Oprahization
 | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (January 2012) |
| This article contains wording that unnoteworthy facts. (December 2019) ) |
Oprahization, sometimes spelled Oprah-ization or Oprahtization, is a
Background
Numerous episodes of The Oprah Winfrey Show feature interviews with guests who have committed crimes or other delinquent behavior. Winfrey discusses the ways in which her guests have been victimized prior to their crimes, often in search of a reason why the crime was committed other than malicious intent.[1] In one episode, titled How Far Would You Go?, Winfrey interviewed Ellie Nesler, who had shot and killed a man who was on trial for sexually molesting Nesler's son William. Nesler explained that, because it did not seem likely that the trial would end in a conviction, she killed him to prevent him from sodomizing other children. William, who was also featured on the show, revealed that he had received death threats from him after the abuse, and went on to state that he felt much safer with Dryver dead.[3]
Politics
The Oprahization of politics refers to the tendency for politicians to characterize themselves as having lived a life of suffering and tragedy as a means of appealing to the emotions of voters.
While the Oprahization of politics is generally discussed within the context of the United States, it has also manifested itself in the United Kingdom.[4]
Law
The Oprahization of law refers to the tendency for jury members to acquit or reduce sentences on the basis of the defendant's previous history of victimization.[8] One 1999 research study found strong support for the theory that exposure to crime-mitigating programs such as The Oprah Winfrey Show results in significantly lower punitive recommendations from juries.[9] Prosecutors and professional jury consultants contend that potential jurors who are talk show watchers are generally distrustful of official accounts of the truth.[10]
Other uses
The term "Oprahization of America" has also been applied to the general impact that Oprah Winfrey has had on American culture, fashion and mores.[11]
Another usage echoed by
Notes
- ^ a b Hill and Zillmann 1999, p. 1
- ^ Krauthammer 1992, p. 1
- ^ Hill and Zillmann 1999, p. 6
- ^ a b Krauthammer 1992, p. 2
- ^ Kuypers 2003, p. 4
- ^ Washington Post. Boca Raton News. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
- ISBN 978-0-395-88323-5.
oprahization.
- ^ Gregory 1994, p. 1
- ^ Hill and Zillmann 1999, p. 11
- ISBN 978-0-8223-2569-7.
oprahization.
- ISBN 978-0-8131-2426-1
Sources
- Gregory, S. S.; et al. (6 June 1994). "Oprah! Oprah in the Court!". Time Magazine. Archived from the originalon June 29, 2011. Retrieved 12 February 2011.
- Hill, John R. & Zillmann, Dolf (Winter 1999). "The Oprahization of America: Sympathetic Crime Talk and Leniency". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 43 (1): 67–82. .
- Kuypers, Jim A.; et al. (Summer 2003). "Compassionate Conservatism: The Rhetorical Reconstruction of Conservative Rhetoric" (PDF). American Communication Journal. 6 (4). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2011.
- Krauthammer, Charles (10 August 1992). "The Pornography of Self-Revelation". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
Further reading
- Illouz, Eva (2003). Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An essay on popular culture. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-11813-2.
| Media works |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | |||||
| Related | |||||
