Otto Hahn
Otto Hahn | |
---|---|
Hesse-Nassau, Prussia, German Empire (now Germany) | |
Died | 28 July 1968 (aged 89) (now Germany) |
Alma mater |
|
Known for |
|
Spouse |
Edith Junghans (m. 1913) |
Children | Hanno |
Awards | See list
|
Scientific career | |
Fields | |
Institutions |
|
Doctoral advisor | Theodor Zincke |
Other academic advisors |
|
Doctoral students | |
Signature | |
Otto Hahn (pronounced
A graduate of the
During
Hahn served as the last president of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society for the Advancement of Science in 1946 and as the founding president of its successor, the Max Planck Society from 1948 to 1960. In 1959 he co-founded in Berlin the Federation of German Scientists, a non-governmental organization, which has been committed to the ideal of responsible science. As he worked to rebuild German science, he became one of the most influential and respected citizens of the post-war West Germany.
Early life
Otto Hahn was born in
In 1897, after passing his
Discovery of radiothorium and other "new elements"
Hahn's intention was still to work in industry. He received an offer of employment from Eugen Fischer, the director of
Ramsay was enthusiastic when yet another new element was found in his institute, and he intended to announce the discovery in a correspondingly suitable way. In accordance with tradition this was done before the committee of the venerable
A new element – Very soon the scientific papers will be agog with a new discovery which has been added to the many brilliant triumphs of Gower Street. Dr. Otto Hahn, who is working at University College, has discovered a new radioactive element, extracted from a mineral from Ceylon, named Thorianite, and possibly, it is conjectured, the substance which renders thorium radioactive. Its activity is at least 250,000 times as great as that of thorium, weight for weight. It gives off a gas (generally called an emanation), identical with the radioactive emanation from thorium. Another theory of deep interest is that it is the possible source of a radioactive element possibly stronger in radioactivity than radium itself, and capable of producing all the curious effects which are known of radium up to the present. – The discoverer read a paper on the subject to the Royal Society last week, and this should rank, when published, among the most original of recent contributions to scientific literature.[6]
Hahn published his results in the
From September 1905 until mid-1906, Hahn worked with Rutherford's group in the basement of the Macdonald Physics Building at
Discovery of mesothorium I
In 1906, Hahn returned to Germany, where Fischer placed at his disposal a former woodworking shop (Holzwerkstatt) in the basement of the Chemical Institute to use as a laboratory. Hahn equipped it with
In the space of a few months Hahn discovered
Hahn completed his habilitation in the spring of 1907, and became a Privatdozent. A thesis was not required; the Chemical Institute accepted one of his publications on radioactivity instead.[19] Most of the organic chemists at the Chemical Institute did not regard Hahn's work as real chemistry.[20] Fischer objected to Hahn's contention in his habilitation colloquium that many radioactive substances existed in such tiny amounts that they could only be detected by their radioactivity, venturing that he had always been able to detect substances with his keen sense of smell, but soon gave in.[15] One department head remarked: "it is incredible what one gets to be a Privatdozent these days!"[20]
Physicists were more accepting of Hahn's work, and he began attending a colloquium at the Physics Institute conducted by Heinrich Rubens. It was at one of these colloquia where, on 28 September 1907, he made the acquaintance of the Austrian physicist Lise Meitner. Almost the same age as himself, she was only the second woman to receive a doctorate from the University of Vienna, and had already published two papers on radioactivity. Rubens suggested her as a possible collaborator. So began the thirty-year collaboration and lifelong close friendship between the two scientists.[20][21]
In Montreal, Hahn had worked with physicists including at least one woman,
Discovery of radioactive recoil
Harriet Brooks observed a radioactive recoil in 1904, but interpreted it wrongly. Hahn and Meitner succeeded in demonstrating the radioactive recoil incident to alpha particle emission and interpreted it correctly. Hahn pursued a report by Stefan Meyer and Egon Schweidler of a decay product of actinium with a half-life of about 11.8 days. Hahn determined that it was actinium X (radium-223). Moreover, he discovered that at the moment when a radioactinium (thorium-227) atom emits an alpha particle, it does so with great force, and the actinium X experiences a recoil. This is enough to free it from chemical bonds, and it has a positive charge, and can be collected at a negative electrode.[25] Hahn was thinking only of actinium, but on reading his paper, Meitner told him that he had found a new way of detecting radioactive substances. They set up some tests, and soon found actinium C'' (thallium-207) and thorium C'' (thallium-208).[25] The physicist Walther Gerlach described radioactive recoil as "a profoundly significant discovery in physics with far-reaching consequences".[26]
In 1910, Hahn was appointed professor by the Prussian Minister of Culture and Education,
The move to new accommodation was fortuitous, as the wood shop had become thoroughly contaminated by radioactive liquids that had been spilt, and radioactive gases that had vented and then decayed and settled as radioactive dust, making sensitive measurements impossible. To ensure that their clean new laboratories stayed that way, Hahn and Meitner instituted strict procedures. Chemical and physical measurements were conducted in different rooms, people handling radioactive substances had to follow protocols that included not shaking hands, and rolls of toilet paper were hung next to every telephone and door handle. Strongly radioactive substances were stored in the old wood shop, and later in a purpose-built radium house on the institute grounds.[29]
Marriage to Edith Junghans
With a regular income, Hahn was now able to contemplate marriage. In June 1911, while attending a conference in
Their only child, Hanno Hahn , was born on 9 April 1922. During World War II, he enlisted in the army in 1942, and served with distinction on the Eastern Front as a panzer commander. He lost an arm in combat. After the war he became a distinguished art historian and architectural researcher (at the Hertziana in Rome), known for his discoveries in the early Cistercian architecture of the 12th century. In August 1960, while on a study trip in France, Hanno died in a car accident, together with his wife and assistant Ilse Hahn née Pletz. They left a fourteen-year-old son, Dietrich Hahn.[31]
In 1990, the Hanno and Ilse Hahn Prize for outstanding contributions to Italian art history was established in memory of Hanno and Ilse Hahn to support young and talented art historians. It is awarded biennially by the Bibliotheca Hertziana – Max Planck Institute for Art History in Rome.[32]
World War I
