Path dependence

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Path dependence is a concept in the social sciences, referring to processes where past events or decisions constrain later events or decisions.[1][2] It can be used to refer to outcomes at a single point in time or to long-run equilibria of a process.[3] Path dependence has been used to describe institutions, technical standards, patterns of economic or social development, organizational behavior, and more.[4][1]

In common usage, the phrase can imply two types of claims. The first is the broad concept that "history matters," often articulated to challenge explanations that pay insufficient attention to historical factors.

increasing returns, positive feedback effects, or other mechanisms.[1][2][3][5]

Commercial examples

Videocassette recording systems

The

early adoption
lead:

  1. A
    videocassette rental stores observed more VHS rentals and stocked up on VHS tapes, leading renters to buy VHS players and rent more VHS tapes, until there was complete vendor lock-in
    .
  2. A VCR manufacturer bandwagon effect of switching to VHS-production because they expected it to win the standards battle.
  3. Sony, the original developer of Betamax, did not let pornography companies license their technology for mass production, which meant that nearly all pornographic motion pictures released on video used VHS format.[8]

An alternative analysis is that VHS was better-adapted to market demands (e.g. having a longer recording time). In this interpretation, path dependence had little to do with VHS's success, which would have occurred even if Betamax had established an early lead.[9]

QWERTY keyboard
Dvorak keyboard
Keyboard layouts

QWERTY keyboard

The QWERTY keyboard is a prominent example of path dependence due to the widespread emergence and persistence of the QWERTY keyboard. QWERTY has persisted over time despite more efficient keyboard arrangements being developed –

QWERTY vs. Dvorak is an example of this.[10] However, there is still debate about the validity of this being a true example of path dependence.[11][12]

Railway track gauges

The standard gauge of railway tracks is another example of path dependence which explains how a seemingly insignificant event or circumstance can change the choice of technology over the long run despite contemporary knowhow showing such a choice to be inefficient.[13]

More than half the world's railway gauges are 4 feet 8+12 inches (143.5 cm), known as

standard gauge, despite the consensus among engineers being that wider gauges have increased performance[clarification needed] and speed. The path to the adoption of the standard gauge began in the late 1820s when George Stephenson, a British engineer, began work on the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. His experience with primitive coal tramways resulted in this gauge width being copied by the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, then the rest of Great Britain, and finally by railroads in Europe and North America.[14]

There are tradeoffs involved in the choice of rail gauge between the cost of constructing a line (which rises with wider gauges) and various performance metrics, including maximum speed, low

meter gauge
).

In the 20th and 21st centuries when the break of gauge problem was seen as increasingly undesirable, several countries regauged existing railways to standard 1435 mm gauge, but in some countries such as in India – mostly due to path dependence – it was decided to regauge narrow gauge lines to Indian gauge rather than standard gauge.

In constructing

a high speed rail network in standard gauge in order to enable a high speed connection to France. Russia meanwhile decided to keep Russian gauge for its Saint Petersburg–Moscow railway
upgraded to 250 km/h maximum speeds.

Several

Dresden tramway
is the only 1450 mm gauge rail system in the world) and despite the disadvantage of having to order modifications to rolling stock compared to the standard offerings of major manufacturers, the cost premium for each individual order is orders of magnitude lower than the cost of regauging the entire network.

Economics

Path dependence theory was originally developed by economists to explain technology adoption processes and industry evolution. The theoretical ideas have had a strong influence on

There are many models and empirical cases where economic processes do not progress steadily toward some pre-determined and unique equilibrium, but rather the nature of any equilibrium achieved depends partly on the process of getting there. Therefore, the outcome of a path-dependent process will often not converge towards a unique equilibrium, but will instead reach one of several equilibria (sometimes known as absorbing states).

This dynamic vision of economic evolution is very different from the tradition of

random
events that disrupted the ongoing course, with irreversible consequences.

