
- ^ Johnson, Daniel Ezra (2010). "Stability and Change Along a Dialect Boundary: The Low Vowels of Southeastern New England". American Dialect Society 95. p. 218.
- ^ Becker, Kara (2010). "Regional dialect features on the Lower East Side of New York City: Sociophonetics, ethnicity, and identity". ProQuest LLC: UMI Dissertation Publishing. New York University. pp. 147, 222.
- ^ Labov (2007), p. 356
- ^ Labov, Ash & Boberg (2006:47, 227)
- ^ Robert Siegel (March 12, 2005) [March 12, 1999]. "New Yawk Talk". NPR (Podcast). NPR. Event occurs at 4:54. Archived from the original on May 11, 2021. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
- ISBN 0-8122-1052-2
- ^ ISBN 978-0-5216-1291-3.
- ^ Slomanson, Peter & Newman, Michael (2004), "Peer group identification and variation in New York Latino English laterals", English World-Wide, 25: (2) pp. 199–216.
- ^ Newman, 2014, pp. 72-3.
- ^ Newman, 2014, pp. 39, 85.
Bibliography
- Baker, Adam; Mielke, Jeff; Archangeli, Diana (2008). "More velar than /g/: Consonant Coarticulation as a Cause of Diphthongization" (PDF). In Chang, Charles B.; Haynie, Hannah J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. pp. 60–68. ISBN 978-1-57473-423-2.
- Boberg, Charles (2008). "Regional phonetic differentiation in Standard Canadian English". Journal of English Linguistics. 36 (2): 129–154. S2CID 146478485.
- Duncan, Daniel (2016). "'Tense' /æ/ is still lax: A phonotactics study" (PDF). In Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur; Farris-Trimble, Ashley; McMullin, Kevin; Pulleyblank, Douglas (eds.). Supplemental Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: Linguistic Society of America. .
- Gordon, Matthew (2004). Kortmann, Bernd; Schneider, Edgar W. (eds.). New York, Philadelphia and other Northern Cities. Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3110175320.
- Labov, William (1966), The Social Stratification of English in New York City (PDF) (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-24
- Labov, William (2007). "Transmission and Diffusion" (PDF). Language. 83 (2): 344–387. S2CID 6255506.
- Labov, William; Ash, Sharon; Boberg, Charles (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-016746-8.
- ISBN 0-52128541-0
External links
- If These Knishes Could Talk: The Story of the New York Accent, 2013 documentary film. Film on YouTube.