In July 1914—shortly before the outbreak of World War I—Hahn was recalled to active duty with the army in a Landwehr regiment. They marched through Belgium, where the platoon he commanded was armed with captured machine guns. He was awarded the Iron Cross (2nd Class) for his part in the First Battle of Ypres. He was a joyful participant in the Christmas truce of 1914, and was commissioned as a lieutenant.[33] In mid-January 1915, he was summoned to meet chemist Fritz Haber, who explained his plan to break the trench deadlock with chlorine gas. Hahn raised the issue that the Hague Convention banned the use of projectiles containing poison gases, but Haber explained that the French had already initiated chemical warfare with tear gas grenades, and he planned to get around the letter of the convention by releasing gas from cylinders instead of shells.[34]
Haber's new unit was called Pioneer Regiment 35. After brief training in Berlin, Hahn, together with physicists James Franck and Gustav Hertz, was sent to
Between operations, Hahn returned to Berlin, where he was able to slip back to his old laboratory and work with Meitner, continuing with their research. In September 1917 he was one of three officers, disguised in Austrian uniforms, sent to the
Discovery of protactinium
In 1913, chemists Frederick Soddy and
Hahn and Meitner set out to find the missing mother isotope. They developed a new technique for separating the tantalum group from pitchblende, which they hoped would speed the isolation of the new isotope. The work was interrupted by the
Most of the students, laboratory assistants and technicians had been called up, so Hahn, who was stationed in Berlin between January and September 1917,[38] and Meitner had to do everything themselves. By December 1917 she was able to isolate the substance, and after further work were able to prove that it was indeed the missing isotope. Meitner submitted her and Hahn´s findings for publication in March 1918 to the scientific paper Physikalischen Zeitschrift under the title Die Muttersubstanz des Actiniums; ein neues radioaktives Element von langer Lebensdauer.[37][39]
Although Fajans and Göhring had been the first to discover the element, custom required that an element was represented by its longest-lived and most abundant isotope, and brevium did not seem appropriate. Fajans agreed to Meitner and Hahn naming the element protoactinmium,[40] and assigning it the chemical symbol Pa.[41] In June 1918, Soddy and John Cranston announced that they had extracted a sample of the isotope, but unlike Hahn and Meitner were unable to describe its characteristics. They acknowledged Hahn´s and Meitner's priority, and agreed to the name.[42] The connection to uranium remained a mystery, as neither of the known isotopes of uranium decayed into protactinium. It remained unsolved until the mother isotope, uranium-235, was discovered in 1929.[37][43]
For their discovery Hahn and Meitner were repeatedly nominated for the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in the 1920s by several scientists, among them Max Planck,
Discovery of nuclear isomerism
With the discovery of protactinium, most of the decay chains of uranium had been mapped. When Hahn returned to his work after the war, he looked back over his 1914 results, and considered some anomalies that had been dismissed or overlooked. He dissolved uranium salts in a hydrofluoric acid solution with tantalic acid. First the tantalum in the ore was precipitated, then the protactinium. In addition to the uranium X1 (thorium-234) and uranium X2 (protactinium-234), Hahn detected traces of a radioactive substance with a half life of between 6 and 7 hours. There was one isotope known to have a half life of 6.2 hours, mesothorium II (actinium-228). This was not in any probable decay chain, but it could have been contamination, as the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry had experimented with it. Hahn and Meitner demonstrated in 1919 that when actinium is treated with hydrofluoric acid, it remains in the insoluble residue. Since mesothorium II was an isotope of actinium, the substance was not mesothorium II; it was protactinium.[47][48] Hahn was now confident enough that he had found something that he named his new isotope "uranium Z", and in February 1921, he published the first report on his discovery.[49]
Hahn determined that uranium Z had a half life of around 6.7 hours (with a two per cent margin of error) and that when uranium X1 decayed, it became uranium X2 about 99.75 per cent of the time, and uranium Z around 0.25 per cent of the time. He found that the proportion of uranium X to uranium Z extracted from several kilograms of
Uranium Z was the first example of nuclear isomerism. Walther Gerlach later remarked that this was "a discovery that was not understood at the time but later became highly significant for nuclear physics".[26] Not until 1936 was Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker able to provide a theoretical explanation of the phenomenon.[51][52] For this discovery, whose full significance was recognised by very few, Hahn was again proposed for the Nobel Prize in Chemistry by Bernhard Naunyn, Goldschmidt and Planck.[44]
Applied Radiochemistry
In 1924, Hahn was elected to full membership of the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, by a vote of thirty white balls to two black.[53] While still remaining the head of his own department, he became Deputy Director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry in 1924, and succeeded Alfred Stock as the director in 1928.[54] Meitner became the director of the Physical Radioactivity Division, while Hahn headed the Chemical Radioactivity Division.[55] In the early 1920s, he created a new line of research. Using the "emanation method", which he had recently developed, and the "emanation ability", he founded what became known as "applied radiochemistry" for the researching of general chemical and physical-chemical questions. In 1936 Cornell University Press published a book in English (and later in Russian) titled Applied Radiochemistry, which contained the lectures given by Hahn when he was a visiting professor at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, in 1933. This important publication had a major influence on almost all nuclear chemists and physicists in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and the Soviet Union during the 1930s and 1940s.[56]
In 1966, Glenn T. Seaborg, co-discoverer of many transuranium elements, wrote about this book as follows:
As a young graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley in the mid-1930s and in connection with our work with plutonium a few years later, I used his book Applied Radiochemistry as my bible. This book was based on a series of lectures which Professor Hahn had given at Cornell in 1933; it set forth the "laws" for the
co-precipitation of minute quantities of radioactive materials when insoluble substances were precipitated from aqueous solutions. I recall reading and rereading every word in these laws of co-precipitation many times, attempting to derive every possible bit of guidance for our work, and perhaps in my zealousness reading into them more than the master himself had intended. I doubt that I have read sections in any other book more carefully or more frequently than those in Hahn's Applied Radiochemistry. In fact, I read the entire volume repeatedly and I recall that my chief disappointment with it was its length. It was too short.[56]
Hahn is referred to as the father of nuclear chemistry, which emerged from applied radiochemistry.[57][58][59]
National socialism
