Non-binding resolution

A non-binding resolution is a

Non-binding resolutions are usually specific simple or concurrent resolutions that are not passed on to the executive branch to be signed into the law.^[2] These resolutions differ from pure concurrent resolutions (that are used for various procedural requests such as adjourning sessions) in that they are designed to express formally, document opinions and not initiate a process.

These resolutions offer a means for elected officials to publicly air the concerns of their constituents^[3] and are closely followed by major media outlets. Additionally, these resolutions can be used to state the position of the legislature, showing a preview of how they will vote on future legislation and budget allocations.

Notable historic uses

Canada

• Private Members Motion 296 in support of Jordan's Principle was passed unanimously in the House of Commons of Canada on December 12, 2007.

• Motion 312 was a motion introduced to the Parliament of Canada by Stephen Woodworth, MP for Kitchener Centre, in 2012. M-312 called for the formation of a committee "to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth".^[4]

• Motion 103 was a non-binding motion in the 42nd Canadian Parliament stating that the members of the House of Commons called on the Government of Canada to condemn Islamophobia in Canada. It also called on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to carry out a study on how racism and religious discrimination can be reduced and collect data on hate crimes. The motion was introduced by Iqra Khalid, the Liberal MP representing Mississauga—Erin Mills. The motion passed by a vote of 201–91 on March 23, 2017.

United Nations

• All
  UN Charter
  ) non-binding.
• The United Nations Security Council has the power to pass both binding and non-binding resolutions; whether a resolution is binding depends on what section of the Charter it is enacted under.

United States

In the United States Congress, non-binding resolutions are frequently titled as a "Sense of Congress" resolution, if both houses pass the measure (a concurrent resolution), or as a "Sense of the Senate" or "Sense of the House" resolution, if the measure is passed by only one house (a simple resolution).^[5][6]

• The House of Representatives chose its Speaker using a non-binding resolution in 1936 (H.Res. 543, 74th Congress) and again in 1940 (H.Res. 602, 76th Congress).^[7]
• On June 22, 1971, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution in support of withdrawing troops from Vietnam.^[8]
• In July 1998, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution^[9] affirming their commitment to a democratic Taiwan.
• In February 2007, the House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution,^[10] House Concurrent resolution 63,^[11] to formally express its disapproval of President Bush's troop buildup in Iraq.^[12]
• House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution (
  National Pi Day.^[14]

"It is the sense of Congress that the

Secretary of Defense should take appropriate steps to provide for upgrading information technology systems for the reserve contingents ..."^[15]

The legislatures of the 50 U.S. states also frequently adopt non-binding resolutions. For example:

• In February 2007, the Vermont State House of Representatives^[16] and Senate^[17] passed non-binding resolutions calling for the orderly withdrawal of American military forces from Iraq to commence immediately.

See also

• Resolution (law)
• Non-binding referendum

References