News aggregator
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
In
Contemporary news aggregators include Microsoft Start, Yahoo! News, Feedly, Inoreader, and Mozilla Thunderbird.
Function
Aggregation technology often consolidates (sometimes
History
RSS began in 1999 "when it was first introduced by Internet browser pioneer Netscape".[2] In the beginning, RSS was not a user-friendly gadget and it took some years to spread. "...RDF-based data model that people inside Netscape felt was too complicated for end users."[3] The rise of RSS began in the early 2000s when the New York Times implemented RSS: "One of the first, most popular sites that offered users the option to subscribe to RSS feeds was the New York Times, and the company's implementation of the format was revered as the 'tipping point' that cemented RSS's position as a de facto standard."[4] "In 2005, major players in the web browser market started integrating the technology directly into their products, including Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Mozilla's Firefox and Apple's Safari." As of 2015,[update] according to BuiltWith.com, there were 20,516,036 live websites using RSS.[5]
Types
Web aggregators gather material from a variety of sources for display in one location. They may additionally process the information after retrieval for individual clients.[6] For instance, Google News gathers and publishes material independent of customers' needs while Awasu[7] is created as an individual RSS tool to control and collect information according to clients' criteria. There are a variety of software applications and components available to collect, format, translate, and republish XML feeds, a demonstration of presentation-independent data. [citation needed]
News aggregation websites
A news aggregator provides and updates information from different sources in a systematized way. "Some news aggregator services also provide update services, whereby a user is regularly updated with the latest news on a chosen topic".
News aggregation websites began with content selected and entered by humans, while automated selection algorithms were eventually developed to fill the content from a range of either automatically selected or manually added sources. Google News launched in 2002 using automated story selection, but humans could add sources to its search engine, while the older Yahoo News, as of 2005, used a combination of automated news crawlers and human editors.[10][11][12]
Web-based feed readers
Web-based feeds readers allow users to find a web feed on the internet and add it to their feed reader. These are meant for personal use and are hosted on remote servers. Because the application is available via the web, it can be accessed anywhere by a user with an internet connection. There are even more specified web-based RSS readers.[13]
More advanced methods of aggregating feeds are provided via Ajax coding techniques and XML components called web widgets. Ranging from full-fledged applications to small fragments of source code that can be integrated into larger programs, they allow users to aggregate OPML files, email services, documents, or feeds into one interface. Many customizable homepage and portal implementations provide such functionality.
In addition to aggregator services mainly for individual use, there are web applications that can be used to aggregate several blogs into one. One such variety—called planet sites—are used by online communities to aggregate community blogs in a centralized location. They are named after the
Feed reader applications
Feed aggregation applications are installed on a PC, smartphone or tablet computer and designed to collect news and interest feed subscriptions and group them together using a user-friendly interface. The graphical user interface of such applications often closely resembles that of popular
Software aggregators can also take the form of
Social news aggregators
Social news aggregators collect the most popular stories on the Internet, selected, edited, and proposed by a wide range of people. "In these social news aggregators, users submit news items (referred to as "stories"), communicate with peers through direct messages and comments, and collaboratively select and rate submitted stories to get to a real-time compilation of what is currently perceived as "hot" and popular on the Internet."[14] Social news aggregators are based on engagement of community. Their responses, engagement level, and contribution to stories create the content and determine what will be generated as RSS feed.
Frame- and media-bias–aware news aggregators
Media bias and framing are concepts that fundamentally explain deliberate or accidental differences in news coverage. A simple example is comparing media coverage of a topic in two countries, which are in (armed) conflict with another: one can easily imagine that news outlets, particularly if state-controlled, will report differently or even contrarily on the same events (for instance, the Russo-Ukrainian War). While media bias and framing have been subject to manual research for a couple of decades in the social sciences, only recently have automated methods and systems been proposed to analyze and show such differences. Such systems make use of text-features, e.g., news aggregators that extract key phrases that describe a topic differently, or other features, such as matrix-based news aggregation, which spans a matrix over two dimensions, the first dimension being which country an article was published in, and the second being which country it is reporting on.[15][16]
Media aggregators
Media aggregators are sometimes referred to as podcatchers due to the popularity of the term
Broadcatching
Broadcatching is a mechanism that automatically downloads BitTorrent files advertised through RSS feeds.