Hahn spent February to June 1933 in the United States and Canada as a visiting professor at Cornell University.[62] He gave an interview to the Toronto Star Weekly in which he painted a flattering portrait of Adolf Hitler:
I am not a Nazi. But Hitler is the hope, the powerful hope, of German youth... At least 20 million people revere him. He began as a nobody, and you see what he has become in ten years.… In any case for the youth, for the nation of the future, Hitler is a hero, a Führer, a saint... In his daily life he is almost a saint. No alcohol, not even tobacco, no meat, no women. In a word: Hitler is an unequivocal Christ.[63]
The April 1933 Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service banned Jews and communists from academia. Meitner was exempt from its impact because she was an Austrian rather than a German citizen.[64] Haber was likewise exempt as a veteran of World War I, but chose to resign his directorship of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry in protest on 30 April 1933, but the directors of the other Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes, even the Jewish ones, complied with the new law,[65] which applied to the KWS as a whole and those Kaiser Wilhelm institutes with more than 50% state support, which exempted the KWI for Chemistry.[66] Hahn therefore did not have to fire any of his own full-time staff, but as the interim director of Haber's institute, he dismissed a quarter of its staff, including three department heads. Gerhart Jander was appointed the new director of Haber's old institute, and, ironically, reoriented it towards chemical warfare research.[67]
Like most KWS institute directors, Haber had accrued a large discretionary fund. It was his wish that it be distributed to the dismissed staff to facilitate their emigration, but the Rockefeller Foundation insisted that the funds either be used for scientific research or returned. Hahn brokered a deal whereby 10 per cent of the funds would be allocated to Haber's people. In August 1933 the administrators of the KWS were alerted that several boxes of Rockefeller Foundation-funded equipment was about to be shipped to Herbert Freundlich, one of the department heads that Hahn had dismissed, in England. Hahn complied with an order to halt the shipment, but when Planck, the president of the KWS since 1930, returned from vacation, he ordered Hahn to expedite the shipment.[67][68]
Haber died on 29 January 1934. A memorial service was held on the first anniversary of his death. University professors were forbidden to attend, so they sent their wives in their place. Hahn, Planck and Joseph Koeth attended, and gave speeches.[67][69] The aging Planck did not seek re-election, and was succeeded in 1937 as president by Carl Bosch, a Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry and the Chairman of the Board of IG Farben, a company which had bankrolled the Nazi Party since 1932. Ernst Telschow became Secretary of the KWS. Telschow was an enthusiastic supporter of the Nazis, but was also loyal to Hahn, being one of his former students, and Hahn welcomed his appointment.[70][67] Hahn's chief assistant, Otto Erbacher, became the KWI for Chemistry's party steward (Vertrauensmann).[71]
Rubidium–strontium dating
While Hahn was in North America, his attention was drawn to a mica-like mineral from
From 1,012 grams of the mineral, Strassmann and Ernst Walling extracted 253.4 milligrams of strontium carbonate, all of which was the
Discovery of nuclear fission
After
The radioactive displacement law of Fajans and Soddy said that beta decay causes isotopes to move one element up on the periodic table, and alpha decay causes them to move two down. When Fermi's group bombarded uranium atoms with neutrons, they found a complex mix of half lives. Fermi therefore concluded that the new elements with atomic numbers greater than 92 (known as
Between 1934 and 1938, Hahn, Meitner and Strassmann found a great number of radioactive transmutation products, all of which they regarded as transuranic.
In May 1937, they issued parallel reports, one in Zeitschrift für Physik with Meitner as the principal author, and one in Chemische Berichte with Hahn as the principal author.[88][89][90] Hahn concluded his by stating emphatically: Vor allem steht ihre chemische Verschiedenheit von allen bisher bekannten Elementen außerhalb jeder Diskussion ("Above all, their chemical distinction from all previously known elements needs no further discussion");[90] Meitner was increasingly uncertain. She considered the possibility that the reactions were from different isotopes of uranium; three were known: uranium-238, uranium-235 and uranium-234. However, when she calculated the neutron cross section, it was too large to be anything other than the most abundant isotope, uranium-238. She concluded that it must be another case of the nuclear isomerism that Hahn had discovered in protactinium. She therefore ended her report on a very different note to Hahn, reporting that: "The process must be neutron capture by uranium-238, which leads to three isomeric nuclei of uranium-239. This result is very difficult to reconcile with current concepts of the nucleus."[89][91]
With the Anschluss, Germany's unification with Austria on 12 March 1938, Meitner lost her Austrian citizenship,[92] and fled to Sweden. She carried only a little money, but before she left, Hahn gave her a diamond ring he had inherited from his mother.[93] Meitner continued to correspond with Hahn by mail. In late 1938 Hahn and Strassmann found evidence of isotopes of an alkaline earth metal in their sample. Finding a group 2 alkaline earth metal was problematic, because it did not logically fit with the other elements found thus far. Hahn initially suspected it to be radium, produced by splitting off two alpha-particles from the uranium nucleus, but chipping off two alpha particles via this process was unlikely. The idea of turning uranium into barium (by removing around 100 nucleons) was seen as preposterous.[94]
During a visit to Copenhagen on 10 November, Hahn discussed these results with Niels Bohr, Lise Meitner, and Otto Robert Frisch.[94] Further refinements of the technique, leading to the decisive experiment on 16–17 December 1938, produced puzzling results: the three isotopes consistently behaved not as radium, but as barium. Hahn, who did not inform the physicists in his Institute, described the results exclusively in a letter to Meitner on 19 December:
We are more and more coming to the awful conclusion that our Ra isotopes behave not like Ra, but like Ba... Perhaps you can come up with some fantastic explanation. We ourselves realize that it can't actually burst apart into Ba. Now we want to test whether the Ac-isotopes derived from the "Ra" behave not like Ac but like La.[95]
In her reply, Meitner concurred. "At the moment, the interpretation of such a thoroughgoing breakup seems very difficult to me, but in nuclear physics we have experienced so many surprises, that one cannot unconditionally say: 'it is impossible'." On 22 December 1938, Hahn sent a manuscript to
As a chemist, Hahn was reluctant to propose a revolutionary discovery in physics, but Meitner and Frisch worked out a theoretical interpretation of
At the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry,
World War II
On 24 April 1939,
On the night of 15 February 1944, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry building was struck by a bomb.