Economic development

In economic development, it is said (initially by

QWERTY vs. Dvorak is an example of this phenomenon, has been re-asserted,[18] questioned,[19] and continues to be argued.[20] Economic debate continues on the significance of path dependence in determining how standards form.[21]

Economists from Alfred Marshall to Paul Krugman have noted that similar businesses tend to congregate geographically ("agglomerate"); opening near similar companies attracts workers with skills in that business, which draws in more businesses seeking experienced employees. There may have been no reason to prefer one place to another before the industry developed, but as it concentrates geographically, participants elsewhere are at a disadvantage, and will tend to move into the hub, further increasing its relative efficiency. This network effect follows a statistical power law in the idealized case,[22] though negative feedback can occur (through rising local costs).[23] Buyers often

cluster around sellers, and related businesses frequently form business clusters, so a concentration of producers (initially formed by accident and agglomeration) can trigger the emergence of many dependent businesses in the same region.[24]

In the 1980s, the US dollar

tradable goods below the cost of production in many (previously successful) U.S. manufacturers. Some of the factories that closed as a result, could later have been operated at a (cash-flow) profit after dollar depreciation, but reopening would have been too expensive. This is an example of hysteresis, switching barriers
, and irreversibility.

If the economy follows adaptive expectations, future inflation is partly determined by past experience with inflation, since experience determines expected inflation and this is a major determinant of realized inflation.

A transitory high rate of

labour market differs from the prediction of a "natural" unemployment rate or NAIRU
, around which 'cyclical' unemployment is said to move without influencing the "natural" rate itself.

Types of path dependence

Liebowitz and Margolis distinguish types of path dependence;[25] some do not imply inefficiencies and do not challenge the policy implications of neoclassical economics. Only "third-degree" path dependence—where switching gains are high, but transition is impractical—involves such a challenge. They argue that such situations should be rare for theoretical reasons, and that no real-world cases of private locked-in inefficiencies exist.[26] Vergne and Durand qualify this critique by specifying the conditions under which path dependence theory can be tested empirically.[27]

Technically, a path-dependent stochastic process has an

non-ergodic stochastic process
.

In The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959), Edith Penrose analyzed how the growth of a firm both organically and through acquisition is strongly influenced by the experience of its managers and the history of the firm's development.

Conditions which give rise to path dependence

Path dependence may arise or be hindered by a number of important factors, these may include

  • Durability of capital equipment
  • Technical interrelatedness
  • Increasing returns
  • Dynamic increasing returns to adoption[29]

Social sciences

Institutions

Recent methodological work in comparative politics and sociology has adapted the concept of path dependence into analyses of political and social phenomena. Path dependence has primarily been used in

institutions
, whether they be social, political, or cultural. There are arguably two types of path-dependent processes:

The critical juncture framework has been used to explain the development and persistence of

welfare states, labor incorporation in Latin America, and the variations in economic development between countries, among other things.[31] Scholars such as Kathleen Thelen caution that the historical determinism in path-dependent frameworks is subject to constant disruption from institutional evolution
.

Kathleen Thelen has criticized the application of QWERTY keyboard-style mechanisms to politics. She argues that such applications to politics are both too contingent and too deterministic. Too contingent in the sense that the initial choice is open and flukey, and too deterministic in the sense that once the initial choice is made, an unavoidable path inevitably forms from which there is no return.[32]

Organizations

Paul Pierson's influential attempt[specify] to rigorously formalize path dependence within political science, draws partly on ideas from economics. Herman Schwartz has questioned those efforts, arguing that forces analogous to those identified in the economic literature are not pervasive in the political realm, where the strategic exercise of power gives rise to, and transforms, institutions.

Especially sociology and organizational theory, a distinct yet closely related concept to path dependence is the concept of imprinting which captures how initial environmental conditions leave a persistent mark (or imprint) on organizations and organizational collectives (such as industries and communities), thus continuing to shape organizational behaviours and outcomes in the long run, even as external environmental conditions change.[33]

Individuals and groups

The path-dependence of emergent strategy has been observed in behavioral experiments with individuals and groups.[34]