Feed filtering
One of the problems with news aggregators is that the volume of articles can sometimes be overwhelming, especially when the user has many web feed subscriptions. As a solution, many feed readers allow users to tag each feed with one or more keywords which can be used to sort and filter the available articles into easily navigable categories. Another option is to import the user's Attention Profile to filter items based on their relevance to the user's interests.
RSS and marketing
Some bloggers predicted the death of RSS when Google Reader was shut down.[18][19] Later, however, RSS was considered more of a success as an appealing way to obtain information. "Feedly, likely the most popular RSS reader today, has gone from around 5,000 paid subscribers in 2013 to around 50,000 paid subscribers in early 2015 – that's a 900% increase for Feedly in two years."[20] Customers use RSS to get information more easily while businesses take advantage of being able to spread announcements. "RSS serves as a delivery mechanism for websites to push online content to potential users and as an information aggregator and filter for users."[21] However, it has been pointed out that in order to push the content RSS should be user-friendly to ensure[22] proactive interaction so that the user can remain engaged without feeling "trapped", good design to avoid being overwhelmed by stale data, and optimization for both desktop and mobile use. RSS has a positive impact on marketing since it contributes to better search engine rankings, to building and maintaining brand awareness, and increasing site traffic.[23]
See also
- Comparison of feed aggregators
- History of web syndication technology
- Lifestreaming
- Metasearch engine
- Social media
- Social network aggregation
- Web feed
- Web syndication
References
- ^ S2CID 71547323.
- ^ PMID 19066644.
- ISBN 978-0-596-00881-9.
- ^ "Google Reader is dead but the race to replace the RSS feed is very alive". Digital Trends. July 2013. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
- ^ "RSS Usage Statistics". trends.builtwith.com. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
- ^ .
- ^ "Welcome to Awasu". www.Awasu.com. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
- ^ "Google News and newspaper publishers: allies or enemies?". Editorsweblog.org. World Editors Forum. Retrieved 31 March 2009.
- ^ Luscombe, Belinda (19 March 2009). "Arianna Huffington: The Web's New Oracle". Time. Time Inc. Archived from the original on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 30 March 2009.
The Huffington Post was to have three basic functions: blog, news aggregator with an attitude and place for premoderated comments.
- ^ Hansell, Saul (24 September 2002). "All the news Google algorithms say is fit to print". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- ISBN 978-0-471-75811-2.
- ^ LiCalzi O'Connell, Pamela (29 January 2001). "New Economy; Yahoo Charts the Spread of the News by E-Mail, and What It Finds Out Is Itself Becoming News". New York Times.
- S2CID 205037759.
- S2CID 15187700.
- ^ Felix Hamborg, Norman Meuschke, and Bela Gipp, Matrix-based News Aggregation: Exploring Different News Perspectives in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 2017.
- ^ Felix Hamborg, Norman Meuschke and Bela Gipp, Bias-aware News Analysis using Matrix-based News Aggregation in the International Journal on Digital Libraries (IJDL), 2018.
- S2CID 342057.
- ^ "R.I.P. RSS? Google to shut down Google Reader". www.Gizmag.com. 14 March 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
- ^ Olanoff, Drew. "Google Reader's Death Is Proof That RSS Always Suffered From Lack Of Consumer Appeal". Techcrunch. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
- ^ "Is RSS Dead? A Look At The Numbers". MakeUseOf. 25 March 2015. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
- .
- ^ "Google Reader is dead but the race to replace the RSS feed is very alive". Digital Trends. July 2013. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
- ISBN 9780596519001.
External links
- Feed Readers at Curlie