Life became precarious for those married to Jewish women. One was Philipp Hoernes, a chemist working for Auergesellschaft, the firm that mined the uranium ore used by the project. After the firm let him go in 1944, Hoernes faced being conscripted for forced labour. At the age of 60, it was doubtful that he would survive. Hahn and Nikolaus Riehl arranged for Hoernes to work at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Chemistry, claiming that his work was essential to the uranium project and that uranium was highly toxic, making it hard to find people to work with it. Hahn was aware that uranium ore was fairly safe in the laboratory, although not so much for the 2,000 female slave labourers from Sachsenhausen concentration camp who mined it in Oranienburg. Another physicist with a Jewish wife was Heinrich Rausch von Traubenberg . Hahn certified that his work was important to the war effort, and that his wife Maria, who had a doctorate in physics, was required as his assistant. After he died on 19 September 1944, Maria faced being sent to a concentration camp. Hahn mounted a lobbying campaign to get her released, but to no avail, and she was sent to the Theresienstadt Ghetto in January 1945. She survived the war, and was reunited with her daughters in England after the war.[111][112]
Incarceration
On 25 April 1945, an armoured task force from the British/American
They were relocated to the Château de Facqueval in
As they recovered from the shock of the announcement, they began to rationalise what had happened. Hahn noted that he was glad that they had not succeeded, and von Weizsäcker suggested that they should claim that they had not wanted to. They drafted a memorandum on the project, noting that fission was discovered by Hahn and Strassmann. The revelation that Nagasaki had been destroyed by a plutonium bomb came as another shock, as it meant that the Allies had not only been able to successfully conduct
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1944
On 16 November 1945 the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced that Hahn had been awarded the 1944 Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for his discovery of the fission of heavy atomic nuclei."[124][125] Hahn was still at Farm Hall when the announcement was made; thus, his whereabouts were a secret, and it was impossible for the Nobel committee to send him a congratulatory telegram. Instead, he learned about his award on 18 November through the Daily Telegraph.[126] His fellow interned scientists celebrated his award by giving speeches, making jokes, and composing songs.[127]
Hahn had been nominated for the chemistry and the physics Nobel prizes many times even before the discovery of nuclear fission. Several more followed for the discovery of fission.[44] The Nobel prize nominations were vetted by committees of five, one for each award. Although Hahn and Meitner received nominations for physics, radioactivity and radioactive elements had traditionally been seen as the domain of chemistry, and so the Nobel Committee for Chemistry evaluated the nominations. The committee received reports from Theodor Svedberg and Arne Westgren . These chemists were impressed by Hahn's work, but felt that of Meitner and Frisch was not extraordinary, and did not understand why the physics community regarded their work as seminal. As for Strassmann, although his name was on the papers, there was a long-standing policy of conferring awards on the most senior scientist in a collaboration. The committee therefore recommended that Hahn alone be given the chemistry prize.[128]
Under Nazi rule, Germans had been forbidden to accept Nobel prizes after the Nobel Peace Prize had been awarded to Carl von Ossietzky in 1936.[129] The Nobel Committee for Chemistry's recommendation was therefore rejected by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in 1944, which also decided to defer the award for one year. When the Academy reconsidered the award in September 1945, the war was over and thus the German boycott had ended. Also, the chemistry committee had now become more cautious, as it was apparent that much research had taken place in the United States in secret, and suggested deferring for another year, but the Academy was swayed by Göran Liljestrand, who argued that it was important for the Academy to assert its independence from the Allies of World War II, and award the prize to a German, as it had done after World War I when it had awarded it to Fritz Haber. Hahn therefore became the sole recipient of the 1944 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.[128]
The invitation to attend the Nobel festivities was transmitted via the British Embassy in Stockholm.[130] On 4 December, Hahn was persuaded by two of his Alsos captors, American Lieutenant Colonel Horace K. Calvert and British Lieutenant Commander Eric Welsh, to write a letter to the Nobel committee accepting the prize but stating that he would not be able to attend the award ceremony on 10 December since his captors would not allow him to leave Farm Hall. When Hahn protested, Welsh reminded him that Germany had lost the war.[131] Under the Nobel Foundation statutes, Hahn had six months to deliver the Nobel Prize lecture, and until 1 October 1946 to cash the 150,000 Swedish krona cheque.[132][133]
Hahn was repatriated from Farm Hall on 3 January 1946, but it soon became apparent that difficulties obtaining permission to travel from the British government meant that he would be unable to travel to Sweden before December 1946. Accordingly, the Academy of Sciences and the Nobel Foundation obtained an extension from the Swedish government.