Other examples

  • A general type of path dependence is a typological vestige.
    • In typography, for example, some customs persist, although the reason for their existence no longer applies; for example, the placement of the period inside a quotation in U.S. spelling. In metal type, pieces of terminal punctuation, such as the comma and period, are comparatively small and delicate (as they must be x-height for proper kerning.) Placing the full-height quotation mark on the outside protected the smaller cast metal sort from damage if the word needed to be moved around within or between lines. This would be done even if the period did not belong to the text being quoted.
  • Evolution is considered by some to be path-dependent: mutations occurring in the past have had long-term effects on current life forms, some of which may no longer be adaptive to current conditions. For instance, there is a controversy about whether the panda's thumb is a leftover trait or not.
  • In the
    embrace, extend and extinguish
    .
  • In socioeconomic systems, commercial fisheries' harvest rates and conservation consequences are found to be path dependent as predicted by the interaction between slow institutional adaptation, fast ecological dynamics, and diminishing returns.[35]
  • In physics and mathematics, a
    non-holonomic system is a physical system in which the states depend on the physical paths taken.[36]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ .
  2. ^ a b Puffert, Douglas. "Path Dependence". E-H.net. Economic History Association. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
  3. ^
    S2CID 2182978
    .
  4. .
  5. ^ .
  6. . Most generally, path dependence means that where we go next depends not only on where we are now, but also upon where we have been.
  7. .
  8. ^ M.Admin (2014-03-05). "Betamax Didn't Lose To VHS Because Of Adult Films". KnowledgeNuts. Retrieved 2019-08-06.
  9. . It was the inferior playing time that led to the demise of the Betamax, not the fact that it was first or second or third.
  10. ^ .
  11. .
  12. ^ "The QWERTY myth". The Economist. April 1999.
  13. ISSN 0014-4983
    .
  14. S2CID 13721300. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help
    )
  15. ^ Nelson, R; Winter, S (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
  16. ISBN 978-1-85898-984-6. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2010-12-06. Retrieved 2010-05-20. path dependence can be weak (the efficiency of the chosen path is tied with some alternatives), semi-strong, (the chosen path is not the best but not worth fixing, or strong (the chosen path is highly inefficient, but we are unable to correct it).
  17. . Paul David and Brian Arthur published several papers that are now regarded as the foundation of path dependency (David 1985; Arthur 1989, 1990).
  18. Discover Magazine
    .
  19. . we conclude that QWERTY is about as good a design as any alternative
  20. ^ David, Paul A. (5–12 September 1999). At Last, a Remedy for Chronic QWERTY-skepticism!. European Summer School in Industrial Dynamics (ESSID). l'Institute d'Etudes Scientifique de Cargèse (Corse), France.
  21. ^ Puffert, Douglas (2008-02-10). "Path Dependence". Retrieved 20 May 2010.
  22. PMID 17395721
    .
  23. . ssrn 1009226.
  24. (PDF) on 2016-06-04. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
  25. (PDF) on 2010-12-06. Retrieved 2010-05-20. path dependence can be weak (the efficiency of the chosen path is tied with some alternatives), semi-strong, (the chosen path is not the best but not worth fixing, or strong (the chosen path is highly inefficient, but we are unable to correct it).
  26. ^ Stephen E. Margolis; S. J. Liebowitz. "Path Dependence 4. Evidence for Third-Degree Path Dependence". Retrieved 20 May 2010. Our reading of the evidence is that there are as yet no proven examples of third degree path dependence in markets.
  27. S2CID 107050516
    . In particular, we suggest moving away from historical case studies of supposedly path-dependent processes to focus on more controlled research designs[,] such as simulations, experiments, and counterfactual investigation."
  28. . as generally is the case for branching processes [in Path dependence, its critics and the quest for 'historical economics']
  29. ^ Puffert, Douglas. "Path Dependence". eh.net Encyclopedia.
  30. (PDF) on 2016-06-29.
  31. .
  32. .
  33. ^ Marquis, Christopher; Tilcsik, András (2013). "Imprinting: Toward A Multilevel Theory".
    SSRN 2198954
    .
  34. . [Some test subjects] adopted a strategy once and for all[,] and insisted on using it[,] even when the configurations could not be efficiently played with the strategy adopted.
  35. .
  36. .

References