Founder and President of the Max Planck Society
The suicide of Albert Vögler on 14 April 1945 left the KWS without a president.[54] The British chemist Bertie Blount was placed in charge of its affairs while the Allies decided what to do with it, and he decided to install Max Planck as an interim president. Now aged 87, Planck was in the small town of Rogätz, in an area that the Americans were preparing to hand over to the Soviet Union. The Dutch astronomer Gerard Kuiper from the Alsos Mission fetched Planck in a jeep and brought him to Göttingen on 16 May.[136][137] Planck wrote to Hahn, who was still in captivity in England, on 25 July, and informed Hahn that the directors of the KWS had voted to make him the next president, and asked if he would accept the position.[54] Hahn did not receive the letter until September, and did not think he was a good choice, as he regarded himself as a poor negotiator, but his colleagues persuaded him to accept. After his return to Germany, he assumed the office on 1 April 1946.[138][139]
Outside of Germany it is considered so obvious that the tradition from the period of Kaiser Wilhelm has been disastrous and that changing the name of the KWS is desirable, that no one understands the resistance against it. For the idea, that the Germans are the chosen people and have the right to use any and all means to subordinate the "inferior" people, has been expressed over and over again by historians, philosophers, and politicians and finally the Nazis tried to translate it into fact... The best people among the English and Americans wish that the best Germans would understand that there should be a definitive break with this tradition, which has brought the entire world and Germany itself the greatest misfortune. And as a small sign of German understanding the name of the KWS should be changed. What's in a name, if it is a matter of the existence of Germany and thereby Europe? [144]
In September 1946, a new Max Planck Society was established at
Spokesman for social responsibility
After the Second World War, Hahn came out strongly against the use of nuclear energy for military purposes. He saw the application of his scientific discoveries to such ends as a misuse, or even a crime. Lawrence Badash wrote: "His wartime recognition of the perversion of science for the construction of weapons and his postwar activity in planning the direction of his country's scientific endeavours now inclined him increasingly toward being a spokesman for social responsibility."[150]
In early 1954, he wrote the article "Cobalt 60 – Danger or Blessing for Mankind?", about the misuse of atomic energy, which was widely reprinted and transmitted in the radio in Germany, Norway, Austria, and Denmark, and in an English version worldwide via the BBC. The international reaction was encouraging.
Hahn was also instrumental in and one of the authors of the
On 13 November 1957, in the Konzerthaus (Concert Hall) in
In 1959 Hahn co-founded in Berlin the Federation of German Scientists (VDW), a non-governmental organization, which has been committed to the ideal of responsible science. The members of the Federation feel committed to taking into consideration the possible military, political, and economical implications and possibilities of atomic misuse when carrying out their scientific research and teaching. With the results of its interdisciplinary work the VDW not only addresses the general public, but also the decision-makers at all levels of politics and society.[158] Right up to his death, Otto Hahn never tired of warning urgently of the dangers of the nuclear arms race between the great powers and of the radioactive contamination of the planet.[159] The historian Lawrence Badash wrote:
The important thing is not that scientists may disagree on where their responsibility to society lies, but that they are conscious that a responsibility exists, are vocal about it, and when they speak out they expect to affect policy. Otto Hahn, it would seem, was even more than just an example of this twentieth-century conceptual evolution; he was a leader in the process.[160]
He was one of the signatories of the agreement to convene a convention for drafting a
Death
Hahn was shot in the back by a disgruntled inventor in October 1951, injured in a motor vehicle accident in 1952, and had a minor heart attack in 1953. In 1962, he published a book, Vom Radiothor zur Uranspaltung (From the radiothor to Uranium fission). It was released in English in 1966 with the title Otto Hahn: A Scientific Autobiography, with an introduction by Glenn Seaborg. The success of this book may have prompted him to write another, fuller autobiography, Otto Hahn. Mein Leben, but before it could be published, he fractured one of the vertebrae in his neck while getting out of a car. He gradually became weaker and died in Göttingen on 28 July 1968. His wife Edith survived him by only a fortnight.[164] He was buried in the Stadtfriedhof in Göttingen.[165] The day after his death, the Max Planck Society published the following obituary notice in all the major newspapers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland:
On 28 July, in his 90th year, our Honorary President Otto Hahn passed away. His name will be recorded in the history of humanity as
the founder of the atomic age. In him Germany and the world have lost a scholar who was distinguished in equal measure by his integrity and personal humility. The Max Planck Society mourns its founder, who continued the tasks and traditions of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society after the war, and mourns also a good and much loved human being, who will live in the memories of all who had the chance to meet him. His work will continue. We remember him with deep gratitude and admiration.[166]
Fritz Strassmann wrote:
The number of those who had been able to be near Otto Hahn is small. His behaviour was completely natural for him, but for the next generations he will serve as a model, regardless of whether one admires in the attitude of Otto Hahn his humane and scientific sense of responsibility or his personal courage.[167]
Otto Robert Frisch recalled:
Hahn remained modest and informal all his life. His disarming frankness, unfailing kindness, good common sense, and impish humour will be remembered by his many friends all over the world.[168]
The Royal Society in London wrote in an obituary:
It was remarkable, how, after the war, this rather unassuming scientist who had spent a lifetime in the laboratory, became an effective administrator and an important public figure in Germany. Hahn, famous as the discoverer of nuclear fission, was respected and trusted for his human qualities, simplicity of manner, transparent honesty, common sense and loyalty.[169]
Honors and awards
During his lifetime Hahn was awarded orders, medals, scientific prizes, and fellowships of Academies, Societies, and Institutions from all over the world. At the end of 1999, the German news magazine Focus published an inquiry of 500 leading natural scientists, engineers, and physicians about the most important scientists of the 20th century. In this poll Hahn was elected third (with 81 points), after the theoretical physicists Albert Einstein and Max Planck, and thus the most significant chemist of his time.[170]
As well as the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1944), Hahn was awarded:
- the Emil Fischer Medal of the Society of German Chemists (1922),[171]
- the Cannizaro Prize of the Royal Academy of Science in Rome (1938),[171]
- the Copernicus Prize of the University of Konigsberg (1941),[171]
- the Gothenius Medal of the Akademie der Naturforscher (1943),[171]
- the Max Planck Medal of the German Physical Society, with Lise Meitner (1949),[171]
- the Goethe Medal of the city of Frankfurt-on-the-Main (1949),[171]
- the Golden Paracelsus Medal of the Swiss Chemical Society (1953),[171]
- the Faraday Lectureship Prize with Medal from the Royal Society of Chemistry (1956),[171]
- the Grotius Medal of the Hugo Grotius Foundation (1956),[171]
- Wilhelm Exner Medal of the Austrian Industry Association (1958),[172]
- the Helmholtz Medalof the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (1959),
- and the
Hahn became the honorary president of the Max Planck Society in 1962.[175]
- He was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society (1957).[176]
- His honorary memberships of foreign academies and scientific societies included:
- the Romanian Physical Society in Bucharest,[177]
- the Royal Spanish Society for Chemistry and Physics and the Spanish National Research Council,[177]
- and the Academies in
He was an honorary fellow of University College London,[177]
- and an honorary citizen of the cities of Frankfurt am Main and Göttingen in 1959,
- and of Berlin (1968).[171]
- Hahn was made an Officer of the Ordre National de la Légion d'Honneur of France (1959),[171]
- and was awarded the Grand Cross First Class of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany (1959).[171]
- In 1966, US President Lyndon B. Johnson and the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) awarded Hahn, Lise Meitner and Fritz Strassmann the Enrico Fermi Award. The diploma for Hahn bore the words: "For pioneering research in the naturally occurring radioactivities and extensive experimental studies culminating in the discovery of fission."[178]
- He received honorary doctorates from
- the University of Gottingen,[171]
- the Technische Universität Darmstadt,[171]
- the University of Frankfurt in 1949,[171]
- and the University of Cambridge in 1957.[171]
- the
Objects named after Hahn include:
- NS Otto Hahn, the only European nuclear-powered civilian ship (1964),[179]
- a crater on the Moon (shared with his namesake Friedrich von Hahn),[180]
- and the asteroid 19126 Ottohahn,[181]
- the Otto Hahn Prize of both the German Chemical and Physical Societies and the city of Frankfurt/Main,[182]
- the Otto Hahn Medal and the Otto Hahn Award of the Max Planck Society,[183][184]
- and the Otto Hahn Peace Medal in Gold of the United Nations Association of Germany (DGVN) in Berlin (1988).[185]
Proposals were made at various times, first in 1971 by American chemists, that the newly synthesised element 105 should be named hahnium in Hahn's honour, but in 1997 the IUPAC named it dubnium, after the Russian research centre in Dubna. In 1992 element 108 was discovered by a German research team, and they proposed the name hassium (after Hesse). In spite of the long-standing convention to give the discoverer the right to suggest a name, a 1994 IUPAC committee recommended that it be named hahnium.[186] After protests from the German discoverers, the name hassium (Hs) was adopted internationally in 1997.[187]
See also
Publications in English
- Hahn, Otto (1936). Applied Radiochemistry. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
- Hahn, Otto (1950). New Atoms: Progress and Some Memories. New York-Amsterdam-London-Brussels: Elsevier Inc.
- Hahn, Otto (1966). Otto Hahn: A Scientific Autobiography. Translated by Ley, Willy. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Hahn, Otto (1970). My Life. Translated by Kaiser, Ernst; Wilkins, Eithne. New York: Herder and Herder.
Notes
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 2–6.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. 7–11.
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 281–282.
- ISSN 0211-9536.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 35.
- ^ The Daily Telegraph, London, 18 March 1905.
- .
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 303–313 for a full list
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 15–18.
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 282–283.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Hahn 1988, p. 59.
- ^ Hahn 1966, p. 66.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. 37–38.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, p. 52.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 39–40.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 40–50.
- ISSN 0028-0836.
- ^ Stolz 1989, p. 20.
- ^ a b c Hahn 1966, p. 50.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, p. 65.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 28–29.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 368.
- ^ "Ehrung der Physikerin Lise Meitner Aus dem Otto-Hahn-Bau wird der Hahn-Meitner-Bau" [Honouring physicist Lise Meitner as the Otto Hahn building becomes the Hahn-Meitner building] (in German). Free University of Berlin. 28 October 2010. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. 58–64.
- ^ a b Gerlach & Hahn 1984, p. 39.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 44–47.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 70–72.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 48.
- ^ Spence 1970, p. 286.
- ^ "Hahn, Hanno". Dictionary of Art Historians. 21 February 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
- ^ "Hanno-und-Ilse-Hahn-Preis" (in German). Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Archived from the original on 9 January 2011.
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 286–287.
- ^ S2CID 145243958.
- ^ a b Sime 1996, pp. 57–61.
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 287–288.
- ^ ISSN 0021-9584.
- ^ Hahn 1988, pp. 117–132.
- S2CID 94448132.
- S2CID 4224336.
- ^ "The Open Door Web Site : Chemistry : Visual Chemistry : Protactinium".
- ISBN 978-0-19-091436-3.
- S2CID 94448132
- ^ a b c "Nomination Database: Otto Hahn". Nobel Media AB. 9 June 2020.
- ^ "Nomination Database: Lise Meitner". Nobel Media AB. 9 June 2020.
- ^ "Protactinium | Pa (Element)". PubChem. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. 95–103.
- ^ a b Berninger 1983, pp. 213–220.
- S2CID 28599831.
- S2CID 99021215.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 93.
- ISSN 1364-5021.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 94.
- ^ a b c d e "Otto Hahn". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 95.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. ix–x.
- ^ Tietz, Tabea (8 March 2018). "Otto Hahn – the Father of Nuclear Chemistry". SciHi Blog.
- ^ "Otto Hahn". Atomic Heritage Foundation.
- ^ "Father of Nuclear Chemistry – Otto Emil Hahn". Kemicalinfo. 20 May 2020.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 156–157, 169.
- ^ Walker 2006, p. 122.
- ^ Hahn 1966, p. 283.
- ^ Sime 2006, p. 6.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 138–139.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Sime 2006, p. 7.
- ^ a b c d Sime 2006, p. 10.
- ^ "Max Planck becomes President of the KWS". Max-Planck Gesellschaft. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
- ^ Walker 2006, pp. 122–123.
- ^ "The KWS introduces the 'Führerprinzip'". Max-Planck Gesellschaft. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 143.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 85–88.
- ISSN 0028-1042.
- ISSN 0044-2313.
- ^ Bowen 1994, pp. 162–163.
- ^ "Originalgeräte zur Entdeckung der Kernspaltung, "Hahn-Meitner-Straßmann-Tisch"".
- ^ "Entdeckung der Kernspaltung 1938, Versuchsaufbau, Deutsches Museum München | Faszination Museum". YouTube.
- S2CID 120584702.
- ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 39, 160–167, 793.
- ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 200–201.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 161–162.
- S2CID 93361285.
- ^ Rhodes 1986, pp. 210–211.
- ^ doi:10.1063/1.881174.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 164–165.
- ^ Hahn 1966, pp. 140–141.
- .
- ^ a b c Sime 1996, pp. 170–172.
- ^ S2CID 122830315.
- ^ ISSN 0365-9496.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 177.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 184–185.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 200–207.
- ^ a b Sime 1996, pp. 227–230.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 233.
- S2CID 5920336.
- ^ Sime 1996, pp. 248–249.
- ^ Frisch 1979, pp. 115–116.
- S2CID 4113262.
- S2CID 4076376.
- S2CID 33512939.
- S2CID 4089039.
- ^ a b Walker 1993, pp. 22–23.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 150.
- ^ a b Hahn 1966, pp. 175–177.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 156–161.
- ^ a b Walker 2006, p. 132.
- ^ a b Walker 2006, p. 137.
- ^ a b Hoffmann 2001, p. 188.
- ^ Norris 2002, pp. 294–295.
- ^ Walker 1993, pp. 132–133.
- ^ Sime 2006, pp. 19–21.
- ^ Hahn 1966, p. 179.
- ^ Walker 1993, pp. 158–159.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 195.
- ^ a b Sime 2006, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Walker 1993, pp. 159–160.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 196–199.
- ^ Walker 2006, p. 139.
- ^ Sime 2006, pp. 26–28.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 319.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 201.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 205–206.
- ^ "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1944". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 17 December 2007.
- ^ a b "The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1944: Presentation Speech". Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 3 January 2008.
- ^ Bernstein 2001, pp. 282–283.
- ^ Bernstein 2001, pp. 286–288, 323–324.
- ^ a b Crawford, Sime & Walker 1997, pp. 27–31.
- ^ Crawford 2000, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Crawford 2000, p. 49.
- ^ Bernstein 2001, pp. 311, 325.
- ^ "Statutes of the Nobel Foundation". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
- ^ a b c Crawford 2000, pp. 49–50.
- ^ a b Hoffmann 2001, p. 209.
- ^ Sime 1996, p. 343.
- ^ Brown, Brandon R. (16 May 2015). "Gerard Kuiper's Daring Rescue of Max Planck at the End of World War II". Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ "The end of the war and transition. Max Planck is Interim President of the KWS". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 199.
- ^ Macrakis 1993, pp. 189–189.
- ^ Macrakis 1993, pp. 190–191.
- ^ a b "The birth of the Max Planck Society". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ a b Walker 2006, pp. 145–147.
- ^ Walker 2006, p. 152.
- ^ Walker 2006, p. 147.
- ^ "The founding of today's Max Planck Society". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ "Overview". Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^ Sime 2006, p. 12.
- ^ Walker 2006, p. 124.
- ^ Sime 2004, p. 48.
- ^ Badash 1983, p. 176.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 218–221.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 221–222.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 231–232.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 235–238.
- ^ Sprenger, Sebastian (11 May 2020). "NATO chief backs Germany's vow to keep war-ready US nukes". Defence News. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ Hahn 1988, p. 288.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 242.
- ^ "FGS Brochure" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. Federation of German Scientists. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, p. 248.
- ^ Badash 1983, p. 178.
- ^ "Letters from Thane Read asking Helen Keller to sign the World Constitution for world peace. 1961". Helen Keller Archive. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- ^ "Letter from World Constitution Coordinating Committee to Helen, enclosing current materials". Helen Keller Archive. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved 3 July 2023.
- ^ "Preparing earth constitution | Global Strategies & Solutions | The Encyclopedia of World Problems". The Encyclopedia of World Problems | Union of International Associations (UIA). Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 2300–301.
- ^ "Grab von Otto Hahn aus Göttingen". www.friedhofguide.de. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurt, Die Welt, Hamburg, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Munich, Die Presse, Vienna, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zürich, 29 July 1968.
- ^ Strassmann, Fritz (29 July 1968) "Zum Tode von Otto Hahn". Die Welt.
- .
- ^ Spence 1970, pp. 301–302.
- ^ Fischer, Ernst Peter (27 December 1999). "Die Allmacht Der Unschärfe". Focus (in German). No. 52. pp. 103–108. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Spence 1970, p. 302.
- ^ "Alle Medaillenträger". Wilhelm Exner Medaillen Stiftung. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Harnack Medal". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ Hoffmann 2001, pp. 243–244.
- ^ Spence 1970, p. 300.
- ^ Spence 1970, p. 279.
- ^ a b c d Spence 1970, pp. 302–303.
- ^ "Otto Hahn, 1966 Citation". U. S. Department of Energy. 28 December 2010. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
- ^ "NS Otto Hahn". Germany's Nuclear Powered Cargo Ship. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Planetary Names: Crater, craters: Hahn on Moon". planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "IAU Minor Planet Center". minorplanetcenter.net. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "GDCh-Preise". Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker e.V. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Otto Hahn Medal". Max-Planck -Gesellschaft. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Otto Hahn Award". Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Verleihung der Otto-Hahn-Friedensmedaille". Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen e.V. Archived from the original on 2 July 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ "Names and Symbols of Transfermium Elements (IUPAC Recommendations 1994)" (PDF). IUPAC. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 February 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
- ^ "Names and Symbols of Transfermium Elements (IUPAC Recommendations 1997)" (PDF). IUPAC. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2006. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
References
- Badash, Lawrence (1983). "Otto Hahn, Science, and Social Responsibility". In Shea, William R. (ed.). Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear Physics. The University of Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 22. Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 167–180. OCLC 797094010.
- Berninger, Ernst (1983). "The Discovery of Uranoium Z by Otto Hahn: The First Example of Nuclear Isomerism". In Shea, William R. (ed.). Otto Hahn and the Rise of Nuclear Physics. The University of Western Ontario Series in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 22. Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 213–220. OCLC 797094010.
- OCLC 7324621011.
- Bowen, Robert (1994). Isotopes in the Earth Sciences. London: Chapman and Hall. ISBN 978-0-412-53710-3.
- Crawford, Elisabeth; ISSN 0031-9228.
- Crawford, Elisabeth (2000). "German Scientists and Hitler's Vendetta against the Nobel Prizes". Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences. 31 (1): 37–53. JSTOR 27757845.
- OCLC 861058137.
- OCLC 473315990.
- Hahn, Dietrich, ed. (1988). Otto Hahn - Leben und Werk in Texten und Bildern (in German). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp-Insel Publishers. OCLC 42847178.
- Hahn, Otto (1966). Otto Hahn: A Scientific Autobiography. Translated by Ley, Willy. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. OCLC 646422716.
- Hoffmann, Klaus (2001). Otto Hahn: Achievement and Responsibility. Translated by Cole, J. Michael. Springer. OCLC 468996162.
- Macrakis, Kristie (1993). Surviving the Swastika: Scientific Research in Nazi Germany. Oxford University Press. OCLC 538154456.
- Norris, Robert S. (2002). Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie R. Groves, the Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man. South Royalton, Vermont: Steerforth Press. OCLC 48544060.
- OCLC 224864936.
- OCLC 32893857.
- Sime, Ruth Lewin (2004). Otto Hahn und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zwischen Vergangenheit und Erinnerung (PDF) (in German). Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 March 2005. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- S2CID 119479637.
- Spence, Robert (1970). "Otto Hahn 1879–1968". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 16: 279–313. .
- Stolz, Werner (1989). "Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft Hahn — Meitner". Otto Hahn/Lise Meitner. Biographien hervorragender Naturwissenschaftler, Techniker und Mediziner (in German). Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. pp. 19–41. OCLC 263971970.
- Walker, Mark (May 2006). "Otto Hahn: Responsibility and Repression". Physics in Perspective. 8 (2): 116–163. S2CID 120992662.
- Walker, Mark (1993). German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power. Cambridge University Press. OCLC 722061969.
- Yruma, Jeris Stueland (November 2008). How Experiments Are Remembered: The Discovery of Nuclear Fission, 1938–1968 (PhD thesis). Princeton University.
Further reading
- Berninger, Ernst H. (1970). Otto Hahn 1879–1968. Bonn: Inter Nationes. OCLC 168069.
- Beyerchen, Alan D. (1977). Scientists under Hitler. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. OCLC 970896098.
- Feldman, Anthony; Ford, Peter (1979). Otto Hahn – in: Scientists and Inventors. London: Aldus Books.
- Graetzer, Hans D.; Anderson, David L. (1971). The Discovery of Nuclear Fission: A Documentary History. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold. OCLC 1130319295.
- Hahn, Otto (1970). My Life. Translated by Kaiser, Ernst; Wilkins, Eithne. New York: Herder and Herder. OCLC 317354004.
- Kant, Horst (2002). Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project. Otto Hahn and the declarations of Mainau and Göttingen. Berlin: Max-Planck-Insitut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.
- Reid, Robert William (1969). Tongues of Conscience: War and the Scientist's Dilemma. London: Constable & Co. OCLC 638683343.
- Whiting, Jim (2004). Otto Hahn and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission. Unlocking the Secrets of Science. Bear, Delaware: Mitchell Lane. OCLC 52312062.
External links
- Otto Hahn – winner of the Enrico Fermi Award 1966 U.S Government, Department of Energy
- Otto Hahn on Nobelprize.org including the Nobel Lecture on 13 December 1946 From the Natural Transmutations of Uranium to Its Artificial Fission
- Award Ceremony Speech honoring Otto Hahn by Professor Arne Westgren, Stockholm.
- Otto Hahn and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission Archived 1 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine BR, 2008
- Otto Hahn – Discoverer of Nuclear Fission Author: Dr. Anne Hardy (Pro-Physik, 2004)
- Otto Hahn (1879–1968) – The discovery of fission Visit Berlin, 2011.
- Otto Hahn – Discoverer of nuclear fission
- Otto Hahn – Founder of the Atomic Age Author: Dr Edmund Neubauer (Translation: Brigitte Hippmann) – Website of the Otto Hahn Gymnasium (OHG), 2007.
- Otto Hahn Award
- Otto Hahn Peace Medal in Gold Website of the United Nations Association of Germany (DGVN) in Berlin
- Otto Hahn Medal
- The history of the Hahn Meitner Institute (HMI) Helmholtz-Zentrum, Berlin 2011.
- Otto Hahn heads a delegation to Israel 1959 Website of the Max Planck Society, 2011.
- Biography Otto Hahn 1879–1968
- Otto Hahn – A Life for Science, Humanity and Peace Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine Hiroshima University Peace Lecture, held by Dietrich Hahn, 2 October 2013.
- Otto Hahn – Discoverer of nuclear fission, grandfather of the Atombomb GMX, Switzerland, 17 December 2013. Author: Marinus Brandl.
- Newspaper clippings about Otto Hahn in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW